On-Board Calibration System for the Range Delay of the BepiColombo KaT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

On-Board Calibration System for the Range Delay of the BepiColombo KaT

Description:

Title: TT&C BWG Author: Giovanni Boscagli Last modified by: Giovanni Boscagli Created Date: 12/14/2005 9:53:27 AM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: Giovanni67
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: On-Board Calibration System for the Range Delay of the BepiColombo KaT


1
MORE Team Meeting
On-Board Calibration System for the Range Delay
of the BepiColombo KaT
G.Boscagli (ESA-ESTEC) M.Mascarello (AAS-I)
27th February 2007
2
Introduction for BepiColombo KaT On-board
Calibration(for Ranging Delay)
3
Approach for On-Board Calibration
  • The approach hereafter preliminary analysed is
    based on the idea of implementing this function
    directly inside the KaT unit
  • Target ? Calibration as KaT Internal Unit
    Function
  • The idea is to include inside the KaT unit both
    the SSPA and the Diplexer function.
  • In general more compact solutions improve S/C
    design (mass, interfaces routing, etc) it is
    believed that also calibration performances
    should be improved following this approach.
  • NOTE In this way the calibration doesnt take
    into account the wave-guides (from-to-antenna)
    and the antenna itself. They are outside the
    calibration loop. Which is the contribution of
    wave-guides and antenna in the overall end-to-end
    ranging budget error? At present it is understood
    that the main effect to be considered is related
    to the input/output mismatching variation due to
    temperature variation. This might cause
    multi-path effects and error in the end-to-end
    ranging measurements.

4
Approach for On-Board Calibration
  • For this reason (Calibration as an internal KaT
    function) the KaT unit must be commanded (by the
    on-board computer) in two different modes
  • Nominal Mode RF link via antenna, unit in
    coherent mode (down-link coherent with the uplink
    both for carrier and ranging signal) when RX in
    Tracking Mode.
  • Calibration Mode RX and TX in Loop-back
    Configuration, unit running with the internal
    oscillator, RX coherent (in tracking) with the
    loop-back signal from the TX
  • The approach hereafter proposed is based on the
    use of PN regenerative ranging, the reasons are
  • The use of this ranging scheme simplifies the
    calibration scheme in particular for the
    ambiguity resolution (when compared with other
    approaches as the ESA STD or the NASA Tone
    Ranging).
  • Note - The ambiguity must be solved since the
    KaT loop-back delay (TX-RX) is expected of the
    order of microseconds, while the WBRS band should
    be in the range 5-20 MHz.
  • This comment might not be valid anymore in case
    the group delay variation (versus environmental
    conditions and including aging) is inside the
    WBRS ambiguity resolution. This is difficult to
    be predicted at this stage.
  • The PN regenerative ranging is already
    implemented inside the BepiColombo X/X/Ka Deep
    Space Transponder, so it can be easily re-used
    for the KaT unit simplifying the multi-frequency
    operation as needed by BepiColombo for plasma
    cancellation.

