Presentation of Status WP 4 Innovative dismantling strategies and procedures

1
Presentation of StatusWP 4 -Innovative
dismantling strategiesand procedures

• Presented by USTRATH
• with participation and contributions of
• IITB, LEYAL, MM, NASOL, UoP
• SHIPDISMANTL - 6th Technical Meeting/Mid-Term
  Meeting,
• 6 7 September 2007, Ydra

2
Presentation Outline

• WP 4 Objectives
• Technical Progress
• Open issues for decision
• Closure Plan for WP4
• Discussion

3
Objectives of WP4

• Optimal design of a prototype Shipdismantling
  (SD) facility
• Optimisations according to the D4.1 of a given
  yard related to Full-SD, and Partial-SD

4
Overview of WP4

• Start date M06 (Sep05) actual Feb06
• End date M24 (Jan07) (ext-M27/Apr07)
• Reporting
• D4.1 (due M18/Sep07 (ext-M24/Jan07), USTRATH) gt
  Draft submitted for review
• D4.2 (due M24/Jan07 (ext-M27/Apr07) , USTRATH)
  gt started, in progress
• D4.3 (due M24/Jan07 (ext-M27/Apr07), USTRATH) gt
  started, in progress
• Partners (m-m)
• UGS (15)
• LEYAL (6)
• NASOL (5.5)
• UoP (5)
• IITB (5)
• MM (2.5)
• KCC (1)
• Budget (40 m-m) D4.1 (22) D4.2 (9) D4.3 (9)

5
WP 4 Current Status

• Completed Tasks (Draft Deliverable under review)
• Task 4.1 Generic guidelines for the optimization
  of design, construction and operation of ship
  dismantling facilities
• Ongoing Tasks
• Task 4.2 Optimization according to the generic
  principles introduced in 4.1 of a given
  dismantling yard related to the full ship
  dismantling
• Task 4.3 Optimization according to the generic
  principles introduced in 4.1 of a given
  dismantling yard related to the partial ship
  dismantling

6
Task 4.1 Generic Guidelines forOptimal SD
Facilities

• Deliverable 4.1, by USTRATH (Original Work Plan)
• ST4.1.1 Docking facilities
• ST4.1.2 Equipment recovery
• ST4.1.3 Pre-cleaning
• ST4.1.4 SD process zones
• ST4.1.5 Storage and support facilities
• ST4.1.6 Design by simulation (Cost energy)

7
WP4 Problems/issues

• Schedule over-run due to scope change and scope
  creep in the Task4.1
• Need for ongoing update of list of layout design
  parameters, and technology
• Data availability issues
• Actions taken
• Extended schedule
• Integration of document structure with DSS
• Selection/analysis of a case ship (product data)

8
WP - 4
WP - 5
9
Work Plan Original v. Updated
end Sep06
end Jan07
Updated Original
10
Progress Update
Feb07
Sep07
End Aug05
End Feb06
Sep06
11
WP4 Schedule, Deliverables Milestones
D4.1 Generic guidelines for optimal ship breaking
facilities (m18)
M4.1 Selection and optimization of Leyal docking
system
M4.2 Generic guidelines for optimal structure of
dismantling facilities
D4.2 Optimal design and re-organisation of Leyal
dismantling facilities (m24)
D4.3 Optimal design and re-organisation of
NAFTOSOL dismantling facilities
M4.3 Reports on amendment of current facilities
12

• Report of
• Technical Progress

13
Work-in-progress (as of Mid-term Meeting,
February 2007)

• ST 4.1.6 simulation modelling for facility design
• Concurrent development of hierarchical model by
  USTRAT UoP
• This is being done for
• Generic SD Workflows
• Selected layout variants (Baseline 3)
• Selected technology scenarios (x 4)
• Output measures design parameters
• Input vessel Case ship 1

14
Work Performed (M30)

• D4.1 (Facility development guidelines) kept open
  for feedbacks
• Simulation models developed for
• Revenue for value streams
• Liquids flow
• Hazardous materials (WIP)
• Mobile shear for SD
• Technical reports (guidelines) for above
  simulation models
• Meeting with LEYAL resimulation models

15
Open Issues for Decision

• Use of individual simulation models (UGS Models)
• Decision on whether to integrate with UoP Generic
  Model (Original Plan) or to keep UGS models for
  stand-alone use (worst case scenario)
• For integration availability of resources at UoP
• User access to simulation models (Both UoP and
  UGS models) web-based access (original plan) or
  stand-alone (run-time) mode
• Database update/population issues how
  LEYAL/NASOL provided real data to simulation
  model be handled in the DSS?

16
Closure Plan for WP4

• To be finished by
• mid-October07
• D4.1 updated version submission for closure
• Technical Notes (Individual Simulation Model
  Reports) ready for all agreed sub-models
• D4.2D4.3 draft available for comments
• end October07
• D4.2 D4.3 updated version submission for
  closure
• mid-November07
• D4.2 D4.3 finalised
• WP4 closed

17
DisseminationSD Conference08

• Second International Conference on Shidismantling
  of Obsolete Vessels
• 15-16 September 2008, Glasgow
• Official Call for papers and details will be
  distributed in October07

