WebCT and Desire2Learn: Compared and Considered - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

WebCT and Desire2Learn: Compared and Considered

Description:

Advantages and disadvantages of the two systems as they relate to the needs of ... has a relational database backend (SQL); WebCT has a flat file database backend ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:404
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: markmi9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WebCT and Desire2Learn: Compared and Considered


1
WebCT and Desire2Learn Compared and Considered
  • Presenter Mark Mitchell

2
WebCT Desire2Learn (D2L)
  • Advantages and disadvantages of the two systems
    as they relate to the needs of independent study
    programs.
  • Challenge of coordinating these systems with
    other university information management systems
    and
  • The implications of the legal challenge posed by
    WebCTs recent patent claims.

3
Intentionvs.Reality
4
WebCT Desire2Learn (D2L)
  • Why OU CIDL is switching from WebCT to D2L.
  • How OU CIDL has managed (so far) to coordinate
    D2L with other university information management
    systems (including our own) and
  • What the heck is the patent lawsuit about between
    WebCT and D2L?

5
Audience Survey
  • Program name
  • Online courseware management system in use? If
    so, which system?
  • Considering a change? If so, to which system?

6
OU CIDLs Switch from WebCT to D2L
  • Began using a handful of custom online courses
    before 2000 (Yikes!)
  • Adopted WebCT in 2000 (Campus Edition 3.8
    upgraded to CE 4.1 January 2004)
  • Began converting WebCT courses to D2L in the
    summer of 2006 (relatively smooth transition)
  • Started adding new enrollments in D2L courses on
    September 28, 2006

7
WebCT and D2L More Similar than Different
  • Media rich content support
  • Quiz management
  • Communication tools (e-mail, chat rooms,
    discussion/bulletin boards)
  • Presentation and collaboration tools (individual
    and group websites)
  • Course management (student enrollments,
    instructor and grading assistant access)

Compare CMS http//www.edutools.com/item_list.jsp
?pj8
8
Some Differences Count More than Others
  • WebCT e-mail internal while D2L works with
    external mail systems
  • More control over helpdesk access and privileges
    with D2L
  • D2L has a relational database backend (SQL)
    WebCT has a flat file database backend
  • Cost (OU offered to CIDL access to D2L managed on
    their servers without cost)

9
CIDL, D2L and Other Information Management Systems
  • Course enrollments added to CIDLs student
    information management system (OMNI) transferred
    to main campus server for creating exception
    accounts
  • Exception accounts provide D2L user accounts and
    OU e-mail address
  • Courses listed on enroll.ou.edu and students are
    added to courses with semester-based courses

10
WebCT vs. D2L Timeline
  • July 26
  • Blackboard Inc. issues news release on being
    awarded a U.S. patent on e-Learning Technology
    Blackboard Inc. files suit against Desire2Learn
    Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
    District of Texas alleging that Desire2Learn is
    infringing on the patent Blackboard announced
    that day

11
WebCT vs. D2L Timeline (contd)
  • Sept 14 Desire2Learn files answer and
    counterclaims
  • Sept 19 Blackboard Inc. answers Desire2Learn's
    Counterclaim

12
WebCT vs. D2L Timeline (contd)
  • Sept 20 Blackboard Inc. files motion to dismiss
    Desire2Learn's Inequitable Conduct Counterclaim
  • Sept 25 Desire2Learn receives an Order
    Governing Proceedings

13
WebCT vs. D2L Timeline (contd)
  • Oct 4 Desire2Learn files Response to
    Blackboard's Motion to Dismiss
  • Oct 11 Blackboard files Reply to Desire2Learn's
    Response to Motion to Dismiss

14
WebCT vs. D2L Links
  • Blackboard info on patent http//www.blackboard.c
    om/patent
  • D2Ls response http//www.desire2learn.com/patent
    info/

15
U.S. Patent No. 6,988,138 B1
  • In January 2006, Blackboard received a US patent
    for
  • Internet-based education support system and
    methods
  • In other words, the very concept of learning
    management systems.

16
Prior Art (from Wikipedia)
  • In most patent laws, prior art or state of the
    art (the latter term sometimes has other meanings
    as well) is all information that has been made
    available to the public in any form before a
    given date. If an invention has been described in
    prior art, a patent on that invention is not
    valid.

http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_virtual_le
arning_environments
17
Letter from EDUCAUSE to WebCT (excerpt)
  • We believe that Blackboard should disclaim the
    rights established under your recently-awarded
    patent, placing the patent in the public domain
    and withdrawing the claim of infringement against
    Desire2Learn. We believe this action would be in
    the best business interests of Blackboard and in
    the best interests of higher education. We do not
    make this request lightly or underestimate the
    courage it will take to implement. However, we
    believe it is the right action for your
    corporation and our community.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com