5
Impact of Calibration on BepiColombo KaT
Front-End Architecture
NOTE this section has been written without
considering the current subsystem architecture
6
Impact of Calibration on KaT Front-End
Architecture
Preliminary RF Power Budget (TX Filter neglected)
RF Budget RF Budget
TX 2 W 33.01 dBm
TX coupler 30 dB 3.01 dBm
Attenuator- T1 30 dB -26.99 dBm
Passive Mixer 10 dB -36.99 dBm
Attenuator- T2 60 dB -96.99 dBm
RX coupler 50 dB -146.99 dBm
T2 is indicated as variable attenuator, it might
be commanded for selecting the proper RF power
(at RX input) for calibration minimum value
around -146 dBm (nominal value around -125 dBm,
TBC) .
Loop-Back Path
7
Impact of Calibration on KaT Front-End
Architecture
  • According to the proposed approach, the new
    circuits/functions to be developed are
  • The functions in the light-blue boxes 2 GHz LO,
    T1, T2, Mixer
  • The functions in the light-green boxes TX
    coupler, RX coupler
  • NOTE - The functions indicated in the light-red
    boxes represent the Diplexer and they are present
    in any case. In the current subsystem baseline
    (see dedicated slides by AAS-I on this issue),
    the Diplexer is indicated as external to the KaT
    the advantage of having it integrated inside the
    KaT unit is clear from a calibration point of
    view and for a more compact solution.
  • According to the architecture as proposed in the
    previous slide, when in calibration mode the
    loop-back signal is routed back from the TX to
    the RX side and to the antenna as well.
  • NOTE It might be useful (TBC) to introduce the
    control of the TX Power (2
  • Watt SSPA) to minimise the TX power via antenna
    when in calibration mode
  • question is the SSPA delay dependant on the
    selected Gain/Output-Power?

8
Impact of Calibration on KaT Frequency Plan
  • The KaT frequency plan must be carefully studied
    in order to simplify the generation of the 2 GHz
    LO signal and to avoid internal RFI issues.
  • NOTE - For instance considering the Cassini
    KaT frequency plan (next slide) we observe that
    the 1st IF chain is almost at the same frequency
    of the LO signal for calibration.
  • The Cassini KaT turn-around ratio (next slide) is
    not included in the current CCSDS/ECSS
    recommendations for TTC applications. The values
    from the current ECSS-E-50-05B (Radio Frequency
    and Modulation, draft issue under public review)
    are
  • The Ka/Ka turn-around ratio values are under
    discussion also in the frame of CCSDS, at present
    the draft recommendation (January 2007) is to use
    3599/3344 and 3599/3360

9
Cassini KaT Frequency Plan
10
CURRENT COMMUNICATIONS SUBSYSTEM BASELINE(from
BepiColombo SRR Data Package)This section has
been provided by AAS-I (Marco Mascarello)
Question Are there any difficulties (due to
on-board baseline architecture) for implementing
the above proposed approach for calibration?
11
Communications Subsystem Current baseline
12
Communications Subsystem (Option KaT Amplifier)
13
KaT on board calibration including Triplexer
Including a Triplexer inside the KaT, it would
be possible to calibrate all the paths till the
antenna interface.
14
Triplexer (from current BepiColombo SRR Data
Package)
  • The Ka-Band Triplexer is a 4 port device in
    charge of splitting input and output signals. It
    will consist of a new development for BepiColombo
    based on existing technology.
  • The splitting will be accomplished by an E-plane
    trifurcation. Each sub-band will be selected by
    an H plane filter. The foreseen useful bandwidth
    of the filters will be the following
  • Rx Filter 50 MHz (TBC) within 34 200 to 34 700
    MHz
  • Tx1 Filter 200 MHz (TBC) within 31 800 to 32
    300 MHz
  • Tx2 Filter 50 MHz within (TBC) 31 800 to 32
    300 MHz
  • As for the X-Band diplexer, the mechanical
    concept will be two symmetrical pieces.
    Interfaces will be standard WR28 waveguide
    flanges. The estimated dimensions for the
    assembly are 75 x 45 x 23.1 mm, while the
    estimated maximum mass should be less than 65 g.

15
Concern
  • The above solution based on the Triplxer inside
    the KaT unit shows an important drawback
  • The Ka-band DST signal is applied to the Antenna
    through the KaT unit.
  • This represents a blocking point !
  • Other solution must be addressed, for instance
  • Keeping the Triplexer external to the KaT unit
    (calibration not anymore an internal KaT
    function).
  • Analysing different mixing approach between DST
    and KaT signals at HGA input.

