Standardized Testing and California Schools - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Standardized Testing and California Schools

Description:

To rank each student with respect to the. achievement of others in broad areas of knowledge. ... CA- High School Exit Exam (CA-HSEE) about 15% of score. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: tepu6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Standardized Testing and California Schools


1
Standardized Testing and California Schools API
Scores
  • Whats the Connection?

2
Lets Start Thinking
  • 1. Where is the best place to examine direct data
    about student learning?
  • 2. List at least three advantages and three
    disadvantages to using standardized assessment
    tools.
  • 3. List at least three advantages and three
    disadvantages to using local or homegrown
    assessment tools.
  • 4. What are some advantages to embedded
    assessment?

3
Whats the Deal with Testing?
  • ?As a society, we like numbers. If sometime can
    be quantified, it is viewed as valid or more
    scientific. If it cannot be quantified, we view
    the activity with suspicion.
  • ?Machine scoring of a test is fast, efficient,
    and cheap.
  • ?Hand scoring of a test is slow, time consuming,
    and very expensive.

4
Lessons from the Past
  • ? Mass testing came about in the late 1800s /
    early 1900s.
  • ? Originally used to decide who was qualified to
    attend universities and who was bound to work in
    factories.
  • ? Attempted to model the efficient factory
    methods of Henry Ford test should be easy,
    cheap, and work for everyone.
  • ? Early IQ Tests (the Alpha-Beta Tests) were
    developed for the U.S. Army as a way to decide
    the career path of new recruits.
  • ? Early test also developed to determine which
    immigrants could enter the U.S.

5
Standardized Tests Whats the Difference?
  • Criterion-Referenced Test
  • ?Criterion-referenced tests, also called mastery
    tests, compare a person's performance to a set of
    objectives. Anyone who meets the criterion can
    get a high score.
  • ?Everyone knows what the benchmarks / objectives
    are and can attain mastery to meet them.
  • ?It is possible for ALL the test takers to
    achieve 100 mastery.

6
Standardized Tests Whats the Difference?
  • Norm-Referenced Test
  • ?Norm-referenced tests compare an individual's
    performance with the performance of others.
  • ?They are designed to yield a normal curve, with
    50 of test takers scoring above the 50th
    percentile and 50 scoring below it, so half the
    test takers MUST pass and half the test takers
    MUST fail
  • ?The test makers design the test with questions
    that MOST people will get incorrect.
  • ?If too many people get a question correct, or
    too many score well, then test questions are
    thrown out until they achieve a normal curve
    again.

7
Interpreting Test Scores (some definitions)
  • Raw score. This is the number of items the
    student answered correctly. It is used to
    calculate the other, more useful scores.
  • Stanine. One of nine equal sections of the normal
    curve. Stanines can be easily averaged and
    compared from test to test, but are less precise
    than other scores.
  • Normal curve equivalent (NCE). For these scores,
    the normal curve is divided into equal units
    ranging from 1 to 99, with an average of 50.
    These can be averaged and compared from test to
    test or year to year.

8
Normal Curve
  • Half of the test takers are grouped into the
    passing region of the curve and half into the
    failing region of the curve.
  • So by definition, half the test takers MUST
    fail, i.e. be below the 50th percentile.

9
State/School Goals
  • So when a school says that their goal is to have
    70 of their students above the 50th percentile,
    is this possible?
  • Well, yes, but it would mean that another school
    would have to have 70 of their students below
    the 50th percentile.

10
Closer to Home San Diego City Schools (SDCS)
  • In 2001, SDCS officials reported that as a
    district (second largest in the state), they had
    66 of their students above the 50th percentile
    on the SAT/9 test for 2000.
  • The news media reported the shame of SDCS
    because 1/3 of their students where below the
    50th percentile.
  • Was this a fair report??

11
MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATIONCRITERION- VERSUS
NORM-REFERENCED TESTING
  • Many educators and members of the public fail to
    grasp the distinctions between criterion-reference
    d and norm-referenced testing. It is common to
    hear the two types of testing referred to as if
    they serve the same purposes, or shared the same
    characteristics. Much confusion can be eliminated
    if the basic differences are understood.
  • The following is adapted from Popham, J. W.
    (1975). Educational evaluation. Englewood Cliffs,
    New Jersey Prentice-Hall, Inc.

