Interactions Between Forms of Memory: When Priming Hinders New Episodic Learning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Interactions Between Forms of Memory: When Priming Hinders New Episodic Learning

Description:

Explicit memory for conscious recollection of events from past experience ... shorter lags between repetitions deleterious to explicit memory (Ebbinghaus, 1885) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: ellyn4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Interactions Between Forms of Memory: When Priming Hinders New Episodic Learning


1
Interactions Between Forms of MemoryWhen
Priming Hinders New Episodic Learning
  • Anthony D. Wagner, Anat Maril, and Daniel L.
    Schacter
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2000

Wei-Chung Lee April 25, 2001
2
Forms of Memory
Long Term Memory
Explicit (Declarative)
Implicit (Non-declarative)
Semantic (Facts)
Episodic (Events)
Priming
Procedural
Associative Learning
Nonassociative Learning
Skeletal musculature
Emotional responses
Medial temporal lobe
Reflex pathways
Amygdala
Striatum
Neocortex
Cerebellum
3
Motivation
  • When and how do these different forms of memory
    interact?

?
4
Episodic Memory
  • Explicit memory for conscious recollection of
    events from past experience

Buckner and Koustaal, 1998
5
Perceptual Repetition Priming
  • Facilitation derived from repeated exposure to a
    stimulus

Buckner et al., 1998
6
Hypothesis
  • Priming for past experiences can hinder new
    episodic encoding.

7
Predictions
  • Enhanced behavioral and neural priming during
    re-encoding with a shorter (2 min.) relative to a
    longer (25 hr.) lag between two encoding
    episodes.
  • Impaired long-term retention of episodic memory
    in conditions with greater behavioral and neural
    priming.
  • Lag Effect shorter lags between repetitions
    deleterious to explicit memory (Ebbinghaus, 1885).

8
Experimental Procedure
  • Varied temporal lag between initial and repeated
    encoding episodes with words.

9
Behavioral Priming
  • Mean median Reaction Times (RTs) for
    Abstract/Concrete decision (msec).
  • Once-presented 777
  • Long-Lag 763
  • Short-Lag 720





p lt 0.09 p lt 0.0001
10
Neural Correlates of Episodic encoding and
Repetition Priming
Once-presented gt Fixation
Once-presented gt All Re-encoding
  • A subset of regions activated by episodic
    encoding demonstrate a significant repetition
    priming effect (i.e.. decrease in activation)
    anterior-LIPC, posterior-LIPC, and left fusiform
    cortex.

11
Lag Effects on ROI Activation
  • Long-Lag gt Short-Lag
  • Priming also effects activation in left frontal
    operculum, left middle frontal, and medial
    frontal regions (Data not shown)
  • Greater neural correlate of priming during
    re-encoding following a shorter temporal lag
    rather than long

12
Explicit Memory
  • Explicit memory scores (pHit - pFalse alarm)
  • Overall (High Low Confidence) pHit
  • Long-Lag 35 77
  • Short-Lag 31 73
  • Once-Presented 22 64
  • High Confidence explicit memory
  • Long-Lag 32 46
  • Short-Lag 25 38
  • Once-Presented 17 30







p lt 0.005 p lt 0.0001
13
Priming Negatively Correlates with Subsequent
Explicit Memory
  • A negative association across-subjects between
    behavioral neural (posterior anterior-LIPC
    shown) priming and subsequent explicit memory.
  • Reliable correlations not found for Short-Lag
    trials (highest levels of priming led to lowest
    levels of High Confidence gt range too small)

14
Conclusions
  • Correlation of behavioral and neural measures of
    priming during the re-encoding of a stimulus and
    impaired episodic encoding.
  • cross-talk between implicit and explicit forms
    of memory.
  • Posited mechanism Priming reduces encoding
    variability or multiple retrieval routes
    increasing the probability that same
    task-relevant stimulus features ...

15
Implications Questions
  • Consolidation? Time course of Lag Effect
    optimal time to re-encode?
  • Attention?
  • 1 ?L neocortex ? 1x106 neurons ? 1x109 synapses
    and 1 voxel ?
  • Segregation of memory types justified?
  • Activation maps show significant differences in
    Blood Oxygenation Levels.
  • Encoding versus re-encoding
  • Not encoding/re-encoding the same words between
    sessions - may evoke different meanings/salienci
    es.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com