Title: Tax and Business Related Considerations for Private Equity and Other Investment Funds
1Tax and Business Related Considerations for
Private Equity and Other Investment Funds
- Jonathan W. DePriest
- Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams Aughtry
- Tax Executive Institute Denver Chapter
- Federal Tax Day December 10, 2013
2Basic Structures PE Funds
- Structure of the PE fund itself will depend upon
the nature of its investors - US domestic taxable
- US domestic tax-exempt
- Foreign (and from which jurisdictions)
- AND the nature of its target (investee) portfolio
companies - Foreign/Non-US
- Domestic C Corporation
- Domestic Partnership
3Basic Structures for PE Funds
Principals/ Individuals
Non-U.S. Investors
Certain Non-U.S. Investors, and U.S. Investors
Manager Partnership or S Corporation
Management G.P.
Feeder Corporation (Non-U.S.)
x and carried interest
Partnership
Fee for management services
Target Investments
4Basic Structures for PE Funds
- Investor Tax Issues
- Non-US Investors
- Avoid ECI
- Avoid FIRPTA
- Avoid filing US returns
- Results often in using a foreign blocker
usually organized in a tax haven jurisdiction - Parallel and co-investment structures often
necessary
5Basic Structures for PE Funds
- Investor Tax Issues Continued
- US domestic taxable investors
- PE fund itself should not bear tax
- Pass-through of capital gains and losses
- Minimization of phantom income
- No reporting obligations or tax payment
obligations in non-US jurisdictions (or if
incurred, ability to use foreign tax credit) - Avoid investing in CFCs (parallel foreign
partnership structure for non-US investments)
6Basic Structures for PE Funds
- Investor Tax Issues Continued
- US domestic tax-exempt investors
- Avoid investments in operating partnerships
(UBTI) - Avoid unrelated debt-financed income (UDFI)
- Avoid fees for services (UBTI)
- Avoid certain insurance income
7Basic Structures for PE Funds
- Use of Swaps
- Blocker companies interpose additional level of
tax - Use of total return swap (TRS)
- Investor puts up cash collateral for a notional
investment, and typically pays interest on the
notional amount (sometimes net of collateral) - Institutional counterparty will hedge with
investment notional amount in PE fund - Desire for full collateralization risks
recharacterization
8Basic Structures for PE Funds
- Use of Swaps Continued
- Industry Director Directive (IDD) on use of TRS
by foreign investors - Avoids 30 withholding tax
- Likely too risky
- Use of TRS by US TEIs
- Fairly common for private funds of MLPs
- Applicable to PE funds
9Basic Structures for PE Funds
- Management Fees and Carried Interests
- Limited partnership to receive management fees
1 LLC general partner subject to self-employment
tax, limited partnership exception under Section
1402(a)(13) for LP share - Investment entity to invest the managers capital
commitment and receive carried interest,
exceptions for self-employment tax under Section
1402(a)(2) and (3)
10Corporate vs. Partnership Structures for Target
(Investee) Portfolio Companies held by PE Funds
- Corporate is more traditional, and frankly
presents fewer issues - Investment by PE Fund in US domestic C
corporation often takes the form of preferred
stock - Possible combination with debt
11Corporate vs. Partnership Structures for Target
(Investee) Portfolio Companies held by PE Funds
- Typical features of Preferred Stock
- Dividends
- Liquidation Preference
- Redemption Rights
- Conversion rights and related anti-dilution
protections
12Corporate vs. Partnership Structures for Target
(Investee) Portfolio Companies held by PE Funds
- Preferred Stock Dividends
- Cash
- Payment-in-kind (PIK)
- Cumulative or Compounding
- When as and if declared by the Board will
generally mean taxable upon receipt - Automatic increase to the liquidation preference
generally means taxable as they accrue
13Corporate vs. Partnership Structures for Target
(Investee) Portfolio Companies held by PE Funds
- Preferred Stock Dividends
- Treatment of Preferred Stock as tax common by
adding participating features - Double dip participation in dividends with
