Transforming Readers to Writers: Three Steps to Creating Effective Writing Assignments - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Transforming Readers to Writers: Three Steps to Creating Effective Writing Assignments

Description:

Transforming Readers to Writers: Three Steps to Creating Effective Writing Assignments May 2011 Spring Modules Writing Across the Curriculum Beth Hedengren – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:435
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: beth1171
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Transforming Readers to Writers: Three Steps to Creating Effective Writing Assignments


1
Transforming Readers to Writers Three Steps to
Creating Effective Writing Assignments
  • May 2011
  • Spring Modules
  • Writing Across the Curriculum
  • Beth Hedengren

2
Readers to Writers
  • The writing prompt functions to transform its
    writer (the teacher) and its readers (the
    students) into a reader (the teacher) and writers
    (the students)
  • Anis S. Bawarshi. Genre and the Invention of the
    Writer Reconsidering the Place of Invention in
    Composition. Logan, Utah Utah State University
    Press, 2003, p. 130.

3
(No Transcript)
4
Overview
  • Writing Prompt Issues
  • 3 Things
  • Purpose
  • Expectations
  • Feedback
  • Rubrics

5
When prompts go wrong
  • I never understood one assignment in high
    schoolnot one.
  • Student,
  • Katherine Gee

6
Bewildered
  • A few weeks ago, one of my roommates asked if I
    could help him get started on a paper for his
    humanities class.
  • The writing assignment prompt was, Analyze how
    the form and meaning of the architecture work
    together and are interconnected.
  • I was baffled. So what does she want you to do?
    I asked him.
  • I wish I knew, he replied.
  • (Jared Fronk, February 20, 2008)

7
Write
  • Are your students ever bewildered by your
    written instructions?
  • What do you think might be confusing to them?
  • What do you think helps your students to
    understand your expectations?

8
Small Group Share
  • What works well with your writing assignments?
  • What concerns do you have about your writing
    assignments?

9
NSSE Writing Engagement
  • Best practices in teaching writing are
    positively associated with outcomes.
  • These positive relationships exist above and
    beyond the amount of reading and writing students
    do.

10
NSSE Quality of Engagement
  • Kind of projects they assign
  • Way they explain their assignments
  • Activities they require students to engage in
    while working on the assignments

11
NSSE Data
  • 80 of faculty thought assignments were clear.
  • 60 of students thought assignments were clear.

12
Is this enough?
  • As the capstone project of this course, you will
    conduct research and write an 8-10 page paper on
    a topic related to the course.

13
Our responsibility
  • Teachers are always implicated in the writing
    their students produce.
  • In our assignments we construct occasions for
    writing, purposes, time frames, and guidelines.
  • Katherine Gottschalk and Keith Hjortshoj,
  • The Elements of Teaching Writing A Resource for
    Instructors in All Disciplines,
  • Boston Bedford/St. Martins, 2004.

14
Two Parts to Instructions
  1. Printed (or electronic) instructions
  2. In-class discussion, examples, modeling

15
PUrpose
  • Explain how the assignment is relevant to the
    course and the discipline.
  • Say something about why you felt the need to
    give the assignment in the first place.
  • -- A Student

16
Expert Writers Draw on Five Knowledge Domains
Anne Beaufort, College Writing and Beyond A New
Framework for University Writing Instruction,
2007.
17
Recognize Dual Discourse Communities
  • Discipline
  • Classroom

18
Connect with Real Purpose
  • We need to help students see the connection
    between being a good engineer and being a good
    writer. Students must write about something
    theyve done, to a real customer, practical,
    realistic assignments of the kind they would
    use.
  • Mechanical Engineering Professor

19
Big Picture
  • What do you want to accomplish with this
    assignment, in terms of your course goals?
  • How does this assignment fit with disciplinary
    expectations? What are the students learning that
    will prepare them to write/think/interact in a
    larger community?

20
Genre
  • How would you characterize the genre of this
    assignment?
  • Are your students familiar with this genre? Do
    they understand it the same way you do?
  • What function does this genre serve in your
    discipline?
  • What can you do to help the students understand
    the genre?

