Education for Some More than Others ? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Education for Some More than Others ?

Description:

Education for Some More than Others ? A Regional Study on Education in CEE/CIS 2007 Why the title Education for Some More than Others? BACKGROUND A ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:140
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: ITD1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Education for Some More than Others ?


1
Education for Some More than Others ?
  • A Regional Study
  • on Education
  • in CEE/CIS
  • 2007

2
Why the title
  • Education for Some More than Others?

3
BACKGROUND
  • Follow-up to UNICEF IRC report (1998) -
    Education for All ? - which found marked
    increase in disparities in quantity quality of
    education in CEE/CIS
  • How far has this trend towards Education for
    Some More than Others continued?
  • How far have the 12 steps towards Education for
    All recommended in 1998 been taken, what
    additional steps are needed now?

4
A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW
The report examines
  • 1. The regional context

2. Education reforms where are we now ?
3. Access and equity issues
4. Learning and Labour Outcomes
5. Costs, financing and governance
5
FOCUS ON EQUITY
  • The report analyses equity and disparity issues
    in basic education from 3 different angles
  • From a Human Rights point of view
  • From a Social Cohesion point of view
  • From a longer-term Economic point of view

6
Geographic Coverage
  • 29 countries 6 Sub-Regions
  • Caucasus
  • Central Asia
  • South and Eastern Europe
  • Western CIS
  • Central and Eastern Europe
  • Baltic States

7
CEE/CIS Region
8
THE CEE/CIS CONTEXT
9
CONTEXT
  • Economic recovery throughout the region but
    fiscal difficulties in weaker economies
  • Increased average standard of living but
    increased income inequality and rising
    unemployment rates
  • Decline in absolute poverty but persisting
    pockets of poverty particularly child poverty
  • Prevalence of child labour (Moldova, Central
    Asia, SEE) to the detriment of schooling
  • Steep downward trend in the population aged 0-17

10
KEY FINDINGS
11
KEY FINDINGS (1)
Almost two decades after the onset of transition
Reversal and Deterioration of Education in CEE/CIS
  • Provision and quality of education in CEE/CIS has
    not improved instead, it has deteriorated in
    many ways
  • Trends observed in 1998 towards increased
    disparities in education have continued.

12
KEY FINDINGS (2)
  • 2.4 million children of primary-school age (9)
    out of school in the region in 2004
  • 12 million children of secondary-school age (22)
    out of school in the region in 2004
  • More than 14 million children entering adult life
    without either any kind of formal education or a
    school diploma

13
KEY FINDINGS (3)
  • 3 countries Georgia, Moldova and Tajikistan -
    unlikely to achieve MDG 2 (universal primary
    education completion by 2015)
  • 2 countries Turkey and Tajikistan - not on
    track to achieve MDG 3 (elimination of gender
    disparities at all levels of education by 2015)

14
KEY FINDINGS (4)
Children out of school
  • Family background (family income, parental
    education) is increasingly a determinant of
    inequality in enrolment and attendance mainly
    at pre-school level
  • Ethnic groups particularly Roma - are at great
    educational disadvantage with enrolment and
    completion rates well below those of the
    majority-group children (see graphs on next
    slides)
  • Children with Special Needs number of children
    in institutions or receiving benefits tripled
    between 1990 and 2000 from 500,000 to 1.5
    million

15
Roma children Net Enrolment Primary Education ()
Source OSI TRANSMONEEE
16
(No Transcript)
17
Budget Deprivation in Tajikistan
18
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Between-country disparities
  • More public expenditure on education produces
    better results up to a certain level CEE and
    Baltic States (see graph on next slide)

Within-country disparities
  • Socio-economic background is one of the most
    important factors influencing learning outcomes

Relevance of Education
  • Countries in the region do better in TIMSS and
    PIRLS than in PISA ? source of concern

19
(No Transcript)
20
LABOUR MARKET OUTCOMES
  • High youth unemployment rates 35.6 in SEE
    (2001) and 30.4 in CEE (2005)
  • Statistics show that young workers of both sexes
    do benefit from staying in education system as
    long as possible
  • But focus-group discussions show that people in
    poorer countries are skeptical about reaping
    benefits of education - particularly in case of
    girls in Azerbaijan, Tajikistan, Turkey

21
COSTS, FINANCING GOVERNANCE (1)
  • Public expenditure on education increased but
    remains insufficient in most countries and tends
    to benefit the richest families
  • Reforms have been initiated but have not
    penetrated the classrooms particularly in
    poorer and rural areas
  • Out-dated teaching methods, lack of relevance of
    curricula, poorly paid and demotivated teachers,
    low transition to upper-secondary education ?
    decreasing quality falling demand for education

22
COSTS, FINANCING GOVERNANCE (2)
  • Decentralization funding burden passed to local
    communities and families to the detriment of
    equity
  • Student/ teacher ratios Demographic dividend ?
    scope for efficiency gains
  • Private tutoring becoming more widespread (69 of
    secondary school students in some countries) ?
    Danger of unethical practices, low-income
    families lose out

23
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS
24
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS (1)
  • Need to re-define the basic package of
    educational services that a state should provide
    free to its citizens
  • Need to improve governance of education systems
    decentralization, community participation
  • Need to increase efficiency take better
    advantage of demographic dividend - make greater
    use of Medium Term Expenditure Frameworks

25
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS (2)
  • Other measures promote early childhood
    approaches, child-friendly school principles,
    child-centered teaching methods, school fee
    abolition, cash transfers etc
  • Make use of existing frameworks Fast Track
    Initiative, EU accession and affiliation
    processes (Stability Pact, European Neighborhood
    Policy) to push reforms forward

26
IMPLICATIONS FOR UNICEF
27
IMPLICATIONS FOR UNICEF
  • Need to make better use of field
    presence/experience to contribute to education
    reforms through evidence-based advocacy and
    policy dialogue
  • Need to expand/refine sector analysis to explore
    further such areas as governance, costing,
    financing, political economy, accountability,
    efficiency using a human rights lens
  • Need to build capacity within UNICEF Offices and
    among partners to play such a new role

28
UNICEFs WORK IN CEE/CIS
29
UNICEFs WORK IN CEE/CIS
Less project work Greater involvement at policy
level
  • Lead donor agency for FTI in 4 countries
  • Lead role in ECCE reform and expansion 12
    countries initiated the development of Early
    Learning and Development Standards (ELDS)
  • Girls Education Campaign in Turkey
  • Child-Friendly School approach gaining momentum
    6/15 countries involved in the development of
    Child Friendly School Indicators or Standards for
    Quality Education

30
Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com