16
BepiColombo X/X/Ka DST PN Regenerative Ranging
  • 1999 JPL
  • Balanced Weighted-Voting Tausworthe (v2 and 4)

17
Introduction to Pseudo Noise (PN) Ranging
Sequence
  • The term Pseudo-Noise (PN) ranging refers in a
    strict sense to the use of a ranging-sequence
    system in which the ranging sequence is a logical
    combination of the so-called range clock-sequence
    and several Pseudo-Noise (PN) sequences.
  • The range clock sequence is the alternating 1
    and 1 sequence of period 2 chips.
  • A Pseudo-Noise (PN) sequence is a binary ?1
    sequence of period L whose periodic
    autocorrelation function has peak value L and
    all (L1) off-peak values equal to 1.

Range Clock Frequency
18
Example for the introduction of the
Titsworth/Tausworthe generation scheme
Introduction to Pseudo Noise (PN) Ranging Sequence
Component Sequences or Probe Sequences
PN Sequence
As an example, considering the following
component sequences of period 2, 3 and 5,
respectively (the first period of each sequence
is underlined)
Seq. Gen. 1
Seq. Gen. 2
Seq. Gen. 3
Combined by majority logic give the following
period-30 sequence
PN Sequence
19
Example for the introduction of the
Titsworth/Tausworthe generation scheme
Introduction to Pseudo Noise (PN) Ranging Sequence
  • Note that the period T of the PN sequence
    obtained with the Tausworthe scheme is given by

    with LCM Least Common Multiple

30 in the above example
Importance of having prime length component
sequences
  • The correlation of this sequence (considered as
    /-1 sequence) with the component/probe sequences
    gives the following results
  • Note that 2 3 5 10 operations of
    correlation are required instead of the 30
    operations needed in the classical approach. In
    fact, only 9 decisions are required because of
    the antipodal result of the sequence of period-2
    (the clock sequence). Only one of the two
    operation of correlation must be performed
    because the other correlation will be the
    negative of the other.

20
More in general we can state that
Introduction to Pseudo Noise (PN) Ranging Sequence
  • The ranging sequence is acquired by the receiver
    as the result of correlations between the
    received sequence and certain 1 periodic
    sequences (and their cyclic shifts) whose periods
    are divisors of the ranging?sequence period and
    that we will refer to as probing sequences.
  • The probing sequences are related in some manner
    to the ranging sequence, e.g., the ranging
    sequence might be the sequence resulting from
    some sort of voting by the chips of all the
    probing sequences at the same chip time.
  • The probing sequences must have the property that
    when all these in-phase decisions are correctly
    made, then these decisions determine the delay
    (modulo the ranging sequence period L) in chips
    of the received ranging sequence relative to the
    corresponding model of the ranging sequence. The
    (one-way) ambiguity (U) due to the period of the
    ranging sequence in meters is


ranging clock frequency
chip rate
c speed of the light
21
The 1999 JPL PN Ranging scheme (Tausworthe
scheme)
Titsworth/Tausworthe generation scheme
  • The combining logic is based on the following
    rule the ranging-sequence chip is a 1 if and
    only if either C1 has a 1 at that position or
    all five of the sequences C2, C3, C4, C5 and C6
    have a 1 at that position, or both.

In literature this sequence can be indicated
also as JPL 99 or Taus
  • C1, C2, C6 are the so called Probing Sequences.

22
The 1999 JPL PN Ranging scheme (Tausworthe scheme)
  • It is obvious from this combinational rule that
    the range clock will be strongly correlated with
    the ranging sequence, which facilitates locking
    on to the range clock at the receiver.
  • Since the component sequences C2, C3, C4, C5 and
    C6 are all PN sequences with relatively prime
    periods 7, 11, 15, 19 and 23, respectively, the
    period of the 1999 JPL ranging sequence is L
    2x7x11x15x19x23 1,009,470 chips.
  • The probing sequences in the 1999 JPL PN
    ranging-scheme are the range clock sequence
    together with the five component PN sequences.
  • The total number of correlation operations
    required for the probing sequences, excluding the
    range clock, is thus 7 11 15 19 23 75.