common on as-if converted basis - Participation on liquidation of the greater of
liquidation preference or what holder would be
entitled to receive on as-if converted basis
14Corporate vs. Partnership Structures for Target
(Investee) Portfolio Companies held by PE Funds
- Tax Common
- Allows deferral of tax on PIK dividend
- Avoids OID issues with redemption premium
15Corporate vs. Partnership Structures for Target
(Investee) Portfolio Companies held by PE Funds
- Traditional LTEIPs are more easily accomplished
- Most are familiar with qualified stock options
- PE views on vesting, forfeiture, Liquidity Events
- Sale of company vs. IPO
16Corporate vs. Partnership Structures for Target
(Investee) Portfolio Companies held by PE Funds
- Partnership is more and more prevalent among
operating companies and their owners, and from
the private equity funds perspective presents
conflicts among - U.S. domestic taxable investors
- U.S. tax-exempt investors
- Foreign investors
17Corporate vs. Partnership Structures for Target
(Investee) Portfolio Companies held by PE Funds
- Debt Contingent Interest
- Expressed as the greater of a fixed percentage
interest rate or contingent interest - Contingent interest expressed as a percentage of
adjusted gross revenue - Not unlike the NPI discussed below
- UBIT Avoidance for TEIs
18Corporate vs. Partnership Structures for Target
(Investee) Portfolio Companies held by PE Funds
- Preferred Equity in a Partnership
- Allocations of taxable income to support
preferred return upon liquidation (liquidation is
in accordance with capital accounts) - Works well if income is growing
- Capital accounts must be reflective of the
relative rights and preferences upon liquidation - Getting through the waterfall
19Corporate vs. Partnership Structures for Target
(Investee) Portfolio Companies held by PE Funds
- Can lead to unexpected results and incentives
- Amortization of goodwill for acquisitions
- Smaller, one-off acquisitions
- Sale of Personal Goodwill
- Sale of Option
- Risk of Recharacterization
- Payment for Non-Compete vs. Compensation
- Management vs. Investor Perspectives on
Distributions - PE investors must mark their portfolios and
EBITDA will be critical
20Corporate vs. Partnership Structures for Target
(Investee) Portfolio Companies held by PE Funds
- Management LTEIP Structures
- Grants of Partnership Interests
- Options Plans
- Profits Interests
- Bonus plans
- Management Challenges Relating to All of the
Above - Valuation, rebooking and phantom Income issues
- Earnings hits for EBITDA consider GAAP and tax
- Survivor mentality for who is actually there
for a Liquidity Event
21Corporate vs. Partnership Structures for Target
(Investee) Portfolio Companies held by PE Funds
- State and Local Tax (SALT) Issues in Partnerships
- Depending upon nature of investments, state tax
filings could be triggered in multiple
jurisdictions - Multiple flow-through portfolio companies in
multiple jurisdictions - Even for de minimis amounts, penalties can be
significant and lead you to file the analysis
must be undertaken
22Real Assets Oil Gas Working Interests
- Net Profits Interest Conveyance
- Fund for Domestic Taxable Investors acquires a
Working Interest - Such Fund conveys Net Profits Interest in the
Working Interest to a parallel fund for TEIs to
allow them to invest without generating UBTI - NPI must relate to real estate
- TEI Fund lends taxable fund cash sufficient to
finance tangible personal ppty
23Real Assets Oil Gas Working Interests
- Accounting and Expense Allocation Issues
- Administrative Issues, including multiple closes
and potential need for revaluation - Use of NPI Calculation Agent
- Cannot add or pull out properties within an NPI
conveyance after it is constituted - PLP Structure to Accommodate Financing for TEI
Fund - Making Taxable and Tax-Exempt Funds Economically
Equivalent
24Real Assets Oil Gas Working Interests
- Acquisitions Financing Structure
Seller
Energy Fund GP, L.P.
Lender 2
Lender 1
PLP L.P.
Tax-Exempt Investors
PLP
Taxable Investors
Energy Fund II-A, L.P.
Energy Fund II-B, L.P.
