Title: The 10-cm SSM/I and AMSR ice thickness algorithm: what is its value?
1The 10-cm SSM/I and AMSR ice thickness algorithm
what is its value?
- Seelye Martin
- (co-authors Robert Drucker,
- Ron Kwok, Ben Holt)
Material from http//polar.ocean.washington.edu
2Application to polynyas
3Polynya cross-section
4Northern hemisphere region of interest
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7The algorithm and its advantages
- This algorithm depends only on the ratio of the
37V and H channels, - R37 TBV37/TBH37
- 2. The use of this ratio avoids the problems
with the Team and other similar algorithms that
also depend on both 18and 37 GHz, yielding a
larger resolution, and more problems with land
contamination.. - 3. Algorithm is validated against AVHRR ice
thicknesses. - 3. Algorithm gives ice thickness, as opposed to
Cavalieri - and Markus algorithms, which yield only the
thin ice - category.
-
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10Same algorithm is applied to AMSR data, using
simultaneous AMSR/SSM/I comparison to determine
the coefficients in the thickness algorithm.
11Comparison of AMSR heat fluxes with ScanSAR
and with SSM/I obviously AMSR yields better
definition.
12SSM/I, AMSR comparison for first 90 days of 2001
Ice production in equivalent thickness (m)
13SSM/I, AMSR comparison for first 90 days of 2001
14Application to Antarctic Ross Sea ice shelf
15Test of SSM/I algorithm to Ross Sea, Figure
shows SSM/I heat flux contours over ScanSAR image
16Ross Sea ice shelf SSM/I and ScanSAR comparison
17Conclusions
- 10-cm algorithm is validated against AVHRR,
provides good definition of polynyas, and allows
calculation of the heat flux - Improved AMSR resolution yields obvious benefits
- Tests of applicability come from Chukchi, Ross
Sea. - Even SSM/I can view small polynyas downwind of
icebergs. - The success of this simple algorithm bring up the
question what is the purpose of the continued
investigation into the properties of such large
scale algorithms as the NASA TEAM algorithm,
which has been under development since the early
1980s?
18(No Transcript)
19(No Transcript)