Title: Diapositive 1
1Theories and Methods of the Business Cycle. Part
1 Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium
Models II. The RBC approach Jean-Olivier
HAIRAULT, Professeur à Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne
et à lEcole dEconomie de Paris (EEP)
2II. The RBC approach 1. Introduction
- F. Kydland and E. Prescott, 1982, Econometrica,
Nobel Prize in 2005. - In the line of the Lucas critique to
Keynesianism Building a model with explicit
micro-foundations taking part in the general
equilibrium analysis market clearing, no
monetary factors, at odds with keynesian
tradition. - One-step forward no rationale for macroeconomic
management the optimal growth model with
short-run fluctuations induced by productivity
shocks (stochastic neoclassical growth model in
the line of Solow (1956), Cass (1965) and
Brock-Mirman (1972)). Hard-core of the RBC
approach which has been challenged by a lot of
works. - No more methodological opposition between
business cycle and growth research which was at
the heart of the neoclassical synthesis. - Building a successful (relative to data)
business cycle model imposing a new method based
on calibration to evaluate the performance of
business cycle models relative to a new
definition of the business cycle facts.
Quantitative Approach. - The methological innovation has been criticized
but is now extensively used in macroeconomics
today, even by proponents of stabilization
interventions. The methods initiated by Kydland
and Prescott are now commonly used in monetary
and international economics, public finance,
labor economics, asset pricing. In contrast to
early RBC studies, they involve market failures
so that government interventions are desirable.
3II. The RBC approach 1. Introduction
- Shock-based approach productivity shocks
- Propagated by intertemporal choices derived from
dynamic optimization under rational expectations. - Studying the canonical model first presented by
King, Plosser and Rebelo (1988), Journal of
Monetary Economics and reconsidered in King and
Rebelo (1999), Handbook of macroeconomics.
4II. The RBC approach 2. Measuring cycles
- Any time series can be decomposed as the sum of a
trend and a cycle. - Trend and cycle components are not observable.
This implies to adopt a particular way of
measuring them.
5II. The RBC approach 2.1 Growth Cycles
6II. The RBC approach 2.2 Trend Cycles
7II. The RBC approach 2.3. Measuring cycles by
using HP filter
- More than identifying the non-stationarity of
series, we need an economic definition of
business cycles consistent with the decades of
works following the seminal approach of Burns and
Mitchell (NBER tradition). - The HP filter can make stationary series up
through four orders of integration. - It is flexible enough to remove the undesired
long-run frequencies of the stationnary component
of series. - See F. Canova 1998 for a detailed analysis of
the HP filter. Journal of Monetary Economics - See M. Baxter and R. King 1999, Review of
Economics and Statistics.
8II. The RBC approach 2.3 Measuring cycles by
using HP filter
9II. The RBC approach 2.3 Measuring cycles by
using HP filter
10II. The RBC approach 2.3 Measuring cycles by
using HP filter
- To understand how HP filter works, it may be
useful to compare with the measure resulting from
a band-pass filter procedure the HP filter looks
like a BP filter which makes the cyclical
component those parts of output with
periodicities between 6 and 32 quarters high
frequencies like seasonnal frequencies and low
frequencies are removed
11II. The RBC approach 3. Quantifying Business
Cycles
- What are the business cycles features? For Lucas,
all business cycles would be all alike. - The stylized facts that any models should aim at
replicating. - Amplitude of cycles Variability of macroeconomic
series, differentials of variability across
aggregates standard deviation - Comovements of macroeconomic series correlation
- Persistence of expansions and recessions
auto-correlation
12II. The RBC approach 3.1 Cyclical dynamics
13II. The RBC approach 3.1 Cyclical dynamics
14II. The RBC approach 3.1 Cyclical dynamics
15II. The RBC approach 3.2 Quantifying Business
Cycles
16The RBC approach 3.2 Quantifying Business Cycles
17The RBC approach 3.2 Quantifying Business Cycles
- High degree of co-movement, except for labor
productivity. - Capital governement expenditures are rather
a-cyclical. - High serial correlation which makes the evolution
predictable.
18II. The RBC approach 3. 3 Are business cycles all
alike?
- French Business Cycles (Hairault 1992, Economie
et Prévision), 1970-1990, quarterly data. See
also Danthine and Donaldson 1993, European
Economic Review for an European business cycles
overview.
19II. The RBC approach 4 Introduction to the
canonical RBC model
- Neoclassical growth model in the line of Cass
1965 - with stochastic productivity shocks (Brock and
Mirman 1972) and labor supply (Lucas and
Rapping 1969). - See Plosser 1989, Journal of Economic
Perspectives.
20II. The RBC approach 4. Introduction to the
canonical RBC model
- See Plosser 1989, Journal of Economic
Perspectives.
