Moving Lectures Out of the Classroom to Make Room for Learning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Moving Lectures Out of the Classroom to Make Room for Learning

Description:

[A] person full of ... stubborn notions ... case studies, games. Active, collaborative, ... Downloads any materials that have been posted for use in-class ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: carl118
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Moving Lectures Out of the Classroom to Make Room for Learning


1
Moving Lectures Out of the Classroom to Make Room
for Learning
  • Carl R. F. Lund
  • Dept. of Chemical and Biological Engineering
  • UB TLC Teaching Effectiveness Workshop Series
  • April 7, 2008

2
Conversation at a Faculty Meeting
  • Professor A I cant believe this years junior
    class. They dont know how to insert a topic
    from a pre-requisite course!
  • Professor B Thats inexcusable. I covered that
    in detail in name the pre-requisite course
  • General conversation that follows cites probable
    reasons including laziness, not as good as they
    used to be, shouldnt be here, todays work
    ethic, the media, primary education system,
    parents, society, name some other department
    that teaches a service course, current cultural
    context,

3
Questions Raised by that Conversation
  • Why dont the engineering faculty question the
    effectiveness of their teaching methods?
  • What teaching methods are they using?
  • Which alternative methods are more effective?
  • Why dont the engineering faculty change their
    teaching methods?
  • What is being done to foster change in
    engineering teaching methods?
  • What else could be done to foster change in
    engineering teaching methods?
  • How would it work?

4
Caveats and Disclaimers
  • I am not trained as an educator
  • My research activities have not been in the field
    of education Im not an education specialist
  • Most of the information presented here is my
    opinion or based upon my personal observation
  • When I actually rely on the literature, Ill try
    to point it out
  • The frame of reference for the presentation is
    engineering education
  • I believe much of the content would transfer well
    to other fields

5
Why dont Engineering Faculty Question the
Effectiveness of their Teaching Methods?
  • They are trained engineers, not trained educators
  • Traditional lecture format is all they know
  • Unaware that more effective methods exist
  • Arrogance and/or skepticism
  • Traditional lecture format was good enough for
    me its good enough for them
  • Alternative methods are another education fad
  • Fear that the answer would require change
  • Dont know how to change
  • Dont have time to change
  • Laziness, not as good as they used to be,
    shouldnt be here, todays work ethic, the media,
    primary education system, parents, society, name
    some other department that teaches a service
    course, current cultural context,

6
Engineering Educations Reliance upon the
Traditional Lecture Format
  • National Center for Education Statistics (2001)
  • 87.7 of engineering faculty used lectures as an
    instructional approach in classes they taught
  • 5 indicated the use of methods other than
    lecture, seminar, lab or field work
  • Wirt, J., S. Choy, D. Gerald, S. Provasnik, P.
    Rooney, S. Watanabe, R. Tobin, and M. Glander,
    The Condition of Education 2001, B. Kridl and A.
    Livingston, Editors. National Center for
    Education Statistics, U. S. Dept. of Ed., Office
    of Educational Research and Improvement
    Washington, DC. p. 309, 2001.

7
When does Learning Occur when the Traditional
Lecture Format is Used?
  • The fact is that what routinely goes on in most
    college classes is not teaching and learning, but
    stenography professor transcribes notes from
    notebook to chalkboard, students transcribe from
    chalkboard back to notebook. Even if the notes
    are supplemented with all sorts of insightful
    commentary, research shows that students in
    lectures generally retain a reasonable percentage
    only of what they hear in the first ten minutes
    and relatively little of anything that happens
    thereafter. They really only learn by thinking
    and doing, not watching and listening.
  • Richard Felder, It Goes Without Saying, Chem.
    Engr. Education 25(3), 132-133 (1991).
  • Students then go off on their own and work on
    questions assigned as homework.
  • Heres where they get to do some thinking and
    doing, that is learning
  • The professor isnt (immediately) available to
    help and guide them as they do
  • If homework isnt carefully chosen and if
    students arent conscientious in doing it, many
    may never move beyond the lower three levels of
    Blooms taxonomy (know, comprehend and apply)

8
Which Alternative Methods are More Effective
(when used properly)?
  • Active Learning Methods
  • Michael Prince, Does Active Learning Work? A
    Review of the Research, J. Engr. Education
    93(3), 223-231 (2004).
  • Active Learning
  • Collaborative Learning
  • Cooperative Learning
  • Problem-Based Learning
  • Implementations of these also incorporate
  • Inquiry-Based Experimentation or Learning
  • Learning Games or Contests
  • Case Study Approach

9
Questions Raised by that Conversation
  • Why dont the engineering faculty question the
    effectiveness of their teaching methods?
  • What teaching methods are they using?
  • Which alternative methods are more effective?
  • Why dont the engineering faculty change their
    teaching methods?
  • What is being done to foster change in
    engineering teaching methods?
  • What else could be done to foster change in
    engineering teaching methods?
  • How would it work?