21
Write
  • Review the purposes of the example assignments.
  • Reflect on the purpose of your assignment.
  • Classroom
  • Disciplinary
  • Review the assignment itself. Could you make the
    purpose more clear?
  • How could you use class time to make the purpose
    more clear? To emphasize relevance and importance?

22
Discuss in your groups
  • Example assignments
  • How did they make the purpose clear?
  • Did they consider both the classroom and the
    disciplinary communities?
  • Share the purpose for your assignments.
  • Discuss ways to clarify in your assignment and in
    class.

23
Expectations
  • There is nothing more frustrating than to
    write an entire paper according to your
    interpretation of the prompt only to have it
    handed back with a poor grade reflecting the
    teachers (or TAs) interpretation of your
    interpretation.
  • --A Student

24
Guidelines
  • What are your expectations for thought, content,
    ideas, research?
  • What are your expectations for format?
  • Realize that students are likely to value format
    over content. Make clear where your priorities
    lie.
  • Enough, but not too much!

25
Models
  • What kind of models could you share with the
    class?
  • Professional
  • Student
  • When looking at several good examples, what is
    constant and what can vary?

26
Share Examples
  • I bring examples of professional writing to TA
    meetings. I say, Look at this paper, this is
    professional tone. They get to recognize it.
    (Biology professor)
  • To prepare them to write their annotated
    bibliography, I showed them my annotated
    bibliography. (Sociology professor)

27
Integrate into Your Class
  • An 8-page writing prompt was divided into 3
    short, sequenced assignments, allowing feedback
    at each step on professional skills.
  • The book reviews are successful. We read
    together the same book, talk together, then
    write individually. We do 3 book reviews in one
    semester this way.

28
Evaluation Criteria
  • What criteria will you use to evaluate the
    students work?
  • Do you want to weight any criterion more heavily?
  • How will you teach the students about these
    criteria?
  • How will you include the criteria in the
    assignment?
  • Do your grading criteria match the explanation in
    your assignment?

29
Reflecting
  • Look at the models. How do they make expectations
    clear (or not) ?
  • Look at (or consider) your assignment. What are
    your expectations? How can you make those
    expectations clear, yet concise?
  • Write your ideas.
  • Discuss in your groups.

30
Format
Professors would splash around terms like
sophisticated argument and I would have no clue
what they meant. Use headings and bullet
points. No longer than a page.
31
Format for Ease of Understanding
  • Have you limited the length?
  • Have you used graphic design principles?
  • Have you used vocabulary that is clear to the
    students?
  • Do you distribute (and discuss) the prompt near
    the time students should start writing?

32
Design Principles
  • Contrast
  • Headings, bolding, lists
  • Repetition
  • Fonts, sizes, colors
  • Alignment
  • Visual connections
  • Proximity
  • Similar items grouped together

33
Not Too Much!
  • The original rubric detailed complete
    instructions for each section of the report.
  • The revised version requires communication that
    is persuasively, professionally, clearly,
    concisely and completely conveyed and/or
    documented, emphasizing how well the document
    serves the rhetorical needs of the situation it
    responds to.
  • Mechanical Engineering Professor

34
Reflecting
  • Look at the models. How does the format enhance
    readability? Are they as concise as possible
    while providing sufficient information?
  • Look at (or consider) your assignment. How
    readable is it? Write your ideas.
  • Discuss in your groups.

35
Rubrics
36
Various Kinds
  • See Examples in Packet
  • Holistic
  • Analytic
  • Matrix
  • Combination
  • Use what works for you, your TAs, your students!

37
Three Steps to Better Assignments
  • Purpose
  • Provide the big picture.
  • Explain the situations to which this genre
    responds.
  • Expectations
  • Read multiple samples of the genre as a class.
  • Discuss what features matter and why.
  • Explain grading criteria (rubrics).
  • Format
  • Design for ease of understanding.

38
The rest of the process
  • Draft
  • Review
  • Publish
  • Revise again?

39
Bad Parenting (teaching)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com