Ready or Not assessing and implementing change - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Ready or Not assessing and implementing change

Description:

Provide you with an understanding of community readiness' and how this ... To bring partners together to co-ordinate, plan and deliver Best Start initiatives? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: dhsVi
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ready or Not assessing and implementing change


1
Ready or Not?assessing and implementing change
  • Stephanie Jones
  • Erica Ruck,
  • Ovens and King Community Health Service

2
Workshop Content
  • Provide you with an understanding of community
    readiness and how this fits into Best Start at
    all levels - government, community, organisations
    and services, teams and groups.
  • Work in groups to look at the readiness of your
    BS community

3
What has this got to do with Best Start?
4
Best Start has taken a community approach to
implementing changes within and for families
  • place-oriented setting in local government
    areas
  • driven by partnerships of local people and
    organisations
  • BS in aboriginal communities with strong family
    and kinship networks

5
But is the community ready?

To bring partners together to co-ordinate, plan
and deliver Best Start initiatives? To make
changes to its values, norms and goals that are
key to family and community well-being? To
re-orient services?
6
Definition of Community Readiness
(adapted, Kumpfer, 1997)
  • CR is the extent to which a group of individuals
    is adequately prepared to implement Best Start
  • CR assessment is a process for measuring the
    characteristics of a community, its population,
    community leaders and service systems that can
    influence the success of Best Start

7
AcknowledgesA. Every community is different
  • Vary widely in their interest, ability and
    commitment to making changes (dependent on what
    they are)
  • Level of community connection and networks
  • Have different values, norms, hopes priorities
  • Established communities may be much more
    practiced at working together- not so easy for
    newer or transient communities- with different
    populations

8
B. Stages of change in a community
9
Why increase community readiness?
  • Comprehensive health promotion or change efforts
    are much more likely to have the desired impact,
    particularly when health professionals work with
    local citizens and community leaders
  • Better allocation of resources and efforts
  • Empower communities to deal with a whole range of
    issues
  • More likely to change community norms and values

10
Working with community readiness
  • Erica will take us through how we can use
    identified criteria to assess the readiness of
    community groups to engage in public health
    initiatives, and to adopt different strategies
    depending on the level of readiness.

11
Experience of measuring community readiness
  • A particular issue or concern identified
  • Interviews conducted with community members
  • Measurement of readiness
  • Potential strategies identified
  • Community change

12
Dimensions measured
  • Community efforts (programs, policies)
  • Community knowledge of efforts
  • Leadership (aware active)
  • Community climate (supportive)
  • Community knowledge about the issue
  • Resources for efforts (time, money, space)

13
Stages of Community Readiness
  • No awareness
  • Denial/Resistance
  • Vague awareness
  • Preplanning
  • Preparation
  • Initiation
  • Stabilisation
  • Confirmation/Expansion
  • High level of community ownership

14
Working example-Suicide prevention project in
rural Victoria
  • Community interviews were conducted-some
    individual and some focus groups
  • Value to the community members
  • Value to the worker
  • Intervention strategies designed or confirmed

15
Evaluation
  • Second round of interviews evaluated progress
  • -increase in preparedness to take action
  • ? community leadership influence
  • ? extent to which local resources
  • available to support efforts
  • Attribution to project not direct, but based on
    an a priori expectation of these changes,
    assuming a positive contribution to them is a
    reasonable conclusion

16
Research
  • Support from PHCRED Research Fellowship,
    Melbourne University School of Rural Health
  • Conducted research into readiness with an
    organisation as the community
  • Provided recommendations for how the organisation
    could move forward around a particular issue

17
How is it useful?
  • Acknowledges and engages community members
  • Provides insight for worker/facilitator
  • Guides choice of strategies that are more likely
    to be successful
  • Provides data for monitoring change especially
    useful for evaluation and accountability
  • May create change

18
  • Paradoxical Theory of Change
  • (Arnold Beisser)
  • Change occurs when one becomes what one is, not
    when one tries to become what one is not

19
How can it be used?
  • An assessment tool
  • An evaluation tool
  • A change measurement tool
  • A planning tool

20
  • Stages of Readiness
  • 1.No Awareness
  • Issue is not generally recognized by the
    community or its leaders as a problem (or it may
    truly not be an issue)
  • 2.Resistance
  • At least some community members recognize that
    it is a problem, but there is little recognition
    that it might be a local problem.
  • 3.Vague Awareness
  • Most feel that there is a local problem, but
    there is no immediate motivation to do anything
    about it
  • 4.Preplanning
  • There is clear recognition that something must
    be done, and there may even be a committee.
    However, efforts are not focused or detailed.
  • 5.Preparation
  • Active leaders begin planning in earnest.
    Community offers modest support of efforts.
  • 6.Initiation
  • Enough information is available to justify
    efforts. Activities are underway
  • 7.Stabilization
  • Activities are supported by administrators or
    community decision makers. Staff are trained and
    experienced.
  • 8.Confirmation Expansion
  • Standard efforts are in place. Community members
    feel comfortable using services, and they support
    expansion. Local data are regularly obtained.
  • 9.High Level of Community Ownership
  • Detailed and sophisticated knowledge exists
    about prevalence, causes, and consequences.
    Effective evaluation guides new directions. Model
    is applied to other issues.

21
WORKSHOP
  • In your Best Start groups think about an issue
    and which domain it relates to
  • Discuss at which stage of readiness your
    community may be at in relationship to this
    issue

22
  • After you have chosen the stage of readiness,
  • Design some strategies
  • Report back

23
Contacts
  • Stephanie Jones
  • Stephanie.Jones_at_mh.org.au
  • Erica Ruck
  • Ovens and King Community Health Service
  • rucke_at_ovensandking.org.au
  • Or contact
  • www.TriEthnicCenter.Colostate.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com