Department of Public Management Masters in Safe Environment at Work Enhancing the Human Resource: Em - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 55
About This Presentation
Title:

Department of Public Management Masters in Safe Environment at Work Enhancing the Human Resource: Em

Description:

Employee Well Being at the Workplace - An Interdisciplinary Approach. ... Social welfarist approaches stifle individual initiative and free market ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:90
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 56
Provided by: C353
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Department of Public Management Masters in Safe Environment at Work Enhancing the Human Resource: Em


1
Department of Public ManagementMasters in
Safe Environment at WorkEnhancing the Human
Resource Employee WellBeing at the Workplace -
An Interdisciplinary Approach.
  • The European Social Model, Better Regulation,
    Soft Law and Corporate Social Responsibility
  • Charles Woolfson

2
Strengths of the ESM
  • The ESM while attempting to endorse common
    European societal values also leaves open key
    aspects for local adaptation by member states
    (the principle of subsidiarity)
  • recognising the diversity of local and national
    conditions (multi-level governance and decision
    making processes)

3
  • ve virtues of adaptability and flexibility in
    policy making within a common framework.
  • ve attempt through a common set of standards and
    values to prevent social dumping or free
    riding - to attract foreign investment by
    offering lower levels of protection to citizens
    and workers eg on safety and health at work.

4
Weakness of the ESM
  • -ve complex and ill-understood policy model which
    lacks transparency and relevance
  • -ve subsidiarity is often used by member states
    to block new Community policies and instruments
    and resist binding social regulations

5
The ESM under attack the neo-liberal offensive
  • The ESM founded on social democratic values (a
    social welfarist Europe a balance of market and
    social priorities)
  • Attack from within EU
  • - powerful individual member states such as UK,
    Italy and Germany hostile to ESM, especially
    during the 1980s and 1990s, but still today (the
    Third Way of Tony Blair, Germany Hartz IV
    reforms).
  • - UNICE the European Employers Federation
    afraid of too much regulation as a burden on
    business

6
ESM under external attack
  • Major international financial institutions (IMF,
    World Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and
    Development) argue that European competitiveness
    depends on being able to compete in the global
    market place ie with cheaper sourced products
    from SE Asia, China etc

7
The nature of the attack on the ESM-
  • - New forces of globalisation make the ESM an
    outdated concept of the 1960s and the 1970s
  • - Social welfarist approaches stifle individual
    initiative and free market enterprise (the nanny
    state)
  • - Social protection measure introduce harmful
    rigidities into the labour market which
    undermine necessary flexibility and
    competitiveness (eg minimum wages, too high
    unemployment benefit levels, unwillingness to
    accept lower pay and benefits eg reduced state
    pension rights and increased working age).

8
Soft law, subsidiarity and voluntary
initiatives
  • Regulatory reform at European level -
  • Key policy goal of the Lisbon strategy has been
    to reduce the administrative burden of business
    (European Council, 2000).
  • Traditional EU Directives replaced by more
    efficient, flexible and proportionate instruments
    (for example, framework directives, new approach
    directives or softer regulatory alternatives)
  • This encourages autonomous processes of
    adjustment and confers rule making-powers to
    self-regulatory processes ie., stakeholders
    in the regulation process voluntarily agree to
    frameworks of rules eg sectoral agreements on
    safety and health.

9
Discussion on the ESM - A realistic agenda for
the enlarged Europe?
  • Can the ESM be transposed into the CEE new member
    states?
  • What might be the internal political, economic,
    administrative, social barriers to transposing
    the ESM?
  • What might be the external political, economic,
    administrative, social barriers barriers to
    transposing the ESM?
  • Do we need a European Social Model?

10
Health and Safety in European law
  • Article 118A of the Treaty of Rome (incorporated
    as Article 137 of the Amsterdam -Treaty- the
    Commission with the Member States will develop
    clearly defined policy on prevention of
    occupational accidents and diseases.
  • Key instrument Framework Directive 89/391/EEC
    which contains basic provisions regarding the
    organisation of health and safety at work and the
    responsibilities of employers and workers.
    Subsequent legislation protects workers form
    risks related to exposure to chemical, physical
    and biological agents at work with specific
    directives on harmful substances such as asbestos.

