Title: Tools for Creating a Culture of Assessment The CIPP Model and UtilizationFocused Evaluation
1Tools for Creating a Culture of AssessmentThe
CIPP Model and Utilization-Focused Evaluation
- Yvonne Belanger, Duke University
- Library Assessment Conference
- September 25-27, 2006
- Charlottesville, VA
2Key Questions for Libraries
- How can we build a culture of evaluation, so that
many people contribute to evaluation? - How can we provide a context for evaluation
strategies and results? - How can we conduct evaluation that helps with
decision making?
3Culture of Assessment
- organizational environment in which decisions
are based on facts, research, and analysis, and
where services are planned and delivered in ways
that maximize positive outcomes and impacts for
customers and stakeholders.
Lakos et al, 1998-2002
4Barriers to a Culture of Assessment
- Lack of evaluative thinking (at all levels)
- Lack of engagement in evaluation
- Pseudoevaluations (Stufflebeam, 1999)
- Promote a positive or negative view of a program,
irrespective of its actual merit and worth
5Building evaluative thinking CIPP Model
- Stufflebeams CIPP Model - Context, Input,
Process and Product evaluation - Focus decision-making
- Purpose facilitate rational and continuing
decision-making, particularly for programs and
services with long-term goals
6Details of the CIPP Model
- CIPP
- Context Environment Needs
- Input Strategies Resources
- Process Monitoring implementation
- Product Outcomes - both quality and significance
- More information at www.wmich.edu/evalctr/pubs
7CIPP approach recognizes
- All politics are local offers a tailored
evaluation approach designed to answer locally
interesting useful questions, emphasis is on
credibility and usefulness rather than
generalizability to other places, times, audiences
8CIPP View of Institutionalized Evaluation
Stufflebeam, OPEN, 2003
9Advantages of the CIPP Model
- Adapts well to carrying out evaluations on any
scale (projects, programs, organizations) - An organizing framework, not a lockstep linear
process - Sensitive to needs of decision makers
- Systems approach encourages a systems view of
projects and programs
10Building evaluative thinking and engagement
Utilization-focused evaluation approach
- Taking a utilization-focused approach means
asking - Why is this evaluation being undertaken?
- What decisions need to be made with the results?
- Who will be most affected by those decisions?
- How can we engage those people in the entire
evaluation process?
11Utilization-focused evaluation
- Premise by engaging stakeholders in the entire
evaluation process from design to implementation
of recommendations - Evaluation addresses questions of greatest
importance to those in a position to directly
make use of its findings - Reduces the cultural barriers that can inhibit
use of results by increasing transparency,
empowering stakeholders
12Another advantage of the Utilization-focused
approach
- Process Use benefits
- First described by Patton - ways in which being
engaged in the processes of evaluation can be
useful quite apart from the findings that may
emerge from these processes - Four types of Process Use
- 1. Enhancing shared understandings, especially
about results - 2. Supporting and reinforcing the object of the
evaluation through intervention-oriented
evaluation - 3. Increasing participants engagement, sense of
ownership - 4. Organizational development
Patton 1997, pp. 88-91
13Process Use Culture of Assessment
- Increased capacity to make use of evaluation
findings - Know how to use evaluation information
producing better evaluation users in the
organization who can effectively weigh evidence,
consider contradictions and inconsistencies,
articulate values, and examine assumptions
Patton, 2004, On Evaluation Use Evaluative
Thinking and Process Use
14Example
- Evaluation of the Duke iPod experiment Duke
Digital Initiative
15Summary
- Foster a culture of assessment by
- Adopting frameworks that support decision-making
- Engaging staff as stakeholders in the entire
process of evaluation from design to
implementation of recommendations - Leverage the opportunity of Process Use to
develop staff and make them more saavy evaluation
consumers
16Final Thoughts
- evaluation's most important purpose is not to
prove, but to improve. - Daniel Stufflebeam
- (CIPP Model)
- Research is aimed at truth. Evaluation is aimed
at action. - Michael Quinn Patton
- (Utilization-focused Evaluation)
17Thank You!
- Yvonne BelangerHead, Program Evaluation
- Academic Technology Instructional Services
- Perkins Library
- Duke University
- yvonne.belanger_at_duke.edu
18References
- Stufflebeam, D. (1999). Foundational models for
21st century program evaluation. - Stufflebeam, D. (2003). The CIPP Model for
Evaluation An update, a review of the models
development, a checklist to guide implementation.
Paper read at Oregon Program Evaluators Network
Conference, at Portland, OR. http//www.wmich.edu/
evalctr/pubs/CIPP-ModelOregon10-03.pdf - Patton, M. Q. (2004). "On evaluation use
Evaluative thinking and process use." The
Evaluation Exchange IX(4). - Patton, M. Q. 1997. Utilization-focused
evaluation The new century text (3rd ed.).
Thousand Oaks, CA Sage.