Title: Computational Modelling of Free Surface Flows: wave impact and wave power
1Computational Modelling of Free Surface Flows
wave impact and wave power
- Professor Derek Causon, Clive Mingham and Dr
David Ingram - Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Flow
Analysis - Manchester Metropolitan University
2Outline
- Wave overtopping
- Cartesian cut cell method
- Surface capturing method
- Wave energy device simulation
- Future work
3The VOWS Project (Violent Overtopping of Waves
at Seawalls) http//www.vows.ac.uk,
- Aim
- To investigate the
- violent overtopping
- of seawalls and help
- engineers design
- better sea defences.
Photo by G. Motyker, HR Wallingford
4- Experimental
- Edinburgh, and Sheffield
- Universities
- 2D wave flume tests
- In Edinburgh.
- 3D wave basin tests at
- HR Wallingford.
- Numerical
- Manchester Metropolitan
- University
- AMAZON-CC to help
- experimental design
- AMAZON-SC to simulate overtopping
5VOWS Numerical approach
- Use 1-D Shallow Water Equations to simulate
wave flume and compare with experiments - Use 2-D Shallow Water Equations to provide
advice for wave basin experiments - Simulate violent wave overtopping using more
sophisticated numerics (see later)
6Edinburgh wave flume cross section
Shallow water simulations were reasonable so go
to wave basin
7Experimental Investigation
21m
- Schematic of HR Wallingford wave basin
8Experimental Investigation
- Wave maker 2 blocks, 8, 0.5m units in each
- SWL 0.425 - 0.525m
-
- Elbow angle j 0, 45, 120o
- Vertical or 110 battered wall
- Wave Climate Regular waves and JONSWAP
- period 1.5s, wave height 0.1m
- Variable wave guide length 5 10m
9Advice to Experimentalists
- Effect of gap between wave maker and wave guides
- leakage - Wave guide length to balance
- - Diffraction (around corners)
- - Reflection (from wall and sides)
- Wave heights at seawall
- Likely overtopping places
10 Numerical Simulation of Wave Basin AMAZON-CC
- Shallow Water Equations
- provide a cheap 2D (plan) model of the wave
basin which gives qualitative features (but not
correct!) - Cartesian cut cell Method
- Automatic boundary fitting mesh generation
- Moving boundary to simulate wave maker
- Surface Gradient Method (SGM) is used for bed
topography
11Cut Cell Method
Input vertices of solid boundary (and domain)
solid boundary
12overlay Cartesian grid
Cut Cell Method
13Cut Cell Method
Compute solid boundary/cell intersection points
and obtain cut cells
Boundary fitted mesh
14In contrast the classical Cartesian grid gives
saw tooth representation of the boundary
15Cut cells work for any domain
(adaptive) cut cell grid for a coastline
16Also work for moving bodies e.g. wave maker
17AMAZON-CC generation of oblique waves using cut
cells
18Numerical Wave basin
AMAZON-CC simulation of a wave basin
19Results
- Numerical simulation of wave seawall interaction
20AMAZON-SC Numerical Wave Flume
- Two fluid (air/water), boundary conforming, time
accurate, conservation law based, flow code
utilising the surface capturing approach. - Cartesian cut cell techniques are used to
represent coastal structures and bathymetry.
21Multi-fluid Model
- Incompressible Navier-Stokes solver Based on an
artificial compressibility solver. - Surface-capturing method
- Treats the free surface as a contact
discontinuity in the density field, allowing the
use of modern high resolution shock capturing
methods. - Fully two phase approach which solves in both the
air and the water.
22Governing equations
- 2D incompressible, Euler equations with variable
density.
b is the coefficient of artificial compressibility
23Discretisation
- The equations are discretised using a finite
volume formulation -
- Where Qi is the average value of Q in cell i
(stored at the cell - centre), Vi is the volume of the cell, Fij is the
numerical flux - across the interface between cells i and j and
and Dlj is the - length of side j.
24Convective fluxes
- The convective flux (Fij) is evaluated using
Roes approximate Riemann solver. - To ensure second order accuracy, MUSCL
reconstruction is used -
- where (x,y) is a point inside the cell ij, r is
the coordinate - vector of (x,y) relative to ij and DQij is the
slope limited - gradient.
25Time discretisation
- The implicit backward Euler scheme is used
together with an artificial time variable t (to
ensure a divergence free velocity field) and a
linearised RHS.
The resulting system is solved using an
approximate LU factorisation.
26Computer Implementation
- A Jameson-type dual time iteration is used to
eliminate ? at each real (outer) iteration. - The code vectorises efficiently with simulations
typically taking about three hours to run on an
NEC SX6i deskside supercomputer.
27Test Cases
- Low amplitude sloshing
- Collapsing Cylinder
- Collapsing Cylinder with an obstacle
- Regular wave propagation
28Collapsing water column flow over an obstacle
-
- As the water flows to the right it hits the
- obstacle, flows over it and hits the opposite
- wall.
-
- The confined air escapes upwards and the
- water falls to the floor on the other side of
- the obstacle.
-
- Comparisons with experiments conducted
- by Koshizuka et al. (1995) are presented.
