Improving the health and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Improving the health and

Description:

Lipid composition can be improved with respect to human health by genetic selection. ... and Hellen Burroughs Endowment. National Cattleman's Beef Association ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:113
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 56
Provided by: tjkn
Category:
Tags: health | improving

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Improving the health and


1
Improving the health and healthfulness of
beef J.M. Reecy, and D.C. Beitz Iowa State
University
2
Overview
  • Disease resistance
  • Infectious Bovine Keratoconjunctavitus
  • Respiratory Disease
  • Improving the Healthfulness of Beef

3
Pink Eye
  • Reported in the USA since 1889
  • 45 of Missouri herds have endemic IBK
  • Average prevalence 8
  • More common in the young 10-60
  • Immunity develops with age
  • No gender affinity

4
What Causes Pink Eye
  • Moraxella bovis
  • Brannamella ovis?
  • High UV light
  • Dust
  • IBR infection
  • IBR vaccination
  • Mycoplasma infection Mycoplasma bovoculi
  • Trauma
  • Face flies- Musca autumnalis (since 1946)

5
Options For Control/ Prevention
  • Are the technologies up to the job?

6
Options For Control/ Prevention
  • Not up to the job
  • Vaccines
  • Fly control
  • Dust control
  • Pasture clipping

7
What are the Future Options
  • Genetic selection
  • Improved vaccines
  • Better treatment

8
Requirements of the project
  • Serve as a model for disease resistance/susceptibi
    lity research
  • Internal parasites - nematodes
  • Respiratory
  • Use field records
  • Need to develop data collection scheme

9
Data Collection
  • Two seasons
  • When cases are actively observed
  • Weaning
  • Scoring system
  • Data sheets

10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
Pinkeye Data Analysis
  • 1823 head (Indiana, Iowa, Missouri, Wisconsin)
  • Heritability
  • MTDFREML
  • Model Y ? CG animal PE error
  • CG Sex-weaning group (4)
  • PE permanent environmental
  • h2 0.18

14
Effect of Pinkeye/Corneal Abrasion on Weaning
Weight
Weaning Weight (Lbs)
15
Additional Results
  • No evidence of prior exposure to bovine
    rhinotracheitis as having an effect
  • No evidence of Carrier status (M. bovis and B.
    Ovis) effecting incidence

16
Tear Film
  • Lipid layer Reduces evaporation , prevents
    contamination
  • Aqueous layer Lubrication and protection
  • Mucus layer Lubricates and protect the cornea.

17
Ocular defense factors affecting susceptibility
  • sIgA and Lactoferrin (Lf) as candidate factors in
    the tear film influencing susceptibility
  • Antigen binding protection against invading
    microorganisms
  • Hypothesis Cattle susceptible to pink eye
    produce higher levels of sIgA and lower Lf

18
(No Transcript)
19
Probability of Corneal Scarring
20
MARC Pinkeye data
  • Gary Snowder (JAS 2005 83(3)507-18. )
  • 19 years of data
  • Calves listed as being treated in the herd book
  • Number of records
  • 907 to 10,947 head per breed
  • 1.3 to 22.4 incidence

21
Breed N N Incidence h2
Angus 6,347 3.7 3.7 0.25
Hereford 4,579 22.4 22.4 0.28
Red Poll 998 3.1 3.1 0.09
Charolais 2,878 6.5 6.5 0.00
Simmental 1,775 7.6 7.6 0.10
Limousin 961 3.4 3.4 0.11
Gelbvieh 2,391 2.1 2.1 0.05
Pinzgauer 908 1.3 1.3 0.02
Braunvieh 907 1.8 1.8 0.12
MARC I 4,336 3.9 3.9 0.03
MARC III 10,947 5.9 5.9 0.26
22
(No Transcript)
23
Respiratory Disease
  • Bovine Respiratory Disease is the most common and
    costly disease in the U.S.
  • National mortality rate for bovine respiratory
    disease is 6 (NAHMS, 1997)
  • Lung lesions are routinely observed in animals
    that exhibited no clinical signs

