What Can Simulation Contribute to the Study of Labour Markets? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

What Can Simulation Contribute to the Study of Labour Markets?

Description:

Edmund Chattoe-Brown (ecb18_at_le.ac.uk) Department of Sociology, University of Leicester http://www.simian.ac.uk – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:75
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: acuk
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What Can Simulation Contribute to the Study of Labour Markets?


1
What Can Simulation Contribute to the Study of
Labour Markets?
Edmund Chattoe-Brown (ecb18_at_le.ac.uk)
Department of Sociology, University of Leicester
http//www.simian.ac.uk
2
Thanks
  • This research funded by the Economic and Social
    Research Council as part of the National Centre
    for Research Methods (http//www.ncrm.ac.uk).
  • The usual disclaimer applies particularly
    regarding Nigel Gilbert (co-PI SIMIAN, Sociology,
    Surrey).

http//www.simian.ac.uk
2
3
The implications of innovation
  • Despite the quest for innovation, there doesnt
    seem to be much reflection on its implications in
    social science (particularly as regards research
    methods). Equal timing example Trivial but
    interesting.
  • Most innovations (as anywhere) are more of the
    same (focus groups and semi-structured
    interviews).
  • In the 1920s-1930s both ethnography and
    statistical models were innovations in sociology.
  • There is very uneven coverage of methods across
    the social sciences and the number of major
    methods in each discipline is small. It is thus
    very easy to mistake local conditions for
    global reality Almost no qualitative research
    in economics, very few sociological (as opposed
    to economic or psychological) experiments in
    sociology.

http//www.simian.ac.uk
3
4
A thought experiment
  • Suppose there could be radical innovation in
    research methods (rather than import of existing
    methods), what impact would that have?
  • A whole new place to stand with respect to all
    research conducted until that point.
  • A truism that each research method shapes the
    questions raised and the kind of solutions put
    forward?
  • A radically innovative method could thus
    potentially cast light on the biases, lacunae and
    theoretical preconceptions of whole substantive
    research fields.
  • This opportunity seems hugely important and yet
    we give little thought to blue sky questions
    like How could such radical innovations in
    methods be found?

http//www.simian.ac.uk
4
5
Part of a wider problem
  • Ethnographers criticise statisticians for over
    simplifying social processes. Statisticians
    respond that their models fit and ethnographers
    cannot show that the additional complexity
    makes a difference to statistical analysis.
  • We have an impasse because neither side can
    express insights within the framework of the
    other. It becomes a matter of religious faith
    how complex a particular social phenomenon
    actually is. This is not relativism. There is a
    fact of the matter but these methods cant
    access it.
  • Methods show how well they apply by their own
    criteria but not which method should be applied
    in the first place No wrong method error.
    Statisticians never conclude from a low R
    squared that they should become ethnographers!

http//www.simian.ac.uk
6
A large complex system
  • Workers are recruited into organisations and may
    be promoted or fired. Ultimately they retire,
    leave or die.
  • Workers acquire skills through education and in
    work. It is these skills that fit them for
    certain jobs.
  • Organisations must combine skills into jobs to
    create output with value exceeding the cost
    of input. (This includes charities and the
    probation service too.) If they cant, they fail.
    The population of organisations is relatively
    stable but, as well as failure, founding and
    self-employment occur.
  • Organisations have internal structure permitting
    promotion, control, technical innovation and so
    on.
  • Producers are also consumers.

http//www.simian.ac.uk
6
7
Now what?
  • How do we engage with this large complex system?
  • This isnt really a theory. Each broad
    description can be progressively subdivided into
    observable social processes (recruitment and
    thence short listing, interviewing and final
    negotiations to appoint).
  • We see the competing methods clichés operating
    here. Ethnography can tell us in exhaustive
    detail what happens in a job interview but not
    what the resulting aggregate picture would be.
    Statistical analysis can tell us how attributes
    shape outcomes but not what dynamic
    micro-foundations are giving the patterns.
  • The same style of argument might be applied to
    sub-components of the system.

http//www.simian.ac.uk
7
8
Sleight of hand?
  • Realistically, I cant talk through a detailed
    simulation of the labour market. It would take
    too long and almost certainly bog down in
    discussions about assumptions.
  • What I am going to do instead is to explain a
    very simple simulation that has nothing to do
    with labour markets to show how the method works
    and then show you a simulation of labour markets
    very briefly to prove that I am not selling a
    Reliant Robin by advertising a Rolls Royce.
  • This is consistent with what anyone would do when
    explaining an existing method to novices. (You
    dont start teaching regression with 25 variables
    and a whole bunch of interaction terms.) Oddly,
    however, for a novel method, it makes people
    incredibly sceptical.
  • Dont need to know what goes on under the
    bonnet regarding programming either?

http//www.simian.ac.uk
8
9
The Schelling segregation model
  • Agents live on a square grid. Each has maximum
    8 neighbours.
  • There are two types of agents (red and green).
    Some grid spaces are vacant. Initially everything
    distributed randomly.
  • All agents decide what to do in the same very
    simple way.
  • Each agent has a preferred proportion (PP) of
    neighbours of its own kind (0.5 PP means you want
    at least half your neighbours to be your own kind
    - but you would accept all of them i. e. PP is
    minimum.) Vacant grid spaces dont count which
    is why the PP is a fraction not a number.
  • If an agent is in a position that satisfies its
    PP then it does nothing otherwise it moves to a
    vacant site chosen at random.