25Real Assets Timber
- TIMOs Timber Investment Management Organization
- Actual silvicultural management, timber cruises,
etc. handled by the TIMO - Some infrastructure and staffing to evaluate HBU
plays
26Real Assets Timber
- 631(a) vs. 631(b) cutting contracts
- Wood supply agreements are one of two types,
delivered log contracts under Section 631(a) of
the Codethe owner harvests the timber and sells
the cut logsand pay-as cut or lump sum contracts
under Section 631(b) of the Codethe purchaser
harvests the timber and pays for what has been
cut and the owner has a retained economic
interest in the timber, or the owner sells
standing timber outright for a lump sum.
27Real Assets Timber
- 631(b) cutting contracts pay as cut or lump
sum contracts produce income which is passive
income under Section 512(b) and not UBTI in the
hands of tax-exempt investors
28Real Assets Timber
- HBU Sales care to avoid treatment as a dealer
to avoid generating UBTI and preserve LTCGs - Partnership agreement provisions confirming
investment purpose - Use of SPVs for various holdings, tracking time
and efforts for HBU sale to show minimal nature
29Real Assets TimberHBU Sales
- Various factors considered, with frequency and
substantiality of sales being most important - Nature and purpose of acquisition of ppty and
duration of ownership - Nature and extent of taxpayers efforts to sell
ppty - Number, extent, continuity and substantiality of
the sales - Extent of subdividing, developing and advertising
to increase sales - Use of business office for sales
- Time and effort habitually devoted to sales
30Real Assets Other
- Financial distress in municipalities
- Focus on key infrastructure assets
- Good match for large state pension funds
- Airports
- Railways
- Toll Roads (mixed bag)
- Professional management
- Political challenges vs. economic reality
31ERISA Considerations
- VCOC- by taking an active role in the management
of portfolio companies, PE funds may rely on an
exemption from ERISA for venture capital
operating companies - At least 50 of assets must be invested in
venture capital investments - Must exercise management rights with respect to
one or more of the operating companies in which
it invests
32ERISA Considerations
- REOC
- Real estate funds seek to rely on an exclusion
from ERISA for real estate operating companies - Must invest at least 50 of assets in real estate
that is managed or developed and for which the
fund has the right to substantially participate
in the management or development activities - Delegation is possible, so long as the fund has
the right to terminate at will and actually
supervises
33ERISA Considerations
- Section 408(b)(2) Regulation 2550.408b-2(c)
requiring covered Service Providers to make
specified periodic disclosures to covered plans,
mainly around compensation arrangements
34ERISA Considerations
- Significant Participation Test
- A private fund is generally able to avoid ERISAs
application if it limits the level of investment
by benefit plan investors to less than 25 of any
class of the funds equity
35ERISA Considerations
- Significant Participation Test
- Count all Benefit Plan Investors
- Employee Benefit Plans subject to ERISA
- Taft-Hartley (multi-employer) Plans
- Certain church plans
- IRAs this is an easy one to miss!
- Importantly, government plans (e.g., CALPERs,
Colorado PERA) dont count
36ERISA Considerations
- Significant Participation Test
- Disregard Investments by manager and affiliates
(they are not counted in the denominator to
calculate the 25) - Test on a Class Basis
- Continuous monitoring required
37ERISA Considerations
- Assuming the private fund meets the significant
participation test, relief can be found from the
prohibited transactions relating to parties in
interest through status as a QPAM or Qualified
Professional Asset Manager.
