The Good Life or Dictatorship, Depression and Genocide - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

The Good Life or Dictatorship, Depression and Genocide

Description:

Congo. Low. Autocracy. Cuba. Medium. Democracy. Sweden. Low. Autocracy ... Congo. Civil War? Diversity. Country. Does ethnic diversity cause civil war? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:289
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: tarl151
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Good Life or Dictatorship, Depression and Genocide


1
The Good Life or Dictatorship, Depression and
Genocide?
  • The Logic of Comparative Politics

2
I. Why Study Comparative Politics?
  • Internationalized Problems
  • Environment Other countries environmental
    policies affect our air, water, and soil

3
Chernobyl Effects
4
I. Why Study Comparative Politics?
  • Internationalized Problems
  • Environment Other countries environmental
    policies affect our air, water, and soil
  • Economy Other countries economies and economic
    policies affect our economy, for better or worse

5
(No Transcript)
6
I. Why Study Comparative Politics?
  • Internationalized Problems
  • Environment Other countries environmental
    policies affect our air, water, and soil
  • Economy Other countries economies and economic
    policies affect our economy, for better or worse
  • Instability Other countries wars and civil
    violence endanger our security

7
(No Transcript)
8
I. Why Study Comparative Politics?
  • Internationalized Problems
  • Environment Other countries environmental
    policies affect our air, water, and soil
  • Economy Other countries economies and economic
    policies affect our economy, for better or worse
  • Instability Other countries wars and civil
    violence endanger our security
  • Repression Human rights violations affect us
    through immigration and international conflict

9
(No Transcript)
10
B. Domestic Problems
  • How can we preserve freedom at home? Look at
    cases where freedom failed
  • How can we achieve economic growth? Look to
    other economies performance
  • How can we protect our security? Examine
    security strategies of other countries

11
C. Questions Looking for variation
  • How independent should the judiciary be? Need
    examples of politicized judiciaries
  • What effect does the two-party system have on
    politics and government? Need examples of
    multi-party systems
  • What effect does government-sponsored universal
    health insurance have on health? Need examples
    of national health strategies

12
II. The Comparative Method Solving Problems and
Answering Questions
  • Turn normative (value) problems into empirical
    (fact) ones.
  • Normative statements
  • Definition Prescriptive statements about how the
    world should be or how we ought to behave
  • Keywords Should, Ought, Right, Wrong, Best,
    Worst
  • Examples What is the best government? Should we
    take measures to reduce inequality? Should we go
    to war?

13
2. Empirical Statements
  • Definition Descriptive, Explanatory, or
    Predictive statements about what the world is
    like or how it is likely to change
  • Keywords Causes, Prevents, Affects, Increases,
    Decreases, Higher, Lower
  • Examples Does democracy decrease the risk of
    war? Does a free market economy grow faster than
    a command economy?

14
B. Theories and Hypotheses
  • Identify the dependent variable (DV) What do you
    wish to explain? Chapter 2 has examples of
    problems
  • Suggest possible independent variables (IVs) that
    might explain the dependent variable. Chapter 2
    has a long list of IVs Resources, Social
    Identity, Ideas, etc.
  • Hypothesize either a positive or negative
    relationship between each IV and the DV
  • Positive () ? Wealth ? ? Political Stability
  • Negative or Inverse (-)
  • ? Corruption ? ? Political Stability

15
4. Theory The story behind your hypotheses
  • Why did you expect a positive relationship? What
    causes what?
  • Are there other things you expect to find if this
    hypothesis turns out to be true?

16
Example A theory of political stability with
five hypotheses
Dependent Variable
Independent Variables
Hypothesized Relationships
17
C. Hypothesis-Testing Here Comes the Science
  • 1. Gather evidence (data) on the DV and all IVs
  • Comparative Politics Gather data for each
    country examined (Belgium, France, Sweden,
    Burundi, etc.), perhaps even each country-year
    (Belgium 1990, Belgium 1991, Belgium 1992, France
    1990, France 1991, etc.)
  • Process Gather data that might challenge the
    hypothesis (your selection of cases will be
    scrutinized closely for bias!)
  • Goal Variables shouldvary. Often a problem
    with single-country studies.

