Title: Management and Reporting of the Federal Public Sector Pension Plans
1Management and Reporting of the Federal Public
Sector Pension Plans
- Presentation by Phil Charko
- November 29, 2006
2Objectives of Presentation
- To provide an overview on the reporting of
federal public sector pension plans and how they
have evolved in the context of - Legislative Requirements
- Accounting Practices
- Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants
(CICA) professional standards
3Types of Pension Plans
- There are two broad categories of employer
sponsored pension plans in Canada - Defined Benefit (DB) plan that promises a
certain level of pension based on salary and
years of service benefits paid to plan members
are not tied to the amount of money contributed
by the plan member there is a defined benefit - Defined Contribution (DC) - pension schemes where
the final entitlement is not certain and
dependant on employee and employer contributions
and investment returns - 40 of working Canadians have access to these
employer sponsored plans
4Defined Benefit Plans
- Todays presentation will focus on Defined
Benefit (DB) plans - Most DB plans are
- Regulated under federal or provincial pension
benefits standards legislation such as the
Federal Pension Benefit Standards Act (PBSA) - Required to be funded with assets set aside and
segregated from the operations of the plan
sponsor to secure payment of future benefits
against possible insolvency of employer - Reported as per CICA standards 3461and Public
Sector Accounting standard 3250
5Uniqueness of Federal Public Sector Pension Plans
- The three large federal public sector pension
plans belong to the defined benefit category - These plans are unique
- They are statutorily exempted from legislation
such as the Federal Pension Benefits Standards
Act (PBSA) - They are legislated
- Public Service Superannuation Act (PSSA)
- Canadian Forces Superannuation Act (CFSA)
- Royal Mounted Canadian Police Superannuation Act
(RCMPSA) - Reporting requirements were first defined in the
Civil Service Superannuation Act (CSSA) of 1924 - Federal public sector plans were not funded prior
to 2000 - Obligation to pay defined benefits established by
legislation and secured by the credit of the
Government of Canada
6Federal Public Sector Pension Plans All Unfunded
Before 2000
- Setting aside of assets determines if a plan is
funded or unfunded - Up to April 2000, the Government relied upon its
ability to raise funds in the future from tax
revenues or external borrowings to pay benefits
as they became due - The Government had not set aside any money into a
separate fund or separate legal entity - The Government did not have a segregated pool of
assets for the payment of pension benefits
These are unfunded pensions in the sense that
assets have not been put aside to pay for the
ultimate pension benefits (Supplementary
Information Observation by the Auditor General,
Public Account, Volume 1, 1996/1997)
7Pre-2000 Pension Account Transactions
- Prior to April 2000, Superannuation Accounts were
used to track transactions and to record an
estimation of the pension liability for each of
the pension plans - These were created as statutory accounts in the
Accounts of Canada and are reported in the Public
Accounts - As required by statute, Superannuation Accounts
were credited with - Employer and employee contributions and pension
transfers - Employer contributions to cover deficits
- Interest on the accounts balances
- Superannuation Accounts were debited with benefit
payments made out of the Consolidated Revenue
Fund (CRF), and pension transfers - The intention was that the net balance of these
Superannuation Accounts approximate the pension
liabilities
Superannuation Account balances are simply
tracking the result of statutory accounting
transactions
8Rationale for Tracking Account
- The Superannuation Accounts tracking approach
was established with two purposes, according to
Walter Riese, Chief Actuary, Government of
Canada, 1969 - Increased disclosure to Canadian taxpayers to
provide reasonably accurate assessment of the
amount of pension obligations as they were
accruing each year - Provided additional protection to plan members so
that future legislators could not argue that
the plan was being operated without adequate
recognition of the financial implications - The use of these accounts led to a great deal of
confusion about the character of the Accounts as
it made them look like they comprised real assets
Even though unfunded, Government records and
reports Superannuation Accounts transactions for
purpose of reporting an approximation of its
pension liabilities
9Overview of Pre-2000 Account Balances
- During the 1970s and 1980s actuarial valuations
indicated that pension liability was higher than
account balances deficit - The legislation required the government to credit
the account to make up for the deficiencies - By the end of 1990s however, amounts credited to
the accounts exceeded government pension
actuarial liabilities excess credited amounts
totalled 33B - Factors Leading To The Excess Credit Amounts
- Legislative inflexibility, for example
- Lengthy period of very high account
interest credits based on simulated (20 year
bond portfolio) - Lower wage increases and inflation rates
than expected - Legislative requirement of full employer
