Serving American Indian Students Under Title III - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Serving American Indian Students Under Title III

Description:

How are American Indian students eligible for Title III services? ... This often leads to non-standard English, 'Indian English' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: jple
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Serving American Indian Students Under Title III


1
Serving American Indian Students Under Title III
  • J P Leary, Consultant
  • American Indian Studies Program
  • Department of Public Instruction
  • 608/267-2283 or 800/441-4563
  • jp.leary_at_dpi.state.wi.us

2
Demographics
There are eleven federally recognized tribes in
Wisconsin, each of whom is engaging in efforts to
revitalize their languages.
3
Demographics
  • There are over 50,000 American Indians in
    Wisconsin (US Census, 2000).
  • There are over 14,000 American Indian students
    attending public, tribal, or private K-12 schools
    in Wisconsin.
  • Public enrollment 12,748
  • Tribal schools 1,250
  • Private schools (including Indian Community
    School) 300

4
Key Questions
  • How are American Indian students eligible for
    Title III services?
  • What information do we use to identify students
    for services?
  • What types of services can we provide?
  • What about instruction in tribal language?
  • Other questions?

5
Q. How are American Indian students eligible for
Title III services?
  • A. American Indian students are included in No
    Child Left Behinds definition of Limited English
    Proficient and are therefore eligible for
    services under Title III.

6
Title IX, Sec. 9101
  • (25) LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT- The term limited
    English proficient', when used with respect to an
    individual, means an individual
  • (A) who is aged 3 through 21
  • (B) who is enrolled or preparing to enroll in an
    elementary school or secondary school
  • (C)(i) who was not born in the United States or
    whose native language is a language other than
    English
  • (ii)(I) who is a Native American or Alaska
    Native, or a native resident of the outlying
    areas and
  • (II) who comes from an environment where a
    language other than English has had a significant
    impact on the individual's level of English
    language proficiency or
  • (iii) who is migratory, whose native language is
    a language other than English, and who comes from
    an environment where a language other than
    English is dominant and
  • (D) whose difficulties in speaking, reading,
    writing, or understanding the English language
    may be sufficient to deny the individual
  • (i) the ability to meet the State's proficient
    level of achievement on State assessments
    described in section 1111(b)(3)
  • (ii) the ability to successfully achieve in
    classrooms where the language of instruction is
    English or
  • (iii) the opportunity to participate fully in
    society.

7
Title IX, Sec. 9101
  • (25) LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT- The term limited
    English proficient', when used with respect to an
    individual, means an individual
  • (A) who is aged 3 through 21
  • (B) who is enrolled or preparing to enroll in an
    elementary school or secondary school
  • (C)(i) who was not born in the United States or
    whose native language is a language other than
    English
  • (ii)(I) who is a Native American or Alaska
    Native, or a native resident of the outlying
    areas and
  • (II) who comes from an environment where a
    language other than English has had a significant
    impact on the individual's level of English
    language proficiency or
  • (iii) who is migratory, whose native language is
    a language other than English, and who comes from
    an environment where a language other than
    English is dominant and
  • (D) whose difficulties in speaking, reading,
    writing, or understanding the English language
    may be sufficient to deny the individual
  • (i) the ability to meet the State's proficient
    level of achievement on State assessments
    described in section 1111(b)(3)
  • (ii) the ability to successfully achieve in
    classrooms where the language of instruction is
    English or
  • (iii) the opportunity to participate fully in
    society.

8
Q. What information do we use to identify
students for services?
  • A. American Indian students are LEP if
  • Their use of and proficiency in English has been
    impacted by another language and
  • They lack proficiency in English sufficient to
    score above minimal on state assessments

9
Linguistic Impact
  • Refers to the impact another language has on how
    a student learns English and the form of English
    learned
  • This often leads to non-standard English, Indian
    English
  • Some linguists refer to the condition where
    students are proficient in neither their tribal
    language nor English as semilingualism (Leap,
    1986)

10
Linguistic Impact
  • Very few American Indian students in Wisconsin
    are fluent in their tribal language
  • However, because linguistic impact can be traced
    across up to four generations, virtually all
    American Indian students can be considered
    linguistically impacted by their tribal language.

