Frontier Extended Stay Clinic Demonstration Project - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Frontier Extended Stay Clinic Demonstration Project

Description:

Frequency of Project Top 5 Diagnoses at Discharge. No 'typical' clinic (IFHS close) diagnoses vary significantly. ... Top 10 Diagnoses at Discharge for Each Clinic ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: anis
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Frontier Extended Stay Clinic Demonstration Project


1
Frontier Extended Stay ClinicDemonstration
Project
  • Report on 12 Months Data
  • Presented by
  • Alaska Center for Rural Health
  • Alaskas AHEC
  • December 2006

2
General Observations
  • Data collection period for ARMC, CRMC, and IFHS
    3/15/05 3/14/06.
  • Data collection period for IIMC 9/15/05-9/14/06
    (due to later start in project).
  • Years data captures seasonal variations (fishing
    season, tourist season).
  • Data submitted by clinics of very high quality
    required minimal data cleaning.
  • Clinics reported a remarkably similar number of
    FESC encounters no need to weight/adjust the
    data.

3
Key Findings
  • Each clinic is a distinct blend of geographical
    challenges, material human resources, and
    community/culture.
  • Consequently, the data show that there is no
    typical participating FESC clinic.
  • Overall project means/averages hide these
    distinctions.
  • However, there is considerable common ground.

4
Key Differences and Common Ground
  • Key differences
  • Mon Ob/Transfer patient breakdown
  • Patient disposition breakdown
  • Length of encounters
  • Percentage of Medicare-reimbursable encounters
  • Key common ground
  • High percentage of after hours encounters
  • FESC-related staff stress (esp. after hours)
  • Clinics ability to quickly diagnose, stabilize
    and
  • medevac Transfer patients (weather permitting).

5
Number of FESC Encounters
  • Clinics reported very similar numbers of FESC
    encounters.
  • Consequently no need to weight/adjust data.

6
Type of FESC Encounter
  • FESC encounter type breakdown is highly variable
    from clinic to clinic a key indicator of the
    conditions unique to that clinic.

7
Disposition of FESC Patients
  • Disposition of patients is highly variable from
    clinic to clinic - closely tracks Mon Ob/Transfer
    breakdown (most Mon Obs are discharged home,
    nearly all Transfers are medevaced).

8
Disposition of Mon Ob Patients
  • In all clinics, large majority of Mon Ob patients
    are discharged home.
  • Similar smaller percentages are referred for
    non-urgent follow-up care.

9
Mean FESC Encounter Length
  • Mean encounter length extremely variable (range
    1.42 17.07).
  • Transfer encounters generally shorter than Mon
    Obs (exception IFHS, due to weather-caused
    medevac delays).

10
Median FESC Encounter Length
  • Median encounter lengths also highly variable
    (range 1.25 10.25).
  • Median reduces effect (statistical noise) of
    very long outliers.
  • Relatively short Transfer median lengths show
    clinics ability to quickly diagnose, classify,
    and medevac Transfer patients.

11
Maximum/Minimum FESC Encounter Length
  • Minimum encounters were all Transfers clinics
    can accomplish medevacs extremely rapidly under
    right conditions.
  • Maximum encounters nearly all Mon Obs exception
    IFHS, due to a prolonged weather delay.

12
Maximum Encounter Length Mon Obs vs. Transfers
  • Maximum encounters highly variable range 4.00
    to 99.50.
  • Transfer maximums quantify longest medevac delays
    (due to bad weather, lack of daylight, waiting
    for transport, stabilizing patient).

13
Distribution of Encounter Length All Encounters
  • No clinic with typical distribution matching
    overall project.
  • Few encounters gt12 hours, very few gt24 hours
    exception CRMC.

14
Distribution of Encounter Length Mon Obs
  • No clinic with typical Mon Ob distribution
    matching overall project.
  • Few encounters gt12 hours or gt24 hours
    exception CRMC.

15
Distribution of Encounter Length Transfers
  • No clinic with typical Transfer distribution
    matching overall project.
  • Very few Transfer encounters gt12 hours or gt24
    hours exception IFHS, due to medevac weather
    delays.

16
After Hours Encounters
  • More common ground similar percentages of
    encounters occurring outside of normal clinic
    hours (after hours) project mean 47.
  • Represents FESC work and stress loads of after
    hours/on call staff.