contributions despite excess account credits - Safety margins in the assumptions
Even though legislation made it clear the
government was responsible for covering any
deficits, there were no provisions for
debiting excess credited amounts
10Introduction of Allowance Accounts
- Since the Superannuation Accounts failed to
fairly represent the true liability, the
Auditor-General (AG), qualified his audit opinion
on the Governments financial statements through
the 1980s - In the same period, evolving Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (GAAP) required new
accounting rules to be introduce to better
reflect the governments pension obligation in the
Public Accounts. - In 1990, as provided for under the Financial
Administration Act, allowance accounts were
created that, together with the Superannuation
Accounts, enabled a better reflection of the
actuarial liability for pension benefits in the
Governments financial statement - Accounting standards also required over or
under-estimation of pension liabilities to be
gradually adjusted. The amortization of
actuarial gains resulted in a reduction in annual
pension expense starting in 1990-91 - This change enabled the AG to provide a clean
audit opinion on this aspect
- Allowance Account
- Allowed to report more accurately the actuarial
liability of the plans in the governments
financial statements - Had positive fiscal impact throughout the 90s
because of the amortization of actuarial gains
11Change in Funding Status 1999 Legislation
- In 1999, the Public Sector Pension Investment
Board Act (PSPIBA) was passed by Parliament in
order to improve the financial management of
federal public sector pension funds - Important changes stemming from the PSPIBA to the
pension plans - Establishment of a Pension Fund for each plan,
which provides for the external investments of
contributions pertaining to service after April
1, 2000 - Creation of a Public Sector Pension Investment
Board (PSPIB) to manage the amounts transferred
to it for investment under provisions under the
Plans - The Government remains solely responsible for
assuming any shortfalls between the pension funds
and the actuarial liability as well as between
the obligation recorded in the Account and the
actuarial liability
121999 PSSA Amendments
- In 1999, amendments were made to the Public
Service Superannuation Act (PSSA), notably - Pensions became calculated on best of five years
instead of best of six years - The new act authorized the President of the
Treasury Board to debit the Accounts in order to
reduce the amount of certain excess credit
balances in the Superannuation Accounts - The 1999 amendments also made improvements to
certain benefits, such as the supplementary death
benefit
13Statutory Accounting and GAAP
- The legislation governing the Superannuation
Accounts specified the debits and credits to the
Accounts - It did not anticipate all situations and possible
corrections that may have been required to adjust
the balance of the Accounts to fairly reflect
the liability - Although the Accounts were intended to record the
liability, they include amounts calculated using
methodologies that differ from normal accounting
process (e.g. Government contribution and
interest credited on the Account balances) - This creates distortion from normal GAAP results
- Accounting is adjusted centrally to GAAP, using
allowance and provision accounts under S.64 of
FAA to record and present the pension liability
in the financial statements (FS)
14Pension Accounts vs GAAP Presentation
- Pension Accounts Balance
- (-) allowance
-
- Net Book Value of liability
- Table 6.17 in Section 6, V 1 in the Public
Accounts
- Actuarial value of liability
- Less Plan assets
- net pension liability
- (-) unamortized gains or (losses)
- Net Book Value of liability
- Note 7 to FS, Section 2, V1 in the Public
Accounts
15Main differences in expenses
- Accounts (Statutory)
- Government Contributions
- Admin cost recovered
- Deficit funding
- Crediting of excess
- Interest credits on balance of account
- GAAP
- Current service cost
- Amortization of gains and losses
- Plan amendment cost
- Accelerated amortization
- Eliminate internal RCA tax
- Interest on average actuarial liability
- Less expected return on plan assets
16Pre and Post April 2000 Differences
- Pre April 2000 service
- Liability 1.3 / 2 per year of service
- Liability recognized in GOC Financial statements
- No assets set aside
- Pension liability
- Post April 2000 service
- Liability 1.3 / 2 per year of service
- Liability recognized in GOC Financial statements
- Less assets invested through Investment Board
- Pension liability
- The difference resides in how the liability is
presented in the financial statements of the GOC
either gross or net of assets - The 1999 amendments did not affect the way the
liability accrues for the GOC - It also did not affect pension benefits that are
to be paid to employees
17Conclusion
- Legislative requirements, accounting practices
and professional standards have shaped the
evolution and reporting of federal public sector
pension plans - Challenges impacting reporting include
- Complex and evolving CICA PBSA standards
- Hybrid nature of plans
- Improving disclosure
- Communicating pension plans to plan members is a
priority and this should include information on
the funding and reporting of the plans - Pension Portal www.pensionandbenefits.gc.ca
18(No Transcript)