24
Respiratory Disease
  • Use field records
  • Need to develop data collection scheme
  • Treatment data
  • Lung Score

25
Designing Beef to Produce a Healthier Product
26
Overview
  • Goal of Research
  • Develop the tools to allow breeders to select for
    healthier beef
  • What does this mean to the beef industry?
  • It will be able to actively address human health
    concerns with respect to consumption of beef

27
Interaction of Genetics and Environment in
Causing Human Disease
PRIMARILY NATURE (Genetics)
PRIMARILY NURTURE (Environment)
Heart Disease
Motor vehicle accidents
Osteoporosis
Dwarfism
Stroke
Pneumonia, influenza
Diabetes
Obesity
Nutritional deficiencies, nutritional anemias
Colon cancer
Cirrhosis of the liver
Breast cancer
Lung cancer
28
Two Leading Causes of Human Deaths in the U.S.
  • Cause of death Rank1 Deaths
    Percentage
  • All causes --- 2,443,387 100.0
  • Diseases of heart 1 696,947 28.5
  • Malignant neoplasms 2 557,271 22.8
  • Cerebrovascular diseases 3 162,672 6.7
  • Chronic lower respiratory distress 4 124,816
    5.1
  • Accidents (unintentional injuries) 5 106,742
    4.4
  • Diabetes mellitus 6 73,249 3.0
  • Influenza and pneumonia 7 65,681 2.7
  • Alzheimers disease 8 58,866 2.4
  • Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and
    nephrosis 9 40,974 1.7
  • Septicemia 10 33,865 1.4
  • 1Rank based on number of deaths total 79 of
    all deaths.Source National Vital Statistics
    Report, Vol. 15, No. 17

29
Obesity in U.S. in 2004
BMI gt 30, or 30 lbs. overweight for 5'4"
person 2004                                    
                                                  
                                                  
                                                  
                                                  
                                                  
   
30
What are Americans eating?
Calories from Fat SFA MUFA PUFA
An Average American Diet 34 16 11 7
What should Americans be eating?
Calories from Fat SFA MUFA PUFA
American Heart Association Step I Diet 30 9 14 7
American Heart Association Step II Diet 25 7 12 6
31
  • How Do We Name Fatty Acids?
  • Carbon chain length and of unsaturated bonds
    (e.g. 180 or 181)
  • Name
  • Palmitic (160) or Palmitoleic (161)?9
  • Stearic (180) or Oleic (181) ?9
  • Linoleic (182) ?9,12

32
Atherogenic index
The atherogenic index as proposed by Ulbricht and
Southgate, 1991
33
Health Promoting Index
34
How Does Beef Compare to Other Sources of Fat?
35
Health-promoting index of several foods
Food HPI
Food HPI
Beef(NLMB) 1.43 Beef TG(Knight) 1.27 Extreme
milk fat 1.30 Beef(Beitz) 1.16 Tallow 1.12 Greate
st milk 0.94 Average milk fat 0.44 Low milk
fat 0.30 Palm kernel oil 0.15 Coconut oil 0.06
Soy oil 7.69 Olive oil 7.14 Beef
PL(Knight) 3.03 Chicken 2.27 Pork 2.13 Lard 1.92 B
eef(Eichhorn) 1.67 Margarine 1.61 Beef(Knight) 1.5
2 Beef(Garret) 1.49
36
Genotype
Phenotype
Environment
37
Feeding systems affecting fatty acid composition
Ruminant species - Rumen biohydrogenation -
Forage increases reductive potential of the
rumen - Rumen can be overloaded with PUFA
(CLA increase in pasture-fed cattle)
38
Fatty Acid Synthesis and Modification
Fatty acid synthesis
160
180
140
161
181
141
39
Sample
Processing
974 Steaks from beef cattle
40
  • Statistical analysis
  • Steers and bulls slaughtered at normal finishing
    weight.
  • Contemporary groups based on year, farm of
    origin, feedlot, and harvest date.
  • 63 contemporary groups (1-65 cattle per group).
  • 77 sires (1-40 progeny per sire).

