Radiological Terrorism: Introduction

1 / 59
About This Presentation
Title:

Radiological Terrorism: Introduction

Description:

Nuclear weapons testing, Bikini Atoll, 7/24/46. U.S. Department of Energy photograph. ... Military-Style Backpack, similar to one carrying the 1996 Centennial Olympic ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:130
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 60
Provided by: Braxton

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Radiological Terrorism: Introduction


1
Radiological TerrorismIntroduction
2
Nuclear WMD
  • Modern time weapons
  • First used in WWII

3
Nuclear weapons testing, Bikini Atoll,
7/24/46 U.S. Department of Energy photograph.
4
Nuclear WMD
  • Modern time weapons
  • First used in WWII

5
Replicas of atomic bombs dropped over Hiroshima
and Nagasaki, Japan in 1945. National Atomic
Museum photograph
6
Military-Style Backpack, similar to one carrying
the 1996 Centennial Olympic Park Bomb, could
deliver a dirty bomb Federal Bureau of
Investigation photograph
7
Pros / Cons
  • Advantages
  • Highly disruptive

8
Pros / Cons
  • Advantages
  • Highly disruptive
  • High fear / terror factor

9
Pros / Cons
  • Advantages
  • Highly disruptive
  • High fear / terror factor
  • Significant media profile

10
Pros / Cons
  • Advantages
  • Highly disruptive
  • High fear / terror factor
  • Significant media profile
  • Nuclear bombs also have

11
Pros / Cons
  • Advantages
  • Highly disruptive
  • High fear / terror factor
  • Significant media profile
  • Nuclear bombs also have
  • Vast destructive power (destroys infrastructure)

12
Pros / Cons
  • Advantages
  • Highly disruptive
  • High fear / terror factor
  • Significant media profile
  • Nuclear bombs also have
  • Vast destructive power (destroys infrastructure)
  • Effect (death and destruction) is immediate

13
Nuclear weapons testing, Operation Greenhouse,
May 8, 1951 at Enewetak. U.S. Department of
Energy photograph.
14
Pros / Cons
  • Disadvantages
  • Expensive to obtain/maintain

15
Pros / Cons
  • Disadvantages
  • Expensive to obtain/maintain
  • Relatively short shelf life (7 years)

16
Pros / Cons
  • Disadvantages
  • Expensive to obtain/maintain
  • Relatively short shelf life (7 years)
  • Low level of control and containment

17
Pros / Cons
  • Disadvantages
  • Expensive to obtain/maintain
  • Relatively short shelf life (7 years)
  • Low level of control and containment
  • Destroys infrastructure

18
Pros / Cons
  • Disadvantages
  • Expensive to obtain/maintain
  • Relatively short shelf life (7 years)
  • Low level of control and containment
  • Destroys infrastructure
  • High risk of detection

19
A U.S. Customs Inspector checks seaport
containers coming into the United States. U.S.
Department of Homeland Security photo by James
Tourtellotte
20
Pros / Cons
  • Disadvantages
  • Relatively short shelf life (7 years)
  • Low level of control and containment
  • Destroys infrastructure
  • High risk of detection
  • Radiation signature helps pinpoint source

21
Destructivity
  • WMD far exceeds that of conventional, chemical,
    or biologic weapons

22
Destructivity
  • WMD far exceeds that of conventional, chemical,
    or biologic weapons
  • Dirty bombs lack real destructive power

23
Destructivity
  • WMD far exceeds that of conventional, chemical,
    or biologic weapons
  • Dirty bombs lack real destructive power
  • Goal of the terrorist
  • Harassment vs. death

24
Lethality
  • Nuclear blast potential

25
Lethality
  • Nuclear blast potential
  • Kill tens of thousands of people

26
Lethality
  • Nuclear blast potential
  • Kill tens of thousands of people
  • Small target area

27
Lethality
  • Nuclear blast potential
  • Kill tens of thousands of people
  • Small target area
  • Dirty bomb potential

28
Lethality
  • Nuclear blast potential
  • Kill tens of thousands of people
  • Small target area
  • Dirty bomb potential
  • Few deaths

29
Lethality
  • Weapon Grams
  • Fuel-air explosives 320 million
  • Mustard gas 3.2 million
  • Sarin nerve gas 800,000
  • A "crude" nuclear weapon 5,000
  • Type A botulinal toxin 80
  • Anthrax spores 8