38ERISA Considerations
- QPAM Status
- Registered Investment Adviser AND
- Must have in excess of 85 mm in client AUM as of
the last day of most recent FY AND - Must have partner/shareholder equity in excess of
1 mm as of the most recent balance sheet
prepared in accordance with GAAP
39ERISA Considerations
- Other Consequences of holding plan assets
- Performance Fees
- Use of Affiliated Brokers
- Cross Trades
- Principal Transactions
- Custody
- Employer Securities
- Expenses
40ERISA Considerations
- Other consequences of holding plan assets
continued - Expenses
- Indemnification
- Potential Plan Sponsor Liability
- Co-Fiduciary Liability
- Fidelity Bonding
- Information Reporting
41ERISA Considerations
- Performance Fees permissible if
- Fund manager is an RIA
- Decision to hire Fund manager (i.e., to invest in
the Fund) and to pay performance fee made by
independent fiduciary of each benefit plan
investor - Each benefit plan investor has total assets of at
least 50 mm - Investor can withdraw from the Fund on reasonably
short notice
42ERISA Considerations
- Performance Fees Continued
- Arrangement complies with Advisers Act Rule 205-3
- Total fees paid do not exceed reasonable comp
- Fund manager or affiliates do NOT act as market
maker for securities transactions by Fund
43ERISA Considerations
- Performance Fees Continued
- Perf Fee determined on annual performance, taking
into account both realized and unrealized gains
and losses, and where termination date is other
than an anniversary date, net profit is
determined from the beginning of the prior full
year through termination date
44ERISA Considerations
- Performance Fees Continued
- FINALLY, each benefit plan investors fiduciary
represents that it fully understands the formula
for calculating the perf fee and the risks
associated with such arrangements - These criteria ONLY APPLY if the manager is an
investment manager under ERISA, which it would
not be if the significant participation test is
satisfied.
45Other Investment Fund Considerations for
Partnerships PTP Rules under 7704
- Under IRC Section 7704, a partnership with more
than 100 investors will be treated as a publicly
traded partnership and taxed as a corporation if
interests in the partnership are traded on an
established securities market or a secondary
market or the substantial equivalent of such a
market.
46Other Investment Fund Considerations for
Partnerships PTP Rules under 7704
- Options?
- Limit income to qualifying income
- Can be difficult to achieve 90 or more gross
income as investment-type income - Commodities dont generally qualify
- Mezzanine financings dont generally qualify
- Limit withdrawals to redemption and repurchase
safe harbor - Limit the number of investors to 100, per the
private placement safe harbor
47Other Investment Fund Considerations for
Partnerships PTP Rules under 7704
- Resulting Practice Strict Adherence to Private
Placement Safe Harbor for Institutionally-Oriented
Funds to support a will tax opinion - Use of Multiple Funds with 100 partners
- Modifying Investment Strategies (particularly
targeted volatility levels) among funds to
distinguish them
48Other Investment Fund Considerations for
Partnerships PTP Rules under 7704
- For PE funds, strict policing of transfers and
secondary transactions is needed to establish
that the substantial equivalent of a secondary
market does not exist, where the PE fund has more
than 100 partners - Contrast with secondary managers with significant
funds to deploy
49Other Investment Fund Considerations for
Partnerships PTP Rules under 7704
- Growing use of Commodities
- 90 Qualifying Income under 7704(d) relevant if
a partnership exceeds 100 partners and permits
withdrawals more frequently than quarterly,
outside of the redemption and repurchase safe
harbor - Commodities-related income and gain is only
Qualifying Income if a principal activity of
the partnership is buying and selling commodities
or options, futures or forwards with respect to
commodities
50Other Investment Fund Considerations for
Partnerships PTP Rules under 7704
- Scant Guidance as to what a principal activity
means - Examples from Percentage Holdings
- Dedicated Investment Team Members (those holding
a Series 3 license) - Number of Trades
- of absolute value of gains and losses generated
51Other Investment FundConsiderations for RICs
- Regulated Investment Companies registered under
the 1940 Act and electing to be taxed as RICs
under Subchapter M. - 90 of its gross income must be Qualifying
Income under IRC Section 851(b)(2). - Asset diversification test
- Year-end distribution obligation to distribute
90 of its realized taxable income for the
taxable year
52Other Investment FundConsiderations for RICs
- Qualifying Income 90 of a RICs gross income
must be derived annually from the qualifying
income sources enumerated in IRC Section
851(b)(2). - Notably absent from the list are income and gains
on commodities - Commodities are not securities under 2(a)(36)
of the 1940 Act
53Other Investment Fund Considerations for RICs
- Growing Use of Commodities for Liquid Alternative
Strategies - Use of offshore subsidiary blockers
- CFC, Subpart F Income will be includable in gross
income of the RIC - So long as currently distributed, it will be
Qualifying Income - Limited to 25 of total asset value as of the end
of each quarter of each tax year (includes assets
held as collateral for derivative positions).