17
Frequency of Project Top 5 Diagnoses at Discharge
  • No typical clinic (IFHS close) diagnoses
    vary significantly.
  • Common ground - incidence of top 2 injury and
    cardiovascular.

18
Frequency of Project Top 5 Mon Ob Diagnoses
  • Again, no typical clinic ARMC is close
    diagnoses vary.
  • IFHS substance abuse most common IIMC injury
    most common CRMC renal-urinary high incidence.
  • Common ground high incidence of
    gastrointestinal (esp. CRMC).

19
Frequency of Project Top 5 Transfer Diagnoses
  • Highly variable only IIMC approaches overall
    project pattern.
  • Common ground injury and cardiovascular top 2
    for all clinics.

20
Top 10 Diagnoses at Discharge for Each Clinic
  • Highly variable only IFHS approaches overall
    project pattern.
  • Common ground injury, cardiovascular,
    gastrointestinal.

21
Medicare/aid Eligibility for Reimbursement
  • Medicare/aid-eligible FESC patients range from 7
    (IFHS) to 55 (IIMC).
  • High percentage filtered out by 4 hour
    encounter length criteria (esp. IIMC).
  • Net Medicare reimbursable encounters range from
    4 (IFHS) to 19 (CRMC).
  • Most clinics will receive minimal financial boost
    from CMS reimbursements.

22
Time Distribution Medicare/aid-Eligible Encounters
  • Time distribution of Medicare/aid eligible FESC
    encounters highly variable
  • Total numbers of eligible patients also highly
    variable
  • Potential reimbursements thus variable, from high
    (CRMC) to very low (IIMC)

23
Time Distribution Medicare-Eligible Encounters
  • Time distribution of Medicare eligible FESC
    encounters highly variable
  • Total numbers of eligible patients also highly
    variable
  • Potential reimbursements thus variable, from high
    (CRMC) to very low (IIMC)

24
Clinic Thumbnails
  • ARMC Short encounters (all types) rapid
    medevacs low percentage medevaced high
    percentage discharged home many Medicare
    eligible patients but few Medicare-reimbursable
    encounters.
  • CRMC Very long Mon Ob encounters rapid
    medevacs low percentage medevaced high
    percentage discharged home many
    Medicare-eligible patients and many Medicare
    reimbursable encounters.

25
Clinic Thumbnails
  • IFHS Long encounters otherwise rapid medevacs
    prolonged by distance/bad weather median
    percentages medevaced and discharged home very
    few Medicare eligible patients and very few
    reimbursable encounters.
  • IIMC Very short encounters (all types) very
    rapid medevacs high percentage medevaced few
    discharged home many Medicare-eligible patients
    but very few Medicare-eligible encounters.

26
Key Variables
ARMC CRMC IFHS IIMC
Medevaced 32 31 49 74
Transfer mean length (hrs) 4.00 4.00 8.64 1.42
Mon Obs 66 67 50 22
Mon Ob mean length (hrs) 4.19 17.07 5.83 3.14
After hours 40 55 42 54
Top 3 Diagnoses at Discharge Injury Gastro Cardio Gastro Pneum/bronch Cardio Cardio Injury Gastro Injury Cardio Gastro
Medicare reimbursable 7 19 5 5
27
Key Qualitative Findings
  • Staff cite stress and turnover due to both
    FESC-related and unrelated causes (or causes
    beyond clinic control).
  • Main FESC-related causes cited
  • - Stress of after hours/on-call FESC
    encounters
  • - Disruption of daytime routine
  • - Lack of space for FESC patients
  • - Demands on skills (urgent care)
  • - Sporadic nature of encounters
    (anticipatory stress)
  • - Community expectations for after
    hours/urgent care

28
Key Qualitative Findings
  • Unrelated/uncontrollable causes cited
  • - Medevac weather delays
  • - Personal/family/spousal issues
  • - Professional isolation/lack of educational
    opportunities
  • - Call schedule/sleep loss/call remuneration
  • - Administrative issues
  • - Staff issues staff turnover/poor hires
  • Clinics that added after hours staff/providers
    reduced staff stress. New/additional equipment
    also helped.
  • Most staff positive and optimistic about FESC
    project, and recommend project participation.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com