Chapter 19 Performance Evaluation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 19 Performance Evaluation

Description:

Any measurement of performance should somehow tie together the return of the ... in Table 19 - 6 we are redoing the calculations assuming the investor deposited $300. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: khartv
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 19 Performance Evaluation


1
Chapter 19Performance Evaluation
  • Business 4179

2
Key Issues
  • Any measurement of performance should somehow tie
    together the return of the investment and the
    riskiness of that return.
  • Sharpe and Treynor performance measures are
    classic elements of performance evaluation and
    are useful.
  • They become less useful when there are additions
    to or withdrawals from the portfolio. In such a
    case the internal rate of return becomes the
    appropriate measure of return.
  • The presence of options in a portfolio
    complicates the performance evaluation process.
    Two methods for comparing an optioned portfolio
    with an unoptioned counterpart are the Residual
    Option Spread and the Incremental Rate of Return
    from Options.

3
Question 19 - 1
  • Risk, by definition, the chance of loss. A risky
    situation involves an uncertain outcome, and some
    possible outcomes are adverse. Repeated draws
    from the probability distribution will
    periodically result in the selection of an
    adverse outcome. It is important to know
    something about the distribution before choosing
    to draw one. Because you were lucky once does
    not mean you will be again.

4
Question 19 - 2
  • Investors like return and dislike risk.
  • Utility comes from getting more return and
    reducing risk. Securities are priced to provide
    a level of return consistent with their perceived
    level of risk. Over the long term, a portfolio
    of risky securities should earn a higher return
    than a safer portfolio.
  • Some portfolio components, however, probably will
    be losers. Risk-adjusted performance measurement
    seeks to associate a measure of the likelihood of
    loss with the return statistic.

5
Question 19 - 3
  • Investors do not like risk.
  • Everything else being equal, they prefer the
    least risky alternative.

6
Question 19 - 4
  • You would want to know how long it took to
    double, and what its interim price behaviour
    looked like. It also would be useful to compare
    the security to the return and risk of a market
    index over the same period.

7
Question 19 - 5
  • Examples include legal lists of eligible
    investments, regulatory constraints, special tax
    incentives/disincentives, and statutory
    restrictions.

8
Question 19 - 6
  • It makes no difference. The geometric mean
    return is invariant to the order of the returns.

9
Question 19 - 7
  • A. Arithmetic
  • B. Geometric
  • C. Geometric or arithmetic, depending on what you
    were going to do with the information.

10
Question 19 - 8
  • Returns can be negative.
  • You cannot take an even root of a negative
    number, and if you have an odd number of negative
    returns the geometric mean will be an imaginary
    number.
  • Return relatives are only positive.

11
Question 19 - 9
  • When looking at a single security, it is best to
    use the Treynor measure, as the market only
    rewards you for bearing systematic risk. The
    Treynor measure is based on beta, which measures
    systematic risk.

12
Question 19 - 10
  • Writing covered calls partially offsets changes
    in the value of the portfolio either up or down.
    This attenuates the volatility of the portfolio.

13
Problem 19 - 1
14
Problem 19 - 2
  • The annual returns of the equally weighted
    portfolio are 5, 0, -6.33, 12 and 5.67.
    Their mean is 3.27 with a standard deviation of
    .0613. The Sharpe measure is then
  • SHp .0327 - .03 / .0613 .0440

Portfolio
15
Problem 19 - 3
  • A (1.05)(1.0)(.95)(1.08)(1.05)2 - 1 .0250
  • B (1.04)(1.01)(.96)(1.10)(1.05)2 - 1 .0310
  • C (1.06)(.99)(.90)(1.18)(1.07)2 - 1 .0358
  • Portfolio (1.05)(1.0)(.9367)(1.12)(1.0567)2 -
    1 .0308
  • Ranking by geometric mean
  • C (best)
  • B
  • Portfolio
  • A (worst)

16
Problem 19 - 4
  • The monthly IRR is 0.0026, for an annual rate of
    3.12

17
Problem 19 - 4
  • IRAR (SH0 - SHU)s0 (.0433)-(-0.087)(.0462)
    0.0060

18
Problem 19 - 6
  • IRAR (SH0 - SHU)s0
  • (.0433)-(-0.087)(.0462) 0.0060

19
Problem 19 - 7
20
Problem 19 - 9
Using the data in Table 19 - 6 we are redoing the
calculations assuming the investor deposited
300. (I have done this Excelso just
double-click the table to see the underlying
formulae.)
21
Problem 19 - 9 ...
Product of MVE/MVB values 1.406 V 40.6
22
Problem 19 - 9 ...
  • The daily valuation worksheet with 300/month
    gives precisely the same answer as with the
    100/month investment, while the approximate
    method produces an answer considerably different.
    This illustrates that while the time-weight rate
    of return is invariant to the size of the
    periodic investments (and is therefore more
    accurate), the approximate method is sensitive to
    them.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com