Biomolecular Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Biomolecular Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Description:

01/28/04 Biomolecular Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy BIOCHEMISTRY BEYOND STRUCTURE Protein dynamics from NMR Analytical biochemistry Comparative analysis – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:80
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: Cha69
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Biomolecular Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy


1
Biomolecular Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Spectroscopy
01/28/04
  • BIOCHEMISTRY BEYOND STRUCTURE
  • Protein dynamics from NMR
  • Analytical biochemistry
  • Comparative analysis
  • Interactions between biomolecules

Tutorial on resonance assignments (see the
website)
2
Why The Interest In Dynamics?
  • Function requires motion/kinetic energy
  • Entropic contributions to binding events
  • Protein Folding/Unfolding
  • Uncertainty in NMR and crystal structures
  • Effect on NMR experiments- spin relaxation is
    dependent on rate of motions ? know dynamics to
    predict outcomes and design new experiments
  • Quantum mechanics/prediction (masochism)

3
Characterizing Protein Dynamics
Parameters/Timescales
4
Dynamics From NMR Parameters
  • Number of signals per atom multiple signals for
    slow exchange between conformational states

Two resonances (A,B) for one atom Populations
relative stability
Rex lt w (A) - w (B)
Rate Estimates
A
B
  • Multiple states are hard to detect by Xray
    crystallography

5
Dynamics From NMR Parameters
  • Number of signals per atom multiple signals for
    slow exchange between conformational states
  • Linewidths narrow faster motion, wide
    slower dependent on MW and structure

6
Linewidth is Dependent on MW
  • Linewidth determined by size of particle
  • Fragments have narrower linewidths

Arunkumar et al., JBC (2003)
7
Detecting Functionally Independent Domains in
Multi-Domain Proteins
RPA32
RPA14
gt 300 residues / 80 signals
  • Why?
  • Flexibility facilitates interactions with
    protein targets

8
Dynamics From NMR Parameters
  • Number of signals per atom multiple signals for
    slow exchange between conformational states
  • Linewidths narrow faster motion, wide
    slower dependent on MW and conformational states
  • Exchange of NH with solvent slow timescales
    (milliseconds to years!)
  • Requires local and/or global unfolding events
  • NH involved in H-bond exchanges slowly
  • Surface or flexible region NH exchanges rapidly

9
Dynamics From NMR Parameters
  • Number of signals per atom multiple signals for
    slow exchange between conformational states
  • Linewidths narrow faster motion, wide
    slower dependent on MW and conformational states
  • Exchange of NH with solvent slow timescales
  • NMR relaxation measurements (ps-ns, ms-ms)
  • R1 (1/T1) spin-lattice relaxation rate (z-axis)
  • R2 (1/T2) spin-spin relaxation rate (xy-plane)
  • Heteronuclear NOE (e.g. 15N- 1H)

10
Dynamics To Probe The OriginOf Structural
Uncertainty
?
  • Measurements show if high RMSD is due to high
    flexibility (low S2)

Weak correlation
?
?
Strong correlation
?
?
11
Analytical Protein Biochemistry
  • Purity (can detect gt99)- heterogeneity,
    degradation, buffer
  • Check on sequence (fingerprint regions)

12
Protein Fingerprints
1H COSY
15N-1H HSQC
13C HSQC also!
Assay structure from residue counts in each
fingerprint
13
Comparative Analysis
  • Different preparations, chemical modifications
  • Conformational heterogeneity (e.g. cis-trans
    isomerization)
  • Homologous proteins, mutants, engineered proteins

14
Comparative Analysis of StructureIs the protein
still the same when we cut it in half?
RPA70
  • Chemical shift is extremely sensitive
  • If peaks are the same, structure is the same
  • But, if peaks are different, differences not
    directly interpretable

15N
15N
15N
2
2
3
1H
3
1
1
1H
1H
Same idea for comparing mutants or homologs
Arunkumar et al., JBC (2003)
15
Biochemical Assay of MutationsMutations can
effect folding and stability
Wild-type
Partially destabilized
Partially destabilized hetero-geneous
Unfolded
Ohi et al., NSB (2003)
16
Biochemical Assay of MutationsWhat is the cause
of the Prp19-1 defect?
Not perturbation at binding interface
? Destabilized U-box leads to drop in activity
Ohi et al., NSB (2003)
17
NMR to Study Interactions
  • Monitor the binding of molecules
  • Determine binding constants (discrete off rates,
    on rates)
  • Identify binding interfaces

18
Monitoring Binding Events
Titration monitored by 15N-1H HSQC
  • NMR Provides
  • Site-specific
  • Multiple probes
  • In-depth information
  • Spatial distribution of responses can be mapped
    on structure

19
Binding Constants From NMR
Stronger
Weaker
Molar ratio of d-CTTCA
Fit change in chemical shift to binding equation
Arunkumar et al., JBC (2003)
20
Probing Protein InteractionsStructure is the
Starting Point!
Mer et al., Cell (2000)
21
Probe Binding Events by NMR15N-RPA32C
Unlabeled XPA1-98
15N-1H HSQC
  • Only 19 residues affected
  • Discrete binding site
  • Signal broadening ? exchange between the bound
    and un-bound state
  • Kd gt 1 mM

RPA32C RPA32C XPA 1-98
Mer et al., Cell (2000)
22
Map XPA Binding Site on RPA32C Using NMR
Map of chemical shift perturbations on the
structure of RPA32C
Mer et al., Cell (2000)
23
Map Site for RPA32C on XPA
  • Same residues bind to peptide and protein
  • Same binding site
  • Slower exchange for peptide
  • Kd lt 1 mM

XPA1-98 domain
XPA29-46 peptide
Mer et al., Cell (2000)
24
Manual Database Search Predicts Binding Sites in
Other DNA Repair Proteins
XPA29-46 UDG79-88 RAD257-274
E R K R Q R A L M L R Q A R L A A R R I Q R N K A
A A L L R L A A R R K L R Q K Q L Q Q Q F R E R M
E K
Mer et al., Cell (2000)
25
All Three Proteins Bind to RPA32CBinding Sites
are Identical
UDG79-88
RAD257-274
XPA29-46
Mer et al., Cell (2000)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com