Code of ethics for social work research: reopening the discussion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Code of ethics for social work research: reopening the discussion

Description:

Recognition and Governance sub-group of JUC SWEC Research ... Emancipatory agenda or disinterested enquiry. Users as researchers who looks after whom? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:196
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: jswe
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Code of ethics for social work research: reopening the discussion


1
Code of ethics for social work research
re-opening the discussion?
  • Recognition and Governance sub-group of JUC SWEC
    Research Strategy Implementation Group
  • Lena Dominelli, Louise Hardwick, Margaret
    Holloway, Annie Pullen, David Stanley

2
The JUC SWEC Research StrategyRecognition and
Governance
  • The sub-group remit (RG2.1) is
  • - to lead a review and possible revision of the
    current code of social work ethics by 2008
  • This workshop aims to
  • - contribute to the review of ethics in social
    work research
  • - explore possible frameworks for social work
    research governance.

3
The JUC SWEC Research StrategyRecognition and
Governance
  • To date, we
  • - have facilitated a workshop on Ethical
    Scrutiny and Governance at the ESRC RDI sponsored
    PhD training event in Glasgow
  • - have developed a questionnaire to examine
    frameworks for ethical scrutiny in social work
    research
  • - continue to contribute to the DH initiated and
    led Ethics Review in Social Care Research

4
An uncertain history.
  • Much social work/care research before 2000
    conducted without external ethical scrutiny
  • Governance frameworks largely absent fragmented
    system
  • Tendency towards small-scale qualitative studies
  • Health (LRECS) criteria and scrutiny designed for
    different context
  • Barely covered in research student training

5
Whats changed?
  • Increasing public scrutiny, accountability and
    regulation in contexts in which Social Work
    research takes place
  • Acknowledgement that social science has paid less
    attention to ethical scrutiny than medicine and
    health
  • Realisation that good intentions are not enough
    risks to service users of poorly
    designed/conducted research

6
Research governance
  • A mechanism for improving research quality and
    safeguarding public by
  • Enhancing ethical and scientific quality
  • Promoting good practice
  • Reducing adverse incidents and ensuring lessons
    are learnt
  • Preventing poor performance and misconduct
  • (DH, 2000)
  • NB Process as well as structures (Dominelli and
    Holloway, 2005)

7
Current social work research guidance / governance
  • ESRC Research Ethics Framework (2005)
  • Code of Ethics for Social Work Research (Butler
    2002)
  • Research Governance for Health and Social Care
    (Department of Health 2005)
  • Operationalized though different ethics
    committees e.g. NHS NRES (formerly COREC) RECs,
    University ethics committees, CSSRs, etc.

8
The Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
  • Has published a Research Ethics Framework (REF)
    to be used by students and researchers
  • Research proposals must usually be assessed by an
    ethics committee, unless the research has been
    identified as posing minimal risk to
    participants.

9
minimal risk to participants
  • Would be granted unless the research involves
    vulnerable groups identified as
  • 1. children young people, those with learning
    disability or cognitive impairment, or
    individuals in a dependent or unequal
    relationships
  • 2. on the grounds of research involving
    sensitive topics (sexual behaviour, their illegal
    or political behaviour, their experience of
    violence, their abuse or exploitation, their
    mental health or their gender or ethnic status)
  • 3. research involving groups where permission of
    a gatekeeper is normally required for initial
    access to member (for example ethnic of cultural
    groups, native peoples or indigenous communities)

10
minimal risk to participants cont.
  • Would be granted unless the research involves
  • 4. deception or which is conducted without
    participants full and informed consent
  • 5. access to records of personal or
    confidential information
  • 6. research that would induce psychological
    stress, anxiety or humiliation
  • 7. intrusive intervention (such as
    administration of drugs or other substance)
    (ESRC 20058)

11
ESRC REF (2005) six core principles of ethical
research
  • Integrity and Quality of the Research
  • Informed Consent
  • Voluntary Participation
  • Confidentiality and Anonymity of the Data
  • Avoiding Harm to Research Participants
  • Possible Conflicts of Interest

12
Code of Ethics for Social Work and Social Care
Research (Butler 2002)
  • Product of ESRC funded seminar series on
    Theorising Social Work Research
  • Foundations for a code of ethics for social work
    research should be derived from social work
    ethics itself.
  • draw from the principles of biomedical ethics
    Beauchamp Childress Paradigm
  • 4 principles scope

13
Four principles plus scope
  • Autonomy (independence self-governing)
  • Beneficence (doing good causing good to be
    done)
  • Non-maleficence (obligation not to inflict harm
    intentionally)
  • Justice
  • (righteousness, equitableness)
  • - applicable regardless of philosophy, politics,
    religion, moral theory, or life stance, and the
    scope of applications encompass most of the moral
    issues that arise in health care (Gillion
    1994184)

14
Research Governance Framework (DoH 2005)
  • Aimed at continuous improvement of quality and
    the reduction of unacceptable variations in
    research practice through 5 key standards in 5
    domains
  • Ethics
  • Science
  • Information
  • Health, Safety and Employment
  • Finance and Intellectual Property
  • Same standards to all but the way the standards
    are achieved differ according to the type of
    research, context and methods
  • (DoH 2004)

15
Key issues
  • Informed consent
  • Dignity, safety, well-being of participants
  • Privacy /confidentiality
  • Use(s) of data
  • Safety / welfare of researchers
  • Publication/ dissemination of findings
  • Power relationships amongst stake-holders

16
Social Work professional ethics some dilemmas
for research
  • Participation implies inclusion of vulnerable
    subjects rights and risks of having a voice
  • Multiple accountabilities in non-hierarchical
    research
  • Respect for diversity or privileging greatest
    good for greatest number
  • Emancipatory agenda or disinterested enquiry
  • Users as researchers who looks after whom?
  • Determining risk whose perspective?
  • What cultural assumptions underpin?

17
Current challenges for Social Work research
  • Improve ethical literacy in own field
  • Refine ethical scrutiny and governance in forms
    appropriate to SW research
  • Influence consideration of ethical implications
    flowing from different research paradigms
  • Contribute to general research ethical debates
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com