State of the Practice: Constructivist instructional design for online course design: a research stud - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

State of the Practice: Constructivist instructional design for online course design: a research stud

Description:

... were the Sloan-C and the EDUCAUSE Instructional Technologies (INSTTECH) lists. ... Summary and Discussion of Findings. APPENDIX: Summary of Findings ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:329
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: carlosr3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: State of the Practice: Constructivist instructional design for online course design: a research stud


1
State of the Practice Constructivist
instructional design for online course design a
research study
Carlos Morales, Ph.D. Executive Director eCampus
and Learning Technologies Lock Haven University
of PA November 2008
2
Abstract
  • The continued to growth of online learning in the
    past decade has prompted the development of new
    strategies and methods for course design. The
    need to develop course materials that appeal and
    captivate the interest of online learners is
    higher than ever. This presentation focuses on
    the results of a doctoral dissertation that
    targeted instructional designers and
    administrators of online learning programs
    regarding their perceptions and practices
    pertaining constructivist learning environments
    in online course design. Results include the
    rationale and frequency for its adoption,
    barriers and type and number of activities
    grounded in constructivism.
  • Findings based on Dissertation titled
  • PERCEPTIONS AND PRACTICES OF INSTRUCTIONAL
    DESIGNERS TOWARDS THE USE OF CONSTRUCTIVIST
    LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS IN ONLINE COURSE DESIGN

3
Basis for Study
  • The increased visibility gained by online
    learning in the last decade came accompanied by
    an increase in the accountability by the public
    as well as by accrediting agencies that demanded
    high quality course offerings and equivalencies
    to courses delivered in face-to-face learning
    (Allen and Seaman, 2004 2005).
  • Constructivist instructional design permits
    instructional designers to design learning
    environments in which students can integrate and
    maximize authentic learning experiences and
    activities (Dick, 1992 Tam, 2000 Willis, 1995).
  • As recognized in the literature, instructional
    designers have found that the current
    instructional design theories have limited
    applicability when the intent of course goals and
    objectives are based on a constructivist approach
    (Bolan, 2003 Jonassen, 1999 Tam, 2000
    Williams, 2002).

4
Research Questions
  • The research questions were designed to survey
    and describe the perceptions and practices
    employed by instructional designers concerning
    the use of constructivist learning environments
    in online course design.
  • What are the perceptions instructional designers
    have about online course design grounded in
    constructivist theory?
  • What practices do they use and to what extent are
    instructional designers implementing practices
    for building learning environments grounded in
    constructivist theory in online course design?

5
Methods
  • This study was comprised of a 19-item Likert
    scale web-based survey and five open-ended
    questions.
  • The potential population of the study was
    estimated at 5500 participants, although the
    sample consisted of 42 instructional designers
    and administrators of online learning/instructiona
    l design programs. The list-servs utilized in
    this study were the Sloan-C and the EDUCAUSE
    Instructional Technologies (INSTTECH) lists.

6
Population
  • The research study was conducted during Summer
    2007. Administrators included Deans, Directors,
    Executive Directors and Vice Presidents of
    academic technology.
  • Participants were from two and four-year higher
    education institutions with a population ranging
    between 1,500 and 8,500 full-time students.
  • 58.54 were from institutions offering graduate
    studies while 34.15 were from four-year
    institutions. 7.32 were from two-years
    institutions.

7
Summary and Discussion of Findings
8
APPENDIX Summary of Findings
Summary and Discussion of Findings
Figure 1. Preferred Instructional design model
9
Summary and Discussion of Findings
10
Summary and Discussion of Findings
11
Summary and Discussion of Findings
12
Summary and Discussion of Findings
13
Summary and Discussion of Findings
14
Summary and Discussion of Findings
15
Constructivist Models
  • Constructivist Models
  • Action Research
  • Activity Theory
  • Anchored Instruction
  • Andragogy (Knowles)
  • Case Studies
  • Web-quests
  • Cognitive Apprenticeship
  • Cognitive Flexibility Theory
  • Generative Learning
  • Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL)
  • Conversation Theory
  • Discovery Learning
  • Inquiry Teaching (Collins and Stevens)
  • Interpretation Construction (ICON) Design Model
    (Black and McClintock)
  • Mind Tools (Jonassen)
  • Structural Knowledge (Jonassen)
  • The Minimalist Model (Carroll)
  • Problem-Based Learning
  • The Project Method (Kilpatrick and Dewey)
    Self-initiated, holistic, purposeful activity
  • Play
  • Role Play
  • Goal-based Scenarios (Schank)
  • Situated Cognition
  • Observational (Social) Learning Theory (Albert
    Bandura)

16
Recommendations
  • Recommendations for Practice
  • The following is a summary of the main
    recommendations for practice that can serve as a
    framework for instructional design teams and
    online learning programs.
  • In order to improve the quality of online
    education, instructional designers must advocate
    for the development of online learning
    environments built upon constructivist
    principles.
  • Faculty must recognize that the instructional
    designers role is a prescriptive one, including
    advice and consultation and might yield to a
    broader usage of constructivist activities for
    online course design.

17
Recommendations cont.
  • Recommendations for Future Research
  • This research study attempted to fill a gap in
    the literature by investigating the perceptions
    and practices employed by instructional designers
    concerning the use of constructivist instruction
    principles in online learning course design. This
    study has addressed an important area mentioned
    in the literature and contributed to a growing
    body of knowledge on the subject.
  • Additional research should be conducted regarding
    the incorporation of constructivist principles in
    instructional design for online education
    studying to what extent the practices employed by
    instructional designers have an impact on course
    activities and course quality.
  • Future studies could focus on investigating
    instructional designers practices in
    institutions where large staff and centralized
    operations for online course design are in place.
    Also the focus might include studying
    student-performance variables and how the
    incorporation of constructivist principles in
    instructional design affect the teaching and
    learning in courses delivered via the online
    method.

18
Contact info
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com