Effects of various soil amendments on soil test P values - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Effects of various soil amendments on soil test P values

Description:

Effects of various soil amendments on soil test P values David Brauer, Glen Aiken, Dan Pote ARS/USDA, Booneville AR S.J. Livingston, L.D. Norton – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: DaveB107
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Effects of various soil amendments on soil test P values


1
Effects of various soil amendments on soil test P
values
  • David Brauer, Glen Aiken, Dan Pote
  • ARS/USDA, Booneville AR
  • S.J. Livingston, L.D. Norton
  • ARS/USDA, W. Lafayette IN
  • T.R. Way and J.H. Edwards
  • ARS/USDA, Auburn, AL

2
Acknowledgements
  • Additional funds were provided by
  • Southern Plains Area Office/ARS
  • U.S. Poultry and Egg Association

3
Rationale and Objectives
  • Rationale
  • Manure applications from concentrated animal
    feeding operations have increased soil P levels
  • P transport from agricultural land to surface
    water is undesirable
  • Objectives
  • Evaluate various amendments to decrease soil test
    values for P

4
First Experiment-Kurten TX
5
Farm History- Kurten Site
  • Farm occupies 200-300 acres
  • Dairy operation- Post WWII era (30 years)
  • Hen laying operation since early 1980s
  • 500,000 birds
  • 30-35 Mg of wet manure produced daily (70
    moisture)

6
Aerial view of Kurten Site
7
Kurten TX site Climate
  • Rainfall
  • About 900 mm of annual rainfall
  • About 100 mm occurs in July and August, thus
    leading to low soil moisture
  • Annual Average temperature
  • About 20 C

8
Kurten Site- Soil Characteristics
  • Zulch fine sandy loam (thermic udertic
    Paleustalfs)
  • Chemical characteristics Ap horizon
  • Mehlich III P 1,500 mg/ kg
  • Bray-1 P 3,000 mg/ kg
  • DRP (251) 50 mg/ kg
  • Soil Ca 5,500 mg/ kg
  • Soil pH 7.8

9
Soil amendments at Kurten Site
  • Gypsum (2 rates, 1.5 and 5 Mg/ ha)
  • Alum (1.4 Mg/ ha)
  • Waste paper (24.4 Mg/ ha)
  • Waste paper plus Gypsum
  • Waste paper plus Alum
  • Waste paper plus Alum and Gypsum

10
Experimental Protocol
  • Amendments applied annually 1999 to 2001 in
    March.
  • Soil samples (0-7.5 cm and 7.5-15 cm) collected
    in July/August from 1999 to 2004.
  • Bray-1 P and DRP (25 ml water per 1 g soil).
  • DRP solutions analyzed for Ca-readily reactive
    Ca.

11
Ca and Al additions (kg/ha)
Annual Amt Annual Amt Total Amt Total Amt
Ca Al Ca Al
1.5 Mg Gypsum/ha 350 1,050
5 Mg Gypsum/ha 1,160 3,580
1.4 Mg Alum/ ha 130 390
22.4 Mg Paper/ha 100 300
12
Bray-1 P (Means for 1999-2001)
13
Soil DRP (Means for 1999-2001)
14
Changes in Soil DRP with time
15
Changes in reactivesoil Ca with Gypsum from
1999 to 2001
16
Rainfall Simulation Data (Livingston et al. 1999)
17
Booneville Experiment
  • Ability to change soil P levels with waste paper
  • Leadvale silt loam
  • Low P soil (lt60 mg P/kg Bray-1 P values)
  • 3 rates of waste paper (22, 44 or 88 Mg/ha to
    supply 90, 170 or 350 kg Al/ha)

18
Booneville Experimental Area
19
Waste Paper Addition on Soil P
20
Waste paper and Soil Bulk Density
21
Conclusions
  • Gypsum can reduce runoff and DRP when soil P
    values are very high
  • Low soluble, reactive Ca
  • Ca added in amounts equal to Mehlich P
  • Decreases in runoff P with amendments
  • Maybe associated with changes in soil structure
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com