Computational Modelling of Free Surface Flows: wave impact and wave power - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 56
About This Presentation
Title:

Computational Modelling of Free Surface Flows: wave impact and wave power

Description:

Computational Modelling of Free Surface Flows: wave impact and wave power – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:188
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 57
Provided by: del64
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Computational Modelling of Free Surface Flows: wave impact and wave power


1
Computational Modelling of Free Surface Flows
wave impact and wave power
  • Professor Derek Causon, Clive Mingham and Dr
    David Ingram
  • Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Flow
    Analysis
  • Manchester Metropolitan University

2
Outline
  • Wave overtopping
  • Cartesian cut cell method
  • Surface capturing method
  • Wave energy device simulation
  • Future work

3
The VOWS Project (Violent Overtopping of Waves
at Seawalls) http//www.vows.ac.uk,
  • Aim
  • To investigate the
  • violent overtopping
  • of seawalls and help
  • engineers design
  • better sea defences.

Photo by G. Motyker, HR Wallingford
4
  • Experimental
  • Edinburgh, and Sheffield
  • Universities
  • 2D wave flume tests
  • In Edinburgh.
  • 3D wave basin tests at
  • HR Wallingford.
  • Numerical
  • Manchester Metropolitan
  • University
  • AMAZON-CC to help
  • experimental design
  • AMAZON-SC to simulate overtopping

5
VOWS Numerical approach
  • Use 1-D Shallow Water Equations to simulate
    wave flume and compare with experiments
  • Use 2-D Shallow Water Equations to provide
    advice for wave basin experiments
  • Simulate violent wave overtopping using more
    sophisticated numerics (see later)

6
Edinburgh wave flume cross section
Shallow water simulations were reasonable so go
to wave basin
7
Experimental Investigation
21m
  • Schematic of HR Wallingford wave basin

8
Experimental Investigation
  • Wave maker 2 blocks, 8, 0.5m units in each
  • SWL 0.425 - 0.525m
  • Elbow angle j 0, 45, 120o
  • Vertical or 110 battered wall
  • Wave Climate Regular waves and JONSWAP
  • period 1.5s, wave height 0.1m
  • Variable wave guide length 5 10m

9
Advice to Experimentalists
  • Effect of gap between wave maker and wave guides
    - leakage
  • Wave guide length to balance
  • - Diffraction (around corners)
  • - Reflection (from wall and sides)
  • Wave heights at seawall
  • Likely overtopping places

10
Numerical Simulation of Wave Basin AMAZON-CC
  • Shallow Water Equations
  • provide a cheap 2D (plan) model of the wave
    basin which gives qualitative features (but not
    correct!)
  • Cartesian cut cell Method
  • Automatic boundary fitting mesh generation
  • Moving boundary to simulate wave maker
  • Surface Gradient Method (SGM) is used for bed
    topography

11
Cut Cell Method
Input vertices of solid boundary (and domain)
solid boundary
12
overlay Cartesian grid
Cut Cell Method
13
Cut Cell Method
Compute solid boundary/cell intersection points
and obtain cut cells
Boundary fitted mesh
14
In contrast the classical Cartesian grid gives
saw tooth representation of the boundary
15
Cut cells work for any domain
(adaptive) cut cell grid for a coastline
16
Also work for moving bodies e.g. wave maker
17
AMAZON-CC generation of oblique waves using cut
cells
18
Numerical Wave basin
AMAZON-CC simulation of a wave basin
19
Results
  • Numerical simulation of wave seawall interaction

20
AMAZON-SC Numerical Wave Flume
  • Two fluid (air/water), boundary conforming, time
    accurate, conservation law based, flow code
    utilising the surface capturing approach.
  • Cartesian cut cell techniques are used to
    represent coastal structures and bathymetry.

21
Multi-fluid Model
  • Incompressible Navier-Stokes solver Based on an
    artificial compressibility solver.
  • Surface-capturing method
  • Treats the free surface as a contact
    discontinuity in the density field, allowing the
    use of modern high resolution shock capturing
    methods.
  • Fully two phase approach which solves in both the
    air and the water.

