USGS Procedures for High-Flow Measurement using the Price AA Meter - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

USGS Procedures for High-Flow Measurement using the Price AA Meter

Description:

USGS Procedures for High-Flow Measurement using the Price AA Meter Annual Tri-Agency Coordination Meeting Memphis, TN Mark E. Smith mesmith_at_usgs.gov – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:86
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: kmnolan
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: USGS Procedures for High-Flow Measurement using the Price AA Meter


1
USGS Procedures for High-Flow Measurement using
the Price AA Meter
Annual Tri-Agency Coordination Meeting Memphis, TN
Mark E. Smith mesmith_at_usgs.gov USGS CRSO, Denver,
CO November 17, 2009
2
Discharge and Velocity Measurement
  • A current-meter measurement is the summation of
    the products of the subsection areas of the
    stream cross section and their respective average
    velocities
  • USGS uses the mid-section computational method

3
Stream discharge is sum of discharges in all
sub-sections (mid-section method)
Total Discharge ((Area1 x Velocity 1) (Area2
x Velocity2) .. (Arean x Velocityn))
4
Point Measurement of Velocity
5
Water velocity in each sub-section
estimated using a current meter to measure water
velocity at selected vertical locations in the
water column.
6
Velocity Measurement
  • Discharge measurement using a current meter
    requires determination of the mean velocity in
    each of the selected verticals.
  • The mean velocity in a vertical is the average of
    many point velocities in that vertical, but it
    can be approximated by a few velocity
    observations and a known relation (for normal
    conditions) between those observations and the
    mean in the vertical.

7
Velocity Measurement
  • Flow velocity in natural channels generally
    pulsates. The USGS measures velocity for 40 - 70
    seconds to better represent average velocity at a
    point.

Comparison of pulsations for two different mean
velocities measured in a laboratory flume, 12 ft
wide. (Rantz, 1982 vol. 1)
8
Vertical-Velocity Curve
  • The vertical-velocity profile under normal
    conditions tends to have the shape shown below.
    We can use this relation to compute a mean
    vertical velocity based on measurements at
    certainpoints in the vertical.

9
Six-Tenths Velocity Method
  • In the 0.6-depth method, an observation of
    velocity made in the vertical at 0.6 of the depth
    below the surface is used as the mean velocity in
    the vertical
  • The U.S. Geological Survey uses the 0.6-depth
    method under relatively shallow conditions

10
Two-Point Velocity Method
  • When velocity profiles are relatively normal, the
    average velocity can be adequately estimated by
    averaging velocities at .2 and .8 of the depth
    below the water surface
  • The two-point method is used with the Price AA
    meter when depths are gt 2.50 ft

11
Three-Point Velocity Method
  • In the three-point method velocities are observed
    at 0.2, 0.6, and 0.8 depths.
  • Usually, the mean velocity is computed by
    averaging the 0.2- and 0.8-depth observations and
    then averaging that result with the 0.6-depth
    observation.
  • The three-point method is used when velocities in
    the vertical likely are distributed abnormally
    because of disturbing elements in the water.
  • Note With a Price AA current meter, the
    three-point method cannot be applied unless the
    depths are greater than 2.5 ft (0.76 m).

12
Vertical-Velocity Curve
13
Current-Meter Measurementof High Flows(Bridges,
Boats, or Cableways)
14
Current-Meter Measurementof High Flows
  • The Price AA current meter generally is used when
    making a conventional high-flow measurement.
    Depth is measured using asounding reelvelocity
    ismeasured afterpositioning themeter in
    thevertical.

15
Current-Meter Measurementof High Flows
  • Some reels are equipped with a computing depth
    indicator. To use the computing spiral, the
    indicator is set at zero when the center of the
    current-meter rotor is at the water surface. The
    sounding weight and meter are then lowered until
    the weight touches the streambed.