54Other Investment FundConsiderations for RICs
- Use of Commodity-Linked Notes (CLNs)
- RIC pays issuer par value upon purchase, and
receives par value back from issuer at maturity,
adjusted up or down by the product of (1) par
value, (2) change in value of a commodity index,
and (3) a leverage factor not to exceed three. - Additional debt-like features
- Interest payments
- Early redemption feature for principal protection
- No more than three year maturity
- Status as a security somewhat unclear, but it
is the basis of status as qualifying income
55Recently Proposed Rules for RICs holding MLPs
- In recent years, MLPs have grown in popularity as
an investment because of their yield.
56Recently Proposed Rules for RICs holding MLPs
- Closed-end Funds and Open-End Funds have been
launched to invest a significant portion of their
portfolios in MLPs. Many of these funds are
structured as RICs some are structured as C
corporations.
57Recently Proposed Rules for RICs holding MLPs
- For those that are RICs, under Section
851(b)(3)(B), to qualify as a RIC, a fund must
have not more than 25 of its total assets in
qualified publicly traded partnerships (as
defined in Section 851(h)). This is part of the
asset diversification test.
58Recently Proposed Rules for RICs holding MLPs
- Some industry participants structured as RICs
used a subsidiary C corporation to increase
exposure to MLPs above the 25.
59Recently Proposed Rules for RICs holding MLPs
- On August 2, 2013, the Service proposed
regulations under Section 851(c) regarding the
definition of a controlled group for purposes
of the asset diversification test, to provide a
look through for the investments of subsidiary
C corporations.
60Recently Proposed Rules for RICs holding MLPs
- Public hearing scheduled for December 9, 2013.
61Side Letter Practice Among Institutional
Investors
- Requirement for Legal Opinions
- Delaware law corporate opinion covering due
authorization and enforceability of the side
letter - Rubber hits the road on fiduciary issues
- Tax opinion as to partnership status
- Rubber hits the road on 7704 PTP safe harbors
- FIN 48 interplay on tax positions taken at fund
level
62Side Letter Practice AmongInstitutional Investors
- Transparency into fund portfolio
- More sophisticated risk management protocols
require real time information - Issues with other investors
- Provide all investors with same information
- Use of aggregation services
63Side Letter Practice Among Institutional
Investors
- Accelerated or Enhanced Liquidity/Withdrawal
Rights - Issues for other investors the GPs fiduciary
responsibilities - If registered under the Advisers Act, the GP has
additional fiduciary obligations
64Side Letter Practice Among Institutional
Investors
- Most Favored Nation clauses (MFNs)
- Regulatory risk implement a compliance policy
and appoint someone responsible for overseeing
MFN compliance - Carve-outs
- Founders, manager and affiliates and employees
- By dollar amount invested
- By regulatory conditions
- Provide summary with identifying information
omitted, to protect privacy - Take the bitter with the sweet no
cherry-picking!
65Side Letter Practice AmongInstitutional Investors
- Other Provisions
- Non-US Withholding Taxes and Tax Filings
- Listed Transactions and Prohibited Reportable
Transactions - Notice Provisions (disparate informational
concerns) - Key Person Provisions (disparate informational
concerns) - Indemnification Limitations (esp. govt and ERISA
plans) - Jurisdictional issues (esp. govt plans)
- Confidentiality/Public Records Issues
661940 Act Considerations
- 3(c)(1) Funds Not more than 100 beneficial
owners and not making or presently proposing to
make a public offering (all accredited investors
under Reg D is the norm) - Non-integration for taxable and tax-exempt
parallel funds - Look-through for owners of 10 or more of a
3(c)(1) funds voting securities - Look-through for entities formed for the purpose
of investing in a 3(c)(1) fund, 40 test - General solicitation under new Rule 506(d) passed
under the JOBS Act permissible
671940 Act Considerations
- 3(c)(7) Funds up to 1999 record holders under
1934 Act - All investors must be qualified purchasers
- QP status for individuals means 5 mm in
investments - For entities, 25 mm in investments
- Same private placement requirement as 3(c)(1)
funds - All accredited investor offerings are the norm
681933 Act Considerations
- Per the above, all 1940 Act exemptions require an
exemption from the registration requirements of
the 1933 Act - Rule 506 of Regulation D
