201 Transitional Issues and Alternative Processes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

201 Transitional Issues and Alternative Processes

Description:

Keith Pepper - Director, Marin County DCSS. Presenters: ... Be aware of the date of collection impacts on the conversion balance for the reapply ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: ams95
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 201 Transitional Issues and Alternative Processes


1
201 Transitional Issues and Alternative
Processes
  • September 18, 2007

2

2007 Annual Child Support Training Conference
201 Transitional Issues and Alternative
Processes
Moderator Keith Pepper - Director, Marin County
DCSS Presenters Anne Pounds - CCSAS Business
Partner On-Site Support Group Lead Salli
Matteson - Legal Unit Supervising Child Support
Officer, Yolo County Ruby Tumagan - LCSA Project
Consultant, DCSS
3
Definition of Transitional Issues
  • Certain business processes require an awareness
    of an LCSAs transition status
  • Managing Participant Updates
  • Updating Managing County
  • Merging Statewide Cases
  • Case Opening for California Responding Interstate
    Cases
  • Case Transfer
  • Performing Transitional Adjustments

4
Definition of Transitional Issues
  • For other business processes, CSE acts as a third
    consortium
  • Case related actions such as establishing
    paternity and support orders
  • Participant related actions such as enforcement
    interface submissions and enforcement action
    suppression

5
Key Points of the Presentation
  • What happens to data in SWS when a county cuts
    over to CSE
  • Definition of Controlling County, Managing
    County, and Managed By
  • Differences in the ways statewide participants
    and cases become obsolete and ways to prevent
    duplicate cases and participants

6
Pre-existing and Converted Data in CSE
  • All cases and participants pre-exist in SWS at
    the time of cutover the data conversion process
    does not create new cases or participants
  • Conversion to CSE does not correct or replace
    case or participant information pre-existing in
    SWS
  • County Case and Participant views are deleted
    during conversion

7
Pre-existing and Converted Data in CSE
  • Case numbers are not reassigned your case
    number may begin with another countys FIPS code
  • IVD cases in CSE cannot be closed if there exists
    a related open county case view

8
Pre-existing and Converted Data in CSE
9
Locate Interface Participant Updates
  • Information received from a locate source may
    replace existing primary data
  • Primary SSNs can be replaced with SSNs received
    from the FCR
  • Primary Address can be replaced if the existing
    Primary Address is unverified and the new
    address is from a reliable source
  • Make sure to verify addresses otherwise
    Postmaster Verification letters will be sent

10
Participant Related Terms
  • There are two terms associated with participant
    data management
  • Controlling County - Governs how updates from ARS
    and CASES are processed
  • Has no effect if participant only has cases in
    transitioned counties
  • Managed By - Governs which transitioned LCSA
    receives participant level tasks

11
Controlling County
  • To prevent ARS/CASES from overwriting primary and
    secondary data entered online, use CSE to change
    the Controlling County to any transitioned LCSA
  • Use SWS to change CC if changing to a
    non-transitioned LCSA
  • Use CSE to change CC if changing to a
    transitioned LCSA
  • CSE will not automatically reassign Controlling
    County from a transitioned LCSA to a
    non-transitioned LCSA due to ARS/CASES updates

12
Managed By
  • Is not the same as Managing County
  • The Managed By field determines which
    transitioned county receives participant level
    tasks for NCPs
  • Participants who are only CPs or Dependents do
    not have a Managed By designation
  • Is viewable in CSE but not SWS

13
Managing County
  • Determines which county receives a portion of an
    NCPs collection in the event there are multiple
    related county views
  • Determines whether a case is considered a
    transitioned case (managed using CSE) or a case
    being managed using ARS/CASES
  • Affects case assignment and task routing
  • Affects accounts, legal actions and enforcement
    activities

14
Managing County
  • If you are not the Managing County, your case
    accounts and balances do not convert to CSE (but
    are in the Legacy Data Archive)
  • You must use SWS to change MC if
  • Both LCSAs are not transitioned
  • You are changing from a transitioned LCSA to a
    non-transitioned LCSA
  • You must use CSE to change MC if
  • Both LCSAs are transitioned
  • You are changing from a non-transitioned LCSA to
    a transitioned LCSA

