Teacher Credentials and Student Achievement in High School: A Cross Subject Analysis with Student Fixed Effects - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Teacher Credentials and Student Achievement in High School: A Cross Subject Analysis with Student Fixed Effects

Description:

Teacher Credentials and Student Achievement in High School: A Cross Subject Analysis with Student Fixed Effects Charles T. Clotfelter Helen F. Ladd – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:132
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: HelenL156
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Teacher Credentials and Student Achievement in High School: A Cross Subject Analysis with Student Fixed Effects


1
Teacher Credentials and Student Achievement in
High School A Cross Subject Analysis with
Student Fixed Effects
  • Charles T. Clotfelter
  • Helen F. Ladd
  • Jacob L. Vigdor
  • Presentation at CALDER Conference, Oct. 4, 2007

2
Motivation
  • Focus on teacher credentials.
  • Lively policy debate about whether teacher
    credentials are predictive of student
    achievement.
  • Credentials are potentially important policy
    levers.
  • Focus on high schools
  • Compare use of administrative data sets to
    examine teacher credentials in the elementary
    grades

3
North Carolina data
  • End-of- course (EOC) tests in high schools.
  • -- Preferable for this purpose to the
    comprehensive exit exams used in many states
  • -- Based on standard course of study
  • -- Scores count for 25 percent of a students
    grade in the course.
  • gt Teachers have strong incentive to teach the
    material and students to learn it.
  • Availability of data on a wide array of teacher
    credentials.

4
Approach
  • We use test scores on five tests typically taken
    by 9th or 10th graders English I, algebra I,
    biology, geometry, and ELP (economic, legal and
    political systems)
  • Four cohorts of students matched to their
    specific teachers
  • Students in 10th grade in 1999/2000 2000/01
    2001/02 2002/03
  • Concern about selection into courses

5
Models
  • Preferred model.
  • Student achievement in subject S
  • f(teacher credentials and characteristics,
    classroom characteristics, student fixed effects)
  • Student fixed effects VIP. They control for all
    subject-invariant characteristics of students,
    such as basic ability or motivation. Equivalent
    to expressing everything relative to the mean for
    that student (Some remaining technical concerns,
    but see paper)
  • Alternative model.
  • No student fixed effects but include student
    level time-invariant characteristics, such as
    race and gender.

6
Strategy
  • Basic model and many variations on each
    credential to examine in detail the achievement
    effects of credentials.
  • All test scores are normalized by subject and
    year to have mean of 0 and s.d. of 1. .
  • Magnitude for purposes of comparison.
  • Effects of being black with low SES -0.116
    s.d.
  • (From alternative model)

7
Credentials I
  • Teacher experience (base no experience)
  • 2-3 years 0.050
  • 6-12 years 0.061 not diff. from 0.050
  • (With addition of teacher fixed effects,
    coefficients rise with experience)
  • Teacher licensure (base regular license)
  • Lateral entry -0.061
  • other -0.046

8
Credentials II
  • Masters degree (base no grad. degree)
  • Received after 5 years of teaching 0.009
  • Comparable results for NC elementary teachers
    - 0.010 in reading
  • National Board Certification (base never
    certified)
  • Pre-certification 0.022
  • Cert. app. year 0.048
  • Has certification 0.051 (sig. dif from
    0.022)
  • Compare NC elementary results. No human capital
    effect.

9
Credentials III
  • Teacher test scores (base within 1 sd of
    average)
  • lt 1 sd below average -0.027
  • gt 1 sd above average 0.010
  • (By subject matters most for math courses)
  • Teacher certification (base no certification)
  • -- in subject 0.081
  • -- in related subject 0.074
  • -- in other subject 0.012 (not sig.)
  • (Disaggregated. Biggest for math and biology)

10
Magnitudes
  • Predicted achievement difference for teacher at
    the 90th percentile compared to a teacher at the
    10th percentile of the predicted achievement
    distribution
  • 0.183 standard deviations
  • Large effect
  • Relative to class size reduction of 5 students
    0.013
  • Relative to SES effects (from alternative model)
    0.116
  • But, nonetheless, credentials explain only 1/5 to
    1/3 of the overall variation in teacher quality.

11
Distributional concerns
  • Uneven distribution of teacher credentials
    across high poverty schools, defined by poverty
    quartile
  • Q 1 (high) Q4 (low)
  • Non reg. license 20. 5 13.3
  • Lic.test score 0.057 0.117

12
Across classrooms algebra I
Novice teacher () Lateral entrant () Teacher test score lt1 sd
Blacks 20.24 7.23 8.27
Whites 16.75 4.02 3.80
13
Distributional effects
  • Consider black vs. white differences in teacher
    credentials in algebra 1 multiplied by estimated
    achievement effects.
  • Across a large number of credentials total
    adverse effect on black achievement lt0.02
  • May seem tiny, but looms larger relative to the
    coefficient for a black student (controlling for
    other factors) of -0.057
  • gt Maldistribution of teachers contributes to
    black-white achievement gap.

14
Conclusions
  • Teacher credentials matter in high school
  • Aggregate effects are quite large
  • Some differences with findings at the elementary
    level. E.g. masters degree National Board
    Certification
  • Uneven distribution of teacher credentials across
    students by race contributes to the black-white
    achievement gap.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com