Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle

Description:

Results: Model in generally poor agreement with observed seasonal cycle of NEE... Problem: How to get rid of the double peak in seasonal cycle of NEE? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: globalcarb
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle


1
Constructing and evaluating forward models of the
terrestrial carbon cycle
Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences
Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division NCAR
2
Relevance of the terrestrial carbon cycle to
studies of the global climate
  • Biophysical characteristics of the land surface
    depend on the interactions between surface
    weather, atmospheric composition and chemistry,
    and vegetation ecophysiology leaf area, canopy
    height, Bowen ratio, relative abundance of
    different plant functional types.
  • Atmospheric concentration of CO2 depends, in
    part, on the dynamics of the terrestrial carbon
    cycle, with important variation at seasonal,
    interannual, decadal, and longer timescales.

3
  • Research questions
  • What are the current dynamics of the
    terrestrial carbon cycle?
  • What are the likely future trends in
    source/sink strengths under different emission
    and landuse change scenarios?
  • How do current dynamics and likely future
    trends depend on coupling with climate and
    atmospheric chemistry?
  • How much model detail is required to capture
    the dominant spatial and temporal modes of
    variation in the current and likely future
    terrestrial carbon cycles?
  • How can coupled climate and carbon cycle models
    be evaluated?

4
(No Transcript)
5
Coupled
6
Land-Atmosphere Nitrogen Cycle
7
(No Transcript)
8
Effects on NEE of natural and anthropogenic
disturbances Simulation based on recorded
disturbance history at Harvard Forest
NEE (gC m-2 yr-1)
9
Effects on NEE of anthropogenic changes in
atmospheric composition and chemistry
10
Terrestrial carbon cycle model evaluation over
gradients in climate and disturbance
history Evaluation based on observations of
carbon and water budget components from seven
evergreen needleleaf forest Fluxnet
sites Fluxnet collaborators B.E. Law, H.L.
Gholz, K.L. Clark, E. Falge, D.S. Ellsworth, A.H.
Goldstein, R.K. Monson, D. Hollinger, M. Falk, J.
Chen, J.P. Sparks
11
Based on DeFries et al., 2000
12
Location of Fluxnet sites included in this study
Base map average annual precipitation for
1980-1997
13
Location of seven ENF Fluxnet sites in climate
space
Grey region Complete climate space for the U.S.
(lower 48)
Black region Climate space occupied by evergreen
needleleaf forest in the U.S (lower 48)
14
Summary of site characteristics
15
Duke Forest, NC
Gainesville, FL
Blodgett Forest, CA
Niwot Ridge, CO
Wind River Crane, WA
Howland Forest, ME
Metolius NRA, OR
16
Modeling Protocol
  • Using the Daymet surface weather database as the
    model driver at all sites.
  • Spinup simulation to bring C and N pools into
    steady state repeated 18-year record of surface
    weather. Using assumed levels of CO2atm and
    Ndep circa 1795 AD.
  • Ensemble of site history simulations, with
    increasing CO2atm (IS92a), increasing Ndep from
    anthropogenic sources (following Holland et al.,
    1997), and disturbance history as recorded at
    each site. All simulations ending at 2000 AD.
  • Evaluation of ensemble statistics at current
    stand age, comparison against historical
    observations where possible.

17
Daymet database of daily surface weather drivers
climate summary
18
Disturbance history ensembling Each member
consists of a disturbance history simulation
initiated in a different year of the cyclic
18-year surface weather record.
19
Results Decadal and longer timescale variations
dominated by disturbance history
20
Results Decadal and longer timescale variations
dominated by disturbance history
21
Results Relationship between NEE and GEP depends
on time since disturbance, and on changing
CO2atm and Ndep
22
Results Relationship between NEE and GEP depends
on time since disturbance (continued)
23
Results NEE response to disturbance, changing
CO2atm, and Ndep shows strong interaction
effects
24
Results NEE response to CO2atm for old sites
near steady state depends on the rate of increase
in CO2
25
Results Model captures observed variability in
leaf area index across the climate and
disturbance history gradients
26
Results Model captures observed variability in
evapotranspiration across the climate and
disturbance history gradients
27
Results Model captures observed seasonality in
evapotranspiration across the climate and
disturbance history gradients
28
Results Model tends to underestimate annual NEE,
with strong biases at the warmest sites (FL, DU)
and the old sites (ME, WR).
29
Results Model in generally poor agreement with
observed seasonal cycle of NEE
30
Results but the biases are not consistently
attributed to either Re or GEP.
31
Results but the biases are not consistently
attributed to either Re or GEP.
32
Model evaluation at Metolius old-growth site
Comparison to biometric measurements of carbon
budget components
(all units gC m-2 yr-1)
33
(No Transcript)
34
Results Model in generally poor agreement with
observed seasonal cycle of NEE
35
Results Model agrees well with chronosequence
estimates of NEE at the one site where they are
available (FL)
36
Results Model in generally poor agreement with
observed seasonal cycle of NEE
37
Problem How to get rid of the double peak in
seasonal cycle of NEE? Focus on the Duke Forest
site
38
  • Reducing the temperature sensitivity for MR and
    HR gives some improvement, but double peak
    persists.
  • Excessive reduction of temperature sensitivity
    for HR results in low GPP due to limited N
    mineralization (reduced decomposition of soil
    organic matter).
  • Have to turn to the temperature dependencies
    for GPP and consider the RuBisCO enzyme.

39
Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (R
uBisCO)
  • Enzyme kinetics described by Woodrow and Berry,
    1988, Ann. Rev. Plant Physiology and Plant
    Molecular Biology.
  • Enzyme activity increases exponentially with
    temperature (eventual irreversible decrease in
    activity at high temperature, as proteins
    denature).
  • RuBisCO catalyzes the fixation of CO2
    (photosynthesis) and the fixation of O2 (leading
    to photorespiration).
  • The carboxylase and oxygenase reactions have
    different Michaelis-Menten coefficients, and
    these coefficients have different temperature
    dependencies.
  • These differences result in an optimal
    temperature for photosynthesis which does not
    depend directly on the temperature sensitivity
    for the enzyme activity.

40
The values listed are calculated from
measurements of the enzyme from spinach. There
may, however, be small significant differences in
the kinetic properties of Rubisco from different
species of C3 plants. -Woodrow and Berry, 1988
Low Topt
High Topt
Re
GEP
GEP
Re
MR
MR
HR
GR
HR
GR
NEE
NEE
41
Results There is apparently a significant
variation in the kinetic parameters for RuBisCO
across the climate gradient.
42
  • Next steps in model parameterization and
    evaluation
  • Find optimal kinetic parameters at each site, try
    to establish a dependency with simple climate
    indices that explains the variation in optimal
    temperature (underway).
  • Incorporate measurements from soil chambers and
    leaf-level gas exchange data as additional
    constraints. Test climate dependency of optimal
    temperature with these data (underway).
  • Expand the analysis to other plant functional
    types deciduous broadleaf forest, evergreen
    broadleaf forest, and grasses (C3 and C4).
  • Bring in more extensive evaluation databases
    (inventory, remote sensing).

43
Simulated Leaf Area Index for Evergreen
Needleleaf Forest, NW U.S.
(Compute time approximately 70 hours running
threaded code on lhotse)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com