15
Obsolete Statewide Participants
  • Statewide participants can become obsolete due to
  • Updates from ARS/CASES that cause a county view
    to unlink from a statewide participant and
  • Participant has no non-IVD cases or cases in
    transitioned counties
  • There are no remaining participant county views
  • CSE participant merges performed by a user

16
Obsolete Statewide Participants
  • Information copied from the Obsolete
    participant is different
  • For ARS/CASES updates
  • Name, SSN, DOB, employment, address
  • Participant relationships
  • Case and court case associations
  • For CSE participant merges performed by a user
  • Name, SSN, DOB, employment, address
  • Participant relationships and case associations
  • Public Assistance History
  • Legal actions including pending legal actions
  • Financial information suspended collections,
    CSE receivables, allocation and disbursement
    holds

17
Obsolete Statewide Participants
  • Use Activity Log to determine how statewide
    participant became obsolete
  • If from ARS/CASES update
  • County Participant xxx from county yyy has
    been unlinked from this participant.
  • Participant xxx merged into participant
    yyy.
  • If user performs CSE merge
  • Source participant xxx was merged into target
    participant yyy.                         

18
Merging Statewide Participants
  • Before merging statewide participants
  • Confirm primary/secondary Name, primary DOB and
    primary SSN of all related county participant
    views
  • Update county view information in ARS/CASES if it
    will not match the Target otherwise a new
    statewide participant will be created
  • Verify Controlling County after merge

19
Obsolete Statewide Cases
  • Statewide cases can become obsolete due to
  • Updates from ARS/CASES
  • CSE case merges performed by a user
  • A processed service request will prevent a
    statewide case from becoming obsolete due to an
    ARS/CASES update
  • A user may need to use CSE to manually merge the
    two cases

20
Obsolete Statewide Cases
  • Information copied from the Obsolete case is
    different
  • For ARS/CASES updates
  • County case and participant views linked as
    appropriate
  • For CSE case merges performed by a user
  • Case status and interstate status
  • Family violence and good cause indicators
  • Case participant status
  • Legal actions including pending legal actions
  • CSE support orders, CSE case accounts and CSE
    case financial transactions (task created for
    financial worker to review financial merge and
    run CSE Balance Regeneration)

21
Obsolete Statewide Cases
  • Use Activity Log to determine how statewide case
    became obsolete
  • If from ARS/CASES Update
  • SWS has recorded the removal of County Case
    xxx from county yyy from this statewide
    case.
  • Case xxx merged into case yyy.
  • If user performs CSE merge
  • The source case xxx was merged into target
    case yyy.    

22
Interstate Cases California Responding
  • California Central Registry opens cases for
    transitioned LCSAs
  • Task CM040 (case assignment) sent to LCSA case
    worker based on task routing rules
  • CCR does not enter court order hardcopy
    information still sent to LCSA
  • Currently no change for non-transitioned LCSAs
    (until mid-Oct)

23
Interstate Cases California Responding
  • Change Request CR-C-01237, Interstate Processing
    Certification Response scheduled for V 2.2.2
    (mid-October 2007)
  • Information entered by CCR will be sent
    electronically to ARS/CASES hardcopy
    information still sent to LCSA
  • All Transmittal 1 acknowledgements (including
    rejections) will be generated by CSE and printed
    at CCR

24
Case Transfer
  • Greatly simplified between transitioned LCSAs
  • Support orders and accounts already in CSE
  • No case closure
  • For Mixed Transitioned and Non-Transitioned
  • Need to coordinate the timing of financial and
    enforcement actions
  • Need to coordinate the change in managing county
    the transitioned case must be managing county
    to open or close accounts

25
Transitional Adjustments
  • Detailed ARS/CASES financial transactions are not
    converted
  • To adjust a collection that was previously
    distributed in ARS/CASES, a worker must
  • Manually add account information for the back-out
  • Be aware of the date of collection impacts on the
    conversion balance for the reapply
  • User is automatically taken to the CSE
    transitional adjustment pages if collection
    pre-dates conversion
  • Non-transitioned LCSAs should contact a
    transitioned LCSA to perform transitional
    adjustments

26
201 Transitional Issues and Alternative
Processes
  • September 18, 2007
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com