History QuotesRank each on a 110 scale on how much you agree 10 or disagree 1 with them - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

History QuotesRank each on a 110 scale on how much you agree 10 or disagree 1 with them

Description:

History Quotes-Rank each on a 1-10 scale on how much you agree (10) or ... (access to seas, good harbors, climate vs. landlocked, mountainous, cold area) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: ssd4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: History QuotesRank each on a 110 scale on how much you agree 10 or disagree 1 with them


1
History Quotes-Rank each on a 1-10 scale on how
much you agree (10) or disagree (1) with them
  • History An account, mostly false of events
    mostly unimportant, which are brought about by
    rulers, mostly knaves, and soldiers, mostly
    fools Ambrose Bierce
  • History abhors determinism but cannot tolerate
    chance-Bernard De Voto
  • Who controls the past controls the future, who
    controls the present controls the past-George
    Orwell
  • Those who dont study the past are doomed to
    repeat it-George Santayana

2
What if
  • What if you awoke and could not remember the past
    at all? Sweet? Problematic? Important?
    Irrelevant?
  • Do our micro-memories have any relevance to
    history?
  • Is it important to know your past? Why?
  • If you were to write a diary how do you decide
    what to include what to ignore?
  • Which is a better source, an Biography written by
    a historian or an Autobiography?
  • Do people learn from their mistakes? Is that a
    benefit to history? If not, insanity?

3
Is History merely the study of the past (302).
  • Evidence-Because we can only know the past to the
    extent that we have evidence of it History can be
    defined as not the study of the past, but the
    study of the present traces of the past (302).
  • Problems-1. too little evidence 2. Usually too
    much evidence
  • Ex-Write the history of 2009 How would you do
    this?
  • Often in the distant past too little evidence
    leads to MISINTERPRETATION of the evidence
  • Ex-Picture pg. 302
  • Our knowledge of the Greek/Persian Wars are based
    on a single, unreliable source, the Greek
    Historian Herodotus (485-420 BCE)

4
Herodotus-Father of History
  • The Greek researcher and storyteller Herodotus of
    Halicarnassus (fifth century BCE) was the world's
    first historian.
  • In The Histories, (the worlds first history
    book he describes the expansion of the
    Achaemenid empire under its kings Cyrus the
    Great, Cambyses and Darius I the Great,
    culminating in king Xerxes' expedition in 480 BCE
    against the Greeks. It also contains descriptions
    of the peoples that the Persians have conquered,
    fairy tales, gossip, legends, and a very
    humanitarian morale.
  • We know little about the Father of History. Yet,
    there are only a few ancient writers that we know
    as well as Herodotus.
  • Herodotus of Halicarnassus hereby publishes the
    results of his inquiries, hoping to do two
    things to preserve the memory of the past by
    putting on record the astonishing achievements
    both of the Greek and the non-Greek peoples and
    more particularly, to show how the two races came
    into conflict.

5
Significance
  • Usually, problem is not too little evidence but
    too much
  • So we make history a record of the past
    SIGNIFICANT events
  • Rank 1-7 the following in order of significance
  • a. Bill Clinton is caught having an affair with
    Monica Lewinski
  • b. Sumner School District establishes IB
    Programme
  • c. Russia invades Georgia, 108 people killed
  • d. Britney Spears shaves her head
  • e. Todays ToK class
  • f. President signs Bail Out legislation into
    affect
  • g. Seahawks lose 4th game in a row, Matt
    Hasslebeck hurt again
  • Must First Establish Criteria, Right?
  • Could one become more significant in the future?
    Less? Which is most important to you right now?
  • So, the THREE IMPORTANT FEATURES of HISTORY are
    not only Evidence and Significance, but also
    Explaining and Understanding it as well.

6
Why study that Crap?
  • Is explaining why as important as what?
    Should History be about explaining why or just
    tell the what?
  • Henry Ford (1863-1847) characterized history as
    more or less bunk. Is it old news that has
    nothing to do with today?
  • Justifications
  • 1. It gives us identity-How?
  • 2. It is a defense against propaganda-How?
  • 3. Enriches understanding of Human Nature-How?
  • Claim-the study of Northern Hemisphere history
    is a mandatory IB subject. Arguments for?
    Against?

7
3 Justifications
  • 1-Sense of identity-Is a country like a person?
    Memento clip for a country?
  • Box 305
  • 2-Defense against propaganda-
  • Stalin and Trotsky picture (pg. 305)
  • Chief Seattle Quote pg. 306
  • George Orwell He controls the past controls the
    future. Is this true?
  • 3-History enriching understanding of Human
    Nature
  • What does History show about humanity?
  • Immanuel Kant Quote 307
  • Can history create Self Realizing Expectations?
    War inevitable? Economic depression? Races cannot
    coexist? Climate beyond our control? Greed rules
    all?

