ACEIs, ARBs, or DRI for Adults With Hypertension - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

ACEIs, ARBs, or DRI for Adults With Hypertension

Description:

ACEIs, ARBs, or DRI for Adults With Hypertension Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) www.ahrq.gov – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:83
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: KHS378
Learn more at: http://www.baylorcme.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ACEIs, ARBs, or DRI for Adults With Hypertension


1
ACEIs, ARBs, or DRI for Adults With
Hypertension
  • Prepared for
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
  • www.ahrq.gov

2
Background Prevalence
  • Approximately 75 million Americans have
    hypertension.
  • The prevalence of hypertension increases with
    advancing age.
  • More than half of people 55 to 74 years old and
    approximately three-fourths of those 75 years
    are affected.
  • Hypertension is the primary attributable risk
    factor for death and results in substantial
    morbidity.
  • Hypertension impacts numerous target organs,
    including the brain, eyes, heart, arteries, and
    kidneys.

3
Background Treatment
  • Despite the high rates of morbidity and mortality
    attributable to hypertension, control of the
    condition remains suboptimal.
  • Effective lifestyle interventions may include
    diet, exercise, and control of body weight.
  • Many people also require antihypertensive
    medication to lower blood pressure.

4
Background Pharmacological Blockade of the
Renin-Angiotensin System
  • Among the many choices in antihypertensive
    therapy, some of the most common are those aimed
    at affecting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone
    (renin) system. These include
  • Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs)
  • Angiotensin II Type I Receptor Blockers (ARBs)
  • Direct Renin Inhibitor (DRI)

5
Background Drugs Targeting The Renin System May
Not Be Clinically Equivalent
  • Although ACEIs and ARBs both target the renin
    system and reduce the downstream effects of
    angiotensin II, it is not clear that these
    medications are in fact clinically equivalent.
  • ACEIs only block partial production of
    angiotensin II.
  • ACEIs have well-known side effects not shared to
    the same extent by ARBs, including cough and
    angioedema.
  • The newer DRI aliskiren may have a side-effect
    profile and efficacy that differ significantly
    from ACEIs or ARBs.
  • Given the public health importance and widespread
    use of these agents, it is important to
    understand their comparative effects on clinical
    outcomes.

6
Rationale for Update
  • In 2007, AHRQ published its first systematic
    review on the comparative effectiveness of ACEIs
    versus ARBs for adults with hypertension.
  • In 2011, this review was updated to include
    comparisons with the DRI aliskiren.
  • ACEIs and ARBs are the second and fifth most
    commonly prescribed medications for hypertension,
    and use of DRI is increasing.
  • Comparative effectiveness of the DRI versus ACEIs
    or ARBs has not been assessed.

7
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Comparative Effectiveness Review (CER) Development
  • Topics are nominated through a public process,
    which includes submissions from health care
    professionals, professional organizations, the
    private sector, policymakers, the public, and
    others.
  • A systematic review of all relevant clinical
    studies is conducted by independent researchers,
    funded by AHRQ, to synthesize the evidence in a
    report summarizing what is known and not known
    about the select clinical issue. The research
    questions and the results of the report are
    subject to expert input, peer review, and public
    comment.
  • The results of these reviews are summarized into
    Clinician and Consumer Research Summaries for use
    in decisionmaking and in discussions with
    patients. The research reviews and the full
    report, with references for included and excluded
    studies, are available at www.effectivehealthcare
    .ahrq.gov.

8
Rating the Strength of Evidence From the CER
  • The strength of evidence was classified into four
    broad categories