22
Governing equations
  • 2D incompressible, Euler equations with variable
    density.

b is the coefficient of artificial compressibility
23
Discretisation
  • The equations are discretised using a finite
    volume formulation
  • Where Qi is the average value of Q in cell i
    (stored at the cell
  • centre), Vi is the volume of the cell, Fij is the
    numerical flux
  • across the interface between cells i and j and
    and Dlj is the
  • length of side j.

24
Convective fluxes
  • The convective flux (Fij) is evaluated using
    Roes approximate Riemann solver.
  • To ensure second order accuracy, MUSCL
    reconstruction is used
  • where (x,y) is a point inside the cell ij, r is
    the coordinate
  • vector of (x,y) relative to ij and DQij is the
    slope limited
  • gradient.

25
Time discretisation
  • The implicit backward Euler scheme is used
    together with an artificial time variable t (to
    ensure a divergence free velocity field) and a
    linearised RHS.

The resulting system is solved using an
approximate LU factorisation.
26
Computer Implementation
  • A Jameson-type dual time iteration is used to
    eliminate ? at each real (outer) iteration.
  • The code vectorises efficiently with simulations
    typically taking about three hours to run on an
    NEC SX6i deskside supercomputer.

27
Test Cases
  • Low amplitude sloshing
  • Collapsing Cylinder
  • Collapsing Cylinder with an obstacle
  • Regular wave propagation

28
Collapsing water column flow over an obstacle
  • As the water flows to the right it hits the
  • obstacle, flows over it and hits the opposite
  • wall.
  • The confined air escapes upwards and the
  • water falls to the floor on the other side of
  • the obstacle.
  • Comparisons with experiments conducted
  • by Koshizuka et al. (1995) are presented.

29
Collapsing water column flow over an obstacle
computation
experiment
30
Collapsing water column flow over an obstacle
computation
experiment
31
Boundary Conditions
  • Seaward boundary a velocity controlled
    procedure is used to generate waves, velocities
    are either computed from linear wave theory using
    JONSWAP spectra or specified based on shallow
    water simulations.
  • Atmospheric boundary a constant atmospheric
    pressure gradient is applied. Spray and water
    passing out of this boundary are lost from the
    computation.
  • Landward boundary a solid wall boundary
    condition is used for the landward end of the
    domain.
  • Seawalls and beaches modelled using Cartesian
    cut cell techniques.

32
VOWS Wave Flume experiments
  • Experimental programme conducted in the 20m wave
    flume in Edinburgh and the 100m wave flume at
    UPC, Barcelona.
  • Vertical and 101 battered walls tested
    (with/without berms and recurves) on a 110
    beach, for impulsive wave conditions
    (0.03ltHlt0.10) using 1000 random waves.
  • Water is 0.09m deep at the toe of the wall and
    the wall has a freeboard of 0.17m.

33
VOWS Test 1A
  • Wave Climate Hs0.063, Tm1.23
  • Sea Wall 101 batter, Rh0.1296
  • Wave Conditions h0.0544
  • Wave gauges, sampled at 100Hz, located 1.0, 2.0,
    3.0, 4.25, 5.5, 6.75, 8.0 and 11.21 metres from
    the seawall.
  • Wall fitted with an overtopping detector and a
    load cell.

Shallow Water Model AMAZON-CC, showing test
section 2m from the seawall.
34
Seaward boundary conditions
  • Surface elevation
  • experimental wave gauge 2m from wall.
  • Used to specify r
  • U Velocity
  • Computed velocity from the Riemann invariant
    boundary condition of a shallow water simulation
  • Applied uniformly to water column
  • Other variables
  • p and v are extrapolated

?
?
?
35
AMAZON-SC simulation
  • Overtopping event occurred 142 seconds into the
    experiment.
  • Seaward boundary located 2m from wall.
  • Landward boundary is transmissive.
  • Assume flat water for initial conditions.