11
Adapting to Change in Work and Society A New
Community Strategy on Health and Safety at Work
2002-2006
  • Occupational safety and health linked to
    quality in work, as a positive factor to the
    business competitiveness equation
  • Emphasis on well-being at work, implying not
    simply the absence of sickness and injury, but
    attainment and preservation of general physical
    and mental health in the work process
  • Consolidating of a culture of risk prevention
    through a combination of policy instruments and
    a partnership approach to safety and health at
    work
  • Mix of policy instruments including both
    voluntary initiatives, such as social dialogue,
    corporate social responsibility, economic
    incentives and benchmarking which improves
    peoples knowledge of risks and attempts to
    ensure better application of existing law.
  • mainstreaming of neglected issues such as the
    gender factor

12
Enlargement and the new strategy on safety and
health at work
  • candidate countries - an average frequency of
    occupational accidents which is well above the
    average for the EU
  • mainly because of their higher degree of
    specialisation in sectors which are traditionally
    regarded as high-risk
  • No figures provided for relative frequencies of
    accidents or illnesses

13
Diplomatic understatement the call for
heightened vigilance
  • The data indicate that the preventive approach
    set out in Community directives has not yet been
    fully understood and taken on board by the
    various players, nor applied effectively on the
    ground (2002,p.4)

14
Preparing for enlargement
  • one of the major challenges facing the European
    Union (2002, 17)
  • ensure that the new Member States can be
    absorbed in conformity with the rules and with a
    guarantee that the institutions and bodies of the
    EU will continue to function smoothly
  • the candidate countries themselveshave to
    absorb into their national systems an enormous
    and complex corpus of legislation

15
an effective transfer of experience and
knowledge.
  • beefing-up programmes of technical assistance,
    using partnership and twinning arrangements
    developing arrangements for the exchange of
    experience and access to knowledge and to the
    results of Community research, by integrating the
    candidate countries into the institutions and
    bodies concerned strengthening the social
    dialogue at all levels, particularly in firms
    promoting the collection and analysis of data on
    accidents at work and occupational illnesses,
    notably by integrating the candidate countries
    into ongoing Community work on statistical
    harmonisation.

16
Strategy an elaborate and systematic plan of
action
  • The Commission strategy claims to provide a
    coherent policy framework and proposes concrete
    action, along with a full implementation
    timetable

17
Institutional mechanisms for promoting the new
strategy
  • The European Agency for Safety and Health at Work
    in Bilbao - a driving force in matters
    concerning awareness-building and risk
    anticipation
  • Agency to set up a risk observatory in order to
    provide examples of good practice and to organise
    exchanges of experience and information by way of
    the systematic collection of data
  • Agency instructed to integrate the candidate
    countries into these information networks, and
    devise working tools which are geared to their
    specific situation

18
Positive steps
  • Attempt to integrate the candidate countries has
    been through the creation of Agency focal
    points - a Europe-wide network of
    representatives of labour inspectorates, now
    involving all of the new member states.
  • Informational role, the Agency web presence in
    the national languages of the new member states,
    augmenting existing resources.
  • Basic information about Agency campaigns, annual
    reports and factsheets, for example, on stress,
    bullying and violence at work are now available
    in the languages of the new members.

19
Promoting Quality at Work in an Enlarged
European Union
  • future initiatives are outlined in the Agencys
    Rolling Programme of Work 2005-2008
  • 30 - 50,000 Euros will be allocated to each
    member state, new and old, to encourage the
    further development of national focal points
  • Creation of a dedicated Topic Centre for the
    New member States (funded to 240,000 Euros)
  • An Enlargement Action Plan (1.75m Euros)
    focussing on communications activities, data
    collection and awareness raising/campaigning in
    new member states

20
Concerns
  • All long overdue programmes.
  • Is the Agency is being asked to do the
    impossible, with too little resources and too
    late in the day?
  • How far can informational and networking activity
    secure the consolidating of a culture of risk
    prevention?
  • Little evidence so far of working tools which
    are geared to their (NMS) specific situation.