30
CIA Reports on Former Soviet Union Source U.S.
Central Intelligence Agency
31
Availability
  • Nuclear proliferation is a problem

32
Availability
  • Nuclear proliferation is a problem
  • Rogue nations may provide terrorist groups with
    both weapons and technical knowledge

33
Availability
  • Nuclear proliferation is a problem
  • Rogue nations may provide terrorist groups with
    both weapons and technical knowledge
  • Fall of the Soviet Union left many unaccounted
    nuclear devices

34
Availability
  • Nuclear proliferation is a problem
  • Rogue nations may provide terrorist groups with
    both weapons and technical knowledge
  • Fall of the Soviet Union left many unaccounted
    nuclear devices
  • For sale on the black market

35
Availability
  • Terrorist groups performing own research and
    development of nuclear weapons

36
Availability
  • Terrorist groups performing own research and
    development of nuclear weapons
  • Industry use of radiological materials provides
    the isotopes for dirty bombs

37
Availability
  • Terrorist groups performing own research and
    development of nuclear weapons
  • Industry use of radiological materials provides
    the isotopes for dirty bombs
  • Power plant sabotage could produce massive dirty
    bombs

38
Delivery
  • Suitcase bomb easily transported by person

39
Delivery
  • Suitcase bomb easily transported by person
  • 10 kiloton bomb readily moved by truck or boat

40
Delivery
  • Suitcase bomb easily transported by person
  • 10 kiloton bomb readily moved by truck or boat
  • Radiation detection equipment might miss a small
    device

41
Underwater radiation detector U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency photo
42
The Terrorist Risk
  • Five levels of risk

43
The Terrorist Risk
  • Five levels of risk
  • Threatened use, with no real capability to use
    them

44
The Terrorist Risk
  • Five levels of risk
  • Threatened use, with no real capability to use
    them
  • Unsuccessful attempts to acquire NW

45
The Terrorist Risk
  • Five levels of risk
  • Threatened use, with no real capability to use
    them
  • Unsuccessful attempts to acquire NW
  • Actual possession of NW

46
The Terrorist Risk
  • Five levels of risk
  • Threatened use, with no real capability to use
    them
  • Unsuccessful attempts to acquire NW
  • Actual possession of NW
  • Unsuccessful attempts to use NW

47
The Terrorist Risk
  • Five levels of risk
  • Threatened use, with no real capability to use
    them
  • Unsuccessful attempts to acquire NW
  • Actual possession of NW
  • Unsuccessful attempts to use NW
  • Successful use of NW

48
The Terrorist Risk
  • Why havent we seen the use of NW by terrorists?

49
The Terrorist Risk
  • Why havent we seen the use of NW by terrorists?
  • Fear of severe backlash

50
The Terrorist Risk
  • Why havent we seen the use of NW by terrorists?
  • Fear of severe backlash
  • More likely reasons

51
The Terrorist Risk
  • Why havent we seen the use of NW by terrorists?
  • Fear of severe backlash
  • More likely reasons
  • Difficult to acquire

52
The Terrorist Risk
  • Why havent we seen the use of NW by terrorists?
  • Fear of severe backlash
  • More likely reasons
  • Difficult to acquire
  • Expensive

53
The Terrorist Risk
  • Why havent we seen the use of NW by terrorists?
  • Fear of severe backlash
  • More likely reasons
  • Difficult to acquire
  • Expensive
  • Difficult to maintain

54
The Terrorist Risk
  • Why havent we seen the use of NW by terrorists?
  • Fear of severe backlash
  • More likely reasons
  • Difficult to acquire
  • Expensive
  • Difficult to maintain
  • High risk of detection

55
Defense
  • Defensive capabilities are limited

56
Defense
  • Defensive capabilities are limited
  • Best defense

57
Defense
  • Defensive capabilities are limited
  • Best defense
  • Reduce nuclear proliferation

58
Defense
  • Defensive capabilities are limited
  • Best defense
  • Reduce nuclear proliferation
  • Limit access to uranium and plutonium

59
Defense
  • Defensive capabilities are limited
  • Best defense
  • Reduce nuclear proliferation
  • Limit access to uranium and plutonium
  • Improve surveillance and detection capabilities
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)