21II. The RBC approach 5. The assumptions of the
canonical RBC model
22II. The RBC approach 5. The assumptions of the
canonical RBC model
23II. The RBC approach 6. Stationarization of the
canonical RBC model
24II. The RBC approach 7. Private decisions and
prices in the canonical RBC model
25II. The RBC approach 7.1 Household decisions in
the canonical RBC model
- The value function represents the expected
life-time utility conditionnal to ks, A and k
the current flow of utility the expected
utility that results from starting tomorrow with
k, K and A and proceeding from then on. ks
and k are determined today. A will be known
tomorrow, so we have to compute the expected
value tomorrow.
26II. The RBC approach 7.1 Household decisions in
the canonical RBC model
27II. The RBC approach 7.1 Household decisions in
the canonical RBC model
28II. The RBC approach 7.1 Household decisions in
the canonical RBC model
- First condition The present marginal utility of
consumption is equal to the expected and
discounted marginal value (in terms of utility)
of capital. - Second condition The marginal rate of
substitution between consumption and leisure is
equal to the real wage. - Third condition the expected and discounted
marginal value of capital is given on the
optimal path by the interest factor evaluated in
terms of the marginal utility of consumption
tomorrow.
29II. The RBC approach 7.1 Household decisions in
the canonical RBC model
- The third and the first conditions determine
together the so-called stochastic Euler (or
Keynes-Ramsey) condition which relies the
marginal rate of substitution between current and
future consumptions to the rental rate
30II. The RBC approach 7.2 Firm decisions in the
canonical RBC model
31II. The RBC approach 8. The competitive
equilibrium in the canonical RBC model
32II. The RBC approach 8. The competitive
equilibrium in the canonical RBC model
- These conditions corresponds to the first best
allocations of ressources. There is an
equivalence between the optimal quantities chosen
by the social planner and those in a competitive
general equilibrium. Fluctuations are optimal!
33II. The RBC approach 8. Consumption and leisure
smoothing in the canonical RBC model
34II. The RBC approach 9. The steady state in the
canonical RBC model
- The Euler equation can be written at the steady
state as follows - Given constant returns to scale, the marginal
product of capital depends on the capital-labor
ratio
35II. The RBC approach 9. The steady state in the
canonical RBC model
36II. The RBC approach 10. A closed-form solution
of the canonical RBC model
37II. The RBC approach 10. A closed-form solution
of the canonical RBC model
38II. The RBC approach 11. Transitionnal path in
the canonical RBC model
- Non-linear system of stochastic finite difference
equations under rational expectations. - In general no analytical solution, need to rely
on numerical approximation methods.
39II. The RBC approach 11.1 Expliciting utility and
production function
40II. The RBC approach 11.2 Log-linearizing the
equilibrium conditions
41II. The RBC approach 11.3 Solving linear
difference equations
42II. The RBC approach 11.4 A saddle path
equilibrium
43II. The RBC approach 11.4 A saddle path
equilibrium
44II. The RBC approach 11.5 The saddle path equation
45II. The RBC approach 12. Calibration
- Make explicit use of the model to set the
parameters - A lot of discipline
- Let us see it on our baseline model
- Have to set (alpha,gamma,delta,theta,
beta,eta,,sigma,rho) - Use data related to growth (k/y, c/y, i/y, h,
wh/y, r ) - What type of information do we have?
- (k/y, c/y, i/y, h, wh/y, r ) from the model
- (alpha,gamma,delta,theta, beta) the subset of
parameters can be calibrated
46II. The RBC approach 12.1 Using information on
the growth path
47II. The RBC approach 12.1 Using information from
the growth path
48II. The RBC approach 12.2 Using information from
micro-econometrics
49II. The RBC approach 12.2 Using information from
micro-econometrics
50II. The RBC approach 12.2 Using information from
micro-econometrics
weak
w
high
Nd, Ns
51II. The RBC approach 12.3 Estimating the
productivity stochastic process
52II. The RBC approach 13. Inspecting the
transitional dynamics
53II. The RBC approach 13. Inspecting the
transional dynamics
54II. The RBC approach 13. Inspecting the
transional dynamics
55II. The RBC approach 13. Inspecting the
transional dynamics
56II. The RBC approach 13. Inspecting the
transitional dynamics
- Taking into account a productivity innovation at
each period.
57II. The RBC approach 14. Responses to
productivity shocks
58II. The RBC approach 14. Responses to
productivity shocks
59II. The RBC approach 14. Responses to
productivity shocks
60Sl II. The RBC approach 15. The Slutsky-Frisch
effect
61II. The RBC approach 16. Stochastic simulations
62II. The RBC approach 16. Stochastic simulations
63II. The RBC approach 16.1 Volatility
64II. The RBC approach 16.2 Persistence and
comovement
65II. The RBC approach 17. Historical simulations