High Further research is very unlikely to change the confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate Further research may change the confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low Further research is likely to change the confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Insufficient Evidence either is unavailable or does not permit estimation of an effect.
9
Number of Studies Evaluating Various Treatment
Options
ARBs ARBs ARBs ARBs ARBs ARBs ARBs ARBs DRI
Unspecified ARBs Candesartan cilexetil Eprosartan Irbesartan Losartan Olmesartan medoxomil Telmisartan Valsartan Aliskiren
ACEIs Unspecified ACEIs 20 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0
ACEIs Benazepril 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
ACEIs Captopril 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
ACEIs Enalapril 0 4 2 4 13 0 5 2 0
ACEIs Fosinopril 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0
ACEIs Lisinopril 0 6 0 0 0 0 3 5 0
ACEIs Moexipril 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ACEIs Perindopril 0 1 0 0 2 0 3 0 0
ACEIs Quinapril 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0
ACEIs Ramipril 0 0 0 0 2 1 5 3 2
ACEIs Trandolapril 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
DRI Aliskiren 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -
10
Evidence of Benefits Blood Pressure-Lowering
Effects
  • Similar long-term blood pressure-lowering effects
    were seen with ACEIs and ARBs. (high strength of
    evidence)
  • The DRI aliskiren may be slightly more effective
    at reducing blood pressure than an ACEI
    (ramipril) however, no differences were detected
    between aliskiren and an ARB (losartan). (low
    strength of evidence)

11
Evidence of Benefits Clinical Outcomes
  • There were no significant differences between
    ACEIs and ARBs for these outcomes
  • Mortality and major cardiovascular events (low
    strength of evidence)
  • Rate of monotherapy success (high strength of
    evidence)
  • Quality of life measures (low strength of
    evidence)
  • Progression of renal disease (moderate strength
    of evidence)
  • Effects on LVMI or LVEF (low strength of
    evidence)
  • ACEI and ARBs are similar in their lack of effect
    on serum lipid levels, blood glucose levels, and
    HbA1c. (moderate strength of evidence)
  • There was insufficient evidence for all other
    outcomes beyond blood pressure reduction on the
    comparative effectiveness of the DRI aliskiren.

12
Evidence on Adverse Effects
  • Cough is more prevalent in patients on ACEIs than
    ARBs (About 9 of patients treated with an ACEI
    and about 2 of patients treated with an ARB
    report a cough).
  • (high strength of evidence)
  • ACEIs were associated with lower rates of
    persistence and higher rates of withdrawals due
    to adverse events when compared with ARBs.
    (moderate strength of evidence)
  • Lower persistence with ACEIs versus ARBs may be
    explained largely by the differential rates of
    cough.
  • Excluding cough, there were no significant
    between-class differences in any other specific
    adverse events.

13
Evidence on Adverse Effects Angioedema
  • Angioedema was uncommon and most frequently
    associated with ACEIs.
  • In one study, the DRI was associated with
    angioedema in one patient, but overall the
    evidence was insufficient.

14
Gaps in Knowledge
  • Long-term comparisons of a DRI with ACEIs and
    ARBs.
  • The impact of cough on quality of life, care
    patterns (e.g., use of therapeutic agents for
    cough symptoms or conditions associated with
    cough), and health outcomes, particularly for
    individuals who continue to use ACEIs.
  • Subgroups of special importance such as
    individuals with hypertension and diabetes
    mellitus, congestive heart failure, chronic
    kidney disease, and dyslipidemia.
  • Broader representation of groups such as the
    elderly and ethnic and racial minorities.
  • Clinical trials with long-term followup that
    report on the incidence of new cancer diagnoses
    and cancer deaths in patients on ACEIs, ARBs, or
    a DRI.

15
Patient Cost Information
  • Medication costs may contribute to decreased
    adherence among patients.
  • Average wholesale prices for these
    antihypertensive agents range from 30 to 160
    per month, depending on dosage.
  • On average, ACEIs are less expensive for patients
    than ARBs and the DRI aliskiren.
  • The most inexpensive ACEIs for patients are the
    generic forms of benazepril, enalapril,
    lisinopril, and quinapril.
  • The majority of ARBs are not available in generic
    form. The average cost of most brand-name ARBs is
    between 80 and 195 per month, depending on
    dosage.
  • The DRI aliskiren is also not available in a
    generic form. The average wholesale cost of
    aliskiren is 100 or 120 per month, depending on
    dosage.

16
What To Discuss With Your Patients
  • The importance of taking blood pressure
    medication as prescribed.
  • The tradeoffs between the benefits and adverse
    effects when taking an ACEI, ARB, or DRI.
  • How to identify and when to report serious side
    effects.
  • Barriers that may affect adherence to their
    specific treatment regimen.
  • All other medications they may be taking and
    their possible interactions.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com