New Technologies for Challenging Situations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

New Technologies for Challenging Situations

Description:

New Technologies for Challenging Situations Perennial and Nursery Crops in California S. Schneider, T. Trout, J. Gerik USDA ARS, Parlier, CA – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:135
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 66
Provided by: SallySc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: New Technologies for Challenging Situations


1
New Technologies for Challenging Situations
Perennial and Nursery Crops in California
  • S. Schneider, T. Trout, J. Gerik
  • USDA ARS, Parlier, CA
  • H. Ajwa, B. Westerdahl
  • U C, Davis

2
Challenging Situations
  • Field Nursery Crops
  • strict nematode control regulations in California
  • efficacy needed to 150 cm
  • crop rescue if nematode management fails

3
Challenging Situations
  • Perennial Crop Replant
  • roots from previous crop can harbor nematodes
    deep in the soil
  • management is needed for more than one season
  • minor failures compound over the life of the
    vineyard or orchard

4
Challenging Situations
  • Ornamental Crops
  • diversity of cropping systems
  • 145 crops/grower at one time
  • short cropping cycle
  • residual activity of pesticides
  • proximity to urban areas

5
Common Issues
  • diversity of soil types
  • diversity of climates
  • diversity of pests pathogens
  • dependence on methyl bromide

6
Potential Solutions
  • new materials
  • new application technologies
  • rescue technologies
  • site-specific management
  • innovative combinations of all tools available

7
New Materials
  • covered previously by Dr. Rodriquez-Kabana
  • Performance in perennial, nursery, and
    ornamental systems will be presented

8
Application Technologies
  • Drip Irrigation Systems as a delivery vehicle
    for fumigants
  • closed system
  • use water to move emulsified materials
  • adapt to distribution pattern needed
  • bed vs. broadcast
  • shallow vs. deep
  • post-plant applications of supplemental materials

9
Optimization of Drip Fumigation
Dr. Husein Ajwa
  • application rate minimum efficacious rate for
    drip fumigation vs. shank injection
  • amount of irrigation water needed for optimum
    distribution of fumigants in various soils
  • drip tape configurations (emitter discharge rate,
    emitter spacing, and drip tape spacing)
  • combination of fumigants at reduced rates
  • impermeable film (VIF) vs standard PE mulch
  • pre-irrigation, initial soil water content

10
Drip Application Equipment
Flow meter
Nitrogen cylinder
Injection port
Water meter
Static mixer
11
Micro gas chromatograph with a multi-port
sampling valve
12
(No Transcript)
13
InLine (1,3-dichloropropene chloropicrin)
  • Monitor 1,3-D distribution in soil when applied
    in different amounts of irrigation water (26, 43,
    61 mm)
  • Monitor 1,3-D distribution when applied under
    standard PE mulch and VIF

14
30 cm
0 cm
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
Metam Sodium (MITC)
  • Monitor MITC distribution in soil when applied as
    metam sodium using three different drip tape flow
    rates
  • low, lt 0.34 gpm/100 ft
  • med, 0.67 gpm/100 ft
  • high, gt 1.00 gpm/100 ft

18
(No Transcript)
19
Recommendations for drip fumigation
  • To achieve greater fumigant distribution
  • uniformity
  • increase the amount of irrigation water
  • 1.5-2 inches for loam and sandy loam soils
  • 2-2.5 inches for loamy sand and sandy soils
  • use medium flow rate drip tape (soil type?)
  • 0.5-.67 gpm/100 ft for sandy loamy soils
  • use impermeable film
  • if it is available or affordable

20
Field Trials
Vineyard Replant 3 years after treatment
Grape Nursery
Rose
21
Grapevine Nursery Trial - 2001
22
The California Code of Regulations
  • makes it mandatory that nursery stock for farm
    planting be commercially clean with respect to
    economically important nematodes.

23
Experimental Design
  • 85-year-old nematode-infested Thompson Seedless
    vineyard
  • 11 treatments
  • 5 replications

24
Treatments
  • Untreated Control
  • Methyl Bromide (448 kg/ha), Treated Control
  • Shank Iodomethane Pic (224 224 kg/ha)
  • Shank Propargyl Bromide (202 kg/ha)
  • Drip Iodomethane Pic (224 224 kg/ha), water
    cap
  • Drip Propargyl Bromide (202 kg/ha), water cap
  • Drip InLine (468 L/ha)
  • Metam sodium (vapam, 243 L/ha) cap
  • Drip Pic (448 kg/ha)
  • Metam sodium (vapam, 243 L/ha) cap
  • Drip Azide (336 kg/ha), tarped
  • Drip Azide (336 kg/ha), water cap
  • Microspray Metam sodium (vapam, 243 L/ha)

25
Shanked Treatments
  • Shanks 45 cm deep
  • Shanks 1.8m apart
  • tarped

26
(No Transcript)
27
Drip Treatments
  • Broadcast
  • Drip tape
  • 25 cm deep
  • 60 cm apart
  • Medium flow
  • 90 cm water

28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
Caps on Drip Treatments
  • Applied through microsprays
  • 2.4m x 4.6m spacing
  • Water (15 cm)
  • Metam sodium (Vapam 243 L/ha)

32
Nematode Populations at Planting
33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
Nematode Populations after One Growing Season
37
Thompson Seedless Fall 2001
38
Vineyard Replant TrialPlanted 1998
39
Experimental Design
  • 65 year-old nematode-infested Thompson Seedless
    vineyard
  • Randomized complete block, 5 reps

