Where all the items are above average: Assessing information quality in contemporary digital setting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Where all the items are above average: Assessing information quality in contemporary digital setting

Description:

Information Literacy and the Information Commons ... info-commons.org: an online publication advocating access to ideas. Retrieved October 10, 2005 from http: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: miles
Learn more at: http://www.ibiblio.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Where all the items are above average: Assessing information quality in contemporary digital setting


1
Where all the items are above average Assessing
information quality in contemporary digital
settings
  • Miles Efron
  • School of Information
  • University of Texas, Austin
  • miles_at_ischool.utexas.edu
  • http//www.ischool.utexas.edu/miles

2
Modern Information Literacy
  • An information literate individual is able to
  • Determine the extent of information needed
  • Access the needed information effectively and
    efficiently
  • Evaluate information and its sources critically
  • Incorporate selected information into ones
    knowledge base
  • Use information effectively to accomplish a
    specific purpose
  • Understand the economic, legal, and social issues
    surrounding the use of information, and access
    and use information ethically and legally

(ACRL, 2000)
3
Modern Information Literacy
The uncertain quality and expanding quantity of
information pose large challenges for society.
The sheer abundance of information will not in
itself create a more informed citizenry without a
complementary cluster of abilities necessary to
use information effectively.
(ACRL, 2000)
4
Evaluating Online Info Quality
  • Online information is increasingly important in
    contemporary research, but also increasingly
    difficult to evaluate.
  • This difficulty is especially keen at
    institutions like ASU with large proportions of
    millennials in the user population.
  • Reference librarians stand to excel in the job of
    teaching evaluation skills.

5
Evaluating Online Info Quality
This is not to say that teaching students to
evaluate information quality in traditional,
print-based environments is not crucial it
is. For students in the liberal arts and
sciences, clearly a broad palette of resources is
essential for good work.
  • Online information is increasingly important in
    contemporary research, but also increasingly
    difficult to evaluate.
  • This difficulty is especially keen at
    institutions like ASU with large proportions of
    millennials in the user population.
  • Reference librarians stand to excel in the job of
    teaching evaluation skills.

6
Evaluating Online Info Quality
  • Online information is increasingly important in
    contemporary research, but also increasingly
    difficult to evaluate.
  • This difficulty is especially keen at
    institutions like ASU with large proportions of
    millennials in the user population.
  • Reference librarians stand to excel in the job of
    teaching evaluation skills.

7
Evaluating Online Info Quality
  • Online information is increasingly important in
    contemporary research, but also increasingly
    difficult to evaluate.
  • This difficulty is especially keen at
    institutions like ASU with large proportions of
    millennials in the user population.
  • Reference librarians stand to excel in the job of
    teaching evaluation skills.


1. (Sullivan, 2003 Janes, 2003 p. 38)
8
Evaluating Online Info Quality
  • Online information is increasingly important in
    contemporary research, but also increasingly
    difficult to evaluate.
  • This difficulty is especially keen at
    institutions like ASU with large proportions of
    millennials in the user population.
  • Reference librarians stand to excel in the job of
    teaching evaluation skills.

2. (Janes, 2003, p. 39 ARL, 2004)
9
Current Info Literacy Pedagogy
  • A strong body of literature and best practices
    concerning teaching online information evaluation
    already exists3.
  • Emphasis on interrogating author credentials,
    motivation, competence.
  • Combines evaluation of non-Internet information
    with techniques aimed specifically at Web
    resources.

3. (cf. Bopp Smith, 2000)
10
Maturing Technologies, new Literacy Challenges
  • Contributor-run digital libraries (e.g. Wikis,
    Amazon) author incentives.
  • Blogs information commons4 but also insulators
    and incubators
  • Adversarial Information Retrieval how long will
    computational models of trust remain useful?

4. (ALA, 2005).
11
Amazon Incentive and Objectivity
12
Amazon Incentive and Objectivity
Mean stars per book
Mode stars per book
13
Political Blogs Style, Authority, and Bias
14
Adversarial Information Retrieval
  • Computational models of authority (such as
    Google' PageRank) figure importantly into our
    ability to filter large bodies of online
    information.
  • Fraud against such models has spawned a new
    research area 'adversarial info retrieval.'
  • Authority models are now subject to an unnerving
    arms race dynamic.

15
Example Separating the wheat from the chaff
  • As especially vibrant news and current events
    forum slashdot.org.
  • Slashdot allows readers to moderate the
    discussion cooperatively.
  • Part of this process each reader must define a
    "quality threshold" that governs what he or she
    reads on the site.
  • Defining this threshold (and similar choices)
    constitutes an important information skill.

16
Example Separating the wheat from the chaff
17
Information Literacy and the Information Commons
  • What new roles will reference librarians play in
    this domain?
  • Instruction in interpreting not only the quality
    of resources, but the incentives and mechanisms
    for ensuring quality that shape them.
  • Demonstration (quantitative and qualitative) of
    the need for interrogation of information
    quality.
  • Positioning ourselves as guides to interpreting
    and participating in the information commons.

18
Sources
  • American Library Association ALA. (2005).
    info-commons.org an online publication
    advocating access to ideas. Retrieved October 10,
    2005 from http//www.info-commons.org/.
  • Association of College and Research Libraries
    ACRL. (2000). Information Literacy Competency
    Standards for Higher Education Electronic
    Version. Retrieved October 10, 2005 from
    http//www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/informat
    ionliteracycompetency.htm.
  • Association of Research Libraries ARL. (2004).
    ARL Statistics Interactive Edition Electronic
    Version. Retrieved October 10, 2005 from
    http//fisher.lib.virginia.edu/arl.
  • Bopp, R. E. Smith, L. C. (2000). Reference and
    Information Services an Introduction, 3rd
    Edition. Libraries Unlimited.
  • Efron, M. (2003). The liberal media and
    right-wing conspiracies Using cocitation
    information to estimate political orientation in
    Web documents. In Proceedings of CIKM 2004, pp.
    390-398. New York ACM Press.
  • Janes, J. (2003). Introduction to Reference Work
    in the Electronic Age. Neal-Schuman Publishers.
  • Sullivan, D. (2003). Searches Per Day. Retrieved
    October 10, 2005 from http//searchenginewatch.com
    /reports/article.php/2156461.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com