The Role of Employer Behaviour in Immigrant - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

The Role of Employer Behaviour in Immigrant

Description:

Disadvantageous labour market outcomes for immigrants and racial ... clear preferences for country of origin (Coates & Carr, 2005) ... K., & Carr, S. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:77
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: meredith95
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Role of Employer Behaviour in Immigrant


1
The Role of Employer Behaviour in Immigrant
Racial/Ethnic Minority Labour Market Disadvantage
  • Meredith McLellan
  • March 13, 2006

2
Context
  • Disadvantageous labour market outcomes for
    immigrants and racial/ethnic minorities
  • Underemployment / skill underutilization
  • Economic disparity / earnings differentials
  • Segmented labour markets
  • Li (1998) Non-white origin creates a penalty
    for all visible minorities in the labour market.

3
Research Questions
  • What are the labour market processes at work that
    might contribute to these disadvantages?
  • What role does employer behaviour play?
  • Do employers in the occupational mainstream
    create barriers in access to jobs?

4
A Problematic Area of Study
  • Absent or ambiguous data
  • Hiring processes are infrequently documented
    (Petersen, Saporta Seidel, 2005)
  • Racist attitudes have evolved to become more
    subtle and ambivalent (Ziegert Hanges, 2005)
  • Self-censorship of controversial beliefs
    (Supphellen et. al., 1997)
  • Elusiveness of human decision making
  • Literature focuses primarily on gender and racial
    discrimination

5
Types of Studies
  • Field trials / situation testing
  • Laboratory experiments / simulated hiring
    decisions
  • Case studies
  • Surveys

6
Aspects of the Hiring Process
Phase
Definition
Tools Processes
Recruitment
Identifying and contacting the relevant labour
market
Advertising, networks, agencies
Narrowing the applicant pool
Resume assessment, testing
Screening
Selection
Choosing a candidate to hire
Interviews, testing, reference checks
7
Validity of Hiring Tools and Processes adapted
from Catano et. al. (1997)
8
Recruitment Some Findings
  • Recruitment procedures affect the composition of
    the applicant pool (Peterson, Saporta Seidel
    2005)
  • Firms discriminate against minority groups by
    posting fewer vacancies in the section of the
    labour market where minority groups are located
    (Fugazza 2003 Neckerman Kirschenman 1991)
  • Employer reputation affects who applies
  • Current employees play a role in referral
    networks

9
Screening Some Findings
  • Bertrand Mullainathan (2003)
  • African American-sounding names vs.
    white-sounding names on resumes whites received
    more calls for interviews
  • Ziegert Hanges (2005)
  • Black applicants more often rejected in
    in-basket exercise
  • Petersen Dietz (2005)
  • Fewer foreign applicants selected for a job
    interview

10
Selection Some Findings
  • Bias against blacks in cognitive ability tests
    (Chung-Yan Cronshaw, 2002)
  • New Zealand HR managers reveal clear preferences
    for country of origin (Coates Carr, 2005)
  • Greater likelihood of choosing in-group members
    over out-group members (Lewis Sherman, 2003)
  • Adverse impact of assessment centre evaluations
    on Hispanic job applicants (Fiedler, 2001)
  • Some evidence that blacks do poorly in job
    interviews in part because of cultural
    differences (Neckerman Kirschenman, 1991)

11
Person-Organization Fit
  • Compatibility between people and organizations
  • Values
  • Goals
  • Needs
  • Personality
  • Other aspects of fit
  • Person-vocation
  • Person-group
  • Person-job

12
Person-Organization Fit from Kristof (1996)
PERSON
ORGANIZATION
Characteristics Culture/Climate Values Goals Norm
s
Characteristics Personality Values Goals Attitude
s
supplementary fit
Supplies Resources financial physical psychologic
al Opportunities task-related interpersonal
Supplies Resources time effort commitment experie
nce KSAs task interpersonal
Demands Resources time effort commitment experien
ce KSAs task interpersonal
Demands Resources financial physical psychologica
l Opportunities task-related interpersonal
complementary fit
13
Explanations
  • Ingroup favouritism
  • Social dominance theory
  • Organizational climate
  • Aversive racism

14
Selected References
  • Bauder, H. (2003). Brain abuse, or the
    devaluation of immigrant labour in Canada.
    Antipode 35 (4), 699-717.
  • Bertrand, M., Mullainathan, S. (2003). Are
    Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and
    Jamal? A field experiment on labor market
    discrimination. Working Paper 9873. National
    Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Catano, V., Cronshaw, S., Wiesner, W., Hackett,
    R., Methot, L. (1997). Recruitment and
    Selection in Canada. Toronto Nelson.
  • Chung-Yan, G., Cronshaw, S. (2002) A critical
    re-examination and analyis of cognitive ability
    tests using the Thorndike model of fairness.
    Journal of Occpuational and Organizational
    Psychology 75, 489-509.
  • Coates, K., Carr, S. (2005). Skilled
    immigrants and selection bias A theory-based
    field study from New Zealand. International
    Journal of Intercultural Relations 29, 577-599.
  • Darity, Jr., W., Mason, P. (1998). Evidence
    on discrimination in employment Codes of color,
    codes of gender. The Journal of Economic
    Perspectives 12 (2), 63-90.
  • Dovidio, J., Gaertner, S. (2000). Aversive
    racism and selection decisions 1989 and 1999.
    Psychological Science 11 (4), 315-319.
  • Fiedler, A. (2001). Adverse impact on Hispanic
    job applicants during assessment center
    evaluations. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral
    Sciences 23 (1), 102-110.
  • Fugazza, M. (2003). Racial discrimination
    Theories, facts and policy. International Labour
    Review 142 (4), 507-541.

15
Selected References
  • Jewson, N., Mason, D. (1986). Modes of
    discrimination in the recruitment process
    Formalisation, fairness and efficiency.
    Sociology 20 (1), 43-63.
  • Kristof, A. (1996). Person-organization fit An
    integrative review of its conceptualizations,
    measurement, and implications. Personnel
    Psychology 49, 1-49.
  • Latham, G., Sue-Chan, C. (1998). Selecting
    employees in the 21st century Predicting the
    contribution of industrial-organizational
    psychology to Canada. Canadian Psychology 39,
    14-.
  • Lewis, A., Sherman, S. (2003). Hiring you
    makes me look bad Social-identiy based
    reversals of the ingroup favoritism effect.
    Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
    Processes 90, 262-276.
  • Neckerman, K., Kirschenman, J. (1991). Hiring
    strategies, racial bias, and inner-city workers.
    Social Problems 38 (4), 433-447.
  • Petersen, L., Dietz, J. (2005). Prejudice and
    enforcement of workforce homogeneity as
    explanations for employment discrimination.
    Journal of Applied Social Psychology 35 (1),
    144-159.
  • Petersen, T., Saporta, I., Seidel, M. (2005).
    Getting hired Sex and race. Industrial
    Relations 44 (3), 416-443.
  • Supphellen, M., Kvitastein, O., Johansen, S.
    (1997). Projective questioning and ethnic
    discrimination A procedure for measuring
    employer bias. Public Opinion Quarterly 61,
    208-224.
  • Zeigert, J., Hanges, P. (2005). Employment
    discrimination The role of implicit attitudes,
    motivation and a climate for racial bias.
    Journal of Applied Psychology 90 (3), 553-562.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com