The development of quality and healthcare systems in the UK - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

The development of quality and healthcare systems in the UK

Description:

Integral part of UK life and therefore a political pawn ... such as orthopaedics increasing heat in hospital departments and reducing funding available ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: magg55
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The development of quality and healthcare systems in the UK


1
The development of quality and healthcare systems
in the UK
  • Maggie Somekh

2
Creation of the NHS1948 Beveridge report 1942
  • Provides the majority of healthcare in UK
  • Integral part of UK life and therefore a
    political pawn
  • Private health care represents a small percentage
    of the population
  • NHS is free at point of delivery 96bn budget
    providing services to a population of 60 million
    86 living in urban setting

3
Payments in the NHS
  • Apart from prescription charges of 6.65 (free to
    pensioners, children and some others) there is no
    charge
  • Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland manage their
    health services separately and have adopted some
    of the ideas that the English services have.
  • NHS dentistry is not now so widely available,
    there are charges for this at 15.50 for an
    examination and then further costs for work

4
Staffing in the NHS
  • Employ direct most of the doctors nurses and
    clinical staff working for them, these work in
    NHS run hospitals
  • GPs, dentists, opticians and other providers are
    mostly self-employed and contact their services
    back to the NHS.
  • The NHS employs around 1.3 million staff

5
Modern Management in 1980s
  • Griffiths Report of 1983
  • General Managers appointed
  • Clinicians involved in management
  • System under financial pressure
  • Waiting lists for operations lengthy
  • 1988 Margaret Thatcher announced review of NHS

6
Internal Market
  • White papers
  • Working for Patients
  • Caring for People
  • 1990 The National Health Service Community Care
    Act (in England) defined the internal market.

7
Purchaser provider split
  • Purchaser Provider split happened. Health
    Authorities no longer ran hospitals but
    commissioned services and some G.P.s became fund
    holders able to purchase some services
    themselves. The Providers became independent
    trusts which encouraged competition and increased
    local differences
  • Contracting out of services such as catering and
    cleaning started to happen
  • Huge variety in efficacy of these new
    arrangements especially amongst G.P.s

8
Drivers for change
  • Increases in costs of drugs and technology with
    new developments all the time
  • Desire to increase standards of care
  • To offer patients choice
  • Aging population
  • Growing recognition of the role of public health
    and that of primary care in preventative care
    e.g. smoking, obesity, teenage pregnancy, early
    diagnosis of diabetes, and heart disease.

9
Primary Care Trusts
  • Fundholding GPs were now well established
  • Their functions for purchasing services were now
    taken over by PCTs with significant
    responsibility for commissioning services for
    populations.
  • These were managed by a Board including GPs for
    the area
  • The role of commissioning services which had been
    held by the Health Authorities disappeared except
    for highly specialist services and their role
    changed to one of financial monitoring and
    quality monitoring

10
Clinical Governance
  • Through the late 1990s, increasing interest in
    setting standards for care that are measurable
    and provide baseline for audit
  • Development of risk management systems
  • Complaints taken much more seriously
  • No blame policy introduced to encourage reporting
    of near misses and clinical untoward incidents
  • Health and Safety given high priority
  • Staff health and stress levels
  • Readmission rates
  • Suicides
  • Infection control

11
  • Waiting times
  • Privately run clinics (Diagnostic Treatment
    Centres) taking on more and more routine
    procedures such as orthopaedics increasing heat
    in hospital departments and reducing funding
    available
  • Focus on AE waiting times
  • Lack of focus on some other important areas
  • Up to 400 different targets to meet in early
    2000s

12
Clinical Governance
  • CHI (Commission for Health Improvement) set up
    1999 to monitor clinical governance in Trusts
    using star ratings to measure agreed standards
  • NICE (National Institute for Clinical Excellence)
    set up 1999 to provide an evidence base for
    expenditure for effective use of pharmaceuticals
    and procedures

13
Change on Change
  • Having set up over 300 Primary Care Trusts to
    manage commissioning in local areas during the
    early 2000 these are now being reduced to half
    increasing their individual responsibility to
    something like that which the Health Authorities
    originally held
  • Community Trusts being developed to manage the
    delivery of community based services
  • Mental health trusts are being merged to provide
    large trusts serving populations of over a
    million (a large county in England)
  • Acute trusts have merged in many places as
    sustaining specialist services and maintaining
    clinical governance has proved impossible

14
NHS Foundation Hospitals created 2003
  • Three key characteristics
  • Freedom to decide locally how to meet their
    obligations
  • Accountable to local people, who can become
    members and Governors
  • Authorised and monitored by Monitor Independent
    Regulator of NHS Foundation Trusts

15
  • Free to decide capital investment to improve
    services
  • Ability to borrow to support this investment
    without seeking external approval
  • Establish close relationships with those who use
    service. Form of public ownership and
    accountability to ensure hospital reflects local
    needs
  • Core NHS principles remain unchanged
  • This change has added to the change management
    pressure across the NHS with pressure to
    implement these foundation hospitals across
    England before any change of Government.

16
  • Recent Developments
  • Medical training has been restructured
  • All staff have been given revised Job
    descriptions and placed on new pay bands
  • Doctors pay has been increased and linked to
    performance
  • All placing increased financial burden on the
    service and causing lay-offs of Doctors and Nurses

17
  • Private Finance Initiatives to build new
    hospitals have cost more than Government funding
  • Ambitious plans to develop a linked IT system
    across the service have fallen behind target and
    increased dramatically in cost
  • Primary Care Trusts are being encouraged to buy
    15 of their services from private and voluntary
    organisations

18
Negative
  • Staff at all levels are under enormous pressure
    of work
  • There is a low level of misery throughout the
    service as a result of change on change
  • Government does not consult with the right people
    long enough in advance of decisions about change
    thus problems with impact of doctor training
    schemes, recent pay awards and IT schemes and PCT
    size
  • Health is a political pawn and governments will
    continue to try and make their name with changes
    to it
  • Foundation Trusts will make it very hard to have
    anything like a coordinated strategy for a
    health service that reflects the patients pathway

19
Positive
  • Clinical Governance is here to stay and has made
    a difference to patient safety and patient
    empowerment
  • Wastage has largely been eliminated
  • Services are more timely e.g. AE , Cancer,
    waiting lists
  • New arrangements for larger commissioning units
    mean a more expert team will be making decisions
  • Informed choices are now made about drug use and
    new technology
  • Clinicians are more involved in management
  • The original Beveridge principles have so far
    held strong

20
Concerns for the future
  • Fragmentation of services with foundation trusts
    not seeing any responsibility to link with other
    services
  • Community foundation trusts being liable to be
    taken over by private sector management
  • Financial pressures leading to staff reductions
    and the problems arising from this, e.g. bed
    closures, waiting lists, pressure on beds and
    early discharges and revolving door effect on
    patients

21
Dreams for the Future
  • Patient involvement in planning
  • More home treatment, early discharge, home
    treatment teams especially for mentally ill,
    children and elderly
  • Local nursing beds for rehabilitation linked to
    home treatment teams e.g. stroke
  • Focus of highly specialist services in major
    centres of expertise
  • Continuing expanding role of local G.P.service
    including physiotherapy, podiatry, dieticians,
    pathology testing, visiting consultants providing
    clinics in localities and teaching G.P.s
  • Increasing emphasis on health of the nation,
    healthy diet, healthy lifestyle, regular health
    checks. Education for children
  • Stability for the system of provision to allow
    staff morale to improve and systems to bed down.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com