- Federal Covered Security status under NSMIA
- Blue Sky notice filings and fees
- More aggressive state regulators
69Investment Advisers Act of 1940 Considerations
- Registration of the Manager
- 100 mm AUM threshold for SEC registration
generally - 150 mm AUM threshold for private fund advisers
(exempt reporting adviser status) - State regulation
- Performance Fees can only be charged to
Qualified Clients
70Investment Advisers Act of 1940Considerations
- Exemption for Advisers to Venture Capital Funds
- 80 qualifying investments in equity securities
issued by qualifying portfolio company - Must be an operating company
- Does not incur leverage for funds investment
- Not a reporting or foreign traded company
- Limitation on fund-level leverage 15
- Any such leverage is for a non-renewable term not
longer than 120 days - No redemptions by investors
- Venture capital strategy representation
- Private fund status (not registered as an
investment company or BDC)
71Investment Advisers Act of 1940 Considerations
- With regulatory burdens come opportunities
- Attracting institutional money
72Commodity Exchange Act
- Recent changes post-Dodd Frank eliminated Rule
4.13(a)(4), which was an exemption from CPO
registration for pools offered to highly
sophisticated investors - Rule 4.13(a)(3) exemption still available, but
more limited, available to managers of private
funds - Aggregate initial margin does not exceed 5
- Aggregate net notional exposure does not exceed
100
73Commodity Exchange Act
- 4.13(a)(3) sales only to Qualified Eligible
Persons (QPs automatically qualify) - Many managers implementing quantitative
strategies must register as CPOs and CTAs
74Broker/Dealer Registration Requirements under the
1934 Act for PE Fund Managers
- 1934 Act Section 15(a)(1) prohibits any person
from effecting transactions in, or inducing or
attempting to induce the purchase or sale of, any
security, unless that person is registered as a
broker - Section 3(a)(4)(2) defines a broker as any person
engaged in the business of effecting transactions
in securities for the account of others
75Broker/Dealer Registration Requirements under the
1934 Act for PE Fund Managers
- Key Factors
- Participant in key parts of transaction
- Prior experience in securities transactions
- Disciplinary issues
- Handling of funds or securities
- TRANSACTION-BASED COMPENSATION
76Broker/Dealer Registration Requirements under the
1934 Act for PE Fund Managers
- David W. Blass, Chief Counsel, Division of
Trading and Markets,?SEC, Speech on April 5, 2013
to the ABA Trading and Markets Subcommittee A
Few Observations on the Private Funds Space.
77Broker/Dealer Registration Requirements under the
1934 Act for PE Fund Managers
- Very limited applicability of the issuer
exemption in 1934 Act Rule 3a4-1. - Generally applicable to an operating company
personnel of which only occasionally engage in
securities sales (no more than once every 12
months) - Personnel must regularly perform substantial
duties not related to sales of securities - No transaction-based compensation
78Broker/Dealer Registration Requirements under the
1934 Act for PE Fund Managers
- Transaction-based compensation is important,
butif issuer personnel are regularly engaged in
broker/dealer activity, broker/dealer
registration may be triggered - Continuous capital raising activities
- Internal marketing personnel had better be
registered reps of a broker/dealer - Private Placements where is the broker/dealer?
79Broker/Dealer Registration Requirements under the
1934 Act for PE Fund Managers
- Compliance Point How certain fees are booked
- commissions and sales charges appearing on
the G/L need to be paid to a broker/dealer - SEC specifically asks for accounting records in
its examinations - Internal protocols to vet and document the status
of payees as broker/dealers should be implemented - Payment to an unregistered broker/dealer blows
the Blue Sky exemption, opens the issuer to
rescission liability
80Broker/Dealer Registration Requirements under the
1934 Act for PE Fund Managers
- Other PE fund and manager activities
- Investment banking or brokerage activities for PE
fund portfolio companies - Fees charged for sales or financings executed for
portfolio companies
81Chamberlain Hrdlicka Financial Services Practice
Areas
- Asset Management. Chamberlain Hrdlickas asset
management attorneys experience spans multiple
industries and asset classes. We routinely
advise our clients on regulatory aspects of fund
management and investment advisory operations.