21
Internal policy constraints
  • Support among accession state business and
    political elites for European labour protection
    regulation, especially in the area of OHS, is
    limited (absence of reform fit)
  • Regulatory authorities in new member states may
    be subject to post-accession regulatory fatigue
    and depletion of capacities

22
External policy constraints
  • External agencies (IMF) appear to favour
    deregulation and differentiated standards of OHS
    protection in Central and Eastern Europe
  • overregulation of conditions of employment will
    diminish the comparative advantage that CEE
    workers enjoy over their more highly paid western
    counterparts (Washington-based Cato Institute)

23
External policy constraints
  • EU criticized because it rejects the
    possibility of different levels of safety and
    health protection of labour within the Union and
    advocates the need to harmonize health and
    safety standards irrespective of the different
    needs of the member states (Cato Institute,
    2003)
  • Health and safety regulations contribute to
    worsening of the workers lot, by creating an
    artificial increase in labour costs (Cato
    Institute, 2003)

24
External policy constraints
  • EUs post-Lisbon retreat from securing employee
    rights, in favour of promoting growth and
    competitiveness, and a consequent downplaying of
    the social dimension of Europe
  • Adoption by EU of many neo-liberal assumptions
    about regulation and the burden it imposes on
    business
  • European Commission programme of updating and
    simplifying the acquis
  • Health and safety at work legislation being
    subjected to a detailed scrutiny for their
    simplification potential

25
Regulatory reform at European level - Better
regulation and Soft Law)
  • Traditional EU Directives replaced by more
    efficient, flexible and proportionate instruments
    (for example, framework directives, new approach
    directives or softer regulatory alternatives)
  • This encourages autonomous processes of
    adjustment and confers rule making-powers to
    self-regulatory processes ie., stakeholders
    in the regulation process voluntarily agree to
    frameworks of rules eg sectoral agreements on
    safety and health

26
Soft law in action The Open Method of
Co-ordination (OMC)
  • Open Method of Co-ordination endorsed (Lisbon
    Council) as-
  • an important tool of EU governance in achieving
    social and employment policy goals includes
    health and safety at work
  • Notions of benchmarking and best practice -
    securing a flexible and decentralised approach to
    policy creation and implementation

27
OMC, subsidiarity and social partnership
  • The principle of subsidiarity embodied in the OMC
    implies devolving policy inputs to regional and
    local levels, thus spreading horizontally
    outwards to the social partners and civil society
    representatives.
  • These actors will be actively involved, in the
    policy process using variable forms of
    partnership (European Council 2000, para.38).

28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
OMC and Corporate Social Responsibility
  • OMC appeals to companies' sense of corporate
    social responsibility regarding best practices,
    on such matters as
  • work organisation
  • equal opportunities
  • social inclusion
  • safety and health

32
Social partners in the new member CEE states
  • Employers have focused on profitability
  • Workers have prioritized employment security and
    wages over health and safety.
  • No real degree of workforce involvement,
    particularly in small and medium sized
    establishments
  • Trade unions very weak and unable to meet
    employers on equal terms in real social dialogue

33
Doing Business in 2006 Eastern European and
Baltic Nations Encourage Businesses with
Aggressive Regulatory Reforms
  • WASHINGTON, D.C., September 12, 2005 Eastern
    European and Baltic nations are aggressively
    courting entrepreneurs with far-reaching reforms
    that streamline business regulations and taxes,
    according to a new report from the World Bank
    Group.
  • The annual report, which for the first time
    provides a global ranking of 155 nations on key
    business regulations and reforms, finds that
    every country in Eastern Europe improved at least
    one aspect of the business environment

34
Attempts to improve the climate for business to
encourage FDI
  • The top 30 economies in the world in terms of the
    reports ease-of-doing-business index, in order,
    are New Zealand, Singapore, the United States,
    Canada, Norway, Australia, Hong Kong/China,
    Denmark, the United Kingdom, Japan, Ireland,
    Iceland, Finland, Sweden, Lithuania (15), Estonia
    (16), Switzerland, Belgium, Germany, Thailand,
    Malaysia, Puerto Rico, Mauritius, the
    Netherlands, Chile, Latvia (26), Korea, South
    Africa, Israel, and Spain. For the three Baltic
    countries to be in the top 30 is a remarkable
    achievement, as only a decade has passed since
    they first began reforms.

