Online Education in the United States Evidence from the Annual Sloan Surveys - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Online Education in the United States Evidence from the Annual Sloan Surveys

Description:

34% of institutions offer online degree programs. 2004: Entering the Mainstream ... 43% of institutions with Business degree program offer an online Business degree. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:105
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: ccmeo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Online Education in the United States Evidence from the Annual Sloan Surveys


1
Online Education in the United StatesEvidence
from the Annual Sloan Surveys
  • Dr. Elaine Allen
  • Associate Professor of Statistics
    Entrepreneurship,
  • Babson College
  • Co-Director, Babson Survey Research Group
  • Dr. Jeff Seaman
  • CIO and Survey Director, The Sloan Consortium
  • Co-Director, Babson Survey Research Group
  • Monterey, 2007

2
Survey Methodology
  • US higher education degree granting institutions
    open to the public.
  • email to Chief Academic Officers, link to
    web-based survey.
  • Responses merged with IPEDS and College Board
    data.
  • Weighted by region, size, control, and Carnegie
    Classification

3
Course Type Definitions
4
2003 Sizing the Opportunity
  • Schools expect 19.8 online enrollment growth.
  • 72 of institutions of higher education offer at
    least one fully online course.
  • Majority of academic leaders believe learning
    outcomes for online education are equal or
    superior to face-to-face instruction.
  • 34 of institutions offer online degree programs.

5
2004 Entering the Mainstream
  • Schools expect online enrollment to grow by
    24.8.
  • Only 3 of schools do not believe that students
    are at least as satisfied with online courses.
  • A majority of schools (53.6) believe online
    education is critical to their long-term strategy.

6
2005 Growing by Degrees
  • Core faculty teach online courses at the same or
    greater rates than for face-to-face courses.
  • 44 of institutions with face-to-face Masters
    programs offer an online Masters.
  • 43 of institutions with Business degree program
    offer an online Business degree.

7
Online Programs Show Wide Adoption
  • 65.7 of Doctoral/Research institutions with
    Face-to-face Masters also offer online Masters.

8
2006 Making the Grade
  • Responses
  • Total non-duplicated 2,472
  • 55.0 overall response rate
  • Critical Questions Addressed
  • Has enrollment growth slowed?
  • What is the mix of online students?
  • What types of institutions are providing online
    courses and programs?
  • Have perceptions of quality changed?

9
How Many Online Students?
National Enrollments Taking at least one online
course
10
Who Are the Online Students?
Online Students
All Students
Fall 2005
Online student distribution very similar to that
of all students
11
Where Are the Online Students?
Fall 2005
Associates have 51.5 of online, but only 37.9
of total students
12
Size Matters
13
Are these new students?
  • Agreement is pervasive
  • Not clear if serve only those not served by
    face-to-face

14
Mythbusters
15
Urban Myths of Online
  • Courses perceived as poorer quality
  • Students are not as satisfied
  • Faculty dont accept or value it
  • Students dont want it
  • Takes more time and effort
  • Harder to evaluate an online course
  • Students need more discipline
  • Flash in the pan not around for the long term

16
Students are not as satisfied
  • Myth is busted
  • Only 3 disagree Students at least as satisfied
  • True for all types and sizes of institutions

X
17
Flash in the pan
  • Myth is busted
  • Enrollments continue to grow
  • Rate of growth has increased
  • Chief Academic Officers believe in it

X
18
Students dont want it
X
  • Myth is busted
  • Enrollments continue to grow
  • 3.18 Million students, growing at over 35
    annually
  • Lack of student demand cited by only 4.6 of
    institutions
  • Eduventures study
  • Expanding Demand for Online Higher Education
    (August, 2006)
  • Seventy-six percent of consumers interested in
    postsecondary education stated a preference for a
    delivery mode with at least some online element

19
Harder to evaluate
X
  • Myth is busted
  • 82 of institutions say it is no harder to
    evaluate online courses

20
Perceived Course Quality Jury Still Out
61.9 say as good or better
38.1 still feel it is inferior
21
No Decision on Faculty Effort Yet
  • Does it take more time and effort to teach
    online
  • Yes, it takes more effort (35)
  • Neutral, online about the same as face-to-face
    (58)
  • No, it takes less effort (7)
  • 32 think that more time and effort is a
    significant barrier to wide adoption of online
    remainder dont see this as a barrier

Remains an issue for about 1/3 of schools
22
Students need more discipline
  • Myth holds true
  • 64 of institutions believe that this represents
    a significant barrier to wide adoption of online
  • The more experience you have with online, they
    stronger you believe this

23
Faculty dont accept online
  • Myth holds true
  • Majority of institutions say their faculty do not
    accept online
  • No improvement seen over time

24
Final Report Card
  • Busted Myths
  • Students are not as satisfied
  • Students dont want it
  • Harder to evaluate
  • Flash in the pan wont be around for the long
    term
  • Jury Still Out
  • Takes more time and effort
  • Courses perceived as poorer quality
  • Proven to be True
  • Students need more discipline
  • Faculty dont accept or value it

25
Next Steps
  • Additional reports in production
  • Making the Grade Southern Edition
  • Making the Grade Midwest Edition
  • Blending In Blended Education
  • Blending In Southern Edition
  • www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/index.asp
  • Data collection for 2007 study will begin next
    month.

26
Contact Info
  • www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/index.asp
  • allenie_at_babson.edu
  • jseaman_at_sloan-c.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com