REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS:

Description:

Janna Halverson, Sherry Riddick, Belinda Baker. Intentions. Describe the CHILD Profile system ... leading to the requirements analysis work. Describe ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: belind74
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS:


1
REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS Developing a Near-term
Plan for Washingtons Statewide Immunization
Registry Janna Halverson, Sherry Riddick,
Belinda Baker
2
Intentions
  • Describe the CHILD Profile system
  • Describe issues with the current system
    leading to the requirements analysis work
  • Describe requirements analysis process
  • Describe findings
  • Describe next steps
  • evaluate alternatives
  • develop recommendation
  • initiate work
  • reassessment cycle

3
Brief History and Heading Forward
  • 1993
  • All Kids Count (King Snohomish) with DOH
    support
  • Strategic Planning early 2000
  • Governing Board mid 2000
  • DOH assumed responsibility on 1/1/02

4
Purpose
Provide the infrastructure to ensure Washingtons
children receive preventive health care services.
5
Whats the Infrastructure?
  • Health Promotion System Parent reminders of
    well-child care and immunizations and other
    important parenting information
  • Immunization Registry Central repository for
    public and private providers use in
    protecting the public through the control of
    vaccine preventable disease

6
Vision
A fully populated system which is the primary
means for communicating public health messages to
parents and fostering up-to-date immunization
status.
7
Goals
  • By June 30, 2004, increase to 90 the proportion
    of parents with young children (ages birth to 6
    years, born in WA State) sent the CHILD Profile
    health promotion materials.
  • By June 30, 2006, increase to 95 the proportion
    of children who participate in CHILD Profiles
    fully operational, population-based immunization
    registry.  

8
Issues with Current System
  • Need a plan to meet the NIP Functional
    Standards
  • Too much effort and funding is being put into
    maintaining and supporting the network
  • Technology budget fluctuates
  • Very costly to build our own secured,
    HIPAA-compliant environment
  • Supporting many system access methods

9
Issues with Current System
  • Text-based application is antiquated
  • Varying functionality between the text-based
    application and the web application
  • Varying provider/plan understanding of the
    functionality

10
Requirements Analysis Process
  • Interviews/surveys with providers, plans, LHJs
    and DOH Immunization Program
  • Evaluation of current system functionality
  • What are the unmet needs?
  • How are they affecting stakeholders?
  • What is the priority of each need?
  • Comparison of current system functionality
    with requirements and user needs

11
Findings from Requirements Analysis
  • Technical findings regarding current scope
  • Planning issues
  • Vaccine accountability
  • WIC linkage
  • Bioterrorism
  • Communication, training, perceptions
  • Policy

12
Findings
  • Fully web-functional
  • Increased quantity and quality of
    immunization history
  • Improved de-duplication methods
  • Improved integration with health plans and
    practice management software
  • Tracking of primary care provider
  • Improved VFC status tracking
  • Improved CASA extracts

13
Findings
  • Establish vaccine inventory management
  • Integration with VACMAN for orders and
    distribution
  • Provider inventory management capability
  • Linkage with the WIC system (CIMS)
  • Establish an ongoing registry users group
  • Institute a process for assessing stakeholder
    requirements on a regular basis

14
Next Steps
  • Evaluate alternatives
  • Recommendations
  • Select approach (DOH decision making)
  • Initiate work
  • Evolve

15
Evaluate Alternatives
  • Use the assessment of the existing system as
    a baseline for evaluating other alternatives
  • Evaluate/compare three alternate strategies
  • Continued modification and enhancement of
    the existing system
  • Development of a new system
  • Purchase off-the-shelf

16
Criteria for Evaluating Alternatives
  • Ability to meet defined functional requirements
  • Feasibility of infrastructure requirements
  • Cost/Benefit (tangible and intangible)
  • Risk
  • Migration issues
  • System limitations

17
Evolve
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com