Automatic generation of pedagogical website structures by using IMS LD netUniversit - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Automatic generation of pedagogical website structures by using IMS LD netUniversit

Description:

Ecaterina Pacurar Giacomini, PhilippeTrigano. UMR CNRS 6599 Heudiasyc ... Undelete the selected node; Undelete the selected node and all its sub-trees. 29 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: norbert83
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Automatic generation of pedagogical website structures by using IMS LD netUniversit


1
Automatic generation of pedagogical website
structures by using IMS LDnetUniversité web
portalCEPIAH Project
  • Ecaterina Pacurar Giacomini, PhilippeTrigano
  • UMR CNRS 6599 Heudiasyc research laboratory,
  • University of Technology of Compiègne, FRANCE

2
Plan
  • The CEPIAH project Context and Problem statement
  • netUniversité Conception Framework
  • netUniversité Presentation of the Prototype
  • Conclusions and Perspectives

3
Context and Problem statement (1)
  • Origin of our work the CEPIAH project
  • Our research concerns the development of a web
    portal designed to provide support in the
    creation of educational web sites based on
    pedagogical scenarios represented in IMS LD
  • Our application is a tool that helps staff with
    no skills in web development to design their
    educational web sites

4
Context and Problem statement(2)
  • The origin of the CEPIAH project
  • This research has its roots in the CEPIAH project
    (Design and Evaluation of Interactive Documents
    for Human Learning) developed within our research
    team.
  • In this project we developed an interactive guide
    accessible on the web, composed of three modules
    Design help, Evaluation help and Predefined web
    sites models
  • The main role of these three modules is to guide
    the users (teachers, pedagogical designer) who
    have web development skills Trigano Giacomini,
    2004.

5
Context and Problem statement(3)
  • Interviews with people involved in teaching
    within the UTC
  • After a first validation of CEPIAH guide, we had
    a some discussions with teachers of various
    disciplines at the UTC. These helped us to
    understand their teaching practices their
    opinions regarding the software tools used in web
    development.
  • Observations
  • We observed that a majority of the teachers
    expressed a reserve in using these tools. This
    attitude was due, either to a lack of time
    necessary to develop online courses or a lack of
    technical skill (from a teaching and technical
    point of view).

6
Context and Problem statement(4)
  • New research line
  • All these aspects led to the development of our
    interactive guide CEPIAH, an environment that
    assists the design of educational web sites
    (online courses) in order to support teachers who
    do not have web development skills
  • netUniversité The new functionalities are
    integrated into a web portal, called
    netUniversité, as found in the CEPIAH guide.
  • Environment for online courses assisted
    conception
  • Based on the dynamic generation of course
    structures

7
Plan
  • Context and problematic
  • netUniversité conception framework
  • Dynamic generation
  • netUniversité presentation of prototype
  • Conclusions and perspectives

8
netUniversité conception framework
Online course generator
Course basis
Edit Administrate
Navigator
  • Use of IMS LD for the representation of
    pedagogical contents

9
Plan
  • Context and problematic
  • Research goals
  • netUniversity general background
  • Dynamic generation
  • Questionnaires design steps
  • Knowledge based modelling
  • netUniversity presentation of the prototype
  • Conclusions and perspectives

10
Questionnaires design steps Dynamic generation
  • Pedagogical questionnaire (1)
  • Our pedagogical questionnaire makes it possible
    for the user to dynamically choose the
    pedagogical elements that will be integrated in
    his or her educational Web site. This
    questionnaire is structured on three levels of
    granularity a question itself, its reformulation
    as well as an elaboration of this question.
  • Analysis of 175 teaching websites from the point
    of view of the  course content (University of
    Technology of Compiègne)
  • Bibliographic study related to the Instructional
    Theory Ch. Reigheluth, 1987, 1999.
  • Interviews with people involved in teaching at
    UTC

11
Questionnaires design steps Dynamic generation
  • Pedagogical questionnaire (2)
  • Specific type of pedagogical scenarios ?
  • Classic scenario with a presentation of the
    theoretical concepts and solutions to exercises
  • Problem solving scenario integrating an
    individual or collaborative work, with progression
  • Project based learning   type of scenario,
    based on collaborative and/or an individual work
  • This helped us to draw up the items in the
    pedagogical questionnaire related to the
    generation of structures

12
Pedagogical questionnaire
  • Example of question pedagogical questionnaire
  • At the elaboration phase of the questionnaire, we
    present a short synthesis of the theoretical
    concepts of teaching and training, connected to
    this question. We also explain the results of a
    particular answer on the final course structure.