16
Preparation for Measurement
  • Spacing of verticals is determined to provide
    about 25 to 30 subsections
  • Verticals should be so spaced that no subsection
    has more than 10 percent (ideally 5 percent) of
    the total discharge (approximated using the most
    current shift-adjusted rating)

17
Current-Meter Measurementof High Flows
  • The depth at each observation vertical (recorded
    to nearest 0.1 foot) determines the method of
    velocity measurement to be used, normally the
    two-point or the 0.6-depth method. If a
    non-standard velocity distribution is suspected,
    we use the three-point method.
  • After the meter is placed at the proper depth and
    pointed into the current, the number of
    revolutions made by the rotor is counted for a
    period of 40 to 70 s. The stopwatch is started
    simultaneously with the first signal or click,
    which is counted as "zero," and not "one."

18
Current-Meter Measurementof High Flows
  • The size of the sounding weight used in
    current-meter measurements depends on depth and
    velocity in the cross section.
  • The size of the weight (lbs) should be greater
    than the maximum product of velocity (ft/s) and
    depth (ft) in the cross section (more if there is
    debris or ice). If insufficient weight is used,
    the meter assembly will be dragged downstream,
    resulting in errors in the depth computation.

19
Velocity Adjustment forDirection of Flow
  • Required velocity is the component normal to
    measurement section
  • At vertical locations where the meter points into
    an oblique current, multiply measured velocity in
    the vertical by thecosine of angle, a.

20
Adverse Conditions Measurement of Swift, Deep
Streams
21
Measurement of Swift,Deep Streams
  • At sites where depth soundings are possible (i.e.
    weight will reach the bottom) but weight, meter
    drift downstream
  • Depth measured by usual methods will be in error
    too large
  • Error correction has 2 parts
  • Air (dry-line) correction
  • Wet-line correction

22
Measuring Depth
a
Vertical angle of sounding line
Dry-line correction (cd) corrects for excess
amount of line above water
p
c
d
b
p
23
Measuring Depth - cont.
  • Wet-line correction corrects for excess amount of
    line below the water
  • Not a linear function with depth
  • Correction applied to nearest 0.1 foot
  • Cannot be determined until the dry-line
    correction has been deducted from observed depth

p
24
Measuring Depth -Vertical Angle of Sounding Line
Protractor
25
Measuring Depth - cont.
  • Best to eliminate dry-line correction by
  • Using tags on the sounding line (bridges) or
  • Using a stay-line to facilitate depth measurement
    from the water surface (boat deck)

26
Measuring Depth - cont.
Both dry-line and wet-line corrections can be
computed using an Excel spreadsheet
27
USGS Measurement using Price AAMississippi
River at Natchez, MS May 27, 2009
28
Boat-Measurement Procedure
  1. 300-lb weight used to suspend current meter
  2. 300-ft stay line (attached to bridge) used to
    hold horizontal line and position at each
    vertical
  3. Suspension of current meter initiated from boat
    deck, so no air-line correction needed
  4. Vertical angle of sounding line measured from
    boat boom to determine and apply wet-line
    correction

29
Boat-Measurement Procedure cont
  1. Depths at each of 27 verticals measured using
    onboard depth finder (and compared to ADCP
    readings). Depths ranged from 24.0 to 118.0 ft
  2. Velocities measured at .2, .6, and.8 depth points
    for40 seconds in each vertical. Average
    velocities in the 27 verticals ranged from 3.0 to
    10.0 ft/s(no direction-of-flow adjustments were
    needed)
  3. Standard mid-section method used to compute
    discharge

30
Discharge-Computation Results
  • Cross-section Area 192,000 ft2 (by depth
    finder)
  • Discharge by .2, .6, .8 method Q11,460,000
    cfs Avg. V7.60 ft/s
  • Discharge by .2, .8 methodQ21,410,000 cfs
    (-3.4) Avg. V7.33 ft/s
  • Discharge by .6 methodQ31,510,000 cfs
    (3.4) Avg. V7.88 ft/s
  • Uncertainty (Q2 vs. Q3) 6.6 - 7.1

31
Selected References
  • Buchanan, T.J., and Somers, W.P., 1969, Discharge
    measurements at gaging stations U.S. Geological
    Survey Techniques of Water-Resources
    Investigations, book 3, chapter A8, 65 p.
  • Rantz, S.E. and others, 1982, Measurement and
    Computation of Streamflow Volumes 1 and 2,
    Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2175,
    Washington D.C., 631 p.

32
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com