Title: Officer Education System Operations Career Field Information Operations Career Field ODAP 4 ODAP 7 O
1Officer Education SystemOperations Career
FieldInformation Operations Career FieldODAP
4ODAP 7ODAP 8(TAB J)
2Officer Education System
ODAP
1 Apr 01
AS OF
Officer Education System
TRADOC
Key Actions
ODS Characteristic
Develop Motivated, Competent Experienced
Officers
Near-Term
G A R
- Conduct Detailed Studies for
- OPMS Initiatives
- Convene OES Conference
- Identify OPMS OES Issues
- Integrate OES Initiatives within
- each of the four Career Fields
- Implement ILE way Ahead
- Assist in implementation of
- OES initiatives
- Integrate OPMS OES Initiatives
- into Army and TR TXN Plans
ODAP Objective
Revise the Officer Education System (OES) to
Better Prepare Officers for the 21st Century
Near-Term Goal
Integrate OES Initiatives into the Transformation
Campaign Plan
Long-Term Goal
Implement OES improvements into OPMS Officer
Development System
Mid-Term
Rating
RED
- Assist in implement OPMS XXI OES Initiatives
- Integrate OPMS OES Initiatives into
- Army and TRADOC Transformation Plans
Issues
- Integration of Joint Education
- ACS Requirements
- SAMS Utilization
- Implementation of ILE
- CGSOC Slating and Attendance Policy
- Reliance on Distance Learning
- Stabilization of ISC Instructors
- Career Long Learning
CSA Decisions
13, 14, 15, 17
3Operations Career Field
ODAP
Apr 01
AS OF
Operations Career Field Coordination
TRADOC
Key Actions
Develop Motivated, Competent and Experienced
Officers
ODS Characteristic
Near-Term
G A R
- Develop Consolidation CF
- Responses
- Develop Actions / Programs
- in Support of OPMS XXI
- Initiatives
- Develop Manage ODAP
- Continue Recoding
- work w/DCSPER/ MACOMs
ODAP Objective
Establish the Operations Career Field (OPCF)
Near-Term Goal
Assess / Integrate MACOM Recoding
Long-Term Goal
Transition CF to Army Development System
Mid-Term
- Assess Implications of ILE Redesign
- Monitor Analyze CF Designation
- Results, Promotion Trends,
- Development Plans
- Update DA Pam 600-3 to reflect ILE
- redesign and additional education
- requirements
- Integrate ALDTP recommendations
- into the ODAP
- Rework ODAP to reflect Army and TR
- TR Transformation
Rating
AMBER
Issues
- ACS for Ops CF Officers
- Update of AR 600-3 and DA Pam 600-3
- Women in Cbt Policy
- Change to MOCS Process
- Elimination of CGSC Selection Board
- CFD Ceilings
- EAD Structure
CSA Decisions
4.1 -4.2, 17.21
4Information Operations Career Field
Information Operations
ODAP
Apr 01
AS OF
Career Field Coordination
Key Actions
ODS Characteristic
Develop Motivated, Competent and Experienced
Officers
Near-Term
G A R
- Obtain funding for Q-Crs FY02
- Convene CF Conference
- Identify and resolve CF Issues
- ISC attendance policy for IO CF
- Monitor Ed and Tng POM Reqt's
- Monitor CF designation/structure
- Monitor development of Q-Crs
- Monitor/asses 06 Selection Board
ODAP Objective
Establish an Information Operations (IO) Career
Field (CF)
Near-Term Goal
Integration of IO CF Personnel into the Army
Structure
Long-Term Goal
Transition CF to Army Development System
(ADS)
Rating
AMBER
Mid-Term
Issues
- Update IO CF strategy
- Update Regulatory requirements
- Assess IO CF composition and adjust
- as necessary
- Asses ISC policy impact on IO CF
- Asses ADS XXI TF recommendations
- on IO CF
- Assess Army Transformation impact on
- IO CF
-
- Funding for new FA Qualification Courses
- ISC attendance policy for IO CF FAs
- IO CF FA TOE/TDA structure /Army
- Transformation
-
-
CSA Decisions 9
5ODAP 4, 7, 8 ISSUE
ISSUE Force XXI, Army Transformation,
Institutional Transformation and Army Leader
Development and Training Panel alignment with
OPMS XXI.