10
Why Dont Engineering Faculty Change their
Teaching Methods?
  • Curmudgeons
  • A person full of stubborn notions
  • Alternative teaching methods are the latest
    educational fad
  • Skeptics
  • Honestly question the efficacy of alternative
    teaching methods
  • Havent examined the relevant literature or dont
    believe its findings
  • Practical, time-pressured majority
  • Very interested in being a more effective teacher
  • But not if it consumes more of their time than
    the lecture format
  • Efficient
  • Return on time investment (career advancement,
    etc.) is greater for time spent in research and
    creative activity
  • Comfortable
  • Lecture notes are already developed and refined
  • They learned via traditional lectures and feel
    comfortable with it
  • Quite possibly already recognized as a good
    teacher while using the traditional lecture
    format

11
What is being done to Foster Change in
Engineering Teaching Methods?
  • NRC Community of Education Scholars also
    National Academy, Project Kaleidoscope
  • Evaluating and Improving Undergraduate Teaching.
    M.A. Fox and N. Hackerman, eds. The National
    Academies Press, Washington DC 2003.
  • Recommendations for Action in Support of
    Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering
    and Mathematics, 2002. Available from
    http//www.pkal.org/documents/ReportonReports.pdf
    .
  • Improving Undergraduate Instruction in Science,
    Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Report
    of a Workshop. R.A. McCray, R.L. DeHaan, and
    J.A. Schuck, eds. The National Academies Press,
    Washington, DC 2003.
  • Meets the needs (addresses the fears) of those
    who
  • want to change and
  • have time to change but
  • dont know how to change
  • Not necessarily a proactive approach
  • Relies on individual initiative by faculty

12
What Could be done to Foster Change in
Engineering Teaching Methods?
  • Stop writing and using textbooks replace them
    with TExTs
  • TExT (Toolkit for Exceptional Teaching) Project
    (NSF CCLI)
  • Comprehensive course delivery package
  • Incorporate components used traditionally
  • Lectures delivered outside of class time via
    video
  • Learning activities for class time and beyond
  • Detailed lesson plans
  • Necessary resources
  • Assessment instruments
  • Integrated, yet extensible
  • Goals
  • Teach using effective methods with time
    investment comparable to traditional lecture
    format
  • Increase teacher comfort with methods
  • Use a variety of proven active learning
    approaches that are properly implemented
  • (Long term) topic-specific TExT communities that
    bring education specialists, subject-area
    specialists, and teachers together

13
How Would a TExT-Based Course Work?
  • Students
  • Written Materials
  • Learning Objectives
  • Readings
  • Examples
  • Solutions
  • Exams Homework for current year and past
  • Handouts, additional solved unsolved
    assignments
  • Assignments
  • Video Materials
  • Lectures
  • Examples Lectures
  • Computational Tools
  • Professors
  • Student Materials
  • Slides for in-class Review of Readings
  • Learning Activities
  • Several for each reading topic
  • Detailed lesson plan and list of necessary
    supplies
  • Variety of approaches
  • Inquiry, case studies, games
  • Active, collaborative, cooperative, problem-based
  • Assessment Instruments
  • Student Learning
  • Teaching Methods

14
A Mini-Example using Kineticsto Illustrate How
One CanMove Lectures Out of the Classroom to
Make Room for Learning
15
Before Class
  • Professor
  • Assigns one or more study units for this class
  • Downloads review slides for the unit
  • Reviews the subject matter and selects
  • (optional) pre-class assessment instrument
  • Learning activities to be used in class
  • Reviews lesson plans for selected activities
  • Gathers necessary supplies and resources that
    will be used in class
  • (optional) combines slides for review, assessment
    and activities into one PowerPoint presentation
  • Students
  • Downloads
  • Written objectives, reading and examples
  • Video information and examples
  • Reads written materials and views video materials
  • Write down questions or notes any points that
    they didnt understand so they can ask in class
  • Downloads any materials that have been posted for
    use in-class
  • PowerPoint presentation that the professor will
    use in class
  • Computational tools for class
  • Examines in-class materials
  • Prepare for possible quiz

16
First Bump in the Road
  • Engineering students are pre-conditioned to the
    lecture format
  • Majority DO NOT read assignments before class
  • Used to professor telling them whats important
  • Then theyll just read that part, and often only
    if they didnt understand the lecture
  • Only read if professor has reputation for testing
    on things not covered in class
  • Many never read the textbook (except as discussed
    later)
  • Must form different habits in TExT-based course
  • Pre-class assessments (quizzes) - especially
    early in the course
  • Still doesnt work for some
  • Students present the review at the start of class
  • Pre-assigned, or called on in class
  • Im open to any and all ideas!!!

17
Further Thoughts on Student Motivation
  • Students wont come to class prepared unless they
    find some benefit to doing so
  • If one uses all kinds of learning activities in
    class that cause students to think at higher
    levels (analysis, synthesis, evaluation)
  • But then assigns homework and gives exams that
    only requires thinking at the lower levels (know,
    comprehend, apply)
  • Then some (many?) students will find they can
    succeed just as they do in the traditional
    lectures
  • Find an example similar to the problem at hand
    and mimic that example
  • So some fraction of the out of class and exam
    work must require higher level thinking like that
    used in the learning activities
  • To succeed here, students need to mimic the
    learning activities, and to do that, they need to
    participate in the learning activities, and to do
    that, they need to come to class prepared.

