Brief History of States Rights - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Brief History of States Rights

Description:

Brief History of States Rights Prelude to confrontation WAS A CONFLICT BETWEEN NORTH AND SOUTH INEVITABLE? DOES THE CIVIL WAR REPRESENT A CLASH OF IDEOLOGIES? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: markda6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Brief History of States Rights


1
Brief History of States Rights
  • Prelude to confrontation

2
  • WAS A CONFLICT BETWEEN NORTH AND SOUTH
    INEVITABLE?
  • DOES THE CIVIL WAR REPRESENT A CLASH OF
    IDEOLOGIES?
  • WHAT IS YOUR OWN POSITION ON THE ISSUE TODAY
    STATE INDEPENDENCE, FEDERAL DOMINATION OR
    COMBINATION

3
Articles of Confederation 1781
  • All but powerless Federal Government
  • Can not regulate trade
  • Can not create an Army Navy
  • Daniel Shays Rebellion

4
1787 Philadelphia Convention
  • New Document Written
  • New Government Created
  • Constitution of the United States
  • Ratified 1789

5
Northwest Ordinance 1787
  • NO STATE northwest of the Ohio River could be a
    slave state
  • Not to benefit blacks but to prevent a shift in
    the balance of power in the Congress from
    northern dominance to southern dominance

6
Conflicting IdeologiesFederalists v.
Anti-Federalists
  • Federalists Alexander Hamilton Government by
    the elite
  • Anti-Federalists aka Jeffersonian Republicans
    government by the little people the common man

7
Federal ActionAlien Sedition Acts1798
  • Longer period for immigrants to attain
    citizenship
  • President has power to imprison or deport
    foreigners
  • Illegal to publish false or malicious writings
    about the United States

8
Reaction Virginia Kentucky Resolutions1798
  • State laws states have the right to decide if
    Federal Laws exceed agreement between state and
    Federal government
  • Claimed that if states decided that the Federal
    Govt. had exceeded its authority the state could
    ignore the law

9
Virginia KentuckyResolutions
  • These 2 Resolutions become the basis upon which
    the STATES RIGHTS movement rests.

10
Missouri Compromise1820
  • To preserve balance of power between north and
    south in the Senate Maine is admitted as a free
    state and Missouri is admitted as a slave state.
  • Created the line between north and south of 36
    30 permanently dividing the Louisiana purchase
    territory between free soil north of the line
    and slave soil south of it.

11
Tariff of Abominations1828
  • High tariff proposed to protect Northern
    Industrialists and Western interests.
  • Non-industrial South heavily reliant on European
    manufactures is opposed.
  • Debate continues for 2 years

12
Nullification Crisis1832
  • John C. Calhoun tariff will be declared void in
    South Carolina
  • President Andrew Jackson asks for Force Bill
    would allow him to use military against state
    of South Carolina
  • Represents clash President Federal Power vs.
    State sovereignty

13
Great Statesmen
14
Wilmot Proviso - 1848
  • As the Mexican War came to an end, the debate
    over whether or not slavery should be permitted
    in the Mexican Cession heated up.  David Wilmot,
    a congressmen from Pennsylvania suggested that 
    slavery be forever banned in the newly won
    territories.  He claimed that the 36' 30" line
    which was part of the Missouri Compromise only
    applied to the Louisiana purchase.  Many
    northerners had objected to the Mexican War. 
    They like Wilmot felt that the south was looking
    for new lands to expand slavery.  Southerners
    such as John C. Calhoun of South Carolina were
    horrified by Wilmot's proposal.  They wanted the
    institution of slavery to be extended west across
    the Rockies.  Wilmot's bill that would have
    banned slavery in the west passed in the House of
    Representatives where northerners held the
    advantage.  However the Bill was defeated in the
    Senate by southerners such as Calhoun.  The
    debate over whether slavery should or should not
    be allowed in the new territories would continue
    in the years to come.  

15
David Wilmot Senator from Pennsylvania
16
Compromise of 1850
  • Millard Fillmore of East Aurora was President
  • California admitted as a free state
  • Territory of New Mexico and Utah can decide the
    issue themselves
  • Selling of slaves is banned in Washington D.C.
  • Fugitive Slave Act is passed
  • In return for admitting the free state of
    California to the Union it put in place the
    Fugitive Slave Law . The Rigorous requirement to
    return escaped slaves made citizens of every
    state personally responsible for treating human
    beings as property.

17
1852 Election of Franklin Pierce
  • Defeated General Winfield Scott hero of the
    Mexican War
  • Claimed he favored the Compromise of 1850 to get
    votes BUT
  • Most interested in Manifest Destiny Pierce
    focused largely on foreign policy.   He pledged
    to continue America's Manifest Destiny into Latin
    America.  Pierce aggressively pursued the
    annexation of Cuba and the isthmus of Central
    America.  In light of several revolutions in
    Europe at the time, Pierce held America up as a
    model of freedom for the rest of the world. 
    Pierce also sent Matthew Perry and the American
    Navy to open Japan up to trade with the United
    States though the use of gunboat diplomacy.

18
Kansas / Nebraska Act 1854
  • Douglas.  Douglas was a Democrat with
    presidential ambitions.  At the time, a debate
    arose over where to build the new
    Transcontinental Railroad.
  • A bill creating the states of Kansas and Nebraska
    and allowing popular sovereignty in the
    territory. Passed on May 30, 1854, it was
    proposed by Illinois Democratic senator Stephen
    A. Douglas in an attempt to gain support from
    southern senators for his organization of the
    territory. It annulled the prohibition against
    slavery north of 36-30' that was passed in the
    Missouri Compromise
  • Lead to Bleeding Kansas
  • Balance in the Senate is again in question

19
Abraham Lincoln
20
Lincolns Prediction January 27, 1838
  • At what point shall we expect the approach of
    danger? By what means shall we fortify against
    it? Shall we expect some transatlantic military
    giant to step the ocean and crush us at a blow?
    Never! All the armies of Europe, Asia, and Africa
    combined, with all the treasure of the earth in
    their military chests with a Buonaparte for a
    commander, could not by force take a drink from
    the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in
    the trial of a thousand years.   At what point
    then is the approach of danger to be expected? I
    answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up
    amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If
    destruction be our lot, we ourselves must be its
    author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we
    must live through all time, or die by suicide.  

21
A. Lincoln - August 24, 1855
  • Our progress in degeneracy appears to me to be
    pretty rapid. As a nation we began by declaring
    that "all men are created equal." We now
    practically read it "all men are created equal,
    except negroes." Soon it will read "all men are
    created equal, except negroes, and foreigners,
    and Catholics." When it comes to this, I should
    prefer emigrating to some country where they make
    no pretense of loving liberty--to Russia, for
    instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and
    without the base alloy of hypocrisy.

22
  • "A house divided against itself cannot stand." I
    believe this government cannot endure,
    permanently half slave and half free. I do not
    expect the union to be dissolved--I do not expect
    the house to fall--but I do expect that it will
    cease to be divided. It will become all one
    thing, or all the other. June 16, 1858
  • As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a
    master. This expresses my idea of democracy.
    Whatever differs from this, to the extent of the
    difference, is not democracy. August 1, 1858
  •  

23
First Inaugural Address
  • In your hands, my dissatisfied countrymen, and
    not in mine, is the momentous issue of civil war.
    The government will not assail you. You can have
    no conflict without yourselves being the
    aggressors. You have no oath registered in Heaven
    to destroy the government, while I shall have the
    most solemn one to "preserve, protect and defend"
    it. March 4, 1861
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com