23
The 1999 JPL PN Ranging scheme (Tausworthe scheme)
Correlation characteristics and spectrally
relevant properties of the ranging sequence and
probing sequences
Residual carrier Mod index 0.82 rad-pk
Clock Components at fRC
Chip Rate at fChip_Rate 2.5 Mcps
The spectrum shows a powerful clock component at
half the chip rate and below a noisy floor
originating from the combination process with the
other probing sequences. The fact the range clock
is strongly correlated with the ranging sequence
will facilitate locking on to the range clock at
the receiver. The chip is square-wave shaped.
24
Weighted-Voting Tausworthe PN Ranging-Sequence
Scheme
  • The Weighted-Voting Tausworthe sequences are
    derived from the 1999 JPL PN Ranging sequence
    with an apparently small modification on the vote
    logic.
  • The selection of different value for the clock
    vote (v2 or 4) provides
  • flexibility in the choice of the strength of
    the range-clock component in the ranging sequence
  • different level for the power allocated to the
    clock and the other ranging spectral components.

25
Balanced Weighted-Voting Tausworthe PN
Ranging-Sequence Scheme
  • The Balanced Weighted-Voting Tausworthe sequences
    are derived from the Weighted-Voting Tausworthe
    sequences (scheme above) with an apparently small
    modification on the polarity of some probe
    sequences.
  • As the 1999 JPL PN Ranging scheme (Tausworthe
    scheme) also the Weighted-Voting Tausworthe PN
    Ranging-Sequence Schemes (both for v2 and 4)
    present a DC component.
  • A simple way to reduce the imbalance in the
    ranging sequence (and to produce what we call the
    Balanced Weighted-Voting Tausworthe
    ranging-sequence scheme) is choosing the PN
    probing sequences with the following first
    periods
  • C1 1 ?1
  • C2 1 1 1 ?1 ?1 1 ?1
  • -C3 ?1 ?1 ?1 1 1 1 ?1 1 ?1 ?1 1
  • -C4 ?1 ?1 ?1 ?1 1 1 1 ?1 1 1 ?1 ?1 1 ?1
    1
  • C5 1 1 1 1 ?1 1 ?1 1 ?1 ?1 ?1 ?1 1 1
    ?1 1 1 ?1 ?1
  • -C6 ?1 ?1 ?1 ?1 ?1 1 ?1 1 ?1 ?1 1 1 ?1 ?1
    1 1 ?1 1 ?1 1 1 1 1
  • Note - The key to elimination of imbalance is
    the fact the negative of a real
  • sequence has the same autocorrelation function
    as the original sequence.

26
BepiColombo X/X/Ka DST Code Phase Acquisition
The current model of BepiColombo X/X/Ka DST is
programmable and can handle the different
schemes JPL99, BT2 and BT4. The Regenerative
Ranging Channel is composed by
From Carrier Quadrature branch
  • the Chip Tracking Loop (CTL) for ranging code
    clock component phase and frequency recovery
  • the In-phase Integrator output is provided to
    Code Correlators Six Correlators running in
    parallel for probe sequences (C1,. C6) position
    recovery
  • the Down-link Code Generator
  • (In this case only the JPL99 case is represented)