41
Variation in Health-Promoting Index of Beef
42
Composite Fatty Acid Composition
43
Composite Fatty Acid Indexes
44
Does Breed to Breed Variation Exist in Fatty Acid
Composition
  • Collaborative project with Larry Cundiff at Meat
    Animal Research Center
  • 588 animals
  • Sire Lines
  • Angus BeefMaster
  • Hereford Bonsmara
  • Brangus Romosinuano
  • Dam Lines
  • Angus MARC III

45
Significant Differences in Fatty Acid
Composition Exist Between Breeds
Fatty Acid Low High P-value
140 3.40 3.96 lt.0001
160 27.18 29.38 lt.0001
161 3.47 3.78 0.0075
180 12.51 14.31 lt.0001
181 33. 90 35.73 lt.0001
182 1.51 1.87 0.0007
46
Significant Differences in Fatty Acid Indexes
Exist Between Breeds
Index Low High P-value
AI 0.87 1.01 lt.0001
161/160 12.51 13.78 lt.0001
181/180 240.05 274.77 lt.0001
x1/x0 88.07 96.41 lt.0001
16/14 706.97 802.43 lt.0001
18/16 43.49 51.34 lt.0001
47
Significant Differences in Fatty Acids Exist
Between Breeds
Index Low High P-value
181t11 4.49 6.17 0.0016
181c11 1.05 1.25 lt.0001
183n3 0.20 0.24 lt.0001
CLAc9,t11 0.35 0.42 0.0133
225n3 0.16 0.25 0.0378
226n3 0.02 0.03 0.0073
48
New Compounds
  • Conjugated Linoleic Acid
  • Anti-cancer, anti-obesity, anti-diabetic
  • Heme and non-Heme Iron
  • correlated positively with hematological status
  • Spingolipids
  • may inhibit colon cancer in humans
  • Creatine
  • improves muscle strength
  • Vitamin E
  • negatively correlated with risk of prostate
    cancer

49
Are Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Associated
with Fatty Acid Composition
  • 172 purebred American Angus Bulls and Steers ISU
    Meat Quality Selection Herd
  • Stearoyl-CoA Desaturease SNPs
  • Enzyme responsible for desaturating fatty acids
  • SCD 316, SCD536, SCD1278

Amino Acid Genotype Animals Percentage
VV CC 115 67
VA CT 57 33
50
Effect of a Stearoyl-CoA Desaturase DNA
polymorphism
Lipid 161/160 161/160 P-Value
Lipid VA VV P-Value
Phospholipid 6.3 6.8 0.13
TAG 14.5 13.9 0.02
51
  • Summary
  • Triacylglycerol fatty acid composition is more
    heritable than phospholipid fatty acid
    composition.
  • Fatty acid desaturation is more heritable in beef
    cattle than is fatty acid elongation.
  • Health Promoting index/AI is highly heritable.
  • Differences in fatty acid composition exist
    between breeds.
  • DNA markers can be used to identify more
    healthful beef.

52
Conclusions Fatty acid composition is a
heritable trait. Lipid composition can be
improved with respect to human health by genetic
selection.
53
Where Do We Go From Here?
  • Obtain Research Funding
  • Develop resource populations
  • American Angus (have in hand)
  • Meat Animal Research Center
  • Correlation With Other Traits
  • Identify Molecular Markers

54
Where Do We Go From Here?
  • Human Studies
  • Taste Test Panels
  • Feeding Studies
  • Identification of Novel Health Compounds
  • Development of New Analytical Techniques

55
  • Acknowledgements
  • National Beef Cattle Evaluation Consortium
  • USDA Center for Designing Foods to Improve
    Nutrition at the Iowa State University
  • The Wise and Hellen Burroughs Endowment
  • National Cattlemans Beef Association
  • Collaborators
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com