- DISCUSSION
- OPMS XXI was implemented in 1997 to support
Force XXI initiatives. - Army and Institutional Transformation have
superceded Force XXI. - No attempt has been made to determine the impact
of Army Transformation and Institutional
Transformation on OPMS XXI (i.e. multifunctional
soldier versus specialist). - The Army Leader Development and Training Panel
recommendations may impact on OPMS XXI. - ADS initiatives might be incorporated into the
appropriate Army Transformation Campaign Plan
Line of Operations to receive senior Army
Leadership visibility and funding support. - Effects of Transformation must be at least
estimated before TAADS can be fixed
institutional TDAs, IDIV, Corps redesign will
drive changed numbers in smaller functional
areas may drive changes in OPMS XXI planning
assumptions/models.
- RECOMMENDATION
- DCSOPS/DCSPER immediately convene a PAT to
determine the impact of Army Transformation,
Institutional Transformation, and the Army Leader
Development Training Panel have on OPMS XXI
initiatives/implementation.
6ODAP 4, 7, 8 ISSUE
ISSUE Funding for IO CF Functional Area
Qualification Courses
- DISCUSSION
- Nine COHORT YGs have career field designated
(CFD) into the IO CF to date. - DA PAM 600-3 requires officers CFD into IO CF
FAs to attend a FA Qualification Course as part
of FA qualification. - New IO CF FA Qualification Courses were only
partially funded in FY 01, UFRs for FY 02 and
beyond. - DA has directed requirements for new courses
using DL or a means to reduce TTHS, funding for
Dl has been insufficient to meet this requirement
- Increased delays in development, to include DL,
will result in an increased backlog of officers
requiring training.
- RECOMMENDATION
- CF Coordinators continue to work with TRADOC and
ARSTAFF to obtain funding. - ARSTAFF provide funding for continued
development / conduct of IO CF FA Qualification
Courses. - ARSTAFF establish a PAT to review the entire
education and training system to meet the needs
of Army Transformation.
7ODAP 4, 7, 8 ISSUE
ISSUE Intermediate Staff College (ISC)
attendance and curriculum policy decisions
are required for all CF Proponents to develop an
overall functional area educational program (DA
PAM 600-3).
- DISCUSSION
- Proponents need an ILE / ISC program that is
clearly defined and executable. - Proponents need an ILE / ISC policy as soon as
possible to fully implement an overall ILE policy
for their respective branch/FA. - ILE must incorporate the SAM Program in terms of
architecture, attendance, utilization - Lack of an ISC policy prohibits the Proponents
from developing an overall officer education
strategy for their functional areas. - ILE requirements demand a clear Army policy
relating to career long learning - ILE requirements also demand a tenured
instructor/faculty policy by DA. - Any ILE / ISC policy needs to be properly funded
/ resourced for successful implementation.
- RECOMMENDATION
- Immediately staff ILE / ISC policy at GO level
throughout all four Career Fields for Army-wide
implementation in FY 03. - ARSTAFF establish a PAT to review all
policies/regulations affected by ILE and
determine a resource plan to implement full ILE
by FY 03. - ARSTAFF establish a PAT to determine all the
impacts ILE will have on TTHS, attendance at
military and civilian education institutions, and
the applicability of ACS/TWI/Fellowship Programs
within Army Transformation
8ODAP 4, 7, 8 ISSUE
ISSUE Some branches and FAs, particularly in
the IO CF, continue to experience structure
imbalances.
- DISCUSSION
- Changes made during the Jan 99 Recoding
Conference have been reversed by the MACOMs
during the PMAD cycle. - Changes to TOEs/TDAs may have adverse effects on
promotion pyramids and cause imbalance in
officer structure, especially in small functional
areas. - Army Transformation is impacting on structure
faster than originally anticipated and requires a
process for change. - TOE positions must be validated / documented
within the transformation division structure.
- RECOMMENDATION
- CF Coordinators request that the ARSTAFF conduct
a Recoding Conference to fix TAADS and align PMAD
and TAADS. - ARSTAFF ensure positions are documented in the
IDIV TOE.
9ODAP 4, 7, 8 ISSUE
Issue How do we get work done?
Issues worked here
HQDA
FAA
FR
PERSCOM
Issues not worked here
MACOMs
PPOs
AR 600-3
INFO ONLY
ARMY Systems Structure Resources -
POM Training Manning Info LD
POLICY
INFO
IDEP
ADS XXI
FMS
CF COORD
ODP
RC IO INITIATIVE