12
MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATIONCRITERION- VERSUS
NORM-REFERENCED TESTING
Dimension Criterion-ReferencedTests Norm-ReferencedTests
Purpose To determine whether each student has achieved specific skills or concepts. To find out how much students know before instruction begins and after it has finished. To rank each student with respect to theachievement of others in broad areas of knowledge. To discriminate between high and low achievers.
13
MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATIONCRITERION- VERSUS
NORM-REFERENCED TESTING
Dimension Criterion-ReferencedTests Norm-ReferencedTests
Content Measures specific skills which make up a designated curriculum. These skills are identified by teachers and curriculum experts. Each skill is expressed as an instructional objective. Measures broad skill areas sampled from a variety of textbooks, syllabi, and the judgments of curriculum experts.
14
MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATIONCRITERION- VERSUS
NORM-REFERENCED TESTING
Dimension Criterion-ReferencedTests Norm-ReferencedTests
ItemCharacteristics Each skill is tested by at least four items in order to obtain an adequate sample of student performance and to minimize the effect of guessing. The items which test any given skill are parallel in difficulty. Each skill is usually tested by less than four items. Items vary in difficulty. Items are selected that discriminate between high and low achievers.
15
MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATIONCRITERION- VERSUS
NORM-REFERENCED TESTING
Dimension Criterion-ReferencedTests Norm-ReferencedTests
ScoreInterpretation Each individual is compared with a preset standard for acceptable achievement. The performance of other examinees is irrelevant. A student's score is usually expressed as a percentage. Student achievement is reported for individual skills. Each individual is compared with other examinees and assigned a score--usually expressed as a percentile, a grade equivalent score, or a stanine. Student achievement is reported  for broad skill areas, although some norm-referenced tests do report student achievement for individual skills.
16
Tests Currently Used in California
  • ?California Achievement Test 6th Edition
    (CAT/6) National Norm Referenced Test
  • California Standards Test (CST) State Norm
    Referenced Test w/ Scaled Scores
  • ?Golden State Exam Criterion Referenced Test
  • ?CA-High School Exit Exam (CA-HSEE) Criterion
    Referenced Test

17
Testing Case In Point
18
Testing Case In Point
  • In this scenario we will use a fictitious
    norm-referenced test being given a a single
    high school.

19
Testing Case In Point
  • John and his fellow students at Anywhere High
    School are given the Lets Achieve Test version
    1 (LAT/1).
  • The LAT/1 is a norm-referenced test.

20
Testing Case In Point
  • John does not perform well on the test, compared
    to the other test takers.
  • He scores below the 50th percentile and is
    classified below grade level.
  • John spends the next school year getting extra
    tutoring, staying after school, and going to
    Saturday tutoring sessions.

21
Testing Case In Point
  • The following school year on the LAT/1, John
    performs better than he did the previous year.
  • However, because of a school-wide focus on the
    test, all the other students in the school also
    perform better.
  • As a result, Johns norm-reference test score is
    still below the 50th percentile and he is still
    classified as below grade level.

22
Academic Performance Index (API)
  • The API score was originated to provide a
    systematic method to rank order schools based on
    a number of criteria. It is to measure academic
    growth and performance of a school. The schools
    would receive a rank compared to ALL other
    schools in the state and a second ranking
    comparing them to SIMILAR schools around the
    state.

23
Early Proposed API Criteria (1999)
  • ?Test Results (SAT/9) 60 of score
  • ?Attendance Rates
  • ?Graduation Rates
  • ?Other statewide test results (GSE, CA-HSEE)
  • From 1999 to 2002 ONLY the SAT/9 Test results are
    used to calculate 100 of a schools API score.

24
Current API Criteria (baseline set in 2002)
  • ? California Achievement Test (CAT/6) about 12
    of score. Includes mathematics, reading,
    language, science
  • ? California Standards Test (CST) about 73 of
    score.Includes mathematics, science, language
    arts, social science
  • ? CA- High School Exit Exam (CA-HSEE) about 15
    of score.
  • Eventually API scores will also include
    graduation and attendance rates from schools as
    part of the overall score.

25
Consider This
  • So, does this system adequately measure the
    success of CA students?
  • Does it reflect the learning that is happening in
    CA classrooms?

26
Some Questions
  • What are the appropriate uses of Norm-reference
    tests? Criterion-reference tests?
  • How should these test be used at the
    state/district/school level?
  • What role does testing play in looking at school
    performance? Student performance? Teacher
    performance?

27
The Real Question We Should Ask
  • Testing is a reality that is here to stay.
  • It has been legislated by the state of CA under
    the STAR system and by the federal government by
    the NCLB Act.
  • So we should really be askingHow do we use
    these tools to support students and their
    learning in CA schools?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com