8
So, how can the past be known?
  • Only through our senses? If based on perception
    then, nothing is reliable?
  • Opposite view Skeptic who argues that since past
    no longer exists, it cant be changed so it is
    completely objective.
  • G.R. Elton (1921-1994)-In a very real sense the
    study of history is concerned with a subject
    matter more objective and independent than that
    of the natural sciences. Just because historical
    matter is in the past, is goneits objective
    reality is guaranteed it is beyond being altered
    for any purpose whatsoever
  • Samuel Butler (1835-1902)-Though God cannot
    alter the past, historians can
  • Which is more true?

9
Ways to Know the Past
  • Primary and Secondary Sources
  • How do primary sources become affected/infected
    by 4 Ways of Knowing?
  • Fallible Eyewitnesses-Write an account of last
    Fridays game.
  • 1 Social Bias-Was medieval Europe a religious
    place? Describe the culture of Sumer High
    School. What would your put in a historical time
    capsule to be opened 500 years from now to give
    people an accurate perspective of the times?

10
Primary vs. Secondary Sources Cont
  • Deliberate Manipulation-Where government (or
    other organization) deliberately change the
    facts of history to align with their agenda.
    (Trotsky Example)
  • If the Nazis had won the war, would history be
    different (i.e is history written by the
    victors)?
  • List Advantages Disadvantages of both. Which
    is better? Explain why.

11
Writing History
  • How does one start? How does one choose where to
    begin?
  • Isnt history a selection of a selection?-How?
    (think about primary sources)
  • What are advantages of Hindsight? What seemed
    insignificant can become?
  • Would WWI still be called the war to end all
    wars? Are we currently beginning a Great
    Depression? Did people know they were becoming
    enlightened during The Age of Enlightenment or
    that they were becoming Romantic during The
    Romantic Period?
  • What Age are we in now? Did I grow up in the
    Saved by the Bell generation?
  • What will the war in Iraq/terrorism be Called?

12
Disadvantages of Hindsight
  • When you look back at the past, is it possible to
    see that they could have happened a multitude of
    other ways, or do we seem to get locked in on the
    idea that that was the only way that thing could
    have happened?
  • 2 Hindsight Bias
  • WMD for example. Still invade Iraq?
    Recessioneveryone knew it was gonna happen
    right? 1st Black President-Fo Shizzle in 2008
    right?
  • So, hindsight is a and for historians.
    side allows them to understand and quantify
    significance of events, on the side, it can
    lead to arrogance and misunderstanding about how
    why an event happened and its inevitability.

13
The Problem of Bias
  • 3 Bias-3 types applicable to history
  • -Topic Choice- A historians selections
  • may be influenced by his interests or
    preoccupations-(though choices may biased, that
    does not necessarily mean treatment of topic has
    to be)
  • -Confirmation- A historian might only seek
    evidence that supports his understanding and
    explanation of history-(like Nat Science, a
    good historian is likely to actively seek out
    refutations and address them)
  • -National- (i.e. a German finding excuses for
    the holocaust or an American emotionally coloring
    and rationalizing Hiroshima)
  • Will there ever be a Universal history book
    that all countries agree on? Is that possible?-

14
Pluralistic Approach
  • Is it possible to be unbiased?
  • No easy solution to biases. So
  • Cubist History

15
Theories of History
  • Box pg. 315-Describing AND Explaining-Is it
    possible to isolate a cause?
  • Example-Some Historians have argued the history
    of civilizations depends on geographical factors
    (access to seas, good harbors, climate vs.
    landlocked, mountainous, cold area). Is true?
    Fo Sho?
  • Great Person Theory of History-The course of
    history is mainly determined by great
    individuals (316).
  • Box on 316
  • Collingwood Focus on Empathy in History
  • Is it possible to empathize with Hitler, Stalin,
    Genghis Kahn, Alexander the Great?
  • Question 3 Box 317

16
Economic Determinism Theory
  • Contrast to Great Person Theory
  • Karl Marx
  • Operate with Iron Necessity
  • Future can be predicted
  • It is not great individuals, but _____ and _____
    factors that are the engines of change (318).
  • Box 318
  • Very Deterministic view
  • Marxs own prediction have not come true

17
Role of Chance
  • What if Cleopatra had been an
  • Ugly woman? Would history be different? What if
    Hitler had become an artist?
  • What if Kerry or Gore won the presidency in 2000
    or 2004? What if one of the 15 assassination
    attempts on Hitler had worked? What if?
  • Does it make any sense to try to make sense of
    history or is it all governed by chance?
  • Is History about the what, why, or both?
  • Is the aim of the historian, like that of the
    artist, to enlarge our picture of the world, to
    give us a NEW way of looking at things or is it
    true that the only thing we learn from history
    is that we learn nothing from history?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com