35
Priorities of EUs Competitiveness Council -
Better Regulation
  • BETTER REGULATION AND SIMPLIFICATION OF
    LEGISLATION
  • Health and safety at work
  • Social Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June
    1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage
    improvements in the safety and health of workers
    at work.
  • Yearly information requirements with regard to
    all of the individual measures impose a
    disproportionate burden on the Member States.
  • Information requirements should be minimised,
    harmonised and reverted to a 6 year cycle.
  • Reporting should be shaped as one summary report
    for all measures.
  • Report of 2624th Council Meeting, Competitiveness
    (Internal Market, Industry and Research)
    Brussels, 25 and 26 November 2004. P13.

36
Better regulation
  • European Commission- Less red tape more growth
  • all major items included in the Commission's
    annual legislative and work programme subject to
    impact assessment and simplification since
    beginning of 2005.
  • avoiding gold-plating during the transposition
    of EU legislation.
  • (See Better Regulation for Growth and Jobs in the
    European Union, COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION
    TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
    SEC(2005) 175 Brussels, 16.3.2005,COM(2005) 97
    final).
  • http//europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/LexUriServ/site/e
    n/com/2005/com2005_0097en01.pdf
  • UK EU Presidency 2005
  • delivery of the Commissions Better Regulation
    Agenda of March 2005. Including stronger impact
    assessments on new EU legislation, increased
    business input into the legislative process and
    simplification/withdrawal of some existing
    legislation.
  • http//www.fco.gov.uk/Files/kfile/UKEUPresidency2
    005_PresidencyPriorities_EN.pdf

37
  • The European Commission is committed to improving
    the regulatory environment within which our
    businesses operate and in so doing help them
    compete successfully in global markets.
  • Major efforts have already been launched to
    improve the regulatory environment as part of the
    so-called Lisbon Strategy for growth and jobs.
    Consultation procedures have been strengthened,
    major new proposals for legislation are now
    subject to impact assessment, and existing
    legislation is being evaluated on its
    effectiveness.
  • In mid-March, the Commission announced further
    steps in its Communication on Better Regulation
    for Growth and Jobs. This includes the launch of
    a major new simplification programme by October,
    2005. In order to ensure that the programme
    responds to real concerns, the European
    Commission is keen to hear from businesses which
    rules need to be simplified because they stand in
    the way of sustainable growth, deter business
    investment or hinder job creation.
  • Your views are important to us. They will be
    compiled and examined in the Commissions Red
    Tape Observatory and will also be examined by
    the responsible Commission services.
  • Thank you in advance for your time.
  • José Manuel Barroso, President of the European
    Commission
  • http//europa.eu.int/yourvoice/forms/dispatch?form
    418langEN

38
(No Transcript)
39
Case study of Corporate Social Responsibility
Failure in the Baltic region
  • Ferro-concrete plant in Ukmereges, a small town
    of 30,000 in eastern Lithuania
  • New production line producing expandable
    polystyrene (EPS) insulation panels for buildings
  • granular raw material for EPS emits pentane - a
    gas so flammable that, when mixed with air, even
    heat from a single light bulb can ignite

40
Ukmereges July 2003 3 killed, 10 burn victims
  • no gas-monitoring equipment
  • ventilation was inadequate
  • a fire which resulted when a welder used a
    blowtorch the previous day unreported to the
    authorities
  • substantial amounts of pentane which is heavier
    than air, had accumulated in the foundations of
    the building.

41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
(No Transcript)
45
Profits before Safety
  • Company was the cheapest supplier of foam
    polystyrene panels in the country.
  • The production line had been recently renovated
    and modernised
  • production output was 9 times higher than before
    renovation.
  • Consequently, pentane levels in the occupational
    environment also increased

46
Corporate Failure
  • Company failed to execute any additional
    occupational risk hazard assessments
  • failed to indicate any explosion risk in the
    workers instructions
  • warning instructions were in Russian, not
    Lithuanian
  • regulations relative to workers protection
    against hazardous chemical substances at work
    were not adhered to
  • requirements for protecting employees working in
    a potentially explosive environment were not
    adhered to.