http//www.simian.ac.uk
9
10
Initial random state
http//www.simian.ac.uk
10
11
Clustering
Schelling (early seventies) was interested in
urban residential segregation of ethnic groups.
http//www.simian.ac.uk
11
12
Two questions
  • What is the smallest PP that will produce
    clusters?
  • What happens when the PP is 1?

http//www.simian.ac.uk
12
13
Answers
  • About 0.3.
  • No clusters form.
  • Challenge Had you seen the cluster data
    generated by PP0.3, might you (if you were of a
    particular political or social scientific
    persuasion) have attributed xenophobia to the
    system? (Or individual preference?)

http//www.simian.ac.uk
13
14
Simple individuals/complex system
Counter-intuitive macro (social) results from
simple micro interactions. A non-linear (and
complex) system.
http//www.simian.ac.uk
14
15
The punch line
  • Simulation is a macroscope because it allows us
    to see complexity somewhat like a microscope
    allows us to see very small things.
  • Even in this trivially simple (and behaviourally
    implausible) system, the link between micro and
    macro is not intuitive.
  • We can now see why grossing up practices or
    drilling down from aggregates is problematic.
  • The solution offered by simulation is an explicit
    process specification represented as a computer
    programme (compare narratives/equations).

http//www.simian.ac.uk
15
16
A new role for a new method?
  • In this framework, research methods can do almost
    (but not quite) what they always did. Simulation
    wont take over and the worst work in
    simulation comes from avoiding data.
  • Ethnography becomes more purposive because it
    really builds process theory (rather than
    typology or journalism).
  • Statistics does not compare models with data but
    real data with simulated data How often people
    move house, how big clusters are, what shape and
    so on.
  • What we want to know How people see
    neighbourhoods, how (and where) they decide to
    move, what opportunities and constraints exist
    back to properties of a large structured system,
    compare How do people look for jobs?
  • To hint at an answer to a previous question
    Innovative research methods might exist in parts
    of the research process neglected by existing
    ones (here micro-macro theory building).

http//www.simian.ac.uk
16
17
The labour market simulation
  • Work in progress with Nacho Gª-Valdecasas Medina
    using some ideas suggested by Sean Moley.
  • An attempt to capture the large scale structure
    of the labour market already described.
  • Very simple at this point Better to have
    something for every process than detail in a
    few and some processes missing altogether. (A
    hypothesis about abstraction of process.)
  • Needs to reach steady state after
    initialisation.
  • Start by setting parameters of various kinds then
    access dynamic outputs of a range of types
    (potentially to be compared with real data).
  • Firms create jobs (sets of minimum skill
    requirements and associated wages) and then find
    workers to fill them but the set of jobs must be
    profitable to the firm as a whole.

http//www.simian.ac.uk
17
18
Example output 1
Steady state visible above. Firms arent adapting
to use all worker skills.
http//www.simian.ac.uk
18
19
Example output 2
Comforting that without being told the system
fails to employ the least skilled workers.
http//www.simian.ac.uk
19
20
Example output 3
Again, wages (arbitrary units) have sensible
values and so do unemployment rates. Distribution?
http//www.simian.ac.uk
20
21
Example output 4
To show Im not selling the method Self
employment plainly not sensible. Problem with
production function for single person firms.
http//www.simian.ac.uk
21
22
Conclusions
  • Could simulation be a radical innovation? If
    so, its main contributions could be to revisit
    what we already know and represent a large
    complex system effectively.
  • Examples of new questions raised by the
    approach
  • What, if anything, stops all non transitional
    unemployment occurring in the lowest educated
    group?
  • How are the skill requirements of job sets
    created?
  • What are the market implications of rising skill?
    Firms need to create hierarchies to retain more
    skilled staff.
  • How, mediated by the labour market, is a match
    between skill supply (education) and skill demand
    (employment) achieved?
  • What might happen in this system if meritocracy
    was complicated by issues of gender and
    ethnicity?
  • Not an attempt to favour simulation. Just
    another research method that advantageously
    arrived late. There may be more. Equally clearly,
    however, not just a fix to the limitations of
    an existing method and thus not more of the
    same.

http//www.simian.ac.uk
22
23
Further resources
  • Simulation Innovation, A Node (Part of NCRM
    research, training and advice)
    lthttp//www.simian.ac.ukgt.
  • NetLogo (software used here, free, works on
    Mac/PC/Unix, with a nice library of examples)
    lthttp//ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/gt.
  • Simulation for the Social Scientist, 2nd edition,
    2005, Gilbert/Troitzsch. Dont get first
    edition, not in NL!
  • Agent-Based Models, 2007, Gilbert.
  • Journal of Artificial Societies and Social
    Simulation (JASSS) lthttp//jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk
    /JASSS.htmlgt. Free online and peer reviewed.
  • simsoc (email discussion group for the social
    simulation community) lthttps//www.jiscmail.ac.uk
    /cgi-bin/webadmin?A0SIMSOCgt.

http//www.simian.ac.uk
23
24
Extra slides
  • If needed for questions.

http//www.simian.ac.uk
24
25
Why? So what?
  • Because PP is a minimum, people are always happy
    inside a cluster of their own kind.
  • If a cluster is full (no internal vacancies)
    then it cannot be disrupted except at the
    edges.
  • Whether clusters form thus depends on whether
    their shape is compatible with the PP for edge
    agents. (No sharp corners possible Minimum
    cluster size?)
  • When PP is 1, no shape of the cluster edge is
    compatible with the satisfaction of edge agents
    so the cluster cannot form.
  • An aggregate entity (the cluster) thus becomes a
    structuring principle for individual behaviour. A
    toy version of structuration?

http//www.simian.ac.uk
25
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com