27
BepiColombo X/X/Ka DST Chip Tracking Loop (CTL)
The mid-phase integrator output is multiplied by
/-1 in order to provide the right correction to
the loop. In a certain way the multiplication by
/-1 replaces the transition detector typical of
a DDTL, considering that the PN sequence
resembles a square-wave.
Filtered Loop Error
Quadrature Carrier Branch Output
CTL NCO Base Frequency
Scaled Carrier Loop Error
28
BepiColombo KaT Calibration based on PN
Regenerative Ranging
29
Impact of Calibration on BepiColombo KaT Baseband
Processing
  • We need a separate PN code generator on the TX
    side clocked by the on-board oscillator
  • In the current X/X/Ka DST design the TX PN code
    is generated coherently with the received up-link
    PN code (see previous slide).
  • The TX PN NCO and the RX PN NCO must be clocked
    with the same oscillator, avoiding any timing
    error between the two signals.
  • At the start of the calibration procedure
    (defined by a strobe signal common to RX and TX
    processing functions) the two PN code generators
    (RX and TX) must be identically initialised.
  • The loop back ranging signal acquired by the RX
    provides the delay from TX to RX (Loop-Back
    Delay).
  • The PN code phase acquisition (using the Probe
    Sequences) is used for ambiguity resolution
  • The phase difference between TX and RX ranging
    clock provides the accurate delay measurement

30
Impact of Calibration on BepiColombo KaT Baseband
Processing
  • The phase difference between the RX and TX PN
    Ranging Clock can be measured using the
    filtered phase error loop term of the CTL

Kd
KNCO
E
CTL second order loop
31
Impact of Calibration on BepiColombo KaT Baseband
Processing
  • Open Loop CTL Transfer Function
  • In the X/X/Ka DST the CTL is digitally
    implemented inside the RX Digital Section (Ts is
    the loop sampling time), using the Z transfer
    function we have

CTL second order loop digital representation
aTs
X
Kd

Ts
CTL Detector
X
ßTs2
E
RX NCO N-BIT

B (nominal chip rate)
FCLK1/Ts
32
Impact of Calibration on BepiColombo KaT Baseband
Processing
  • After the transient phase, the error term E
    provides the measurement of the delay between the
    TX and RX ranging clock signal. In radiant we can
    write
  • While in time we have
  • It is evident that for typical loop sampling time
    of the order of 40 MHz and N32 bit NCO the
    phase/time resolution is well below the required
    BepiColombo ranging delay accuracy. The
    calibration resolution in time due to the digital
    loop implementation is
  • The Probe Sequence acquisition phase and the CTL
    error term (E) must be transmitted via telemetry
    down-link (using the X/X/Ka DST link). This
    information (after proper post-processing) can be
    used (on-ground) to evaluate the accurate
    Loop-Back delay.

33
Impact of Calibration on BepiColombo KaT Baseband
Processing
  • Notice that the KaT Ranging Delay (RX gt TX) and
    the Loop Back Ranging Delay (TX gt RX) might be
    different, this is due to
  • The TX/RX different paths (between nominal and
    calibration mode) in the Front-End (Attenuators,
    Mixer, Couplers)
  • Different routing of the signal in the baseband
    digital processing (ASIC gates).
  • Probably the first contribution could be kept
    small (and negligible also under variations of
    environmental conditions) in terms of overall
    error budget. This to avoid further complications
    in terms of calibration.
  • Also the second contribution (inside the DSP)
    might be kept negligible however if not
    negligible, the delta (between the KaT Ranging
    Delay and the Loop Back Ranging Delay) can be
    measured at unit level in the LAB. Notice that
    this contribution is almost independent from the
    temperature since it is related to the clock
    drift (Note - the X/X/Ka DST is embarking an
    OCXO).

34
CONCLUSIONS
35
Conclusions
  • In order to improve the calibration performances
    and to minimise the on-board complexity it is
    suggested to integrate inside the KaT unit the
    SSPA, the Diplexer (), the RF Calibration
    Front-End (Attenuators, Couplers, mixer, LO).
  • () The possibility to integrate the
    Diplexer/Triplexer is not clear (under
    discussion).l
  • The use of PN Ranging (as per X/X/Ka DST)
    simplifies the calibration function in particular
    for ambiguity resolution.
  • Minor changes are foreseen for the base-band
    digital signal processing(). The approach is to
    transmit the CTL error term via TLM link for
    post-processing at the G/S.
  • () However these have an impact on the current
    X/X/Ka DST FPGA/ASIC
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com