47
Official Report
  • Improper aeration system in the industrial
    premises was one of the circumstances that
    stipulated the explosion.
  • in the course of carrying out the extension of
    the exhaust pipe of vacuum system, not all the
    relevant work and fire safety means, which
    guarantee safety in regards of explosion, have
    been envisaged and implemented.
  • Personal safety means did not correspond to the
    characteristics of work and were insufficient for
    the protection from traumas of workers bodies.
  • Non-fulfilment of technical and organisational
    construction and fire safety requirements during
    the design, installation and exploitation of the
    machinery

48
Results of State Labour Inspection of premises in
which dangerous or hazardous work is carried out
  • The companies inspected failed to properly
    evaluate the level of risk and possibility of the
    explosion in the production process. Such a
    situation should put us in doubt about the safety
    and health of the employees working in the
    companies where explosive, combustible
    technologies are installed and used, where
    noxious substances are used, where dangerous
    mechanisms are utilized (like cleaning, plumbing
    and flushing manholes, tanks, gasbags there are
    around 1million of them in Lithuania).

49
Safety Crime and the response of the criminal
justice system
  • 4 cases for criminal charges considered
  • for chief engineer,
  • for Specialist for safety at the work place
  • for technical director
  • for head of the unit.
  • The General director was not under criminal
    investigation.
  • Outcomes unknown at this time.

50
State control of safety crime
  • According to the Lithuanian Labour Inspection, in
    year 2003 around 60 percent of Lithuanian
    companies (their managing directors)
  • did not organize the inspections to estimate the
    level of risk at workplaces
  • did not take any necessary precautions to ensure
    health and safe working environment.
  • As a result, the level of the deadly injures at
    work increased by 16 that year (as compared to
    year 2002) and the number of serious and deadly
    accidents in the transportation companies
    increased by 50. Small and middle-sized
    companies lack the effective safety and health
    control systems.

51
A soft law future?
  • Need to recognise tensions between profits and
    safety
  • Business will not always do the right thing
  • Need for credible compliance incentives enforced
    by pro-active labour inspection and enforcement
  • Empowerment of stakeholders must be real
  • Workplace harms and injuries to employees -
    rarely individual isolated unforeseeable events.
  • They are more often the result of long term
    underlying patterns of (mis)behaviour.

52
Strengthening Policy in OHS
  • Counter pro-business anti-regulation policy
    bias in EU and domestic policy circles
  • New resources to domestic monitoring agencies to
    ensure implementation and enforcement powers to
    stimulate compliance-seeking behaviour
  • A tacit compliance moratorium?
  • Higher penalties for safety violations and a
    greater role for criminalisation of health and
    safety offences where necessary, to balance CSR
    and self-regulation initiatives
  • Resourcing and empowerment of social partners,
    trade unions and employers organisations within
    OHS process.

53
From rhetoric to reality - safety and health at
work in the CEE new member states
  • In the CEE new member accession states many
    employers do not see good health and safety
    necessarily as good business
  • Little interest in good practice voluntary
    initiatives and corporate social responsibility

54
Regime competition
  • Scope for regulatory experimentation (soft law,
    CSR and the OMC) very limited at a domestic level
    in the new member CEE states.
  • Emergence of regulatory regime competition and
    a race to the bottom between new and older
    member states
  • CEE new member accession states in danger of
    providing a reservoir of cheap labour and an
    inferior high hazard work environment.

55
Alternative regulatory strategies to the OMC and
soft law
  • End the pro-business anti-regulation bias in
    policy circles and reaffirm Community-level
    regulation in the enlarged EU
  • New resources to domestic monitoring agencies to
    ensure implementation, enforcement powers
    sufficient to stimulate compliance-seeking by
    member states and domestic actors.
  • Higher commensurate fines for safety violators
    and criminalisation of health and safety offences
    where necessary (corporate killing laws)
  • Resourcing and empowerment of social partners,
    trade unions and employers organisations, within
    the health and safety and social dialogue process
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com