Feedback through critical indicators of student performance: contributing to the assessment of high school education - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Feedback through critical indicators of student performance: contributing to the assessment of high school education

Description:

High schools ranking. Quality of high schools. Pre-college preparation. Recruitment programs ... Collaboration between high schools and the university can be ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: uprm
Learn more at: https://oiip.uprm.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Feedback through critical indicators of student performance: contributing to the assessment of high school education


1
Feedback through critical indicators of student
performancecontributing to the assessment of
high school education
  • David González-Barreto, PhD
  • Antonio González-Quevedo, PhD
  • Sonia Bartolomei-Suárez, PhD
  • University of Puerto Rico Mayagüez
  • http//oiip.uprm.edu

2
Outline
  • Summary
  • Background
  • Introduction and Justification
  • Presentation of the Model
  • Benefits of the Model
  • Description and Components of the Project
  • Evaluation of Two High Schools using a Subgroup
    of Critical Indicators
  • Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Bibliography

3
Summary
  • Data kept at the Office of Institutional Research
    and Planning
  • Students performance in their high schools
  • Students performance at the university level
  • Model of feedback mechanism to high schools
  • Critical indicators
  • High school GPA
  • Ratio between students applying and students
    admitted
  • Retention rates
  • Graduation rates
  • Grades obtained in general education courses at
    the university (e.g., Mathematics, English and
    Spanish)
  • Expected outcomes for the university and the high
    schools

4
Background
  • Office of Institutional Research and Planning
    (OIRP) at the University of Puerto Rico at
    Mayagüez (UPRM)
  • Limitation variables not studied (1, 2)
  • High schools ranking
  • Quality of high schools
  • Pre-college preparation
  • Recruitment programs
  • Admission policy
  • Financial assistance
  • Academic intervention programs
  • Previous work (3)

5
Introduction and Justification
  • Information available in our data warehouse
  • High school grade point average
  • Scores in College Entrance Examination Board
    (CEEB) tests (aptitude in Math, Spanish and
    English, and achievement in the same areas)
  • Grade point average at the university level and
    at the specialty level
  • Grades obtained in the college courses

6
Supplier and Receptor Model of our Academic
Performance Model with Critical Indicators
7
Potential Benefits of the Model
  • Positive influence on high schools whose students
    attend our university
  • Indicators will allow high school to assess their
    performance
  • Collaboration between high schools and the
    university can be established to established
    better teaching techniques and share information
    on the preparation expected for the university
    courses from the perspective of the high schools
  • The indicators can be developed based on
    geographic location of the high schools, gender
    and public or private system

8
Marginal Distributions of High School GPAs and
First Year GPAs at UPRM
9
Marginal Distributions of High School GPAs and
First Year GPAs at UPRM for two hypothetical high
schools
10
Description of the Components of the Project
  • Potential users of the model
  • Parents of our applicants
  • Department of Education of the Commonwealth of
    Puerto Rico
  • Public and private school teachers
  • High school principals and counselors
  • Our Admissions Office
  • Eventual availability of the model and the
    results in our site http//oiip.uprm.edu

11
Evaluation of the two high schools using a
subgroup of the critical indicators
  • Evaluation based on five critical indicators
  • Retention rate (students staying for their second
    year of studies who entered our institution as
    first year students)
  • Graduation rate (the US Department of Education
    definition)
  • GPA in Math courses at the university
  • GPA in Spanish courses at the university
  • GPA in English courses at the university

12
High school A with performance above the median
13
High school B with performance below the median
14
Conclusions
  • This system will prove to be essential for the
    assessment of our public and private high schools
  • Each school can use this system to assess the
    quality of their teaching as far a preparing the
    students for the university
  • This system can be extended to assess the
    performance of universities that send us graduate
    students

15
Acknowledgments
  • Our former Institutional Researcher Irmannette
    Torres-Lugo, M.S.
  • Our Institutional Researcher and Database
    Administrator, engineer Leo I. Vélez, M.S.
  • Our Webmaster and Programmer Maira Rodríguez, B.S.

16
Bibliography
  • 1. Mo-Yin S Tam, Uday Sukhatme, The importance
    of high school quality in university admissions
    decisions, College and University Winter 2003,
    78(3), pp 3-8.
  • 2. Gary S May, Daryl E Chubin,  A retrospective
    on undergraduate engineering success for
    underrepresented minority students, Journal of
    Engineering Education, January 2003, 92(1),
    pp 27-39.
  • 3. Bartolomei-Suárez, Sonia M., González-Barreto,
    D. and González-Quevedo, A.A., Using an Expected
    Loss Function to Identify Best High Schools for
    Recruitment, Proceedings of the 10th
    International Conference on Engineering
    Education, Sept. 3-7, 2007, Coimbra, Portugal.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com