Chapter 12. Stress and Human Error - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 12. Stress and Human Error

Description:

produce phenomenological experience emotional or affective ... of stress will cause people to perseverate or continue with a given action or ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:190
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: Pyra
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 12. Stress and Human Error


1
Chapter 12. Stress and Human Error
  • STRESS
  • stressors (Fig 12.1) environmental factors,
    psychological factors, time pressure
  • produce phenomenological experience emotional
    or affective
  • physiological change observable, often linked
    with phenomenological experience
  • affect characteristics of information processing,
    not always degrade performance
  • Stress Effects on Performance
  • developing models that will accurately predict
    stress effects is challenging
  • ethical considerations make it difficult to carry
    out controlled experiments
  • human performance response to stressors appears
    to be inconsistent and unpredictable
  • the pattern of inferred human stress response
  • stress was a causal factor in the errors made in
    the events, yet the causal inferences will always
    be ambiguous
  • there have been a series of efforts to capitalize
    on stress imposed for other reasons, to gain
    insights into performance
  • a number of studies have examined that effects of
    stressors in more controlled laboratory
    environments
  • Stress Component Effect
  • Arousal
  • easiest way to measure the quantitative levels of
    many stressors is through physiological measures
    of arousal HR, pupil diameter, catacholomine in
    the blood or urine

2
  • associated with improving the level of
    performance
  • most stressors increase the level of arousal but
    sleep loss and fatigue will decrease arousal
  • Selective Attention Narrowing
  • increased selectivity or attentional narrowing
    results from a wide variety of different
    stressors
  • usually degrade performance may actually
    facilitate performance with focused attention
  • Selective Attention Distraction
  • simply impose a distraction, thus divert
    selective attention away from taskrelevant
    processing
  • Working-Memory Loss
  • negative effects of anxiety, perceived danger,
    noise
  • The Yerkes Dodson Law
  • an inverted U-shaped pattern relating stress to
    human performance (Fig 12.2)
  • at the lower end of the arousal scale, increasing
    stress by increasing arousal will increase
    performance
  • higher levels of arousal, stress begins to
    produce the attentional and memory difficulties
    that cause performance to decrease
  • the optimum level of arousal greater
    performance for simple task than complex
  • Perseveration
  • high level of stress will cause people to
    perseverate or continue with a given action or
    plan of action that they have used it in the past
  • combined effects of stress on attentional
    narrowing and perseveration can contribute to a
    pattern of convergent thinking or cognitive
    narrowing and tunneling that can be dangerous in
    crisis decision making
  • stress will enhance the confirmation bias

3
  • Strategic Control
  • the characterization of a set of strategies that
    the human will consciously adapt to cope with the
    perceived stress effects in Fig 12.3
  • adaptive closed-loop model of stress -- appraisal
    and strategic choice
  • operators not respond to the stressor per se, but
    to the perceived or understood level of stress
    (cognitive appraisal)
  • selection of the appropriate or inappropriate
    strategies -- four major categories of adaptive
    responses
  • Recruitment of More Resources
  • try harder or acceleration (time stress) can be
    adaptive but it has risks
  • long-term costs of fatigue and possible health
    risks
  • acceleration may eliminate redundancies ?
    confusions and errors
  • shift in the speed-accuracy trade-off, toward
    faster but more error-prone performance
  • Remove the Stressor
  • Change the Goals of the Task
  • people adaptively invoke qualitatively different
    performance strategies under higher stress
    conditions ? a simpler and less effortful
    strategy is often chosen ? people to abandon
    compensatory strategies in favor of simpler
    non-compensatory ones, which are simpler,
    quicker, and require less WM more stress
    resistant
  • humans adapt by choosing a simpler and more
    efficient strategy
  • stressors even produce performance improvement
  • Do Nothing

