Indexes, Scales, and Typologies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Indexes, Scales, and Typologies

Description:

Religion - a set of cultural ideas, symbols, and practices that focus on the ... 5: Dimensions - different facets or aspects of the concept ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: julieh2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Indexes, Scales, and Typologies


1
Chapter 6
  • Indexes, Scales, and Typologies

2
Can complex concepts be measured with single
variables?
  • Example Religiosity
  • Religion - a set of cultural ideas, symbols, and
    practices that focus on the meaning of life and
    the nature of the unknown
  • Religiosity - the extent to which a person
    believes in and practices a religion

3
Some aspects of religiosity
  • Attending religious services
  • Personal participation in religious rituals when
    not at services (e.g., prayer)
  • Assisting or leading meetings of religious
    organizations
  • Having religious visions or experiences
  • Believing in religious dogma
  • Giving material support to religious organizations

4
Survey measurement of religiosity
  • Measure each aspect of religiosity with a
    separate question.
  • Analysis options
  • Analyze each question separately
  • Develop an index or scale as a single measure
    which summarizes the results of the separate
    questions.

5
What is an index?
  • A composite measure, combining responses to two
    or more separate variables
  • A survey respondents score on an index is
    determined by the responses given to two or more
    questions, each of which measures an aspect of
    the concept.
  • An index is constructed through the simple
    summation of numerical scores received on each
    component variable.

6
Index Construction
  • 1. Item selection
  • 2. Index scoring
  • 3. Examination of empirical relationships
  • 4. Handling missing data

7
1. Item selection Criteria
  • (1) Face validity
  • (2) Unidimensionality
  • (3) Variance

8
1. Item selection criteria (1) Face/logical
validity
  • Each item on the face of it should appear to
    measure the concept
  • Examples
  • Dont include an item measuring level of fear of
    walking outside at night in your index of
    religiosity.
  • Dont include an item measuring attitude toward
    abortion in your index of religiosity.

9
1. Item selection criteria (2) Unidimensionality
  • Babbie (p. 150) the index should represent
    only one dimension of a concept (e.g., one index
    for religious participation another index for
    religious beliefs).
  • From Ch. 5 Dimensions - different facets or
    aspects of the concept
  • However, Babbies next point (General or
    Specific) indicates that something more general
    than a single dimension could be measured e.g.,
    religiosity as a combination of different types
    of religiosity (so, one index combining religious
    participation and belief).

10
  • This is confusing. In index construction, many
    researchers use the term unidimensionality to
    mean that all the items should measure a single
    concept. (Note, however, that this meaning
    differs from the use of dimension in the
    conceptualization process.)
  • Therefore, I use the term here to mean that all
    items in my index must measure religiosity and
    not some other concept, such as alienation,
    anomie, or political ideology.

11
1. Item selection criteria (3) Variance
  • The resulting index should rank respondents from
    low to high with regard to the concept.
  • (NOTE You will not know this until you actually
    construct the index and run a frequency
    distribution on it.)
  • The index should show decent variance e.g., not
    classify almost everyone as high on religiosity.
  • (NOTE Or this!)
  • Thus, as a group, the items must rank some
    respondents as low on religiosity and some as
    high.

12
Sample item selections for Religiosity Index from
GSS 2000
  • How often do you attend religious services?
    (ATTEND)
  • I am going to name some institutions in this
    country. As far as the people running these
    institutions are concerned, would you say you
    have a great deal of confidence, only some
    confidence, or hardly any confidence at all in
    them? Organized religion (CONCLERG)
  • Which of these statements comes closest to
    describing your feelings about the Bible? (BIBLE)
  • About how often do you pray? (PRAY)
  • How good would you say your local church worship
    services are? (WORSHIP)

13
Index Construction
  • 1. Item selection
  • 2. Index scoring
  • 3. Examination of empirical relationships
  • 4. Handling missing data

14
2. Index scoring
  • Determine how each item should be scored
  • All items need to be scored in the same
    direction. A high value on one item must mean
    the same thing conceptually as a high value on
    all others.
  • If not, the coding of an offending item(s) needs
    to be reversed, using SPSS recode feature
  • Consider
  • Range of measurement vs. adequate number of cases
    at each point in resulting index
  • Equal item weights or differing item weights

15
Item scoring - ATTEND
Low Religiosity (0)
High Religiosity (1)
16
Item scoring - CONCLERG
17
Item scoring - BIBLE
18
Item scoring - PRAY
19
Item scoring - WORSHIP
20
Open SPSS and relindex.sav (in the class data
files directory)
  • The variables have been recoded
  • ATTEND ATTENDR
  • CONCLERG CLERGR
  • BIBLE BIBLER
  • PRAY PRAYR
  • WORSHIP WORSHIPR
  • Examine frequency distributions for these to
    assess variance

21
Index Construction
  • 1. Item selection
  • 2. Index scoring
  • 3. Examination of empirical relationships
  • 4. Handling missing data

22
3. Examination of empirical relationships
  • Generally, responses to index items should be
    related.
  • For example, in survey data, respondents who
    answered a certain way (e.g., LR) on one question
    should tend to answer the same way (LR) on others
    in the index.
  • Examine all possible bivariate relationships to
    assess this (e.g., SPSS crosstabulation).

