8th National Conference on Science, Policy and the Environment Climate Change: Science and Solutions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

8th National Conference on Science, Policy and the Environment Climate Change: Science and Solutions

Description:

political commitment by the president. statutory timetables: ... benefit-cost analysis, maximizing net benefits, market mechanisms, risk ... Political resolve ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: donaldra
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 8th National Conference on Science, Policy and the Environment Climate Change: Science and Solutions


1
8th National Conference on Science, Policy and
the EnvironmentClimate Change Science and
SolutionsChallenges of GHG RulemakingJanuary
17, 2008
Remarks by Donald R. Arbuckle Public Affairs
Program University of Texas at Dallas
2
The Role of Congress in GHS Rulemaking
  • To state the obvious, all GHS rulemaking will
    originate from standards established by Congress
    in legislation.
  • Legislation will be necessary to ensure long-term
    national commitment and prevent a fragmented
    legislative and regulatory framework.
  • The more specific the legislation, the more
    focused rulemaking can be but, the more specific
    the legislation, the more risk of technological
    and political inflexibility.

3
Generic Regulatory Standards
  • In fact, the regulatory process is far more
    complicated than Phil Harters colorful and
    almost undecipherable slide, The Process!
  • Many analytic and procedural standards, both
    statutory and administrative, govern rulemaking
  • They have accumulated over the past 70 years and
    are aimed at improving the rigor of the
    rulemaking process.
  • They also serve as obstacles that regulators must
    overcome and as mechanisms used by regulatory
    opponents to delay or defeat rulemaking.

4
Executive Branch Regulatory Requirements
  • Executive Order No. 12866 OMB Regulatory Review
    benefits of a proposed regulation must justify
    its costs, and the selected regulatory
    alternative must maximize net benefits. Market
    mechanisms favored.
  • OMB Bulletin on Peer Review agencies must
    conduct meaningful peer review of the most
    important science disseminated by the Federal
    Government.
  • OMB Memorandum on Risk Assessment lists general
    principles for risk assessment, management,
    communication, and priority setting.
  • OMB Circular on Regulatory Analysis guidelines
    for conducting benefit-cost analysis.

5
Statutory Generic Regulatory Standards
  • Administrative Procedures Act NPRM, public
    comment. Arbitrary and capricious
  • Paperwork Reduction Act federal information must
    minimize burden, reduce duplication, have
    practical utility, and be necessary for the
    proper performance of the agencys function.
  • Unfunded Mandates Reform Act for unfunded
    mandates, agency shall select the least costly,
    most cost-effective or least burdensome
    alternative that achieves the objectives of the
    rule.
  • Information Quality Act requires that agencies
    maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and
    integrity of informationdisseminated by Federal
    agencies.

6
GHS Rulemaking
  • Despite obstacles, GHG regulation is possible. It
    will require
  • clear statutory direction and continued
    Congressional support.
  • political commitment by the president.
  • statutory timetables must be reasonable.
    Hammers hated by regulators but can be
    effective.
  • benefit-cost analysis, maximizing net benefits,
    market mechanisms, risk assessment, peer review,
    information quality are all components of a
    successful rulemaking.

7
Carbon Reduction Regulatory Strategies Suggested
by Dr. Morgan
  • Several approaches contain elements encouraged by
    important generic regulatory standards
  • CO2 emissions tax is simple, relatively easy to
    enforce, economically efficient.
  • Cap and trade uses market incentives to encourage
    compliance and has been used successfully the
    approach helps argue for maximizing net benefits.
  • Both approaches establish performance standards
    that provide affected industries compliance
    flexibility and reward innovation.

8
Problems to Overcome
  • Regulatory Negotiation is powerful, but
  • - difficult to represent all interested parties
  • - who represents the public good?
  • Valuing benefits of GHG reduction
  • - costs are relatively easy to estimate. Will
    be huge, and immediate.
  • - benefits far in the future and not associated
    with readily understandable social advantage,
    e.g., reduced mortality, improved human safety,
    stronger (or at least unharmed) economy.

9
Problems to Overcome
  • - caps how establish if value of benefits is
    not clear?
  • - tax on CO2 emissions the T word.
  • Maintaining Focus
  • GHS reduction will be competing for national
    resources and political attention with problems
    such as health care, social security, homeland
    security, education, international affairs, and
    food, water, and transportation safety.
  • Political resolve
  • Our government operates under a constitutionally
    encouraged suspicion of its own activity and a
    2-year political time horizon.

10
Conclusion
  • Dramatic measures to fix the GHG problem are
    unlikely to prevail. More likely to succeed will
    be modest but broad first steps that establish a
    long term strategic path. That strategy must
    encourage periodic re-assessment of itself,
    maintain its flexibility, and foster and use
    future scientific and technological evolution.
  • Most important the measures must provide an
    easily understandable political logic for future
    elected officials. We will need a GHG Marshall
    Plan.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com