4
  • Moderating Effects
  • Other Stressors -- one stressor may reduce rather
    than amplify the effect of another
  • Personality
  • locus of control those with an internal (self)
    locus of control are less stressed
  • action-oriented (more proactive and effectively
    filter less relevant material) vs. state-oriented
    (more reactive and more inclined to accelerate
    performance)
  • Training and Expertise
  • highly skilled operators are more immune or
    buffered from the negative effects of stress
  • automaticity ? pure expertise in routine
    performance is not sufficient
  • greater repertoire of strategies available
  • greater familiarity with the stressors
  • Stress Remediation
  • Environmental Solutions
  • Design Solutions -- emergency procedures
  • Training
  • HUMAN ERROR
  • human error is the primary cause of 60 to 90 of
    major accidents and incidents
  • result of bad system design or bad organizational
    structure rather than irresponsible action
  • the error was only one of a lengthy and complex
    chain of breakdowns
  • Categories of Human Error An Information
    Processing Approach

5
  • Mistakes
  • failing to formulate the right intentions
    shortcomings of perception, memory, cognition
  • knowledge-based mistakes
  • incorrect plans of actions are arrived at because
    of a failure to understand the situation
    (incorrect knowledge) ? influences of many biases
    and cognitive limits
  • insufficient knowledge of expertise to interpret
    complex information
  • poor displays either present inadequate
    information or in a poor format
  • rule-based mistakes
  • operators know the situation, and they invoke a
    rule or plan of action to deal with it
  • the choice of rule if-then logic
  • choice of a rule guided by frequency and
    reinforcement
  • Slips
  • the right intention is incorrectly carried out
  • capture errors the intended stream of behavior
    is captured by a similar, well practiced behavior
    pattern
  • intended action involves a slight departure from
    the routine, frequently performed action
  • either stimulus or action sequence are closely
    related to now inappropriate action
  • action sequence is relatively automated and
    therefore not monitored by attention
  • pouring orange juice rather than syrup on the
    waffles while reading the newspaper
  • Lapses
  • failure to carry out any action at all

6
  • Mode errors
  • closely related to slips but also have the memory
    failure characteristic of lapses
  • pressing the accelerator of a car to start when
    the transmission is in the reverse mode
  • a joint consequence of relatively automated
    performance or of high workload and of improperly
    conceived system design
  • Distinction Between Error Categories
  • the ease of detectability
  • detection of slips relatively easy
  • preventing slips system and task design
  • preventing mistakes design features related to
    effective display or on training
  • Human Reliability Analysis
  • to predict human error (Fig 12.5)
  • technique for human error rate prediction (THERP)
  • Human error probability (HEP) the ratio of the
    number of errors made on a particular task to the
    number of opportunities for errors ? from
    databases of actual performance or estimated by
    experts (heavily biased and not always terribly
    reliable)
  • event tree or fault tree (Fig 12.6)
  • HEPs can be modified by performance shaping
    factors, multipliers(expertise or the stress)
  • Lack of Database
  • Error Monitoring
  • Nonindependence of Human Errors
  • first error ? resulting frustrations and stresses
    ? increase the likelihood of a subsequent error

7
  • Integrating Human and Machine Reliabilities
  • to integrate actuarial data of human error with
    machine data to estimate system reliability
    difficult to justify ? nonindependence issue ? a
    considerable challenge to estimate reliability
  • Errors in the Organizational Context
  • human error as only one small component in a set
    of more serious organizational deficiencies
  • local triggers or active failures the tip of
    the iceberg
  • resident pathogens or latent conditions the
    base of the iceberg (Fig 12.7)
  • Error Remediation
  • Task Design
  • Equipment Design
  • minimize perceptual confusions
  • Make the execution of action and the response of
    the system visible to the operator
  • Use constraints to lock out the possibility of
    errors
  • Offer remedies
  • Avoiding multimode system
  • Training
  • Assists and Rules
  • memory aids or procedures checklists
  • Error-Tolerant Systems
  • errors are undesirable but inevitable

8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com