13
Questionnaires design steps Dynamic generation
  • Questionnaire regarding the graphic interface
  • The analysis of 175 pedagogical websites from the
     graphical interface point of view enabled us
    to determine various types of possible
    interfaces. Several criteria are taken into
    account navigation starting from the menus, the
    shapes of the buttons of navigation within the
    various pages of the web site, the colors of the
    menus, the buttons, etc.

composition
choice
14
Graphical interface questionnaire
  • Starting from this typology we designed a
    questionnaire, called web site interface
    questionnaire, that facilitates the choice of the
    final web site GUI attributes.
  • Example of question - questionnaire regarding the
    graphical issues

15
Plan
  • Context and problematic
  • Research goals
  • netUniversity general background
  • Dynamic generation
  • Questionnaires design steps
  • Knowledge base modelling
  • netUniversité presentation of the prototype
  • Conclusions and perspectives

16
Knowledge base modelling Dynamic generation
  • Knowledge Base
  • The problem of the complexity of the conditions
    used for the
  • automatic generation lead us to a
    knowledge-based system.
  • The number of entries (represented by the
    possibilities of
  • response to the questionnaires) and the great
    number of pedagogical
  • course structures obtained resulted in the
    development of a rules-
  • based system.
  • Content Rules, Facts, Responses to
    questionnaires
  • Course Structure Generation
  • use of  pedagogical bricks  represented in
    XML-IMS LD

17
Knowledge base modelling Dynamic generation
  • How are these structures created?
  • Starting from the generated links (JESS facts)
    which are situated between the initial
    pedagogical models, the Course Builder loads
    these initial models and connects them thus
    obtaining the desired course structure.
  • The rules are used in order to generate the
    connections between the
    pedagogical models of the course.

18
Knowledge base modelling Dynamic generation
  • A  link  fact associates a  child  element to
    a  parent element

19
Plan
  • Context and problematic
  • Research goals
  • netUniversity general background
  • Dynamic generation
  • Questionnaires design steps
  • Knowledge base modelling
  • netUniversité presentation of the prototype
  • Conclusions and perspectives

20
netUniversité (1)
  • Web portal the administration, conception and
    display of the online course

21
netUniversité (2)
  • Course Content Editor using IMS LD level A, B and
    C

22
netUniversité (3)
  • Without going into the details, we specify that
    our web portal netUniversité, also integrates a
    QTI editor for interactive exercises. The QTI
    editor can be accessed from the interface of the
    course content IMS LD editor.

The link towards the QTI editor
23
netUniversité (4)
  • Currently, the types of exercises, which we
    propose, are for example fill in the gap, open
    answer, true/false, multiples choices query, etc.

The option to choose many types of exercises
To edit the true response
To edit the false response
24
netUniversité QTI (1)
  • In our tool we implemented a "lite" version of
    this standard that allows the representation of
    the six types of exercises
  • text based exercises, multiple choice,
    true/false, matrices for "single choice", open
    answer (large text area), etc.
  • All the tests represented in this personalized
    version of QTI are also valid for the complete
    version.

25
netUniversité QTI (2)
  • In the "lite" QTI version implemented in our
    tool, a test corresponds to a QTI structure
    "assessment". The test is composed from one or
    more sections of exercises/questions (items).
  • The QTI player
  • The QTI player is implemented as a XSL
    style-sheet. The goal is to display the test
    content in an HTML format conforming to the QTI
    specification

26
netUniversité-QTI (5)
  • Integrating the QTI player in the netUniversité
    navigator (IMS LD player)
  • The IMS LD player considers the QTI XML files
    defining the evaluation tests as simple
    resources.
  • Thus, these files are referenced in the
    resources section of the unit of learning like
    all the resource documents.
  • The IMS LD player differentiates these types of
    resources by using attribute type (in our case
    qti) which specifies where the resource is
    declared.