29Collapsing water column flow over an obstacle
computation
experiment
30Collapsing water column flow over an obstacle
computation
experiment
31Boundary Conditions
- Seaward boundary a velocity controlled
procedure is used to generate waves, velocities
are either computed from linear wave theory using
JONSWAP spectra or specified based on shallow
water simulations. - Atmospheric boundary a constant atmospheric
pressure gradient is applied. Spray and water
passing out of this boundary are lost from the
computation. - Landward boundary a solid wall boundary
condition is used for the landward end of the
domain. - Seawalls and beaches modelled using Cartesian
cut cell techniques.
32VOWS Wave Flume experiments
- Experimental programme conducted in the 20m wave
flume in Edinburgh and the 100m wave flume at
UPC, Barcelona.
- Vertical and 101 battered walls tested
(with/without berms and recurves) on a 110
beach, for impulsive wave conditions
(0.03ltHlt0.10) using 1000 random waves.
- Water is 0.09m deep at the toe of the wall and
the wall has a freeboard of 0.17m.
33VOWS Test 1A
- Wave Climate Hs0.063, Tm1.23
- Sea Wall 101 batter, Rh0.1296
- Wave Conditions h0.0544
- Wave gauges, sampled at 100Hz, located 1.0, 2.0,
3.0, 4.25, 5.5, 6.75, 8.0 and 11.21 metres from
the seawall. - Wall fitted with an overtopping detector and a
load cell.
Shallow Water Model AMAZON-CC, showing test
section 2m from the seawall.
34Seaward boundary conditions
- Surface elevation
- experimental wave gauge 2m from wall.
- Used to specify r
- U Velocity
- Computed velocity from the Riemann invariant
boundary condition of a shallow water simulation - Applied uniformly to water column
- Other variables
- p and v are extrapolated
?
?
?
35AMAZON-SC simulation
- Overtopping event occurred 142 seconds into the
experiment. - Seaward boundary located 2m from wall.
- Landward boundary is transmissive.
- Assume flat water for initial conditions.
36Velocity vectors at t2.75s
37Wave Energy
- Simulation of wave energy devices (with Queens
University, Belfast )
LIMPET Oscillating Water Column (OWC)
38Acknowledgements
Professor TJT Whittaker and Dr Matt Folley
School of Civil Engineering, Queens
University of Belfast Device design, experiments
and full scale trials
39Wave Energy
LIMPET 500KW Station, Islay, Scotland. First
wave power station connected to the national
grid, in the world.
40Wave Energy
LIMPET Supplies the town of Portnahaven and
local industry.
41Wave Paddle Test
- Waves simulated by a moving paddle using
AMAZON-SC
Comparison with experimental results
42LIMPET OWC Simulation
- Simulation of waves interacting with LIMPET using
AMAZON-SC
43LIMPET Comparison
44- Oscillating wave surge converter (OWSC)
45The Vane as a Wave Maker
Simulation of a vane with prescribed motion in
air and water using AMAZON-SC
46The Vane as a Wave Maker
- Animation showing velocity vectors and free
surface position around the vane
47OWSC Device Modelling using AMAZON-SC
- The motion of the vane is derived from the forces
exerted on it by - the surrounding water.
48Future Work
- AMAZON-SC is easily extended to 3D.
- EPSRC Grant in preparation.
- Implementation of AMAZON-SC, incorporating AMR,
on high performance computers. - EPSRC Grant being reviewed.
- Apply MMU solvers to sediment transport
- Currently being developed
- Application of AMAZON-SC to deck slam
49Water Entry of a Rigid Wedge
Simulation of a wedge moving at 1m/s until total
immersion using AMAZON-SC
50Water Exit of a Rigid Wedge
Simulation of a wedge moving at 1m/s from water
into air using AMAZON-SC
51Water Entry of a Rigid Wedge
T 0.25s
52Water Entry of a Rigid Wedge
T 1.0s
53Water Entry of a Rigid Wedge
T 1.5s
54Water Entry of a Rigid Wedge
T 2.23s
55References
- JB Shiach, CG Mingham, DM Ingram and T Bruce
(2004) The applicability of the shallow water
equations for modelling violent wave overtopping,
Coastal Engineering 51(1)1-15.ISSN 0378-3839 - JG Zhou, DM Causon, CG Mingham and DM Ingram
(2004) Numerical Prediction of Dam-Break Flows in
General Geometries with Complex Bed Topography,
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering - ASCE 130
(4)332-340.ISSN 0733-9429 - L Qian, DM Causon, DM Ingram and CG Mingham
(2003) Cartesian Cut Cell Two-Fluid Solver for
Hydraulic Flow Problems, Journal of Hydraulic
Engineering 129(9)688-696.ISSN 0733-9429 - DM Causon, DM Ingram and CG Mingham (2001) A
Cartesian Cut Cell Method for Shallow Water Flows
with Moving Boundaries., Advances in Water
Resources 24(2001)899--911.ISSN 0309--1708 - JG Zhou, DM Causon, CG Mingham and DM Ingram
(2001) The Surface Gradient Method for the
Treatment of Source Terms in the Shallow Water
Equations, Journal of Computational Physics
1681-25.ISSN 0021-9991 - K Hu, CG Mingham and DM Causon (2000) Numerical
Simulation of Wave Overtopping of Coastal
Structures Using the Non-linear Shallow Water
Equations, Coastal Engineering 41433-465.ISSN
0378-3839 - DM Causon, DM Ingram, CG Mingham, G Yang and RV
Pearson (2000) Calculation of Shallow Water Flows
Using a Cartesian Cut Cell Approach., Advances in
Water Resources 23545-562.ISSN 0309-1780
56- Thank you for your Attention