Our asset management team provides legal
services to a wide range of clients in the asset
management industry including registered and
unregistered investment advisers, broker-dealers,
corporate entities with multiple subsidiaries,
publicly offered closed-end funds and mutual
funds, private investment funds, and asset and
wealth management firms, trust companies as well
as other organizations with various fiduciary
responsibilities. Our practice includes the
formation and representation of investment
companies, sponsors, advisers and directors,
including SEC and FINRA regulatory compliance
matters fund formation, distribution and
marketing fund board and governance matters
compliance manuals and testing and corporate
transactions involving asset management
businesses, including mergers, acquisitions and
joint ventures.
82Chamberlain Hrdlicka Financial Services Practice
Areas
- Broker/Dealers
- The attorneys at Chamberlain Hrdlicka routinely
counsel broker-dealer clients on a broad range of
legal issues - Dodd-Frank and other financial institution
regulatory reform - Regulatory, compliance and securities law matters
relating to broker-dealers - Advise broker-dealers on the rules of the SEC,
FINRA and other regulatory and self-regulatory
organizations - Registration requirements, including with regard
to unregistered affiliates of registered
broker-dealers that wish to engage in
securities-related activities - Our clients include a broad range of
broker-dealers, as well as their
non-broker-dealer subsidiaries and affiliates. We
also serve small and mid-sized firms, and
affiliates of insurance, commercial banking and
other financial services companies. Chamberlain
Hrdlicka also provides its broker-dealer clients
with a full range of corporate, securities, MA,
tax and other advice in connection with their
investment banking activities.
83Chamberlain HrdlickaFinancial Services Practice
Areas
- ERISA/Benefit Plan Investors
- Review transactions with ERISA plan investors
(401k plans, pension plans including Taft-Hartley
plans, Keogh plans, IRAs, etc.) in
pooled investment funds managed by private fund
managers for compliance with applicable ERISA
requirements including fiduciary responsibility,
QPAM status, plan assets rule, prohibited
transactions and exemptions therefrom. Advise
on fund offering documents for provisions that
address both ERISA plan investors and plan
investors other than ERISA plan investors, such
as US state and local government and foreign
pension plans.
84Chamberlain HrdlickaFinancial Services Practice
Areas
- Family Office
- The attorneys at Chamberlain Hrdlicka understand
the nature of representing wealthy individuals
and their families. Our Family Office attorneys
are very knowledgeable in not only establishing,
but sustaining a Family Office for future
generations. We can offer our clients an array
of services which include, but are not limited
to, investment management regulation and
compliance, income, estate and gift tax planning,
business succession planning, as well as legal
aspects of management of closely-held businesses
through a Family Office.
85Chamberlain HrdlickaFinancial Services Practice
Areas
- Financial Services
- Chamberlain Hrdlickas financial services team is
equipped to handle the ever-changing landscape of
the financial sector and help our clients reach
their business objectives. Our sophisticated
financial services practice includes work in many
areas of the industry, including mergers and
acquisitions, asset management, capital market
activities, product development and compliance,
federal and state securities and domestic and
offshore company formation. Chamberlain Hrdlicka
routinely counsels their clients on matters
regarding regulatory initiatives and legislation,
as well as privacy law compliance.
86Chamberlain HrdlickaFinancial Services Practice
Areas
- Hedge Funds
- Chamberlain Hrdlicka understands sophisticated
private managers need legal advisers with a level
of knowledge and understanding of complex
investment strategies that can support such
sophistication. Our hedge fund attorneys have
experience working with managers with many
different fund styles, from single-strategy to
multi-strategy hedge funds and funds of hedge
funds. Chamberlain Hrdlicka assists clients
throughout all stages of hedge fund development,
providing counsel on the establishment and
operation of hedge funds, including the
preparation of fund formation documents and
private placement memoranda. Chamberlain
Hrdlickas hedge fund practice is dedicated to
providing our clients with a partner to help
assess and manage legal risk so they can focus on
maximizing return.
