Effect of Data Transformation Methods on SVM Performance for Land Cover Mapping - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Effect of Data Transformation Methods on SVM Performance for Land Cover Mapping

Description:

Effect of Data Transformation Methods on SVM Performance for Land Cover Mapping – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:116

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Effect of Data Transformation Methods on SVM Performance for Land Cover Mapping


1
Fifth International Scientific Research
conference Renewable Energy Water
Sustainability, Tanta University, Egypt, March
26-28, 2019
Effect of Data Transformation Methods on SVM
Performance for Land Cover Mapping

By Jwan Aldoski
Prof. Shattri B. Mansor Dr. Zailani Khuzaimah
Universiti Putra Malaysia, Faculty of
Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering,
Address Jalan UPM ,43400, Serdang,
Selangor, Malaysia Emails
Aldoski-Jwan_at_hotmail.com,
shattri_at_gmail.com,
zailanikhuzaimah_at_gmail.com
2
Presentation Outline 
3
Introduction
  • Land Cover (LC)
  • The Earths cover surface information mainly
    provided by Remotely Sensed Images through using
    parametric and non-parametric classification
    algorithms.
  • To overcome parametric algorithms problem some
    non-parametric classification techniques have
    been introduced like Support vector machine (SVM)
    .
  • SVM is supervised learning method used recently
    for LC mapping .
  • The ability of SVM is affected by features type
    that extracted from remote sensing data, thus,
    transformation feature derived from remote
    sensing data maybe performed to achieve the best
    LC mapping result for a given data set .
  • To choice transformation techniques for extracted
    transform features required optimal results.

4
The Aims
The objective of this study is twofold (1)
Evaluate the potential of Landsat 8 imagery and
SVM classification method for LC mapping. (2)
Evaluate the effects of four image transformation
techniques include Principal Components Analysis
(PCA), Independent Components Analysis (ICA) ,
Minimum Noise Fraction Transform (MNF) and
Tasselled Cap Transformation (TCT) on the SVM
classification accuracy
5
Study area
A
  • The test area is the Kota Bharu district ,
    Kelantan sate, Malaysia.
  • The precipitation is more than 6,000 mm of mean
    rainfall annually.
  • Annual temperature is about 27.5 C.
  • Oil palm is the major cash tree in the region.
  • The elevation increases gradually from 400 - 900
    m above sea level
  • Study area is relatively flat

B
C
Malaysia
Kota Bharu
Figure 1. (A) The research area over the Kota
Bharu district (imposed over a natural-color
composite of Landsat-8 image with multispectral
band (RGB 4, 3, 2). (B) Blowup of the study
area (C) Schematic map of the research area,
Malaysia borders, and the Landsat 8 image
footprint.
6
Methodology
A preprocessing Landsat 8 OLI Data May 19, 2017
1- Geometric correction using 15 GCPs and
(DEM) with (RMSE) 0.07 2- Atmospheric
correction using FLAASH algorithm 3- Band
selection 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 bands 4-
Sub-set and Re-projection process
Figure 2. A sample of false color composites of
landsat8 imagery in the study area in the Kota
Bharu district. RGB correspond to band 5 near
IR (0.850.88 lm), band 4 red (0.640.67 lm),
and band 3 green (0.530.59 lm)
7
Methodology
  • B-Derived Transformation Image
  • Transformation techniques include
  • Principal Components Analysis (PCA),
  • Independent Components Analysis (ICA),
  • Minimum Noise Fraction Transform (MNF), and
  • TCT

Figure 6. A sample of false color composites of
TCB, TCG, and TCW landsat8 imagery
Figure 4. A sample of false color composites of
PC1, PC2, and PC3 landsat8 imagery
8
Methodology
C- SVM Implementation and post processing
  1. Collecting Training and test data using Random
    Pixel Selection Strategy

(2) Spectral separability
Separability Values
LULC Categories LULC Categories 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 Water Bodies 1 1.97 1.99 1.98 1.99 1.96 1.99 1.96 1.8
2 Urban Area   1 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.95 1.94 1.61
3 Primary Forest     1 1.62 1.7 1.66 1.89 1.92 1.99
4 Secondary Forest       1 1.55 1.58 1.78 1.85 1.99
5 Oil Palm         1 1.54 1.98 1.95 1.99
6 Rubber           1 1.99 1.97 1.99
7 Agricultural Fields             1 1.85 1.97
8 Grass Area               1 1.96
9 Barren Area                 1
9
Methodology
C- SVM Implementation and post processing
SVM parameters RBF kernel function Penalty
value C120 Kernel parameter ? 0.15 probability
threshold value 1
(3) Apply SVM
  • Five classification strategies were designed
  • only the bands 27 from Landsat 8 (6 bands)
  • PCA1-3, (3 bands),
  • 1-6 ICA (6 bands),
  • 1-5 MNF (5 bands) and
  • 3 TCT (3 bands).