23
  • If items are not related to one another
    empirically, they probably do not measure the
    same concept.
  • If two items are perfectly related, only one
    needs to be included in the index.

24
Gamma Values for Bivariate Relationships Between
Items
25
Index Construction
  • 1. Item selection
  • 2. Index scoring
  • 3. Examination of empirical relationships
  • 4. Handling missing data

26
4. Handling missing data
  • If there are few cases with missing data on one
    or more items, they can be excluded from the
    index (e.g., Ch. 6 exercise).
  • A value can be assigned to missing data according
    to some rule (e.g., mean of the variable, random
    assignment).
  • If relatively few items have missing data for a
    case, an index score can be assigned on the basis
    of the items with non-missing data.
  • The structure of the data collection instrument
    may allow you to impute responses (e.g., checking
    yes for some items on a list and leaving others
    blank blank probablyno).
  • Analysis of other questions among those who had
    missing data may suggest probable answers to the
    missing ones.

27
Creating the index
RELINDEX - Reliogisity Index
RELINDEXattendrclergrbiblerprayr
28
Creating the index in SPSS
  • In Data Editor window Transform Compute
  • Type index name (8 characters or fewer first
    character must be alphabetic) in Target Variable
    box
  • Highlight first variable in variable list and
    move to Numeric Expression box (or type in box)
  • Type or use keypad to insert after first
    variable
  • Continue until all variables have been entered
  • Click TypeLabel and enter a variable label for
    your index under Label do nothing with Type
  • Click OK to create the index and return to the
    Data Editor window (index will be the last
    variable)
  • Click Variable View and enter Value Labels for
    the index (e.g., 0-Lowest, 4-Highest)

29
After index creation - Frequency distribution
  • Run a frequency distribution in SPSS using the
    new index variable to assess one aspect of index
    scoring Range of measurement vs. adequate number
    of cases at each point.
  • Both should be adequate, but it is not possible
    to define this precisely.
  • In general, the index should have a sufficiently
    broad range of measurement to distinguish
    extremes of the concept.
  • However, there should be sufficient
    representation of cases at each point and no one
    point should have an extremely large number of
    cases.

30
Index validation
  • From Ch. 5 Validity - Does the measurement
    technique reflect the nominal definition?
  • Aspects of validity in index construction and
    use
  • 1. Internal validation - Item analysis
  • 2. External validation

31
1. Internal validation - Item analysis
  • Examine the relationship between each individual
    item and the composite index variable
  • E.g. in SPSS Crosstabulate ATTENDR, CLERGR, etc.
    with RELINDEX
  • Usually better to make the item (ATTENDR) the
    column variable and the index (RELINDEX) the row
    variable, since the resulting chart will be
    easier to read that way
  • If item analysis is successful, all items should
    be fairly strongly related to the index variable.
  • If not, reconsider item selection

32
Example of Internal Validation
33
2. External validation
  • The index variable should be related to another
    variable measuring the same or a similar concept
  • E.g., an index of religiosity should be related
    to
  • belief that the U.S. would be a better country if
    religion had less influence (RELIGINF-not in GSS
    2000)
  • place of faith in God in respondents value
    structure (IMPGOD-not in GSS 2000)
  • whether somebody who is against all churches and
    religion should be allowed to teach in a college
    or university (COLATH-in GSS 2000)
  • If not, either the index is a poor measure of the
    concept or the other variable (the validating
    item) is a poor measure of the concept.

34
Example of External Validation
35
Index and scale construction logic
36
How indexes and scales are different
  • If we know a respondents index score, we cant
    tell how individual items in the index were
    answered, unless the score is at one of the two
    extremes.
  • Index scores are assigned by simply summing
    scores to the individual items.
  • RELINDEX - 4 items, where 0all LR 4all HR
  • But if RELINDEX1, we dont know which one was
    HR. If RELINDEX2, we dont know which two were
    HR. Same for 3.
  • If items form a scale, and we know a respondents
    scale score, we can tell how each individual item
    was answered.
  • Scale scores are assigned to ideal patterns of
    attributes.
  • Data analysis determines whether items form a
    scale in a particular sample.

37
Index and scale construction logic
38
How indexes and scales are similar
  • Both are composite measures (more than one item).
  • Both rank cases from low to high with regard to
    the concept (ordinal).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com