11
State Assessments
  • The WKCE (Wisconsin Knowledge and Concepts
    Examination) is a statewide standardized exam
    currently given each year to students in grades
    4, 8, and 10.
  • In 2005-2006, WKCE expands to grades 3-8.
  • The exam measures student achievement in five
    subject areas reading, language arts,
    mathematics, science, social studies. Students
    also provide a rough draft writing sample.

12
State Assessments
  • The overarching goal of NCLB is to increase
    academic performance as measured by state
    assessments
  • In Wisconsin, WKCE scores serves as the outcome
    measure for academic performance

13
State Assessments
  • Statewide, approximately 50 of all American
    Indian students scored minimal or basic on WKCE
    tests in reading and language arts (WINSS,
    2003-2004)
  • By definition, approximately 50 of all American
    Indian students in Wisconsin meet the criteria
    for services under Title III

14
State Assessments
  • Why not use LAS, IPT, Woodcock-Munoz, or other
    assessment instruments for identifying LEP
    American Indian students?
  • You can but do not need to do so
  • States have discretion in setting criteria
  • These instruments are not normed for this
    population nor for this purpose
  • They are weak proxies for determining academic
    proficiency
  • WKCE is a more valid measure of academic
    proficiency in reading and language arts

15
Q. What types of services can we provide?
  • Title III, sec. 3115 authorizes the following
    types of activities
  • Developing and implementing new language
    instruction educational programs and academic
    content instruction
  • Expansion or enhancement of existing language
    instruction programs
  • School-wide programs for restructuring,
    reforming, and upgrading language instruction and
    related activities
  • District-wide programs for restructuring,
    reforming, and upgrading language instruction and
    related activities

16
Required Activities
  • Language instruction programs designed to
    increase English proficiency and student academic
    achievement in core academic subjects
  • Professional development related to improving
    educational outcomes for LEP students

17
Allowable Activities
  • Improving program objectives and instructional
    strategies
  • Upgrading curriculum, instructional materials,
    and assessment procedures
  • Tutoring
  • Vocational education
  • Language programs coordinated with other school
    programs or services
  • Community participation programs
  • Family literacy efforts
  • Parent outreach and training initiatives

18
Q. What about instruction in tribal language?
  • NCLB explicitly recognizes the unique status of
    American Indian tribes and tribal languages under
    the law.
  • PL-101-477, the Native American Languages Act of
    1990, establishes as federal policy the desire to
    preserve, protect, and promote the rights and
    freedom of Native Americans to use, practice, and
    develop Native American languages

19
Native American Languages Act of 1990
  • The traditional languages of Native Americans
    are an integral part of their cultures and
    identities and form the basic medium for the
    transmission, and thus survival, of Native
    American cultures, literatures, histories,
    religions, political institutions, and values
    (sec. 102(3))
  • There is convincing evidence that student
    achievement and performance, community and school
    pride, and educational opportunity is clearly and
    directly tied to respect for, and support of, the
    first language of the child or student (sec.
    102(6))
  • Languages are the means of communication for
    the full range of human experiences and are
    critical to the survival of cultural and
    political integrity of any people (sec. 102(9))

20
NCLB, Title III, SEC. 3125. Rules of Construction
  • Nothing in this part shall be construed
  • (1) to prohibit a local educational agency from
    serving limited English proficient children
    simultaneously with children with similar
    educational needs, in the same educational
    settings where appropriate
  • (2) to require a State or a local educational
    agency to establish, continue, or eliminate any
    particular type of instructional program for
    limited English proficient children or
  • (3) to limit the preservation or use of Native
    American languages.

21
Academic Benefits of Teaching the Tribal Language
  • Students do better in school if their language
    and culture are a part of the schools curriculum
    (Cummins, 1986)
  • Navajo students in an immersion program designed
    for dual proficiency and aligned to state
    standards dramatically outperformed peers in an
    English-only classroom on standardized tests
    (F.T. Johnson and J. Wilson, 2004)

22
Other Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com