Title: Outcome of the African Regional Workshop on Transfer
1Outcome of the African Regional Workshop on
Transfer of Technology Arusha, Tanzania
Dr. Peter P. Zhou EECG Consultants Pty Box
402339 GABORONE. Botswana Tel/fax 267-326575
mail pzhou_at_global.bw Africa Regional Workshop
on Transfer of Technology Arusha, Tanzania,
16-18 August 1999
2Workshop Objectives
- Share views/experiences among Parties on past
transfer of technology in the African Region. - Advance the understanding of technology needs
special situations of the African countries. - Generate information and ideas on practical steps
to enhance the transfer of technology to Africa. - Consider elements of a framework for meaningful
and effective actions to enhance implementation
of Article 4.5 of the Convention.
3Key Themes of Arusha Issues and Questions
- Technology needs- What How
- Barriers Opportunities to the transfer of
technology - Capacity building to enhance tech. transfer_
Specific priorities Strategies - Technology information needs
- Transfer of Technology Mechanisms
- Stakeholder Interactions- public-private-MLI,
BLI, NGO, Civil (roles and potential)
4Themes of the Arusha Workshop
- Technology needs
- What are the technology needs of African
countries? What are the priorities? - Africa to increase Energy-Qty Quality--Move
away from unssustainable traditional biomass- to
new and benign sources - Consider Sociological disparities- industrial
complex Versus social upliftment-poverty
alleviation - Africas diverse socio-economic/political/resource
endowments disparities - Public Domain Techs- need not most sophisticated
5Themes of the Arusha Workshop
- Barriers to the development and transfer of
technologies - Barriers?
- NO CC Policies Legal- regulatory, Institutional
weakness - access to finance (local international) no
ready markets, poorly equipped SMMES - Poorly informed consumer
- political corruption macroeconomic statusPoor
Response to investor enquiry Battling with ESAPS
6Themes of the Arusha Workshop
- Capacity-building for technology transfer
- Focus For capacity-building,?
- Best to learn by doing- engage in EST trial
projects- GEF but missed out in AIJ! - Equip with business skills- part SMMEs
- Empower socioecological groups
- Policy analysis project development- a think
tank idea - Establish strong legal and regulatory
institutions - Change African notions-rationale competitive
edge - Matching needs with capacity
7Themes of the Arusha Workshop
- Technology information
- What information on technology is needed?
- Most technologies public domain- source
application - Tracking technology developments
- CC information In hands of govt, NGO but PVT
sector lacking- sharing among stakeholders - Sharing and replication of Experiences
In-counytry S-S and S-N. - General awareness rationale of CC activities.
8Themes of the Arusha Workshop
- Transfer of technology mechanisms
- Other ML and BL have conditionalities and no EST
facility - UNFCCC important jump start for EST
- GEF operative in Africa- no AIJ- Bias towards
mitigation and more needed in adaptation - Sectorally limited to energy
- What are key elements of appropriate technology
transfer mechanisms under Article 4.5?- prepare
both launching and landing pads
9Themes of the Arusha Workshop
- Stakeholder Involvement
- Govt, NGO and RI actively involved
- Limited Pvt sector role- too much risk in new
venture- to be involved from project development - Govt to promote pvt sector confidence in TT as
new venture. - Govt to buy down risks- but current project
preferences not conducive to sustainability. - Informed society
- Int Organizations- promote existing opportunities
10Three Key Observationsfrom Africa
- The synergy between development and climate
change policies has been under exploited. Success
in RETS. - Actions to address climate change must
simultaneously address development objectives.
Past CC taken as technical Fixes/passing phase-
even distorted markets - Success with awareness/skills/information/Fiscal
policies - Development and implementation of actions
initiatives must involve all key stakeholders - e.g., intergovernmental and multilateral
organizations, national and local governments,
private sector, NGOs public society.
11Significant Outcomes from Arusha
- Require concerted effort to identify and
prioritized technology needs- Public Domain for
suitability- expanding sectoral scope - General barriers to technology transfer are known
and practical actions to overcomethem should be
initiated. - Agreement on meaningful and effective actions and
a framework for actions under the UNFCCC requires
continued consultations - Capacity Building in Africa is of paramount
importance but specific priorities and strategies
need to be mapped.
12Further Significant Outcomes from Arusha
- Require strategic partnerships between
governments, private sector and other
stakeholders on technology transfer. - Require partnerships among African countries as
an important and potentially effective mechanism
for technology transfer. - Require multilateral bilateral donors who play
greaterrole in coordination of EST activities
13Next steps for African countries...
Development of meaningful and effective actions
under the framework of the UNFCCC may be best
achieved by
- Undertaking technology needs assessments to
identify priority technology needs - Further identification and analysis of the
barriers to the transfer of priority technologies - Need a think tank to lead the debate
- Need easier access to financing EST and local
tech. devt - Consultation among stakeholders to identify
practical actions to overcome barriers enhance
implementation of Article 4.5 bring climate
change on Development Agenda
14Next steps for African countries...
- Development of meaningful
- and effective actions under the framework
- of the UNFCCC may be best achieved by
- Building commercial interest for PVT sector/Civil
society participation - Information base Networking at
National/Regional/International - Advocating for easier windows of EST Financing
- Build skills to support Decision making