30 years of chaos research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

30 years of chaos research

Description:

30 years of chaos research from a personal perspective Peter H. Richter – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:122
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Hans145
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 30 years of chaos research


1
30 years of chaos research
from a personal perspective
  • Peter H. Richter

????????
????? ?????????????? CAS-MPG Partner Institute
for Computational Biology
?? 2007 ? 3 ? 29 ?
Shanghai, March 29, 2007
2
Outline
  1. History
  2. Dynamical systems general perspective
  3. Deterministic chaos regular vs. chaotic dynamics
  4. Example I the Lorenz system
  5. Example II the double pendulum
  6. Scenarios of transition to chaos universality
  7. Chaos and fractals dynamics and geometry
  8. Hamiltonian systems entanglement of order and
    chaos
  9. Other developments and summary

3
1. History
  • 1890 Poincaré Méthodes nouvelles de la mécanique
    céleste
  • 1925 Strömgren numerical determination of
    periodic orbits
  • 1963 Kolmogorov, Arnold, Moser invariant
    irrational tori
  • 1963 Lorenz period doubling scenario and
    butterfly effect
  • 1967 Smale horseshoes contain invariant Cantor
    sets
  • 1970 Kadanoff, Wilson renormalization scaling,
    universality
  • 1975 Mandelbrot fractal geometry
  • 1975 Aspen conference on network dynamics
  • 1975 Li Yorke period three implies chaos
  • 1977 Großmann Thomae analysis of period
    doubling
  • 1978 Feigenbaum universality of period doubling
  • 1978 Berrys review on regular and irregular
    motion
  • 1981 Bremen conference on invariant sets in
    chaotic dynamics
  • 1985 Exhibition Frontiers of Chaos

4
2. Dynamical Systems general perspective
  • systems live in phase space
  • of low dimension, compact or open
  • or of high dimension (infinite in case of PDEs)
  • and develop in time
  • continuous time differential equations
  • discrete time difference equations
  • the dynamical laws may be
  • deterministic (no uncertainty in the laws)
  • stochastic (due to fluctuations)
  • the phase space flow may be
  • dissipative (contracting due to friction or other
    losses)
  • conservative (no friction, no expansion)
  • expansive (due to autocatalysis or other positive
    feedback)

5
3. Deterministic chaos regular vs. chaotic
dynamics
  • dynamical point of view long term
    (un)predictability
  • regular motion points that lie initially close
    together tend to stay together or increase their
    distance at most linearly with time
  • chaos sensitive dependence on initial
    conditions points that lie initially close
    together get separated exponentially in time
    (Lyapunov exponents)
  • geometric point of view
  • regular motion the phase space is foliated by
    low-dimensional sets given an initial condition,
    the possible future is strongly restricted
  • chaotic motion given an initial condition,
    relatively large portions of phase space may be
    visited though not necessarily the entire space
  • symbolic point of view
  • regular motion generates regular sequences of
    numbers
  • chaotic motion generates random sequences of
    numbers

6
4. Example I the Lorenz system
standard parameter values s 10, r 28, b
8/3
LP
7
(s,x)-bifurcation diagrams
r 178
8
5. Example II the double pendulum
9
Stability of the golden KAM torus
?
E 10
E 20
10
6. Scenarios of transition to chaos universality
  • through quasi-periodicity
  • break-up of irrational tori

11
Complexification universality of higher degree
x ? x2 c, x and c complex
  • c inside the Mandelbrot set
  • ? finite attractors exists, domains of
    attraction bounded by Julia sets
  • c outside the Mandelbrot set
  • ? no finite attractor chaos

JMN
12
7. Chaos and fractals dynamics and geometry
  • dissipative systems
  • chaotic ( strange) attractors have fractal
    dimensions
  • meromorphic systems
  • chaotic repellors ( Julia sets) have
    fractal dimension
  • Hamiltonian systems
  • chaotic regions are fat fractals

13
8. Hamiltonian systems entanglement
f degrees of freedom if f independent constants
of motion exist, the phase space is foliated by
(rational and irrational) invariant f-tori
Liouville-Arnold integrability
  • When there are less than f integrals, the system
    tends to be chaotic
  • all rational tori break up (Poincaré-Birkhoff)
    into an alternation of islands of stability with
    elliptic centers, and chaotic bands with
    hyperbolic centers containing Smale-horseshoes
  • sufficiently irrational tori survive mild
    perturbations of integrable limiting cases
    noble tori (winding numbers related to the
    golden mean) are the most robust (KAM)

14
Poincaré sections of the restricted 3-body system
Section condition local maximum or minimum
distance from the main body (sun), with one of
the two possible angular velocities
3-B
15
Chaos in the 3-body problem may help to establish
order in solar systems
16
Chaotic scattering
  • Preimages of unstable hyperbolic periodic orbits
    in the space of incoming trajectories are Cantor
    sets

17
9. Other developments and summary
  • from celestial mechanics to molecular dynamics
  • quantum chaos level statistics, scars,
    quasi-classical quantization
  • rigid body dynamics
  • more than 2 degrees of freedom
  • theory of turbulence (many degrees of freedom)
  • influence of stochastic elements in the dynamics
  • fractal growth patterns
  • synchronization of non-linear oscillators
  • neurodynamics
  • econophysics

18
Summary
  • Chaos theory has deep roots in science.
  • It emerged from questions on stability and
    predictability of systems,
  • is founded on solid mathematical insight,
  • but was boosted by the development of computer
    technology.
  • The identification of universal scenarios came as
    an exciting surprise
  • As chaos is the rule rather than the exception,
    there are many discoveries yet to be made

???????
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com