Title: Constructing and evaluating forward models of the terrestrial carbon cycle
1Constructing and evaluating forward models of the
terrestrial carbon cycle
Peter Thornton Terrestrial Sciences
Section Climate and Global Dynamics Division NCAR
2Relevance of the terrestrial carbon cycle to
studies of the global climate
- Biophysical characteristics of the land surface
depend on the interactions between surface
weather, atmospheric composition and chemistry,
and vegetation ecophysiology leaf area, canopy
height, Bowen ratio, relative abundance of
different plant functional types. - Atmospheric concentration of CO2 depends, in
part, on the dynamics of the terrestrial carbon
cycle, with important variation at seasonal,
interannual, decadal, and longer timescales.
3- Research questions
- What are the current dynamics of the
terrestrial carbon cycle? - What are the likely future trends in
source/sink strengths under different emission
and landuse change scenarios? - How do current dynamics and likely future
trends depend on coupling with climate and
atmospheric chemistry? - How much model detail is required to capture
the dominant spatial and temporal modes of
variation in the current and likely future
terrestrial carbon cycles? - How can coupled climate and carbon cycle models
be evaluated?
4(No Transcript)
5Coupled
6Land-Atmosphere Nitrogen Cycle
7(No Transcript)
8Effects on NEE of natural and anthropogenic
disturbances Simulation based on recorded
disturbance history at Harvard Forest
NEE (gC m-2 yr-1)
9Effects on NEE of anthropogenic changes in
atmospheric composition and chemistry
10Terrestrial carbon cycle model evaluation over
gradients in climate and disturbance
history Evaluation based on observations of
carbon and water budget components from seven
evergreen needleleaf forest Fluxnet
sites Fluxnet collaborators B.E. Law, H.L.
Gholz, K.L. Clark, E. Falge, D.S. Ellsworth, A.H.
Goldstein, R.K. Monson, D. Hollinger, M. Falk, J.
Chen, J.P. Sparks
11Based on DeFries et al., 2000
12Location of Fluxnet sites included in this study
Base map average annual precipitation for
1980-1997
13Location of seven ENF Fluxnet sites in climate
space
Grey region Complete climate space for the U.S.
(lower 48)
Black region Climate space occupied by evergreen
needleleaf forest in the U.S (lower 48)
14Summary of site characteristics
15Duke Forest, NC
Gainesville, FL
Blodgett Forest, CA
Niwot Ridge, CO
Wind River Crane, WA
Howland Forest, ME
Metolius NRA, OR
16Modeling Protocol
- Using the Daymet surface weather database as the
model driver at all sites. - Spinup simulation to bring C and N pools into
steady state repeated 18-year record of surface
weather. Using assumed levels of CO2atm and
Ndep circa 1795 AD. - Ensemble of site history simulations, with
increasing CO2atm (IS92a), increasing Ndep from
anthropogenic sources (following Holland et al.,
1997), and disturbance history as recorded at
each site. All simulations ending at 2000 AD. - Evaluation of ensemble statistics at current
stand age, comparison against historical
observations where possible.
17Daymet database of daily surface weather drivers
climate summary
18Disturbance history ensembling Each member
consists of a disturbance history simulation
initiated in a different year of the cyclic
18-year surface weather record.
19Results Decadal and longer timescale variations
dominated by disturbance history
20Results Decadal and longer timescale variations
dominated by disturbance history
21Results Relationship between NEE and GEP depends
on time since disturbance, and on changing
CO2atm and Ndep
22Results Relationship between NEE and GEP depends
on time since disturbance (continued)
23Results NEE response to disturbance, changing
CO2atm, and Ndep shows strong interaction
effects
24Results NEE response to CO2atm for old sites
near steady state depends on the rate of increase
in CO2
25Results Model captures observed variability in
leaf area index across the climate and
disturbance history gradients
26Results Model captures observed variability in
evapotranspiration across the climate and
disturbance history gradients
27Results Model captures observed seasonality in
evapotranspiration across the climate and
disturbance history gradients
28Results Model tends to underestimate annual NEE,
with strong biases at the warmest sites (FL, DU)
and the old sites (ME, WR).
29Results Model in generally poor agreement with
observed seasonal cycle of NEE
30Results but the biases are not consistently
attributed to either Re or GEP.
31Results but the biases are not consistently
attributed to either Re or GEP.
32Model evaluation at Metolius old-growth site
Comparison to biometric measurements of carbon
budget components
(all units gC m-2 yr-1)
33(No Transcript)
34Results Model in generally poor agreement with
observed seasonal cycle of NEE
35Results Model agrees well with chronosequence
estimates of NEE at the one site where they are
available (FL)
36Results Model in generally poor agreement with
observed seasonal cycle of NEE
37Problem How to get rid of the double peak in
seasonal cycle of NEE? Focus on the Duke Forest
site
38- Reducing the temperature sensitivity for MR and
HR gives some improvement, but double peak
persists. - Excessive reduction of temperature sensitivity
for HR results in low GPP due to limited N
mineralization (reduced decomposition of soil
organic matter). - Have to turn to the temperature dependencies
for GPP and consider the RuBisCO enzyme.
39Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (R
uBisCO)
- Enzyme kinetics described by Woodrow and Berry,
1988, Ann. Rev. Plant Physiology and Plant
Molecular Biology. - Enzyme activity increases exponentially with
temperature (eventual irreversible decrease in
activity at high temperature, as proteins
denature). - RuBisCO catalyzes the fixation of CO2
(photosynthesis) and the fixation of O2 (leading
to photorespiration). - The carboxylase and oxygenase reactions have
different Michaelis-Menten coefficients, and
these coefficients have different temperature
dependencies. - These differences result in an optimal
temperature for photosynthesis which does not
depend directly on the temperature sensitivity
for the enzyme activity.
40The values listed are calculated from
measurements of the enzyme from spinach. There
may, however, be small significant differences in
the kinetic properties of Rubisco from different
species of C3 plants. -Woodrow and Berry, 1988
Low Topt
High Topt
Re
GEP
GEP
Re
MR
MR
HR
GR
HR
GR
NEE
NEE
41Results There is apparently a significant
variation in the kinetic parameters for RuBisCO
across the climate gradient.
42- Next steps in model parameterization and
evaluation - Find optimal kinetic parameters at each site, try
to establish a dependency with simple climate
indices that explains the variation in optimal
temperature (underway). - Incorporate measurements from soil chambers and
leaf-level gas exchange data as additional
constraints. Test climate dependency of optimal
temperature with these data (underway). - Expand the analysis to other plant functional
types deciduous broadleaf forest, evergreen
broadleaf forest, and grasses (C3 and C4). - Bring in more extensive evaluation databases
(inventory, remote sensing).
43Simulated Leaf Area Index for Evergreen
Needleleaf Forest, NW U.S.
(Compute time approximately 70 hours running
threaded code on lhotse)