40
Treatments
  • Untreated Control
  • Methyl Bromide, 448 kg/ha
  • Shank Iodomethane, 448 kg/ha
  • Drip Telone II EC (327 L/ha in 60 mm water)metam
    sodium (vapam, 243 L/ha) cap
  • Drip Telone II EC (327 L/ha in 100 mm
    water)metam sodium (vapam, 243 L/ha) cap
  • 1-Year Fallow
  • 1-Year Fallow sudac cover crop

41
Variety/Rootstock
  • Thompson Seedless,
  • own-rooted
  • Merlot on Harmony
  • Merlot on Teleki 5C

42
 
Nematodes 3.5 years after treatment
Shank Treatments applied Apr 1998. Drip
Treatments applied Jan 1998. Samples collected
Oct 2001.
43
Long Term Fallow/ Vineyard Replant TrialPlanted
in 2000
44
Experimental Design
  • Vines Removed
  • Winter 1999 untreated control
  • Winter 1998 1 year fallow
  • Winter 1997 2 year fallow
  • Winter 1996 3 year fallow
  • Vines replanted June 2000

45
Effect of Long-term Fallow on Rootknot Nematode
in a Vineyard Replant
46
Effect of Long-term Fallow on Citrus Nematode in
a Vineyard Replant
47
Rose Nursery Field TrialJackson Perkins
  • Wasco
  • Initiated Fall, 2001

48
Rose Nursery Treatments
  • Controls
  • Untreated control
  • Methyl bromide check 392 kg/ha
  • Shanked Treatments
  • MIDAS - 30 Iodomethane/70chloropicrin, 448
    kg/ha
  • Telone C35 with tarp 449 L/ha
  • Telone C35, no tarp 449 L/ha
  • Dripped Treatments
  • InLine, 468 L/ha
  • Telone EC, 327 L/ha
  • Chloropicrin high rate, 448 kg/ha
  • Chloropicrin low rate, 224 kg/ha
  • Chloropicrin, split application - 224 kg/ha 224
    kg/ha 7 days later
  • MIDAS - 30 Iodomethane/70chloropicrin, 448
    kg/ha
  • MIDAS - 50 Iodomethane/50chloropicrin, 336
    kg/ha
  • Metam sodium, drip, 701 L/ha
  • Iota (a biological)

49
Rose Nursery Trial Soil pH
30
60
90
120
150
50
Rose Nursery Trial Nematodes - 0-30 cm
51
Rose Nursery Trial Nematodes 60-90 cm
52
Rose Nursery Trial Nematodes 120-150 cm
53
How do you save the nursery crop if your nematode
management wasnt perfect?
54
Rescue Technologies
Dr. Becky Westerdahl
  • Hot water dips for dormant perennial and bulb
    crops

55
HOT WATER TREATMENTS FOR NEMATODE MANAGEMENT IN
FRUIT TREE ROOTSTOCKS
  • 1997 - 2001 TREATED 6 ROOTSTOCKS
  • MYROBALAN 29C, MARIANNA 2624, LOVELL, NEMAGUARD,
    PARADOX, ENGLISH
  • 5 TEMPERATURES
  • 43.3, 46.1, 48.9, 51.7, 54.4 C
  • 5 LENGTHS OF TREATMENT PLUS UNTREATED
  • 5 REPLICATES
  • EVALUATE
  • SURVIVAL, VIGOR, TRUNK CIRCUMFERANCE
  • PLANTED AT USDA STATION

B. Westerdahl, UC Davis
56
1998 - 2001 TREATMENTS
B. Westerdahl, UC Davis
57
1998 Hot Water Treatment Paradox Walnut
TRUNK DIAMETER INCREASE (INCHES) in 2000
B. Westerdahl, UC Davis
58
Effect of Hot Water Treatments on Rootknot
Nematode
120
MELOIDOGYNE JAVANICA
100
43.3C
80
46.1C
48.9C
60
PERCENT MORTALITY
40
ERROR BARS INDICATE 1 STANDARD ERROR
20
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
MINUTES
B. Westerdahl, UC Davis
59
Conclusions
  • Good distribution of effective concentrations of
    emulsified formulations of fumigants can be
    achieved using drip application technologies

60
Conclusions
  • Drip applied 1,3-D and shank applied iodomethane
    have controlled rootknot nematode as well as
    methyl bromide up to 3.5 years after treatment
  • Efficacy of long term fallow is dependent on the
    nematode genera present in the field

61
Conclusions
  • Efficacy of resistant rootstock depends on the
    diversity of the nematode population
  • Drip application of some currently available
    materials and shank and drip application of some
    new materials achieved nematode control to a
    depth of 150cm
  • Field conditions at the time of application will
    influence efficacy

62
Conclusions
  • Rescue technologies, such as hot water dips, are
    an important tool in the production of clean
    planting material from field grown nurseries

63
Conclusion
  • Integrated management strategies that make use
    of innovative technologies, new materials,
    resistant rootstocks, cultural practices and
    post-plant introductions of beneficial organisms
    offer hope for addressing Challenging Situations

64
Acknowledgements
  • California Fruit Tree, Nut Tree, and Grapevine
    Improvement Advisory Board
  • Sunridge Nursery
  • Jackson Perkins Roses
  • L.E. Cooke Nursery
  • Tri-Cal
  • Tomen Agro
  • Dow Agro Sciences
  • AmVac
  • Albemarle
  • Cal Agri Products
  • HarborChem

65
Thank you!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com