27
netUniversité (5)
  • Graphic Editor module for modifying the course
    structures
  • Once the teacher generates his course, he cannot
    modify its structure. We would like to give the
    possibility to change the order of the
    activities, to add or delete them.
  • As the project is aimed at teachers who do not
    have experience in using the computer, we have
    decided to set up a graphic editor, which should
    help them to modify the IMS LD course structure.
  • This kind of presentation makes their work much
    easier as it provides, at the same time, an
    overview of the course.

28
netUniversité (6)
  • The user interface within the Graphic Editor (1)

. In the upper part we have a toolbar, providing
support for all operations. The buttons from
left to right are moves selected node one
position to the left moves selected node one
position to the right
  • Adds a new node
  • Marks the selected node for deleting
  • Renames the selected node
  • Save the current configuration
  • Undelete the selected node
  • Undelete the selected node and all its sub-trees.

29
Plan
  • Context and problematic
  • Research goals
  • netUniversity conception framework
  • Dynamic generation
  • Questionnaires design steps
  • Knowledge base modelling
  • netUniversity presentation of the prototype
  • Conclusions and perspectives

30
Conclusions and Perspectives
  • Realisation
  • The first version of netUniversité
  • The integration of levels A, B and C in IMS LD
  • Ongoing work
  • Test and make corrections to the first version of
    netUniversité
  • Test of QTI editor (version lite)
  • Test of a graphic editor in order to be able
  • to interactively modify the course structures

31
Conclusions and Perspectives
  • Integration of the communication tools (email,
    chat, forum)
  • Ongoing work
  • First results obtained
  • Experimenting with the teachers
  • University of Technology of Compiègne, France
  • Polytehnica University of Timisoara, in
    Romania
  • Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, in Romania
  • Institut of High Management Studies (IHEC)
  • from Carthage, Tunis

32
Conclusions and Perspectives
33
netUniversite-QTI (3)
  • Particularly, in the implemented QTI version we
    have two types of evaluation evaluation by
    question and evaluation by response.
  • In the case of evaluation by question we consider
    a total score attributed when all the answers are
    correct. This situation is represented from the
    QTI point of view by only one condition (section
    reprocessing) that sets a certain value to the
    variable score (if the answers are correct).
  • In the other case (evaluation by answer) for each
    answer we add a partial score to the final score.
    From the QTI point of view we define a condition
    each answer to be evaluated. Thus, if an answer
    is correct we add a certain value to the final
    score of the question.

34
netUniversite-QTI (4)
  • After the user includes the desired element into
    the exercise, he can edit the content and specify
    the correct responses.
  • In the case of evaluation by response, he will
    also add the scores for each of the correct
    answers.
  • In order to specify the score the teacher must
    click on the small orange icon associated with
    the correct answer.
  • A gray zone will be displayed, which includes
    an option to define the type of answer (bad or
    correct) and an option to edit the score (in the
    case of correct answer).

35
netUniversité-QTI (6)
  • Integrating the QTI player in the netUniversité
    navigator (IMS LD player)
  • Therefore, the navigator knows (using the
    resource type) that in the central page of the
    course it must display the test represented in
    QTI file, and uses the XSL style-sheet in order
    to transform XML content into HTML.
  • After the user answers all the questions, the
    result of the test is obtained from its answers
    and from the information of score computing for
    each question specified in QTI file.
  • The "Test Processing" module which implements
    this calculation process checks firstly if the
    user has not already complete the test. This
    situation is indicated by the value of the score
    stored in the database.

36
netUniversité (7)
  • The user interface within the Graphic Editor (2)
  • In the lower part there are three views
  • To the left is the main view, here the whole tree
    is represented. For each role we have a tree. We
    shall explain what the tree represents in the
    next paragraph.
  • In the upper right part is the empty tree view.
    The difference compared with the previous one is
    that all nodes are empty and we display only one
    tree.
  • In the lower right part is a view with only a
    node and his child. When we select one in any of
    the previous views it will appear here as a root
    and all his children will be shown.
  • These trees represent a course structure. The
    root has a generic name its the activity for
    that role.
  • To understand how a student will go through the
    course we read the tree from left to right. The
    second level in the tree is made by plays. They
    are a way to organize the course presentation.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com