36
Velocity vectors at t2.75s
37
Wave Energy
  • Simulation of wave energy devices (with Queens
    University, Belfast )

LIMPET Oscillating Water Column (OWC)
38
Acknowledgements
Professor TJT Whittaker and Dr Matt Folley
School of Civil Engineering, Queens
University of Belfast Device design, experiments
and full scale trials
39
Wave Energy
LIMPET 500KW Station, Islay, Scotland. First
wave power station connected to the national
grid, in the world.
40
Wave Energy
LIMPET Supplies the town of Portnahaven and
local industry.
41
Wave Paddle Test
  • Waves simulated by a moving paddle using
    AMAZON-SC

Comparison with experimental results
42
LIMPET OWC Simulation
  • Simulation of waves interacting with LIMPET using
    AMAZON-SC

43
LIMPET Comparison
44
  • Oscillating wave surge converter (OWSC)

45
The Vane as a Wave Maker
Simulation of a vane with prescribed motion in
air and water using AMAZON-SC
46
The Vane as a Wave Maker
  • Animation showing velocity vectors and free
    surface position around the vane

47
OWSC Device Modelling using AMAZON-SC
  • The motion of the vane is derived from the forces
    exerted on it by
  • the surrounding water.

48
Future Work
  • AMAZON-SC is easily extended to 3D.
  • EPSRC Grant in preparation.
  • Implementation of AMAZON-SC, incorporating AMR,
    on high performance computers.
  • EPSRC Grant being reviewed.
  • Apply MMU solvers to sediment transport
  • Currently being developed
  • Application of AMAZON-SC to deck slam

49
Water Entry of a Rigid Wedge
Simulation of a wedge moving at 1m/s until total
immersion using AMAZON-SC
50
Water Exit of a Rigid Wedge
Simulation of a wedge moving at 1m/s from water
into air using AMAZON-SC
51
Water Entry of a Rigid Wedge
T 0.25s
52
Water Entry of a Rigid Wedge
T 1.0s
53
Water Entry of a Rigid Wedge
T 1.5s
54
Water Entry of a Rigid Wedge
T 2.23s
55
References
  • JB Shiach, CG Mingham, DM Ingram and T Bruce
    (2004) The applicability of the shallow water
    equations for modelling violent wave overtopping,
    Coastal Engineering 51(1)1-15.ISSN 0378-3839
  • JG Zhou, DM Causon, CG Mingham and DM Ingram
    (2004) Numerical Prediction of Dam-Break Flows in
    General Geometries with Complex Bed Topography,
    Journal of Hydraulic Engineering - ASCE 130
    (4)332-340.ISSN 0733-9429
  • L Qian, DM Causon, DM Ingram and CG Mingham
    (2003) Cartesian Cut Cell Two-Fluid Solver for
    Hydraulic Flow Problems, Journal of Hydraulic
    Engineering 129(9)688-696.ISSN 0733-9429
  • DM Causon, DM Ingram and CG Mingham (2001) A
    Cartesian Cut Cell Method for Shallow Water Flows
    with Moving Boundaries., Advances in Water
    Resources 24(2001)899--911.ISSN 0309--1708
  • JG Zhou, DM Causon, CG Mingham and DM Ingram
    (2001) The Surface Gradient Method for the
    Treatment of Source Terms in the Shallow Water
    Equations, Journal of Computational Physics
    1681-25.ISSN 0021-9991
  • K Hu, CG Mingham and DM Causon (2000) Numerical
    Simulation of Wave Overtopping of Coastal
    Structures Using the Non-linear Shallow Water
    Equations, Coastal Engineering 41433-465.ISSN
    0378-3839
  • DM Causon, DM Ingram, CG Mingham, G Yang and RV
    Pearson (2000) Calculation of Shallow Water Flows
    Using a Cartesian Cut Cell Approach., Advances in
    Water Resources 23545-562.ISSN 0309-1780

56
  • Thank you for your Attention
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com