18
Example Selection on the Independent Variable
Does democracy increase economic growth?
19
Example Selection on the Independent Variable
Does your answer change?
20
Example Selection on the Dependent Variable
Does ethnic diversity cause civil war?
21
Example Selection on the Dependent Variable
Has the answer changed?
22
2. Compare the hypotheses to the data
  • Is the hypothesis a deterministic law? Very
    rare
  • Is the hypothesis a probabilistic law?
  • Is there a correlation between IV and DV?
  • Is the direction ( or -) consistent with the
    hypothesis?
  • Evaluate the usefulness of the laws.
  • How much better can we predict if we know this
    law, versus knowing nothing but the average value
    of the DV? (Example How much better do we do at
    predicting growth if we apply the law to each
    case than if we just guess Medium for every
    country?)
  • How much variation in the DV is left unexplained?

23
(No Transcript)
24
3. Evaluate challenges to the theory
  • Could the DV be causing changes in the IV?
    Solution Time (Cause must precede effect!)
  • Is the independent variable really an intervening
    variable? Solution Control variables.
  • Did some hypotheses fail the test? What might
    have led to this failure? Solution Control
    variables.
  • Do you need to modify your story to better
    predict the DV?
  • What new hypotheses are suggested by these
    results?

25
III. Defining Politics A Starting Point for
Models
  • Definition The authoritative allocation of
    resources and values.
  • Politics creates winners and losers
  • Key Terms
  • Authority Government has a monopoly on the
    legitimate use of force, so it is the only one
    with the authority to allocate.
  • Resource Allocation Money, labor, commodities
  • Allocation of Values Deciding between
    incompatible moral or ethical principles

26
IV. How are resources authoritatively allocated?
A Simple Process Model
27
A. Agenda-Setting
  • Proposing alternatives to the status quo
  • Status Quo The way things are (the current
    system)

28
1. Individuals
29
1. Individuals
30
1. Individuals -- Powerless alone
31
2. Unorganized Groups
32
2. Unorganized Groups -- Must be considered, but
cannot set agenda
33
3. Organized groups
34
3. Organized groups -- Set agenda and shape
citizen response
35
4. Benefits of Organization
a. Credible Commitment -- Conditional support
b. Outreach -- Publicity, Money, Media Access
c. Persuasion -- Information to representatives

36
5. How to Initiate Change
  • Representatives The Elected
  • Use Money, Votes, Publicity
  • Math for politicians Anything Money
    Anything Else?
  • b. Bureaucrats Experts and Career Officials or
    Dictators
  • Use Information, Persuasion
  • c. Appointees Judges, Cabinet, etc.
  • Target Appointers
  • d. ALL Corruption or Revolution

37
B. Government Action 1. Legislation
a. Logrolling You scratch my back, Ill scratch
yours b. Partisanship Leads to either parti
san government or gridlock
From the early American practice of neighbors
gathering to help clear land by rolling off and
burning felled timber.
38
2. Implementation Bureaucracy, Courts, and the
Rule of Law
  • a. Enforcement of laws
  • Relies on executive power and judicial capacity
  • b. Regulations and Decrees
  • Substitute for legislation in many dictatorships
  • Clarify legislation in democracies

39
C. Citizen Response
  • Media reports Citizens base decisions on
    easily-accessible information, whether right or
    wrong
  • Elections and voting Citizens may punish or
    reward leaders (retrospective voting) or look to
    the best candidate for the future (prospective
    voting)
  • Protest and Resistance Citizens may ignore,
    disobey, protest, or fight government authority
    (Challenge to states monopoly on the legitimate
    use of force)

40
D. Implications of the Model
  • Agenda-Setting can determine the outcome of
    political struggles ? organization key to
    political success
  • Democracies should prompt less violent resistance
    than autocracies (legal avenues for powerful
    interests to set agenda)
  • Rational politicians try to anticipate which
    coalitions will support or oppose them in
    elections or war ? pre-empt opposition

41
V. Key Variables in Comparative Politics Steps
in the General Model
  • How is the agenda set?
  • What issues or ideas (cleavages) divide
    unorganized groups?
  • How do people organize?
  • How do organized interests pressure the
    government?
  • How do governments decide?
  • Which coalitions do leaders have to please to
    remain in power?
  • What procedures exist to select between
    logrolling and partisanship?
  • Does partisanship produce partisan rule or
    gridlock?
  • How do citizens behave?
  • How do citizens perceive government action?
  • When are citizens likely to obey the law?
  • When are new leaders selected?
  • What form will citizen resistance take?

42
D. Why study these variables?
  • What causes civil war and genocide?
  • What causes depressions and recessions?
  • What causes political violence?
  • Comparative Politics At least some causes of
    these things lie in the political choices made by
    different countries people and governments --
    and the cultures in which those choices are made
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com