18
WP4 Schedule, Deliverables Milestones
D4.1 Generic guidelines for optimal ship breaking
facilities (m18)
M4.1 Selection and optimization of Leyal docking
system
M4.2 Generic guidelines for optimal structure of
dismantling facilities
D4.2 Optimal design and re-organisation of Leyal
dismantling facilities (m24)
D4.3 Optimal design and re-organisation of
NAFTOSOL dismantling facilities
M4.3 Reports on amendment of current facilities
19
D4.1 Generic Guidelines for Optimum Shipbreaking
Facilities
20
Deliverable 4.1 - GENERIC GUIDELINES FOR OPTIMUM
SHIP-BREAKING FACILITIES Structure of the
Document

• 1 SUMMARY
• 2 INTRODUCTION
• 3 BACKGROUND OF THE SHIPDISMANTLING FACILITY
  PROBLEM
• 4 FACILITY AND LAYOUT DESIGN
• 5 MODELLING THE SHIPBREAKING FACILITY
• 6 MAIN TECHNOLOGY SCENARIOS
• 7 CAPACITY REQUIREMENTS AND PLANT EVALUATION
• 8 DESCRIPTION OF PLANT AND AREAS
• 9 MATERIAL HANDLING SYSTEMS
• 10 MANNING PROFILES AND ITS DISTRIBUTION
• 11 EVALUATION OF FACILITIES
• 12 CONCLUDING REMARKS
• 13 REFERENCES
• 14 APPENDIX

3.1 REVIEW OF SD FACILITY STUDIES 3.2 MODEL
LAYOUT FOR SD FACILITIES 3.3 Guidelines for
Processes and Operations
4.1 Hierarchy of Objectives in SD Facility
Development 4.2 Ranking of Objective Criteria
4.1.1 Health and Safety Risk (Level-1
Criteria) 4.1.2 Environmental Risk (Level-1
criteria) 4.1.3 Financial (Level-1
criteria) 4.1.4 Technical Performance (Level-1
criteria) 4.1.5 Externalities (Level-1
criteria) 4.1.6 Internalities (Level-1 criteria)
5.1 Overview of Ship Dismantling Process 5.2
Modelling of the Ship Dismantling Facility 5.3
Development of Layout Variants for the SD
Facility 5.4 Selection of Candidate Layouts for
Generic SD Facility
5.3.1 Modelling Principles of the Generic
Facility 5.3.2 Variant No.0 Baseline
Layout 5.3.3 Variant No.1 Wet
Basin 5.3.4 Variant No.2a Pier 5.3.5 Variant
No.2b Pier with central zone 5.3.6 Variant
No.2c Sideways pier 5.3.7 Variant No.3 Dry
dock 5.3.8 Variant No.4 Floating
dock 5.3.9 Variant No.5 Slipway 5.3.10 Variant
No.6 Ship-lift
6.1 Development of Initial Scenarios List and
Shortlisting 6.2 Main Technology Scenarios
7.1 Outline of the Capacity Evaluation
Methodology Adopted 7.2 Dynamic Simulation
8.1 De-coating Area 8.2 Primary Dismantling Zone
(Major Block Breaking) 8.3 Secondary Dismantling
Zone (Sub-block Breaking) 8.4 Hazardous Waste
Storage Areas 8.5 Non-hazardous Waste Storage
Areas 8.6 General Storage Areas
11.1 Layout Scorecard
11.1.1 Part 1 Sketch of Layout
Variant 11.1.2 Part 2 Layout Scorecard
21
3.3 Guidelines for Processes and Operations

• Available Background Knowledge ()
• Technical Guidelines by the Secretariat of the
  Basel Convention
• Safety and Health in Shipbreaking Guidelines, by
  ILO
• Implementation of EMS by OECD
• Regulatory Compliance Guide by EPA-USA
• Ship Recycling Process Draft Guidance by DEFRA,
  UK
• Ergonomic Interventions for Shipbreaking
  processes by US-DHHS
• Rules (WAC) for Shipbuilding, Ship repairing and
  Shipbreaking, Washington State Department, Labor
  and Industry
• () Contents lists provided as an Annex of D4.1

22
Work being done

• Second stage of Task involves modification of
  Simulation models created in 4.1.6
• ST 4.2.4 simulation for Full-SD
• ST 4.3.3 simulation for Partial-SD

23
WP4 Task Relations
T4.1 Generic Guidelines
Evaluation of Alternatives
Background Knowledge - SoA Guidelines
Hierarchy of Objectives
D4.1 Generic Guidelines
Layout Scorecard
Technology scenarios Layout variants
Technology scenarios Layout variants
T4.3 Optimisation Partial SD
T4.2 Optimisation Full SD
Simulation Model
updated
updated
D4.2 LEYAL
D4.3 NASOL
Product Data - Case ship
Manning requirements
24
Simulation Model(s)
Process Specifd Models (UGS)
Generic Model (UoP)
Revenue of Value Streams
Hazardous Materials
Mobile Shrear

Liquids Flow
25
SimModel Liquids Flow
26
Model Output gt Decision Support
Simulation Model
27
SimModel Revenue of Value Streams
28
SimModel Revenue of Value Streams Model Output
gt Decision Support

• Unit Cost Info for Value Streams
• Steel
• Copper
• Zinc
• Bronze
• Machinery
• Electrical
• Joinery
• Minerals
• Plastics
• Liguids
• Chemicals/gas
• Plastics
• Others

• Cost and Revenue calculation for Value Streams
• Steel
• Copper
• Zinc
• Bronze
• Machinery
• Electrical
• Joinery
• Minerals
• Plastics
• Liguids
• Chemicals/gas
• Plastics
• Others

Simulation Model
29
SimModel Mobile Shear for ShipDismantling
30

• Thank you!