( 4) Post Classification Processing using
Majority Filtering
Parameters windows size 33 pixels by pixels with
centre pixel weight (1 value)
(5) Accuracy Assessment using Error Matrices
( 6) statistical significance using Z-test
10
Results
  • LC maps based on spectral and transformation
    features derived from Landsat 8 image were
    evaluated using
  • Visual Evaluation
  • Error Matrices
  • Area Evaluation
  • Statistical Significance

11
Results
  • Visual Evaluation

(b) PCA
(a) Original 6 Landsat 8 OLI bands
  • PCA map detect water very well
  • Original 6 Landsat 8 OLI bands Map detect the
    agricultural field
  • Original 6 Landsat 8 OLI bands, PCA and ICA
    detect oil palm, rubber, and agricultural fields
    very well
  • PCA and ICA maps detect barren area and urban
    area well
  • While distinguish between primary forest and
    secondary forest based on the PCA and ICA almost
    impossible

12
Results
  • Visual Evaluation

(e) TCT
(c) ICA
(d) MNF
13
Results
  • Error Matrices
  • The overall trend of LC mapping accuracy ranked
    in terms of OA and kappa statistics, are as
    follows
  • ICA gt PCA gt original 6 bands gt MNF gt TCT
  • The highest LC maps accuracy could be attributed
    to the fact that PCA extended the possibility for
    pattern recognition since the imagery data were
    transformed into new, uncorrelated co-ordinate
    system or vector space. One other hand, ICA as
    expected increase accuracy since it maximized the
    between classes variance and minimized the within
    class variance, this in turn let to an increase
    separability between classes.


  Original 6 bands PCA ICA MNF TCT
Overall Accuracy () 81.50 89.50 90.28 80.33 74.78
Kappa Coefficient (?) 0.79 0.88 0.89 0.78 0.72
14
Results
  • Error Matrices

15
Results
  • Error Matrices

16
Results
  • Area Evaluation
  • Agricultural fields and oil palm covered greatest
    portion about followed by rubber and secondary
    forest about (10and 8 separately) as second
    major land cover.
  • Forest covering in the southern parts of the
    area were mainly on hilly areas.
  • From here we conclude that selection of
    transformation methods not only affects the
    accuracy of the map and also when calculating the
    area they have a clear effect and accordingly
    affects the decision of land management.

17
Results
  • Statistical Significance

SVM-classifier base 1 SVM-classifier base 2 Comparison of Overall accuracy(OV) Comparison of Overall accuracy(OV) Comparison of McNemar test pair-wise (95 confidence level) Comparison of McNemar test pair-wise (95 confidence level) Comparison of McNemar test pair-wise (95 confidence level)
SVM-classifier base 1 SVM-classifier base 2 OV1 OV2 z Observed value z Critical value p Value
original 6 bands PCA 81.5 89.5 12.37 1.96 lt0.0001
original 6 bands ICA 81.5 90.28 11.52 1.96 lt0.0001
original 6 bands MNF 81.5 80.33 1.82 1.96 0.069
original 6 bands TCT 81.5 74.78 7.97 1.96 lt0.0001
PCA ICA 89.5 90.28 0.73 1.96 0.466
PCA MNF 89.5 80.33 12.22 1.96 lt0.0001
PCA TCT 89.5 74.78 15.45 1.96 lt0.0001
ICA MNF 90.28 80.33 12.02 1.96 lt0.0001
ICA TCT 90.28 74.78 15.09 1.96 lt0.0001
MNF TCT 80.33 74.78 7.54 1.96 lt0.0001
SVM with PCA resulted 0.8 increase in
classification accuracy than the SVMs with ICA
which was statistically insignificant or
statistically no difference between
classification accuracy.
18
Conclusions
  • This study was conducted to determine the main LC
    classes using different data transformation
    methods with Landsat-8 OLI image.
  • PCA, ICA, MNF and TCA were used to increase the
    spectral dissimilarities between LC classes in
    order to improve SVM classification accuracy.
  • The dominant LC classes in the study area were
    agricultural fields and oil palm.
  • PCA, MNF and ICA Data transformation improved the
    accuracy of SVM classification. ICA significantly
    improved the classification accuracy with OA
    90.28, followed by PCA with OA 89.5. On the
    other hand, the TCT components did not improve
    the classification accuracy.
  • The Z test shows ICA not statistically
    significant differences with SVM base on PCA
    given the z value 0.73
  • Primary Forest And Secondary Forest Classes as
    they consist of dense tropical trees were showed
    different produces and user accuracy values using
    original 6 Landsat 8 bands and transformation
    images need more study and test

19
Thank You
Any questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com