Correlation of Visual Outcome and Patient Satisfaction with Preoperative Keratometry in Hyperopic LA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Correlation of Visual Outcome and Patient Satisfaction with Preoperative Keratometry in Hyperopic LA

Description:

Correlation of Visual Outcome and Patient Satisfaction with Preoperative ... 2) Cobo-Soriano R, Llovet F, Gonzalez-Lopez F, Domingo B, Gomez-Sanz F, Baviera J. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: Lad59
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Correlation of Visual Outcome and Patient Satisfaction with Preoperative Keratometry in Hyperopic LA


1
Correlation of Visual Outcome and Patient
Satisfaction with Preoperative Keratometry
inHyperopic LASIK Patients
  • L. Espandar M. Moshirfar L. B. Williams S. B.
    Dave
  • John A. Moran Eye Center,
  • University of Utah, SLC, UT
  • No author has any financial or proprietary
    interest in any materials or methods mentioned.

2
PURPOSE
  • To prospectively study the dependence of visual
    outcomes and patient satisfaction on corneal
    keratometry in hyperopic laser in situ
    keratomileusis (LASIK).

Is preoperative corneal keratometry affecting
visual outcome in hyperopic LASIK?
3
METHODS
  • Twenty-six patients (49 eyes) undergoing
    hyperopic LASIK. (average hyperopia 3.44 D,
    range 1.57 to 5.25 D).
  • Lamellar flap created using a Hansatome
    microkeratome (Bausch Lomb Surgical, Inc., San
    Dimas, CA) Superiorly-hinged flaps, 160 µm thick,
    9.5mm diameter.
  • Laser ablation was performed using a LADARVision
    4000 excimer laser system (Alcon Laboratories,
    Inc. Ft. Worth, TX) with a 6 mm optical zone and
    a 9 mm transition zone.
  • Fourteen patients (25 eyes) with preoperative
    average K gt 44.0 D were compared to twelve
    patients (24 eyes) with a preoperative average K
    lt 43.0 D. There were no patients with K between
    43.0 D and 44.0 D.
  • Primary outcome measures UCVA, BSCVA, manifest
    refraction, postoperative dryness, patient
    satisfaction

4
RESULTS
  • Average K values plotted for each eye were
    significantly different between groups 1 and 2
    and showed no overlap between the groups before
    or after LASIK. (Figure 1)
  • There was no difference in degree of preoperative
    hyperopia or any difference in keratometric
    change (?K) between the groups. (Figure 2)
  • Refractive error was not different between the
    two groups preoperatively, however
    after LASIK correction, group 2 had a
    significantly higher SEQ refractive error (1.43
    D 0.60 in group 2 versus 0.82 D 0.51 in
    group 1, p lt0.0005) (Figure 3)
  • Ten patients with K gt 44.0 D lost 2 or more lines
    of best spectacle corrected visual acuity versus
    only one patient with Klt 43.0 D. (Figure 4)
  • Subjective patient satisfaction (Scale 1 4, 4
    most satisfied) showed a significant difference
    between the K gt 44.0 D and K lt 43.0 D groups
    (1.52 0.66 versus 2.75 0.61, p lt 0.0001).
    (Figure 5)

5
FIGURE 1
6
FIGURE 2
7
FIGURE 3
8
FIGURE 4
9
FIGURE 5
10
CONCLUSIONS
  • Increased incidence of loss of BSCVA and
    decreased patient satisfaction is associated with
    preoperative K gt 44 D in hyperopic LASIK.
  • One possible cause of worsened outcome is
    increased dry eye in the Kgt44 D group that was
    significantly drier than Klt43 D group.
  • Another reason might be increased induction of
    higher-order aberration in Kgt44D group.
  • The authors recommend caution in performing LASIK
    on eyes with moderate to high hyperopia and steep
    preoperative corneal keratometry.

11
REFERENCES
  • 1) Shortt AJ, Bunce C, Allan BDS. Evidence for
    Superior Efficacy and Safety of LASIK
  • over Photorefractive Keratectomy for Correction
    of Myopia. Ophthalmology 2006
  • 1131897-1908
  • 2) Cobo-Soriano R, Llovet F, Gonzalez-Lopez F,
    Domingo B, Gomez-Sanz F, Baviera J.
  • Factors that influence outcomes of hyperopic
    laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract
  • Refract Surg. 2002 281530-38
  • 3) Refractive Surgery Section 13. American
    Academy of Ophthalmology BCSC. Ed. Weiss J, 2007.
  • 4) Ditzen K, Huschka H, Pieger S. Laser in situ
    keratomileusis for hyperopia. J. Cataract
  • Refract Surg. 1998 Jan 24(1)42-7
  • 5) Esquenazi S, Mendoza A. Two-year follow-up of
    laser in situ keratomileusis for
  • hyperopia. J Refract Surg. 1999 Nov-Dec
    15(6)648-52.
  • 6) Zadok D, Raifkup F, Landau D, Frucht-Pery J.
    Long-term evaluation of hyperopic laser in situ
    keratomileusis. J. Cataract Refract Surg. 2003
    292181-2188
  • 7) Chen C, Izadshenas A, Rana M, Azar D. Corneal
    asphericity after hyperopic laser in situ
    keratomileusis. J. Cataract Refract Surg. 2002
    281539-1545
  • 8) Jin G, Lyle W, Merkley K. Laser in situ
    keratomileusis for primary hyperopia. J Cataract
    Refract Surg. 2005 31776-784
  • 9) Tabbara KF, El-Sheikh HF, Monowarul Islam SM.
    Laser in situ keratomileusis for the
  • correction of hyperopia from 0.5 to 11.50
    diopters with the Keracor 117C laser. J
  • Refract Surg 2001 17123128
  • 10) Lindstrom R, Herdten D, Houtman D, Witte B,
    Preschel N, Chu R, Sameulson T,
  • Linebarger E. Six-month results of hyperopic and
    astigmatic LASIK in eyes with primary
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com