87Chamberlain HrdlickaFinancial Services Practice
Areas
- Investment Advisors
- Chamberlain Hrdlicka attorneys advise clients in
all aspects of their investment advisory
business, including both retail and institutional
advisory businesses. We counsel our investment
adviser clients on the formation and operation of
many types of alternative investment vehicles,
including hedge funds, fund-of-funds, venture
capital and private equity funds, private real
assets funds and other public and private pooled
investment vehicles. We also advise our clients
on the complex federal and state regulatory,
legal and compliance issues affecting investment
advisers and their affiliates, including
pay-to-play rules and lobbyist registration
compliance matters.
88Chamberlain HrdlickaFinancial Services Practice
Areas
- Investment Management
- Chamberlain Hrdlickas investment management team
provides a full range of legal, regulatory and
advisory services including business formation,
governance issues, transactions, registration,
documentation and agreements, operational
matters, and other corporate matters. We are
able to advise our clients through each stage of
investment maturation, assisting clients from
fund formation and management to distribution
arrangements with financial intermediaries. Our
clients include mutual funds, closed-end funds,
domestic and offshore private investment funds
(including venture capital, private equity, and
hedge funds), investment advisers, and
broker-dealers.
89Chamberlain HrdlickaFinancial Services Practice
Areas
- Private Equity Funds
- Chamberlain Hrdlickas private equity attorneys
can advise clients throughout the life cycle of a
private equity transaction, from formation, to
investments and ultimately to exit. We have
expertise and experience in sophisticated
transactions including leveraged buyouts,
management buyouts, spin-offs, venture capital
financings, going-private transactions, and
recapitalizations and dispositions, as well as
cross-border and international transactions.
90Chamberlain HrdlickaFinancial Services Practice
Areas
- Private Funds
- Chamberlain Hrdlickas Corporate, Securities
Finance practice group includes a team of
attorneys who are well-versed in all legal and
regulatory matters relevant to managing and
investing in private funds. Our experience across
many private fund structures, including private
investment funds, hedge funds and private equity
funds, enables us to assist clients in a wide
scope of fund investment activities. - We help our clients move forward with private
fund activities, employing a cross-disciplinary
approach that incorporates the firms greater
Corporate, Securities Finance practice, along
with other relevant practice areas including tax
and tax planning. At any juncture in private fund
operations, from fund formation to ongoing fund
management, our team can navigate the legal,
regulatory and compliance and governance matters,
advancing for our clients the diverse objectives
of both fund sponsors and investors.
91Chamberlain HrdlickaFinancial Services Practice
Areas
- Wealth Management
- Chamberlain Hrdlickas attorneys routinely
counsel our financial services industry clients
on their wealth management businesses. We
understand wealth management represents the
intersection of many disciplines, from investment
advisory, broker/dealer, family office and tax
and estate planning, to international tax and
cross-border planning. Our strength in the tax
and international tax areas also provides
additional support to our clients with wealth
management businesses.
92Jonathan W. DePriest
- Jonathan DePriest maintains a sophisticated merger
s and acquisitions practice, with an emphasis on
investment management and financial
services industries and asset management and
wealth management firms, as well as private
pooled investment vehicles (such as hedge funds
and private equity funds). Mr. DePriest has
successfully concluded over 2 billion in merger
and acquisition transactions, drawing also upon
the Firms strength in the tax field to provide
sophisticated analysis and support in structuring
transactions. - Mr. DePriest also counsels asset management
clients in launching and managing private pooled
investment vehicles, and serves as counsel to the
adviser for regulated investment companies. Mr.
DePriest has assisted in launching private
investment funds that currently manage over 7
billion in assets. These funds have comprised
diversified multi-asset class, multi-strategy
funds of funds as well as single-strategy hedge
funds, liquid alternatives funds, registered and
regulated investment companies, and alternative
investments such as timber, private energy and
private equity.
93Chamberlain Hrdlicka WhiteWilliams Aughtry
- Atlanta
- Denver
- Houston
- Philadelphia
- San Antonio
- jonathan.depriest_at_chamberlainlaw.com