18
In Class
  • Class starts with a review of the topics they
    should have read and heard about prior to class
  • Opportunity for students to question and seek
    clarification
  • Optionally administer a brief quiz
  • Trivial for those who read and listened to
    provided materials
  • Motivational for those who didnt
  • Lowest level of Blooms taxonomy (know
    understand)
  • First learning activity
  • Might incorporate or end in a mini-lecture that
    summarizes, draws out salient points, annotates,
    etc.
  • Second learning activity (usually of a different
    type than the first)
  • Might continue after class in the form of a
    homework assignment
  • Optional Summary of Class

19
Variety in Learning Activities
  • Appeal to different types of learners (auditory,
    sensory, etc.)
  • Repeated use of one type of activity may not be
    any more effective than repeated use of the
    traditional lecture
  • Maintains student interest
  • Or at least wards of student boredom
  • Some individual, some group

20
Types of Learning Activities
  • Object Lessons
  • Collision theory using ping-pong balls
  • Rate limiting step dealing cards
  • One minute papers or memos
  • Small group problem solving
  • In seats, all groups at board
  • Explanation of solution to rest of class
  • Teams - contest, buzz in when disagree
  • Professor presenting solution
  • One group presenting if buzzer is correct,
    they take over
  • Debate or panel discussion
  • Three-slide presentations

21
Types of Learning Activities
  • Case studies
  • Facilitated through a series of learning
    activities that span a period of time as long as
    the whole semester
  • Can be structured as inquiry-based
  • Simulators
  • Inquiry-based activities
  • Data gathering for subsequent analysis
  • Explain why the system responded as it did

22
Second Bump in the Road
  • Many students have been quite successful without
    ever thinking at the higher levels of Blooms
    Taxonomy
  • Typical student methodologies when presented with
    a problem to solve
  • Find a solved problem in the notes, book, old
    exams, etc.
  • Mimic that solution
  • In many cases, dont recognize that the problems
    are different
  • Find equations that contain the same quantities
    that are given in the problem statement and use
    those equations
  • Go to office hours, without any written attempt
    at the problem and state I cant figure out how
    to solve
  • Starting in class, and continuing after it,
    students must be challenged to think
  • Explain, in physical terms and without equations,
    what will happen when.
  • Give problem statements that include lots of
    extraneous quantities
  • Whenever approached by a student (train yourself
    AND YOUR TAs to)
  • Ask to see what theyve done so far
  • Ask them what they think they should do next
  • Confirm or guide them to the correct action
  • Tell them to do that (right there in your office
    if they want) and then come back if still stuck

23
After Class, Before Exams and Beyond
  • Students
  • Written Materials
  • Learning Objectives
  • Readings
  • Examples
  • Solutions
  • Exams Homework for current year and past
  • Handouts, additional solved unsolved
    assignments
  • Assignments
  • Video Materials
  • Lectures
  • Examples Lectures
  • Computational Tools
  • Professors
  • Student Materials
  • Slides for in-class Review of Readings
  • Learning Activities
  • Several for each reading topic
  • Detailed lesson plan and list of necessary
    supplies
  • Variety of approaches
  • Inquiry, case studies, games
  • Active, collaborative, cooperative, problem-based
  • Assessment Instruments
  • Student Learning
  • Teaching Methods

24
The Key Difference
  • Traditional Lecture Format
  • Before Class
  • ?
  • In Class
  • Knowledge
  • Comprehension
  • ?Application
  • After Class
  • Application
  • Analysis
  • Synthesis
  • Evaluation
  • TExT-Based Format
  • Before Class
  • Knowledge
  • Comprehension
  • ? Application
  • In Class
  • Application
  • Analysis
  • Synthesis
  • Evaluation
  • After Class
  • Higher level thinking persists

25
Student Feedback
  • 2006 and 2007 classes were taught partially using
    the TExT materials and partially using the
    traditional lecture format
  • 43 Anonymous responses to student course
    evaluations
  • 19 responses listed the TExT materials (pre-class
    readings and videos) as an aspect of the course
    they liked while only one listed it as a dislike
  • 9 responses mentioned the active learning
    activities as a like none listed it as a dislike
  • 17 responses suggested that the last part of the
    course (traditional lectures) should be taught
    the same way the first part was taught (TExT)
  • 1 response suggested the opposite that the
    course should be taught using a traditional
    lecture format
  • 5 responses listed the written materials as a
    like and the video materials as a dislike or vice
    versa
  • no responses that expressed dissatisfaction with
    the TExT approach
  • positive responses about the teaching methods,
    for example easy to learn, and great learning
    environment

26
Final Thoughts
  • If Ive been preaching to the congregation
  • Moving lectures out of the classroom can be
    highly effective if
  • They (or an equivalent) still occur before class
  • They are replaced by learning
  • The goal is to foster higher-level thinking
  • If Ive been preaching to the preachers
  • Consider initiating or participating in the
    creation of a TExT in your area of expertise
  • Make it just as easy for a teacher to (properly)
    use more effective methods as it is to lecture.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com